Benjamin Chapman1, Kevin Fiscella2, Paul Duberstein3, Ichiro Kawachi4, Peter Muennig5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 2. Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Center for Communication and Disparities Research, Rochester, New York, USA Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Center for Communication and Disparities Research, Rochester, New York, USA. 4. Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Health Management and Policy, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: IQ is thought to explain social gradients in mortality. IQ scores are based roughly equally on Verbal IQ (VIQ) and Performance IQ tests. VIQ tests, however, are suspected to confound true verbal ability with socioeconomic status (SES), raising the possibility that associations between SES and IQ scores might be overestimated. We examined, first, whether two of the most common types of VIQ tests exhibited differential item functioning (DIF) favouring persons of higher SES and/or majority race/ethnicity. Second, we assessed what impact, if any, this had on estimates of the extent to which VIQ explains social gradients in mortality. METHODS: Data from the General Social Survey-National Death Index cohort, a US population representative dataset, was used. Item response theory models queried social-factor DIF on the Thorndike Verbal Intelligence Scale and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Revised Similarities test. Cox models examined mortality associations among SES and VIQ scores corrected and uncorrected for DIF. RESULTS: When uncorrected for DIF, VIQ was correlated with income, education, occupational prestige and race, with correlation coefficients ranging between |0.12| and |0.43|. After correcting for DIF, correlations ranged from |0.06| to |0.16|. Uncorrected VIQ scores explained 11-40% of the Relative Index of Inequalities in mortality for social factors, while DIF-corrected scores explained 2-29%. CONCLUSIONS: Two of the common forms of VIQ tests appear confound verbal intelligence with SES. Since these tests appear in most IQ batteries, circumspection may be warranted in estimating the amount of social inequalities in mortality attributable to IQ. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: IQ is thought to explain social gradients in mortality. IQ scores are based roughly equally on Verbal IQ (VIQ) and Performance IQ tests. VIQ tests, however, are suspected to confound true verbal ability with socioeconomic status (SES), raising the possibility that associations between SES and IQ scores might be overestimated. We examined, first, whether two of the most common types of VIQ tests exhibited differential item functioning (DIF) favouring persons of higher SES and/or majority race/ethnicity. Second, we assessed what impact, if any, this had on estimates of the extent to which VIQ explains social gradients in mortality. METHODS: Data from the General Social Survey-National Death Index cohort, a US population representative dataset, was used. Item response theory models queried social-factor DIF on the Thorndike Verbal Intelligence Scale and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Revised Similarities test. Cox models examined mortality associations among SES and VIQ scores corrected and uncorrected for DIF. RESULTS: When uncorrected for DIF, VIQ was correlated with income, education, occupational prestige and race, with correlation coefficients ranging between |0.12| and |0.43|. After correcting for DIF, correlations ranged from |0.06| to |0.16|. Uncorrected VIQ scores explained 11-40% of the Relative Index of Inequalities in mortality for social factors, while DIF-corrected scores explained 2-29%. CONCLUSIONS: Two of the common forms of VIQ tests appear confound verbal intelligence with SES. Since these tests appear in most IQ batteries, circumspection may be warranted in estimating the amount of social inequalities in mortality attributable to IQ. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cognition; Mortality; Social Epidemiology
Authors: Jennifer J Manly; Diane M Jacobs; Pegah Touradji; Scott A Small; Yaakov Stern Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Angela Lee Duckworth; Patrick D Quinn; Donald R Lynam; Rolf Loeber; Magda Stouthamer-Loeber Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-04-25 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Benjamin Chapman; Kevin Fiscella; Paul Duberstein; Ichiro Kawachi; Peter Muennig Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Benjamin P Chapman; Alison Huang; Elizabeth Horner; Kelly Peters; Ellena Sempeles; Brent Roberts; Susan Lapham Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 3.710