Literature DB >> 15180719

Esophageal impedance monitoring: the ups and downs of a new test.

Steven Shay.   

Abstract

Impedance monitoring was first proposed as a method for gastrointestinal motility 10 yr ago. It detects changes in resistance to current flow when a bolus traverses an electrode pair, and can distinguish liquid (low-impedance) from gas (high-impedance) boluses (1). Electrode pairs placed at multiple sites on a standard solid-state esophageal manometry catheter can track antegrade bolus transit through the esophagus to correlate with manometry findings. In contrast, the electrode pairs placed at multiple sites on a standard pH probe can track retrograde bolus transit from the stomach to the esophagus to correlate with pH. This issue of The American Journal of Gastroenterology contains reports that relate to each of these two distinct applications of impedance monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15180719     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40119.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  11 in total

1.  More art than science: impedance analysis prone to interpretation error.

Authors:  Thomas Ciecierega; Benjamin L Gordon; Anna Aronova; Carl V Crawford; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Ambulatory pH Monitoring: New Advances and Indications.

Authors:  Brant Lutsi; Ikuo Hirano
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2006-11

Review 3.  Esophageal impedance recording: clinical utility and limitations.

Authors:  Woosuk Park; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

Review 4.  Advances in diagnostic testing for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Andrew J Gawron; Ikuo Hirano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease-which factors are important?

Authors:  Karl-Hermann Fuchs; Arielle M Lee; Wolfram Breithaupt; Gabor Varga; Benjamin Babic; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-10-25

6.  Evaluation of esophageal function in patients with esophageal motor abnormalities using multichannel intraluminal impedance esophageal manometry.

Authors:  Yu Kyung Cho; Myung-Gyu Choi; Jae Myung Park; Jung Hwan Oh; Chang Nyol Paik; Joon Wook Lee; In Seok Lee; Sang Woo Kim; In-Sik Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Acid-based parameters on pH-impedance testing predict symptom improvement with medical management better than impedance parameters.

Authors:  Amit Patel; Gregory S Sayuk; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Impacts of endoscopic gastroesophageal flap valve grading on pediatric gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Kai-Chi Chang; Jia-Feng Wu; Wei-Chung Hsu; Bor-Ru Lin; Huey-Ling Chen; Yen-Hsuan Ni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Esophageal mucosal integrity improves after laparoscopic antireflux surgery in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Femke A Mauritz; Nicolaas F Rinsma; Ernest L W van Heurn; Cornelius E J Sloots; Peter D Siersema; Roderick H J Houwen; David C van der Zee; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo; Maud Y A Van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Effect of acid suppression therapy on gastroesophageal reflux and cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an intervention study.

Authors:  Claire E Kilduff; Melanie J Counter; Gareth A Thomas; Nicholas K Harrison; Benjamin D Hope-Gill
Journal:  Cough       Date:  2014-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.