| Literature DB >> 30334492 |
Cherisse L Seaton1, Joan L Bottorff2, Margaret Jones-Bricker3, Sonia Lamont4,5.
Abstract
Men are a hard-to-reach group in the promotion of modifiable behaviors such as physical activity. Examining the individual differences among men that might predict positive behavior changes could support customization of health promotion programs. This study examined the role of emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience in determining men's physical activity and health-related quality of life following implementation of a gender-sensitive workplace health intervention. Using a pre-post within-subjects design, computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI) was used to collect measures of emotion and ego-resilience along with physical activity and health-related quality of life (using the 12-item short form [SF-12]) at baseline ( n = 139) and after 6 months ( n = 80) from adult men ( Mage = 43.7, SD = 12.5). Baseline emotional outlook and ego-resilience were both positively related to increased physical activity at follow-up among men. Emotional outlook and positive emotion were positively related to ego-resilience, and ego-resilience mediated the relationship between these and the physical component of health-related quality of life. Workplace health interventions that incorporate the promotion of personal resources hold potential for greater impacts.Entities:
Keywords: emotions; gender; health promotion; physical activity; resilience; well-being
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30334492 PMCID: PMC6199438 DOI: 10.1177/1557988318803744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Mens Health ISSN: 1557-9883
Figure 1.Hypothesized role of ego-resilience in the relationship between emotional outlook/positive emotion and physical activity/health-related quality of life.
Comparison of Sociodemographic Characteristics of Participants Who Did and Did Not Complete Follow-Up Surveys.
| Participants with only baseline data ( | Participants with baseline and follow-up data ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % |
| % | Fisher’s exact |
| |
| Marital status | 9.41 | .031 | ||||
| Single | 19 | 32.2 | 13 | 16.3 | ||
| Married | 35 | 59.3 | 64 | 80.0 | ||
| Divorced | 5 | 8.5 | 2 | 2.5 | ||
| Widowed | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.3 | ||
| Ethnicity | 9.16 | .052 | ||||
| Caucasian | 50 | 84.7 | 66 | 82.5 | ||
| First Nations | 4 | 6.8 | 2 | 2.6 | ||
| Metis | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 7.5 | ||
| Asian | 1 | 1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| Other | 5 | 6.8 | 6 | 7.5 | ||
|
| % |
| % |
|
| |
| Household income | 1885.00 | .268 | ||||
| <$19,999 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
| $20,000–39,999 | 1 | 1.8 | 3 | 4.0 | ||
| $40,000–59,999 | 4 | 7.1 | 3 | 4.0 | ||
| $60,000–79,999 | 14 | 25.0 | 13 | 17.3 | ||
| $80,000–99,999 | 9 | 16.1 | 11 | 14.7 | ||
| >$100,000 | 28 | 50.0 | 45 | 60.0 | ||
| No response | 3 | 5 | ||||
| Education | 2030.00 | .137 | ||||
| Less than high school | 5 | 8.6 | 11 | 13.8 | ||
| Completed high school | 15 | 25.9 | 30 | 37.5 | ||
| Trades certification/ college degree | 29 | 50.0 | 28 | 35.0 | ||
| Some university | 2 | 3.4 | 4 | 5.0 | ||
| University degree | 7 | 12.1 | 7 | 8.8 | ||
| No response | 1 | 0 | ||||
| Median | IQR | Median | IQR |
|
| |
| Health limits to PA | 1.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2264.50 | .632 |
| Mean |
| Mean |
|
|
| |
| Age | 41.86 | 11.04 | 45.08 | 13.40 | −1.55 | .124 |
| Height (meters) | 1.78 | .07 | 1.79 | .07 | −.81 | .421 |
| Weight (kg) | 89.87 | 14.42 | 93.69 | 15.85 | −1.46 | .147 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 28.18 | 4.03 | 29.08 | 4.59 | −1.20 | .232 |
Note. IQR = interquartile range; PA = physical activity; BMI = body mass index.
Means, Standard Deviations, Medians, Interquartile Range, and Correlations Between Emotional Outlook, Positive Emotion, and Ego-Resilience and All Scales at Baseline.
| Baseline emotional outlook | Baseline positive emotion | Baseline ego-resilience | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline measures | Mean |
| Median | IQR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Emotional outlook | 4.14 | 0.73 | 4.00 | 1.00 | – | – | ||||
| Positive emotion | 25.28 | 4.41 | 25.00 | 5.00 | .30 | <.001 | – | – | ||
| Ego-resilience | 44.31 | 6.25 | 45.00 | 9.00 | .34 | <.001 | .38 | <.001 | – | – |
| MVPA (min per week) | 304.84 | 339.81 | 210.00 | 296.25 | .22 | .001 | .10 | .094 | .07 | .228 |
| Stage of change for PA | 4.02 | 1.26 | 5.00 | 2.00 | .15 | .046 | .16 | .017 | .18 | .009 |
| Self-efficacy for PA | 4.14 | .97 | 4.00 | 2.00 | .15 | .043 | .13 | .057 | .03 | .634 |
| Health-related quality of life—physical component | 51.41 | 7.36 | 52.96 | 8.73 | .20 | .003 | .30 | <.001 | .22 | <.001 |
| Health-related quality of life—mental component | 49.83 | 5.36 | 51.09 | 4.45 | .04 | .597 | −.01 | .829 | −.10 | .082 |
Note. N = 139 for all variables except those with MVPA, where N = 138. Kendal tau-B coefficients are reported. IQR = interquartile range; MVPA = moderate and vigorous physical activity; PA = physical activity.
Relationships Between Baseline Emotional Outlook, Positive Emotion, and Ego-Resilience and Increase in MVPA and Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-Up.
| Control variables | Predictor variables | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | BMI | Health limits | Baseline emotional outlook | Baseline positive emotion | Baseline ego-resilience | Full model | |||||||||||||||
| Outcome variable | β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
| β | 95% CI |
|
|
|
|
| Increase in MVPA minutes (from baseline to follow-up) | −.05 | [–5.31, 3.35] | .653 | −.08 | [–16.75, 8.60] | .523 | −.04 | [–60.52, 42.79] | .733 | .32 | [3.90, 221.74] | .043 | −.24 | [–32.30, 5.48] | .161 | .49 | [4.64, 31.28] | .009 | 2.21 | .021 | .29 |
| Follow-up health-related quality of life—physical component | .05 | [–.08, .12] | .648 | −.29 | [–.68, –.11] | .007 | −.32 | [–2.82, –.54] | .004 | −.15 | [–4.04, 1.36] | .326 | .01 | [–.46, .47] | .971 | .00 | [–.33, .34] | .983 | 2.14 | .025 | .28 |
| Follow-up health-related quality of life—mental component | .06 | [–.09, .14] | .639 | .06 | [–.24, .41] | .606 | −.16 | [–2.19, .42] | .182 | .12 | [–1.67, 3.86] | .433 | .25 | [–.13, .83] | .146 | −.07 | [–.40, .28] | .720 | 2.00 | .038 | .26 |
Note. N = 78. Separate regressions were conducted for each of the outcome variables: (a) increases in MVPA on baseline emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience controlling for follow-up emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience; (b) follow-up health-related quality of life—physical component on baseline emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience controlling for follow-up emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience; (c) follow-up health-related quality of life—mental component on baseline emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience controlling for follow-up emotional outlook, positive emotion, and ego-resilience; all regressions also included workplace, age, BMI, and health limits as control variables. Adjusted standardized beta (β) coefficients are reported for each predictor variable. MVPA = moderate and vigorous physical activity; BMI = body mass index.
Ego-Resilience as a Mediator in the Relationship Between Emotional Outlook/Positive Emotion and Physical Activity as well as Health-Related Quality of Life.
| Path c | Path a | Path b | Path c’ | Indirect effect (a × b) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome variable | Predictor variable |
| β ( |
| β ( |
| β ( |
| β ( |
| 95% CI |
| Increase in MVPA minutes (from baseline to follow-up) | Emotional outlook | .11 | .17 (.09) | .065 | .40 (.08) | <.001 | −.15 (.13) | .243 | .23 (.10) | .03 | [–.22, .06] |
| Positive emotion | .05 | −.00 (.08) | .969 | .33 (.08) | <.001 | −.01 (.13) | .950 | −.00 (.09) | .995 | [–.10, .11] | |
| Health-related quality of life—physical component | Emotional outlook | .08 | .07 (.09) | .457 | .40 (.08) | <.001 | .24 (.13) | .075 | −.03 (.10) | .804 | [.02, .20] |
| Positive emotion | .08 | .11 (.08) | .210 | .33 (.07) | <.001 | .19 (.13) | .129 | .04 (.09) | ..660 | [.00, .17] | |
| Health-related quality of life—mental component | Emotional outlook | .12 | .27 (.09) | .003 | .40 (.08) | <.001 | .07 (.13) | .586 | .25 (.10) | .018 | [–.05, .12] |
| Positive emotion | .13 | .26 (.08) | .002 | .33 (.07) | <.001 | .08 (.12) | .507 | .23 (.09) | .013 | [–.04, .11] |
Note. N = 78 for models with MVPA and N = 80 for models with health-related quality of life. The predictor variables (emotional outlook and positive emotion) were standardized (by subtracting the mean and dividing by the standard error) prior to analyses so standardized beta (β) coefficients are reported for each path. Bias-corrected confidence intervals (95%) calculated with 10,000 bootstrap samples were considered significant if they did not include zero. Workplace was included as a statistical control in each model. MVPA = moderate and vigorous physical activity. c’ = The apostrophe refers to the c path AFTER the mediator has been included in the model (see Figure 1).