Literature DB >> 24725703

Impact of millimeter-level margins on peripheral normal brain sparing for gamma knife radiosurgery.

Lijun Ma1, Arjun Sahgal2, David A Larson3, Dilini Pinnaduwage3, Shannon Fogh3, Igor Barani3, Jean Nakamura3, Michael McDermott3, Penny Sneed3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate how millimeter-level margins beyond the gross tumor volume (GTV) impact peripheral normal brain tissue sparing for Gamma Knife radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A mathematical formula was derived to predict the peripheral isodose volume, such as the 12-Gy isodose volume, with increasing margins by millimeters. The empirical parameters of the formula were derived from a cohort of brain tumor and surgical tumor resection cavity cases (n=15) treated with the Gamma Knife Perfexion. This was done by first adding margins from 0.5 to 3.0 mm to each individual target and then creating for each expanded target a series of treatment plans of nearly identical quality as the original plan. Finally, the formula was integrated with a published logistic regression model to estimate the treatment-induced complication rate for stereotactic radiosurgery when millimeter-level margins are added.
RESULTS: Confirmatory correlation between the nominal target radius (ie, RT) and commonly used maximum target size was found for the studied cases, except for a few outliers. The peripheral isodose volume such as the 12-Gy volume was found to increase exponentially with increasing Δ/RT, where Δ is the margin size. Such a curve fitted the data (logarithmic regression, R(2) >0.99), and the 12-Gy isodose volume was shown to increase steeply with a 0.5- to 3.0-mm margin applied to a target. For example, a 2-mm margin on average resulted in an increase of 55% ± 16% in the 12-Gy volume; this corresponded to an increase in the symptomatic necrosis rate of 6% to 25%, depending on the Δ/RT values for the target.
CONCLUSIONS: Millimeter-level margins beyond the GTV significantly impact peripheral normal brain sparing and should be applied with caution. Our model provides a rapid estimate of such an effect, particularly for large and/or irregularly shaped targets.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24725703     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  13 in total

1.  Personal perspectives on the evolution of radiation therapy and future outlook for SRS.

Authors:  Ian Paddick
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

Review 2.  Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues.

Authors:  Arjun Sahgal; Mark Ruschin; Lijun Ma; Wilko Verbakel; David Larson; Paul D Brown
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Tumor bed radiosurgery: an emerging treatment for brain metastases.

Authors:  Mark J Amsbaugh; Warren Boling; Shiao Woo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Quantifying the trigger level of the vacuum surveillance system of the Gamma-Knife eXtend™ positioning system and evaluating the potential impact on dose delivery.

Authors:  Béatrice Reiner; Peter Bownes; David L Buckley; David I Thwaites
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

5.  Dosimetric comparison of Gamma Knife® IconTM and linear accelerator-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) plans for the re-irradiation of large (>14 cm3) recurrent glioblastomas.

Authors:  Matthew E Schelin; Haisong Liu; Ayesha Ali; Wenyin Shi; Yan Yu; Karen E Mooney
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2021

6.  Dosimetric impact of rotational errors on the quality of VMAT-SRS for multiple brain metastases: Comparison between single- and two-isocenter treatment planning techniques.

Authors:  Georgia Prentou; Eleftherios P Pappas; Andreas Logothetis; Efi Koutsouveli; Evaggelos Pantelis; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Pantelis Karaiskos
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  A simple knowledge-based tool for stereotactic radiosurgery pre-planning.

Authors:  Daniel S Goldbaum; Justin D Hurley; Russell J Hamilton
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Intracranial motion during frameless Gamma-Knife stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Danushka S Seneviratne; Laura A Vallow; Austin Hadley; Timothy D Malouff; William C Stross; Steven Herchko; Deanna H Pafundi; Daniel M Trifiletti; Jennifer L Peterson
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

9.  Dose-Volume Response Relationship for Brain Metastases Treated with Frameless Single-Fraction Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Mark Amsbaugh; Jianmin Pan; Mehran B Yusuf; Anthony Dragun; Neal Dunlap; Timothy Guan; Warren Boling; Shesh Rai; Shiao Woo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-04-27

10.  Stereotactic radiotherapy of appropriately selected meningiomas and metastatic brain tumor beds with gamma knife icon versus volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Jacob S Buatti; John M Buatti; Sridhar Yaddanapudi; Edward C Pennington; Dongxu Wang; Brandie Gross; Joël J St-Aubin; Daniel E Hyer; Mark C Smith; Ryan T Flynn
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.