BACKGROUND: Female physician-researchers do not achieve career success at the same rate as men. Differences in nonprofessional responsibilities may partially explain this gap. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the division of domestic labor by gender in a motivated group of early-career physician-researchers. DESIGN: Nationwide postal survey between 2010 and 2011. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Physician recipients of National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009 with active academic affiliation at the time of the survey. MEASUREMENTS: Time spent on parenting and domestic tasks was determined through self-report. Among married or partnered respondents with children, a linear regression model of time spent on domestic activities was constructed considering age, gender, race, specialty, MD or MD/PhD status, age of youngest child, number of children, work hours, K award type, and spousal employment. RESULTS: A 74% response rate was achieved, and 1049 respondents were academic physicians. Women were more likely than men to have spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time (85.6% [95% CI, 82.7% to 89.2%] vs. 44.9% [CI, 40.8% to 49.8%]). Among married or partnered respondents with children, after adjustment for work hours, spousal employment, and other factors, women spent 8.5 more hours per week on domestic activities. In the subgroup with spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time, women were more likely to take time off during disruptions of usual child care arrangements than men (42.6% [CI, 36.6% to 49.0%] vs. 12.4% [CI, 5.4% to 19.5%]). LIMITATIONS: Analyses relied on self-reported data. The study design did not enable investigation of the relationship between domestic activities and professional success. CONCLUSION: In this sample of career-oriented professionals, gender differences in domestic activities existed among those with children. Most men's spouses or domestic partners were not employed full-time, which contrasted sharply with the experiences of women. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUND: Female physician-researchers do not achieve career success at the same rate as men. Differences in nonprofessional responsibilities may partially explain this gap. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the division of domestic labor by gender in a motivated group of early-career physician-researchers. DESIGN: Nationwide postal survey between 2010 and 2011. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: Physician recipients of National Institutes of Health K08 or K23 awards between 2006 and 2009 with active academic affiliation at the time of the survey. MEASUREMENTS: Time spent on parenting and domestic tasks was determined through self-report. Among married or partnered respondents with children, a linear regression model of time spent on domestic activities was constructed considering age, gender, race, specialty, MD or MD/PhD status, age of youngest child, number of children, work hours, K award type, and spousal employment. RESULTS: A 74% response rate was achieved, and 1049 respondents were academic physicians. Women were more likely than men to have spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time (85.6% [95% CI, 82.7% to 89.2%] vs. 44.9% [CI, 40.8% to 49.8%]). Among married or partnered respondents with children, after adjustment for work hours, spousal employment, and other factors, women spent 8.5 more hours per week on domestic activities. In the subgroup with spouses or domestic partners who were employed full-time, women were more likely to take time off during disruptions of usual child care arrangements than men (42.6% [CI, 36.6% to 49.0%] vs. 12.4% [CI, 5.4% to 19.5%]). LIMITATIONS: Analyses relied on self-reported data. The study design did not enable investigation of the relationship between domestic activities and professional success. CONCLUSION: In this sample of career-oriented professionals, gender differences in domestic activities existed among those with children. Most men's spouses or domestic partners were not employed full-time, which contrasted sharply with the experiences of women. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Rochelle DeCastro; Kent A Griffith; Soumya Rangarajan; Cristina Churchill; Abigail Stewart; Peter A Ubel Journal: Acad Med Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Abigail Stewart; Dana Sambuco; Rochelle DeCastro; Peter A Ubel Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: N W Sobecks; A C Justice; S Hinze; H T Chirayath; R J Lasek; M M Chren; J Aucott; B Juknialis; R Fortinsky; S Youngner; C S Landefeld Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1999-02-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: P L Carr; A S Ash; R H Friedman; A Scaramucci; R C Barnett; L Szalacha; A Palepu; M A Moskowitz Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Katherine B Santosa; Ellen L Larson; Bianca Vannucci; Jodi B Lapidus; Katherine M Gast; Erika D Sears; Jennifer F Waljee; Amy M Suiter; Cathy C Sarli; Susan E Mackinnon; Alison K Snyder-Warwick Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Constance Guille; Elena Frank; Zhuo Zhao; David A Kalmbach; Paul J Nietert; Douglas A Mata; Srijan Sen Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Anita Raj; Phyllis L Carr; Samantha E Kaplan; Norma Terrin; Janis L Breeze; Karen M Freund Journal: Acad Med Date: 2016-08 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Taiwo Adesoye; Christina Mangurian; Esther K Choo; Christina Girgis; Hala Sabry-Elnaggar; Eleni Linos Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873