Literature DB >> 2473880

Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus.

P Paavilainen1, M L Karlsson, K Reinikainen, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

Auditory stimulus blocks were presented to 12 reading subjects. Each block consisted of 2 types, standard (P = 90%) and deviant stimuli (P = 10%), delivered in a random order. The only difference between these stimuli was their spatial location of origin. The subject always heard the standards as coming straight in front and the deviants from an angle of either 10, 45, or 90 degrees to the right of the standards. The spatial locations were produced via earphones by introducing for low-frequency (600 Hz) tones an interaural phase difference and for high-frequency (3000 Hz) tones an interaural intensity difference. Standard and deviant stimuli were also delivered in more natural, free-field, conditions via differently positioned loudspeakers. The deviant tones elicited an event-related brain potential component called the mismatch negativity (MMN), followed by a P3a component. Thus changes in spatial location of an auditory stimulus produced by following either one of the two main principles of human sound localization elicited the MMN. Consequently, it was concluded that the spatial location of a sound source is coded in the hypothesized neuronal stimulus traces reflected by the MMN and, further, that a change in this location is automatically detected by the brain by means of the MMN generator process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2473880     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90192-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  29 in total

1.  Right-hemisphere dominance for the processing of sound-source lateralization.

Authors:  J Kaiser; W Lutzenberger; H Preissl; H Ackermann; N Birbaumer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Changes in evoked potentials during the action of sound signals with different localizing characteristics.

Authors:  Ya A Al'tman; S F Vaitulevich; L B Shestopalova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-02

3.  Interhemisphere asymmetry of auditory evoked potentials in humans and mismatch negativity during sound source localization.

Authors:  S F Vaitulevich; L B Shestopalova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-06-12

4.  Early phase of spatial mismatch negativity is localized to a posterior "where" auditory pathway.

Authors:  Matthew S Tata; Lawrence M Ward
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of the azimuthal position of stationary and moving sound images on the mismatch negativity phenomenon.

Authors:  L B Shestopalova; S F Vaitulevich
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-10

6.  Learning-induced plasticity in auditory spatial representations revealed by electrical neuroimaging.

Authors:  Lucas Spierer; Eric Tardif; Holger Sperdin; Micah M Murray; Stephanie Clarke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Psychophysics and neuronal bases of sound localization in humans.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Norbert Kopčo; Iiro P Jääskeläinen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory scene analysis: the interaction of stimulation rate and frequency separation on pre-attentive grouping.

Authors:  Pierfilippo De Sanctis; Walter Ritter; Sophie Molholm; Simon P Kelly; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.