| Literature DB >> 24728198 |
Alexandra Gkourogianni1, Ioanna Kosteria1, Aristeidis G Telonis2, Alexandra Margeli3, Emilia Mantzou4, Maria Konsta1, Dimitrios Loutradis5, George Mastorakos6, Ioannis Papassotiriou3, Maria I Klapa7, Christina Kanaka-Gantenbein1, George P Chrousos1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There have been increasing indications about an epigenetically-based elevated predisposition of assisted reproductive technology (ART) offspring to insulin resistance, which can lead to an unfavorable cardio-metabolic profile in adult life. However, the relevant long-term systematic molecular studies are limited, especially for the IntraCytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) method, introduced in 1992. In this study, we carefully defined a group of 42 prepubertal ICSI and 42 naturally conceived (NC) children. We assessed differences in their metabolic profile based on biochemical measurements, while, for a subgroup, plasma metabolomic analysis was also performed, investigating any relevant insulin resistance indices. METHODS &Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24728198 PMCID: PMC3984097 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of ICSI and normal conception (NC) groups.
| ICSI (n = 42) | Control (n = 42) | P | ||
|
|
| 19 (45.2%) | 19 (45.2%) | 0.999 |
|
| 23 (54.8%) | 23 (54.8%) | ||
|
|
| 13 (31%) | 36 (85.7%) | <0.0001 |
|
| 29 (69%) | 6 (14.3%) | ||
|
|
| 22 (52.4%) | 27 (71%) | 0.09 |
|
| 20 (47.6%) | 11 (29%) | ||
|
|
| 5 (11.9%) | 17 (40.5%) | 0.003 |
|
| 37 (88.1%) | 25 (59.5%) | ||
|
|
| 19 (45.2%) | 16 (38.1%) | 0.5 |
|
| 23 (54.8%) | 26 (61.9%) | ||
|
|
| 30 (73.2%) | 30 (71.4%) | 0.86 |
|
| 11 (26.8%) | 12 (28.6%) | ||
|
|
| 18 (45%) | 13 (34.2%) | 0.33 |
|
| 22 (55%) | 25 (65.8%) | ||
|
| 36 (35–37) | 38 (37–40) | 0.0001 | |
|
| −0.39±0.95 | 0.42±0.9 | 0.0001 | |
|
| −0.1 (−0.5–5) | 0.5 (−0.3 0.7) | 0.015 | |
|
| 7.2 (6.1–8.2) | 7.2 (5.8–8.2) | 0.93 | |
|
| −0.2 (−0.8–0.2) | −0.1 (−0.8–0.5) | 0.4 | |
|
| 0.17±0.92 | −0.11±0.99 | 0.17 | |
|
| −0.09±0.8 | −0.03±0.96 | 0.7 | |
|
| 0.48 (0.45–0.5) | 0.48 (0.44–0.52) | 0.5 | |
|
| 0.96±0.06 | 0.94±0.06 | 0.4 | |
|
| 0.006±0.9 | 0.83±1.02 | 0.0004 | |
|
| −0.5 (−0.7–0.009) | −0.26 (−0.6–0.14) | 0.2 | |
|
| 35.6±5.2 | 31.7±5.3 | 0.0013 | |
|
| 38 (33.5–40.5) | 35.5 (31–40) | 0.09 |
Differences between ICSI-Control children using Pearson X2 test, two sample Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, are depicted and expressed as mean±SD or median and IQR (interquartile range).
: Mann-Whitney test,
: Normal distribution, two-sample t-test,
: Pearson X2 test.
Abbreviations: AGA = Appropriate for Gestational Age; BMI = body mass index; SBP = systolic blood pressure DBP = diastolic blood pressure; ICSI = Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; SGA = Small for Gestational Age; W/H = waist-to hip ratio (WHR); WHtR = Waist-to-height ratio.
Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of ICSI and normal conception (NC) girl subgroups used in metabolomics.
| ICSI (n = 10) | Control (n = 9) | P | ||
|
|
| 7 (70%) | 6 (66.7%) | 0.87 |
|
| 3(30%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
|
|
| 7 (70%) | 6 (75%) | 0.8 |
|
| 3 (30%) | 2 (25%) | ||
|
|
| 2 (20%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.5 |
|
| 8 (80%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||
|
|
| 7 (70%) | 6 (66.7%) | 0.87 |
|
| 3 (30%) | 3 (33.3%) | ||
|
|
| 3 (30%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.87 |
|
| 7 (70%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||
|
|
| 5 (55.6%) | 3 (33.3%) | 0.34 |
|
| 4 (44.4%) | 6 (66.7%) | ||
|
| 37 (36–39) | 38 (36–38) | 0.85 | |
|
| 0.06±1.07 | 0.12±0.8 | 0.9 | |
|
| −0.14 (−0.26–0.5) | −0.26 (−0.4–0.5) | 0.8 | |
|
| 6.25 (4.8–7.9) | 5.5 (4.3–7.6) | 0.6 | |
|
| 0.01±0.9 | −0.7±0.8 | 0.08 | |
|
| −0.01±0.95 | −0.5±0.7 | 0.2 | |
|
| 0.04±0.9 | 0.095±0.6 | 0.9 | |
|
| 0.49±0.04 | 0.46±0.02 | 0.12 | |
|
| 0.96±0.06 | 0.94±0.04 | 0.4 | |
|
| −0.5 (−0.7–−0.25) | 0.3 (−0.25 to 1.1) | 0.1 | |
|
| −0.4±0.6 | −0.2±0.3 | 0.4 | |
|
| 34.1±3.3 | 33.6±6.1 | 0.8 | |
|
| 37.5 (36–40) | 38 (30–39) | 0.8 |
Differences between ICSI-Control children using Pearson X2 test, two sample Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, are depicted and expressed as mean±SD or median and IQR (interquartile range).
:Mann-Whitney U test.
: Normal distribution, two-sample Student t-test.
: Pearson X2 test.
Abbreviations: AGA = Appropriate for Gestational Age; BMI = body mass index; SBP = systolic blood pressure DBP = diastolic blood pressure; ICSI = Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; SGA = Small for Gestational Age; W/H = waist-to hip ratio (WHR); WHtR = Waist-to-height ratio.
Biochemical, hormonal and non-conventional cardiometabolic markers in ICSI and NC children groups.
| ICSI (n = 42) | Control (n = 42) | p-value | ||
|
|
| 39.5±2.9 | 38.4± 2.2 | 0.07 |
|
| 13.1± 1.1 | 12.8± 0.8 | 0.22 | |
|
| 71.9± 21.7 | 88.8±38.9 | 0.1 | |
|
| 35 (20–48) | 33 (26–45) | 0.7 | |
|
|
| 81.5 (77–86) | 83 (78–88) | 0.36 |
|
| 31 (28–34) | 34.5 (30–38) | 0.04 | |
|
| 0.62± 0.07 | 0.6±0.08 | 0.25 | |
|
| 30 (27–32) | 27 (24–32) | 0.08 | |
|
| 20 (16–24) | 14 (12–19) | <0.00001 | |
|
| 12 (9–15) | 11 (9–13) | 0.6 | |
|
| 3.55±0.75 | 3.85±0.77 | 0.07 | |
|
| 167.7±25.3 | 172.7±24.5 | 0.35 | |
|
| 43 (36–50) | 52 (36–66) | 0.07 | |
|
| 63.9±8.9 | 60.8±12 | 0.17 | |
|
| 94.6± 21.2 | 100.9±22 | 0.18 | |
|
| 153±21.1 | 156.1±19.8 | 0.5 | |
|
| 75.7±14.7 | 74.2± 14.9 | 0.65 | |
|
| 6.2 (2.4–9.8) | 7.2 (3.9–17.3) | 0.16 | |
|
| 182.6±25 | 156.7±30.1 | 0.0001 | |
|
|
| 8.7±1.2 | 8.9±1.3 | 0.3 |
|
| 2.99 (2.1–4) | 2.4 (1.8–3.7) | 0.22 | |
|
| 5.2 (3.9–6.8) | 4.75 (4.1–7.8) | 0.9 | |
|
| 11.2 (8.5–14.8) | 11.5 (9.3–15.8) | 0.4 | |
|
| 159 (112–226) | 165 (133–221) | 0.58 | |
|
| 1.04 (0.8–1.4) | 0.94 (0.8–1.6) | 0.9 | |
|
|
| 15.1 (7.3–22.8) | 24.58 (16–33.7) | 0.0002 |
|
| 59.9 (44.2–84.8) | 69.2 (52.5–101.7) | 0.15 | |
|
| 1.2 (0.7–1.9) | 1.3 (0.5–1.9) | 0.38 | |
|
| 0.44±0.04 | 0.78±0.14 | 0.022 |
Differences are depicted as mean±SD or median and IQR (interquartile range), according to normality of the data.
*normal distribution, Student t-test for two independent samples;
**MannWhitney test.
Abbreviations:ALP = Alkaline Phosphatase; Apo-A1 = apolipoprotein-A1; Apo-B = apolipoprotein-B; hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICSI = Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; IGF1 = Insulin like Growth Factor 1; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; Lp(a) = lipoprotein(a); NC = naturally conceived; TG = triglycerides; YKL-40 = Human cartilage glycoprotein 39; hsIL-6 = high-sensitivity interleukin-6.
Biochemical, hormonal and non-conventional cardiometabolic markers in ICSI and NC girl subgroups used in metabolomics.
| ICSI (n = 10) | Control (n = 9) | p-value | ||
|
|
| 39 (36.8–39.4) | 37.4 (35.4–39.9) | 0.9 |
|
| 13.3 (12.2–13.3) | 12.6 (11.8–13.3) | 0.5 | |
|
| 69.8±19.3 | 83±37.5 | 0.46 | |
|
| 22.6±12.3 | 33±9.5 | 0.15 | |
|
|
| 75.5 (71–82) | 79 (78–86) | 0.2 |
|
| 31.8±6 | 33.6±7.7 | 0.6 | |
|
| 0.57±0.05 | 0.59±0.06 | 0.5 | |
|
| 32.3±7.2 | 28.1±7.7 | 0.2 | |
|
| 18.8±5.6 | 16.2± 6.5 | 0.4 | |
|
| 8.7±2.3 | 10.4±1.8 | 0.09 | |
|
| 3.7±1.1 | 4.1±0.95 | 0.4 | |
|
| 170.2±22.7 | 168.7±22.3 | 0.88 | |
|
| 47 (40–57) | 45 (38–54) | 0.46 | |
|
| 58±7.6 | 61.3±12.5 | 0.48 | |
|
| 101.6±18.3 | 97.3±18.3 | 0.62 | |
|
| 147.3± 20.3 | 156±26.1 | 0.4 | |
|
| 78.3± 10.5 | 75±11.8 | 0.5 | |
|
| 5.8 (3.1–7.6) | 17.3 (3.6–33.5) | 0.15 | |
|
| 195.7±27.8 | 143.5± 25 | 0.0007 | |
|
|
| 8.9±0.8 | 9.15±1.2 | 0.7 |
|
| 2.86±0.99 | 2.9±1.4 | 0.9 | |
|
| 4.7 (2.4–6.1) | 4.3 (4.1–8.2) | 0.4 | |
|
| 8.6 (5.9–11.9) | 17.9 (11.2–22.3) | 0.02 | |
|
| 130.5 (110–185) | 129 (107–165) | 0.87 | |
|
| 0.9 (0.5–1.1) | 0.91 (0.7–1.4) | 0.5 | |
|
|
| 20.4±10.8 | 21.8±8.2 | 0.75 |
|
| 68.3 (43.9–89.5) | 71.6 (44–119.8) | 0.77 | |
|
| 1.6 (0.94–1.9) | 0.95 (0.6–2.7) | 0.44 | |
|
| 0.39 (0.18–0.66) | 0.48(0.14–1.75) | 0.7 |
Differences are depicted as mean±SD or median and IQR (interquartile range), according to the normality of the data.
*normal distribution, t-test for two independent samples;
**MannWhitney U test.
Abbreviations:ALP = Alkaline Phosphatase; Apo-A1 = apolipoprotein-A1; Apo-B = apolipoprotein-B; hsCRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICSI = Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection; IGF1 = Insulin like Growth Factor 1; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; Lp(a) = lipoprotein(a); TG = triglycerides; YKL-40 = Human cartilage glycoprotein 39; hsIL-6 = high-sensitivity interleukin-6.
Figure 1Multivariate statistical analysis of (A) metabolomic, (B) biochemical, (C) combined datasets for the girl subgroup.
Partial Least Squares – Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) analysis indicates a fair discrimination between the ICSI and NC girl subgroups based on their (A) metabolic profiles, (B) biochemical profiles and (C) combined profiles. In these graphs, each point corresponds, respectively, to the metabolic, biochemical or combined profile of the subject, whose number is shown next to it. The axes of the graphs correspond to functions of multiple variables (i.e. metabolites and/or biochemical markers).
List of positively and negatively significant metabolites in the ICSI compared to the natural conception (NC) group.
| Positively significant metabolites | Negatively significant metabolites | Order of Significance |
| citrate | urea | 11 |
| myo-inositol | x_13 | 22 |
| U_083 (similar to U_088 & U_078) | 3 | |
| U_041 (sugar acid) | 4 | |
| U_046 (sugar – hexose) | 5 | |
| U_010 (putatively α-hydroxyvalerate) | 6 | |
| glycerate | 7 | |
| α-tocopherol | 8 | |
| phosphate | 9 | |
| U_088 (similar to U_083 & U_078) | 10 | |
| P2412 (sugar, marker ion 204) | 11 | |
| (chiro- or) scyllo-inositol | 12 | |
| U_078 (similar to U_083 & U_088) | 13 | |
| lactate | 14 | |
| unknown_no120/P2427 (sugar acid) | 15 | |
| U_055 (sugar pyranose) | 16 | |
| glycerol monostearate | 17 | |
| glucose | 18 | |
| P2400 (putatively alpha-ketoglutarate) | 19 | |
| cholesterol | 20 | |
| gluconate | 21 | |
| 9,12-(z,z)-octadecadienoate (linoleic acid) |
| 22 |
| U_039 (sugar pyranose) | 23 | |
| glyoxylate | 24 | |
| glycerol | 25 | |
| threonate | 26 | |
| U_040 (sugar) | 27 | |
| U_009 (putatively α-hydroxyisobutyrate) | 28 | |
| U_014 | 29 | |
| U_048 (sugarpyranose) | 30 | |
| glycolate | 31 | |
| U_094 (putatively lipid; same marker ion as stearate) |
| 32 |
| isocitrate | 33 | |
| myristate | glycerol 3 –P | 343 |
| erythritol |
| 35 |
The first number in the column corresponds to the order of significance of the positively significant metabolites; the second number corresponds to the order of significance of the negatively significant metabolites.
The table shows the list of positively and negatively significant metabolites at three significance threshold cutoffs. Positively/Negatively Significant Metabolites: Metabolites the concentration of which is significantly larger in ICSI compared to the NC group; FDR (median): False Discovery Rate (median) at each significance threshold cutoff, shown in metabolite number and percentage of the total significant metabolite number (in parenthesis).
Figure 2The significant metabolites between the ICSI and NC girl subgroups within the inter-organ metabolic network.
Positioning the significant metabolites shown in Table 3 within the reconstructed network indicates metabolic physiology differences between the ICSI and NC girl subgroups. All known metabolites detected in the plasma GC-MS metabolic profiles are shown in the area of the figure named “blood”; among these, the metabolites which were not included in the analysis after the normalization and filtering steps are shown in gray boxes. The names of the positively and negatively significant metabolites (Table 3) are shown in red and green fonts, respectively, while the nonsignificant are shown in black. The plasma metabolites are connected with dashed lines with the same metabolite pool in any of the depicted tissues. The intra-tissue pools of the plasma positively and negatively significant metabolites are shown in red and green, respectively; it is noted that we cannot predict the intra-tissue metabolite concentration from its plasma concentration, but we have tried to include the most significant tissue “sources” and “sinks” that contribute to the observed plasma concentration.