| Literature DB >> 24725494 |
David M Berman1, Jonathan I Epstein2.
Abstract
Several investigators have challenged the idea that low-grade cancers are a cause for concern, suggesting that the term cancer should not be applied to these tumors. This article reviews the defining features of cancer, and the diagnostic and prognostic classification systems currently used for prostate cancer. Logical, morphologic, and molecular evidence is presented to show that low-grade prostate cancers are correctly classified as cancer. The authors suggest, however, that 6 out of 10 on an aggressiveness scale is inappropriate for indolent cancer, and that a proposed reinterpretation of Gleason grading categories is a more logical way to address overtreatment.Entities:
Keywords: Gleason grade; Low-grade cancer; PSA screening; Prostate cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24725494 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.01.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urol Clin North Am ISSN: 0094-0143 Impact factor: 2.241