M J Donovan1,2, M Noerholm2, S Bentink2, S Belzer2, J Skog2, V O'Neill2, J S Cochran3, G A Brown4. 1. Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 2. Exosome Diagnostics, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Urology Clinics of North Texas, Dallas, TX, USA. 4. Delaware Valley Urology, LLC, Voorhees, NJ, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: New screening methods that can add predictive diagnostic value for aggressive (high-grade, Gleason score ⩾ 7) prostate cancer (PCa) are needed to reduce unnecessary biopsies for patients with non-aggressive PCa. This is particularly important for men presenting for an initial biopsy with an equivocal PSA in the 2-10 ng ml(-1) range. PCA3 and ERG are biomarkers that can add predictive value for PCa in urine; however, with a limited utility as a digital rectal exam (DRE) is required. METHODS: First-catch urine samples were collected at six sites from men scheduled to undergo a prostate biopsy. Exosomal RNA was extracted, RNA copy numbers of ERG and PCA3 were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the EXO106 score (the sum of normalized PCA3 and ERG RNA levels) was computed. Performance was compared with standard of care (SOC; PSA, age, race or family history) parameters. Contingency table, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve and box-plot analyses were performed. RESULTS: In this cohort (N=195), a dichotomous EXO106 score demonstrated good clinical performance in predicting biopsy result for both any cancer and high-grade disease. For high-grade disease, the negative and positive predictive values were 97.5% and 34.5%, respectively. The discrimination between high-grade and Gleason score ⩽ 6 (including benign) biopsy results by a combination of EXO106 and SOC (area under the curve (AUC)=0.803) was significantly improved compared with SOC without EXO106 (AUC=0.6723, P=0.0009). The median EXO106 score correlated (P<0.001; Spearman's rank order) with histologic grade. CONCLUSIONS: A novel molecular signature (EXO106 score) derived from non-DRE urine demonstrated independent, negative predictive value for the diagnosis of high-grade PCa from initial biopsy for men with 'gray zone' serum PSA levels. Its use in the biopsy decision process could result in fewer prostate biopsies for clinically insignificant disease.
BACKGROUND: New screening methods that can add predictive diagnostic value for aggressive (high-grade, Gleason score ⩾ 7) prostate cancer (PCa) are needed to reduce unnecessary biopsies for patients with non-aggressive PCa. This is particularly important for men presenting for an initial biopsy with an equivocal PSA in the 2-10 ng ml(-1) range. PCA3 and ERG are biomarkers that can add predictive value for PCa in urine; however, with a limited utility as a digital rectal exam (DRE) is required. METHODS: First-catch urine samples were collected at six sites from men scheduled to undergo a prostate biopsy. Exosomal RNA was extracted, RNA copy numbers of ERG and PCA3 were measured by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR), and the EXO106 score (the sum of normalized PCA3 and ERG RNA levels) was computed. Performance was compared with standard of care (SOC; PSA, age, race or family history) parameters. Contingency table, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristics curve and box-plot analyses were performed. RESULTS: In this cohort (N=195), a dichotomous EXO106 score demonstrated good clinical performance in predicting biopsy result for both any cancer and high-grade disease. For high-grade disease, the negative and positive predictive values were 97.5% and 34.5%, respectively. The discrimination between high-grade and Gleason score ⩽ 6 (including benign) biopsy results by a combination of EXO106 and SOC (area under the curve (AUC)=0.803) was significantly improved compared with SOC without EXO106 (AUC=0.6723, P=0.0009). The median EXO106 score correlated (P<0.001; Spearman's rank order) with histologic grade. CONCLUSIONS: A novel molecular signature (EXO106 score) derived from non-DRE urine demonstrated independent, negative predictive value for the diagnosis of high-grade PCa from initial biopsy for men with 'gray zone' serum PSA levels. Its use in the biopsy decision process could result in fewer prostate biopsies for clinically insignificant disease.
Authors: Jens Hansen; Michael Rink; Marco Bianchi; Luis A Kluth; Zhe Tian; Sascha A Ahyai; Shahrokh F Shariat; Alberto Briganti; Thomas Steuber; Margit Fisch; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Felix K-H Chun Journal: Prostate Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Simpa S Salami; Folke Schmidt; Bharathi Laxman; Meredith M Regan; David S Rickman; Douglas Scherr; Gerardina Bueti; Javed Siddiqui; Scott A Tomlins; John T Wei; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Mark A Rubin; Martin G Sanda Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Marc C Gittelman; Bernard Hertzman; James Bailen; Thomas Williams; Isaac Koziol; Ralph Jonathan Henderson; Mitchell Efros; Mohamed Bidair; John F Ward Journal: J Urol Date: 2013-02-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Hadi Valadi; Karin Ekström; Apostolos Bossios; Margareta Sjöstrand; James J Lee; Jan O Lötvall Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2007-05-07 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Xin-Hua Cheng; Markaisa Black; Vladimir Ustiyan; Tien Le; Logan Fulford; Anusha Sridharan; Mario Medvedovic; Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Tanya V Kalin Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Jouhyun Jeon; Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel; Honglei Xie; Cindy Q Yao; Fang Zhao; Sahar Jahangiri; Carmelle Cuizon; Seville Scarcello; Renu Jeyapala; John D Watson; Michael Fraser; Jessica Ray; Kristina Commisso; Andrew Loblaw; Neil E Fleshner; Robert G Bristow; Michelle Downes; Danny Vesprini; Stanley Liu; Bharati Bapat; Paul C Boutros Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Esther Campos-Fernández; Letícia S Barcelos; Aline Gomes de Souza; Luiz R Goulart; Vivian Alonso-Goulart Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 6.166