Literature DB >> 24733792

Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment.

Allison W Kurian1, Emily E Hare1, Meredith A Mills1, Kerry E Kingham1, Lisa McPherson1, Alice S Whittemore1, Valerie McGuire1, Uri Ladabaum1, Yuya Kobayashi1, Stephen E Lincoln1, Michele Cargill1, James M Ford2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multiple-gene sequencing is entering practice, but its clinical value is unknown. We evaluated the performance of a customized germline-DNA sequencing panel for cancer-risk assessment in a representative clinical sample.
METHODS: Patients referred for clinical BRCA1/2 testing from 2002 to 2012 were invited to donate a research blood sample. Samples were frozen at -80° C, and DNA was extracted from them after 1 to 10 years. The entire coding region, exon-intron boundaries, and all known pathogenic variants in other regions were sequenced for 42 genes that had cancer risk associations. Potentially actionable results were disclosed to participants.
RESULTS: In total, 198 women participated in the study: 174 had breast cancer and 57 carried germline BRCA1/2 mutations. BRCA1/2 analysis was fully concordant with prior testing. Sixteen pathogenic variants were identified in ATM, BLM, CDH1, CDKN2A, MUTYH, MLH1, NBN, PRSS1, and SLX4 among 141 women without BRCA1/2 mutations. Fourteen participants carried 15 pathogenic variants, warranting a possible change in care; they were invited for targeted screening recommendations, enabling early detection and removal of a tubular adenoma by colonoscopy. Participants carried an average of 2.1 variants of uncertain significance among 42 genes.
CONCLUSION: Among women testing negative for BRCA1/2 mutations, multiple-gene sequencing identified 16 potentially pathogenic mutations in other genes (11.4%; 95% CI, 7.0% to 17.7%), of which 15 (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.5% to 16.9%) prompted consideration of a change in care, enabling early detection of a precancerous colon polyp. Additional studies are required to quantify the penetrance of identified mutations and determine clinical utility. However, these results suggest that multiple-gene sequencing may benefit appropriately selected patients.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24733792      PMCID: PMC4067941          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  86 in total

1.  Oncoshare: lessons learned from building an integrated multi-institutional database for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Susan C Weber; Tina Seto; Cliff Olson; Pragati Kenkare; Allison W Kurian; Amar K Das
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

2.  Accessing genomic medicine: affordability, diffusion, and disparities.

Authors:  Reed V Tuckson; Lee Newcomer; Jeanne M De Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Classifying variants of CDKN2A using computational and laboratory studies.

Authors:  Peter J Miller; Sekhar Duraisamy; Joan A Newell; Philip A Chan; Mark M Tie; Amy E Rogers; Claire K Ankuda; Genevieve M von Walstrom; Jeffrey P Bond; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Germline mutations in breast and ovarian cancer pedigrees establish RAD51C as a human cancer susceptibility gene.

Authors:  Alfons Meindl; Heide Hellebrand; Constanze Wiek; Verena Erven; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Dieter Niederacher; Marcel Freund; Peter Lichtner; Linda Hartmann; Heiner Schaal; Juliane Ramser; Ellen Honisch; Christian Kubisch; Hans E Wichmann; Karin Kast; Helmut Deissler; Christoph Engel; Bertram Müller-Myhsok; Kornelia Neveling; Marion Kiechle; Christopher G Mathew; Detlev Schindler; Rita K Schmutzler; Helmut Hanenberg
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Gene patents and personalized cancer care: impact of the Myriad case on clinical oncology.

Authors:  Kenneth Offit; Angela Bradbury; Courtney Storm; Jon F Merz; Kevin E Noonan; Rebecca Spence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  PALB2, which encodes a BRCA2-interacting protein, is a breast cancer susceptibility gene.

Authors:  Nazneen Rahman; Sheila Seal; Deborah Thompson; Patrick Kelly; Anthony Renwick; Anna Elliott; Sarah Reid; Katarina Spanova; Rita Barfoot; Tasnim Chagtai; Hiran Jayatilake; Lesley McGuffog; Sandra Hanks; D Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Douglas F Easton; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Identification of germline alterations of the mad homology 2 domain of SMAD3 and SMAD4 from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry (CFR).

Authors:  Eric Tram; Irada Ibrahim-Zada; Laurent Briollais; Julia A Knight; Irene L Andrulis; Hilmi Ozcelik
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Breast cancer treatment across health care systems: linking electronic medical records and state registry data to enable outcomes research.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Aya Mitani; Manisha Desai; Peter P Yu; Tina Seto; Susan C Weber; Cliff Olson; Pragati Kenkare; Scarlett L Gomez; Monique A de Bruin; Kathleen Horst; Jeffrey Belkora; Suepattra G May; Dominick L Frosch; Douglas W Blayney; Harold S Luft; Amar K Das
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.921

View more
  197 in total

1.  Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Kevin C Ward; Nadia Howlader; Dennis Deapen; Ann S Hamilton; Angela Mariotto; Daniel Miller; Lynne S Penberthy; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Detection of high frequency of mutations in a breast and/or ovarian cancer cohort: implications of embracing a multi-gene panel in molecular diagnosis in India.

Authors:  Ashraf U Mannan; Jaya Singh; Ravikiran Lakshmikeshava; Nishita Thota; Suhasini Singh; T S Sowmya; Avshesh Mishra; Aditi Sinha; Shivani Deshwal; Megha R Soni; Anbukayalvizhi Chandrasekar; Bhargavi Ramesh; Bharat Ramamurthy; Shila Padhi; Payal Manek; Ravi Ramalingam; Suman Kapoor; Mithua Ghosh; Satish Sankaran; Arunabha Ghosh; Vamsi Veeramachaneni; Preveen Ramamoorthy; Ramesh Hariharan; Kalyanasundaram Subramanian
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Increased yield of actionable mutations using multi-gene panels to assess hereditary cancer susceptibility in an ethnically diverse clinical cohort.

Authors:  Charité Ricker; Julie O Culver; Katrina Lowstuter; Duveen Sturgeon; Julia D Sturgeon; Christopher R Chanock; William J Gauderman; Kevin J McDonnell; Gregory E Idos; Stephen B Gruber
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2016-01-12

4.  The Clinical Utility of Next Generation Sequencing Results in a Community-Based Hereditary Cancer Risk Program.

Authors:  A E Bunnell; C A Garby; E J Pearson; S A Walker; L E Panos; Joanne L Blum
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Kent A Griffith; Allison W Kurian; Monica Morrow; Ann S Hamilton; John J Graff; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Associations of CDH1 germline variant location and cancer phenotype in families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC).

Authors:  Winifred Lo; Bin Zhu; Arvind Sabesan; Ho-Hsiang Wu; Astin Powers; Rebecca A Sorber; Sarangan Ravichandran; Ina Chen; Lucas A McDuffie; Humair S Quadri; Joal D Beane; Kathleen Calzone; Markku M Miettinen; Stephen M Hewitt; Christopher Koh; Theo Heller; Sholom Wacholder; Udo Rudloff
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Precision reproductive medicine: multigene panel testing for infertility risk assessment.

Authors:  Stephen C Collins
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Factors Influencing Clinical Follow-Up for Individuals with a Personal History of Breast and/or Ovarian Cancer and Previous Uninformative BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing.

Authors:  Sarah E Chadwell; Hua He; Sara Knapke; Jaime Lewis; Rebecca Sisson; Jennifer Hopper
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 9.  The Changing Landscape of Genetic Testing for Inherited Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Anosheh Afghahi; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2017-05

10.  Prevalence of mutations in a diverse cohort of 3162 women tested via the same multigene cancer panel in a managed care health plan.

Authors:  Mónica Alvarado; George E Tiller; Joanie Chung; Reina Haque
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2020-02-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.