Literature DB >> 26345389

A molecular signature of PCA3 and ERG exosomal RNA from non-DRE urine is predictive of initial prostate biopsy result.

M J Donovan1,2, M Noerholm2, S Bentink2, S Belzer2, J Skog2, V O'Neill2, J S Cochran3, G A Brown4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New screening methods that can add predictive diagnostic value for aggressive (high-grade, Gleason score ⩾ 7) prostate cancer (PCa) are needed to reduce unnecessary biopsies for patients with non-aggressive PCa. This is particularly important for men presenting for an initial biopsy with an equivocal PSA in the 2-10 ng ml(-1) range. PCA3 and ERG are biomarkers that can add predictive value for PCa in urine; however, with a limited utility as a digital rectal exam (DRE) is required.
METHODS: First-catch urine samples were collected at six sites from men scheduled to undergo a prostate biopsy. Exosomal RNA was extracted, RNA copy numbers of ERG and PCA3 were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the EXO106 score (the sum of normalized PCA3 and ERG RNA levels) was computed. Performance was compared with standard of care (SOC; PSA, age, race or family history) parameters. Contingency table, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve and box-plot analyses were performed.
RESULTS: In this cohort (N=195), a dichotomous EXO106 score demonstrated good clinical performance in predicting biopsy result for both any cancer and high-grade disease. For high-grade disease, the negative and positive predictive values were 97.5% and 34.5%, respectively. The discrimination between high-grade and Gleason score ⩽ 6 (including benign) biopsy results by a combination of EXO106 and SOC (area under the curve (AUC)=0.803) was significantly improved compared with SOC without EXO106 (AUC=0.6723, P=0.0009). The median EXO106 score correlated (P<0.001; Spearman's rank order) with histologic grade.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel molecular signature (EXO106 score) derived from non-DRE urine demonstrated independent, negative predictive value for the diagnosis of high-grade PCa from initial biopsy for men with 'gray zone' serum PSA levels. Its use in the biopsy decision process could result in fewer prostate biopsies for clinically insignificant disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26345389     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2015.40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  35 in total

1.  External validation of the updated Briganti nomogram to predict lymph node invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing extended lymph node dissection.

Authors:  Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Marco Bianchi; Luis A Kluth; Zhe Tian; Sascha A Ahyai; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alberto Briganti; Thomas Steuber; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K-H Chun
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.104

2.  Combining urinary detection of TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 with serum PSA to predict diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Folke Schmidt; Bharathi Laxman; Meredith M Regan; David S Rickman; Douglas Scherr; Gerardina Bueti; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A Tomlins; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  PCA3 molecular urine test as a predictor of repeat prostate biopsy outcome in men with previous negative biopsies: a prospective multicenter clinical study.

Authors:  Marc C Gittelman; Bernard Hertzman; James Bailen; Thomas Williams; Isaac Koziol; Ralph Jonathan Henderson; Mitchell Efros; Mohamed Bidair; John F Ward
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Nationwide population based study of infections after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Lundström; Linda Drevin; Stefan Carlsson; Hans Garmo; Stacy Loeb; Pär Stattin; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells.

Authors:  Hadi Valadi; Karin Ekström; Apostolos Bossios; Margareta Sjöstrand; James J Lee; Jan O Lötvall
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-07       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  High SPDEF may identify patients who will have a prolonged response to androgen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Andrew C Haller; Wei Tan; Rochelle Payne-Ondracek; Willie Underwood; Lili Tian; Carl Morrison; Fengzhi Li
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Active surveillance versus radical treatment for favorable-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-09

10.  SPDEF inhibits prostate carcinogenesis by disrupting a positive feedback loop in regulation of the Foxm1 oncogene.

Authors:  Xin-Hua Cheng; Markaisa Black; Vladimir Ustiyan; Tien Le; Logan Fulford; Anusha Sridharan; Mario Medvedovic; Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Tanya V Kalin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  55 in total

Review 1.  What can urinary exosomes tell us?

Authors:  Rui Vitorino; Rita Ferreira; Sofia Guedes; Francisco Amado; Visith Thongboonkerd
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Extracellular vesicles as cancer liquid biopsies: from discovery, validation, to clinical application.

Authors:  Zhen Zhao; Jia Fan; Yen-Michael S Hsu; Christopher J Lyon; Bo Ning; Tony Y Hu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Implementation of a Precision Pathology Program Focused on Oncology-Based Prognostic and Predictive Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael J Donovan; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Temporal Stability and Prognostic Biomarker Potential of the Prostate Cancer Urine miRNA Transcriptome.

Authors:  Jouhyun Jeon; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Honglei Xie; Cindy Q Yao; Fang Zhao; Sahar Jahangiri; Carmelle Cuizon; Seville Scarcello; Renu Jeyapala; John D Watson; Michael Fraser; Jessica Ray; Kristina Commisso; Andrew Loblaw; Neil E Fleshner; Robert G Bristow; Michelle Downes; Danny Vesprini; Stanley Liu; Bharati Bapat; Paul C Boutros
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  The multifaceted role of exosomes in cancer progression: diagnostic and therapeutic implications [corrected].

Authors:  Vignesh Sundararajan; Fazlul H Sarkar; Thamil Selvee Ramasamy
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 6.  Research landscape of liquid biopsies in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Esther Campos-Fernández; Letícia S Barcelos; Aline Gomes de Souza; Luiz R Goulart; Vivian Alonso-Goulart
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 7.  Prostasomes as a source of diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carla Zijlstra; Willem Stoorvogel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Extracellular vesicles in urological malignancies: an update.

Authors:  Johannes Linxweiler; Kerstin Junker
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Improving the Specificity of PSA Screening with Serum and Urine Markers.

Authors:  James T Kearns; Daniel W Lin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  How should radiologists incorporate non-imaging prostate cancer biomarkers into daily practice?

Authors:  Pawel Rajwa; Jamil Syed; Michael S Leapman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.