Jung-Cheng Hsiang1, Amy E Jablonski, Robert M Dickson. 1. School of Physics, ‡School of Chemistry & Biochemistry, and §Petit Institute of Bioscience and Bioengineering, Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400, United States.
Abstract
Fluorescence microscopy and detection have become indispensible for understanding organization and dynamics in biological systems. Novel fluorophores with improved brightness, photostability, and biocompatibility continue to fuel further advances but often rely on having minimal background. The visualization of interactions in very high biological background, especially for proteins or bound complexes at very low copy numbers, remains a primary challenge. Instead of focusing on molecular brightness of fluorophores, we have adapted the principles of high-sensitivity absorption spectroscopy to improve the sensitivity and signal discrimination in fluorescence bioimaging. Utilizing very long wavelength transient absorptions of kinetically trapped dark states, we employ molecular modulation schemes that do not simultaneously modulate the background fluorescence. This improves the sensitivity and ease of implementation over high-energy photoswitch-based recovery schemes, as no internal dye reference or nanoparticle-based fluorophores are needed to separate the desired signals from background. In this Account, we describe the selection process for and identification of fluorophores that enable optically modulated fluorescence to decrease obscuring background. Differing from thermally stable photoswitches using higher-energy secondary lasers, coillumination at very low energies depopulates transient dark states, dynamically altering the fluorescence and giving characteristic modulation time scales for each modulatable emitter. This process is termed synchronously amplified fluorescence image recovery (SAFIRe) microscopy. By understanding and optically controlling the dye photophysics, we selectively modulate desired fluorophore signals independent of all autofluorescent background. This shifts the fluorescence of interest to unique detection frequencies with nearly shot-noise-limited detection, as no background signals are collected. Although the fluorescence brightness is improved slightly, SAFIRe yields up to 100-fold improved signal visibility by essentially removing obscuring, unmodulated background (Richards, C. I.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4619). While SAFIRe exhibits a wide, linear dynamic range, we have demonstrated single-molecule signal recovery buried within 200 nM obscuring dye. In addition to enabling signal recovery through background reduction, each dye exhibits a characteristic modulation frequency indicative of its photophysical dynamics. Thus, these characteristic time scales offer opportunities not only to expand the dimensionality of fluorescence imaging by using dark-state lifetimes but also to distinguish the dynamics of subpopulations on the basis of photophysical versus diffusional time scales, even within modulatable populations. The continued development of modulation for signal recovery and observation of biological dynamics holds great promise for studying a range of transient biological phenomena in natural environments. Through the development of a wide range of fluorescent proteins, organic dyes, and inorganic emitters that exhibit significant dark-state populations under steady-state illumination, we can drastically expand the applicability of fluorescence imaging to probe lower-abundance complexes and their dynamics.
Fluorescence microscopy and detection have become indispensible for understanding organization and dynamics in biological systems. Novel fluorophores with improved brightness, photostability, and biocompatibility continue to fuel further advances but often rely on having minimal background. The visualization of interactions in very high biological background, especially for proteins or bound complexes at very low copy numbers, remains a primary challenge. Instead of focusing on molecular brightness of fluorophores, we have adapted the principles of high-sensitivity absorption spectroscopy to improve the sensitivity and signal discrimination in fluorescence bioimaging. Utilizing very long wavelength transient absorptions of kinetically trapped dark states, we employ molecular modulation schemes that do not simultaneously modulate the background fluorescence. This improves the sensitivity and ease of implementation over high-energy photoswitch-based recovery schemes, as no internal dye reference or nanoparticle-based fluorophores are needed to separate the desired signals from background. In this Account, we describe the selection process for and identification of fluorophores that enable optically modulated fluorescence to decrease obscuring background. Differing from thermally stable photoswitches using higher-energy secondary lasers, coillumination at very low energies depopulates transient dark states, dynamically altering the fluorescence and giving characteristic modulation time scales for each modulatable emitter. This process is termed synchronously amplified fluorescence image recovery (SAFIRe) microscopy. By understanding and optically controlling the dye photophysics, we selectively modulate desired fluorophore signals independent of all autofluorescent background. This shifts the fluorescence of interest to unique detection frequencies with nearly shot-noise-limited detection, as no background signals are collected. Although the fluorescence brightness is improved slightly, SAFIRe yields up to 100-fold improved signal visibility by essentially removing obscuring, unmodulated background (Richards, C. I.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4619). While SAFIRe exhibits a wide, linear dynamic range, we have demonstrated single-molecule signal recovery buried within 200 nM obscuring dye. In addition to enabling signal recovery through background reduction, each dye exhibits a characteristic modulation frequency indicative of its photophysical dynamics. Thus, these characteristic time scales offer opportunities not only to expand the dimensionality of fluorescence imaging by using dark-state lifetimes but also to distinguish the dynamics of subpopulations on the basis of photophysical versus diffusional time scales, even within modulatable populations. The continued development of modulation for signal recovery and observation of biological dynamics holds great promise for studying a range of transient biological phenomena in natural environments. Through the development of a wide range of fluorescent proteins, organic dyes, and inorganic emitters that exhibit significant dark-state populations under steady-state illumination, we can drastically expand the applicability of fluorescence imaging to probe lower-abundance complexes and their dynamics.
Spectroscopy has proven to be crucial for understanding the structures
and kinetics of myriad molecules and their environmental interactions.
For example, analysis of the fingerprint region using infrared spectroscopy
routinely enables resolution of multiple components constituting complex,
unknown samples.[2] Unfortunately, such molecule-specific
spectroscopic signatures are obscured in condensed phase, ambient
temperature electronic spectroscopies. This fact limits the identification
of molecular signatures in high-background samples and often relegates
both single-molecule and bulk spectroscopies to rigorous exclusion
of unwanted absorbers to minimize interference. However, even with
ideal sample preparation, no measurement is truly “background-free”.
In absorption experiments, one must detect the change in incident
laser intensity resulting from (typically weak) sample absorption.
Thus, fluctuations in laser intensity become a primary noise source.[3] In pure systems, one can circumvent laser, detector,
and other spurious noise sources by modulating the signal of interest
and detecting at this modulation frequency, shifted away from the
majority of laser noise. Such studies are also routinely performed
to enhance the sensitivities of sequential and simultaneous multiphoton
spectroscopies.[4] The key aspect is to encode
an external waveform exclusively on the signal of interest, enabling
its detection without interference from other species. Typically,
molecular modulation is the most sensitive, allowing the detection
of changes in incident laser intensity (ΔI/I) of ∼10–6 that result from molecular
absorption.[3]When molecules with
high fluorescence quantum yields are used,
fluorescence detection offers further gains in detection sensitivity,
as the excitation light is filtered out to recover “zero-background”
signals at a wavelength that is shifted to lower energy than that
of the excitation source. For pure samples, the sensitivity is primarily
limited by shot noise from the fluorophore and background instead
of that from the much brighter excitation source. In complex systems,
however, multiple fluorophores are often present that obscure signals
from the desired emitters. This is especially true in biological samples
and can preclude the observation of species of interest in natural
environments, too often relegating mechanistic studies to artificial
in vitro conditions. Even studies of bulk photophysical dynamics can
be obscured by high background or low dark-state quantum yields, such
that observation is facilitated by recording fluctuations at very
low copy numbers.[5,6]While researchers have made
great advances by improving the brightness,
spectral coverage, and biocompatibility of fluorescent probes,[7,8] these only address the signal side of sensitivity (signal-to-noise
ratio). We have endeavored to make even greater sensitivity gains
by decreasing the noise and simultaneously increasing only our desired
signal visibility in high-background environments.[1−10] To accomplish
this, we have applied the principles of modulated spectroscopy to
fluorescence imaging. By investigating and tailoring dye photophysics,
we have created systems whose fluorescence can be dynamically increased
and decreased (modulated) through coillumination at much lower energy
than that of the collected fluorescence.[11−15] Thus, we utilize the spectroscopy of transient dark
states that normally limit fluorescence emission but themselves can
be directly depopulated faster than they normally decay to alter fluorophore
ground-state populations.Generally, organic dyes offer excellent
brightness with broad spectral
tunability and small size; quantum dots exhibit further-improved brightness
and photostability, but at the cost of toxicity, size, and aggregation,
while fluorescent proteins greatly increase the biocompatibility,
but at the cost of total brightness. While these different fluorophores
can be useful in many conventional applications, exogenous or endogenous
background fluorescence, especially in low-copy-number or multiple-labeling
schemes, can seriously limit direct interpretation.[5] In such situations, the key issue becomes signal discrimination
to enable resolution of each unique fluorophore’s signal independent
of the background. Time gating using very long lived (often lanthanide-based)
fluorophores with pulsed excitation is one approach, as background
emitters typically finish fluorescing within 10 ns of the pulsed excitation,
reducing the background at longer delays.[16] Frequency domain approaches (e.g., optical lock-in detection[17] and frequency domain imaging[18]) use repetitive photobleaching of slowly responsive photoswitches
with bursts of higher-energy secondary laser irradiation for fluorescence
recovery. Because both lasers are at higher energy than the collected
emission, an internal reference signal must be added or multidye nanoparticles
must be used. The signal from the brighter nanoparticles is recovered
mixed with the modulated background, or when more standard dye labeling
is used, signals are better discriminated from the modulated background
through cross-correlation with known pure-dye reference signals. Our
efforts have been focused on a more direct analogy between modulation
and fluorescence to selectively encode a modulation waveform only
on the fluorophores of interest without also modulating the background.
This process of synchronously amplified fluorescence image recovery
(SAFIRe)[14] is also a frequency domain technique
used to recover the signal of interest from the background. Importantly,
as the background is not modulated and molecule-specific absorptions
at lower energy than collected emission are utilized to modulate transient
dark-state and ground-state populations, SAFIRe modulates fluorescence
signals faster without introducing extra background emission, can
be used to extract a large demodulation signal without the need to
introduce a pure-dye external reference, and can provide molecule-specific
dark-state lifetimes to expand the dimensionality of fluorescence
imaging.[11] In this Account, we will describe
the principles behind SAFIRe, its attainable contrast improvement,
fluorophore development, dye photophysical properties, and recent
applications of SAFIRe for signal recovery in bioimaging.
Fluorescence Enhancement through Dark-State
Depopulation
For fluorescent molecules, the singlet–singlet
radiative
emission is often hindered by residence in long-lived triplet states,
exciton traps, photoisomers, charge-transfer states, or other dark
states. Once the molecule reaches the dark state, it generally takes
some finite time for the molecule to relax back to its emissive state,
leading to a steady-state buildup of this nonemissive level. This
stochastic on and off “blinking” (Figure 1A) has a steady-state fluorescence intensity ofin which τon and τoff0 are the intrinsic
photophysical on and off times, characterizing how long the molecule
stays in the emissive and dark-state manifolds, respectively, Ion is the on-time fluorescence intensity, and Ioff is the off-time intensity (usually zero).
This population recovery from the dark states of some common fluorophores
can be effected with exceedingly high intensity (MW/cm2), application-limiting, red-shifted secondary excitation.[19] Such long-wavelength coillumination presumably
induces an inefficient reverse intersystem crossing (ISC) process
that alters (reduces) the steady-state dark-state population to increase
the fluorescence emission rate (Figure 1B).
Our goal has been to drastically reduce the necessary secondary intensities
by probing the transient absorptions of these long-lived photoaccessible
dark states. Such sequential two-photon excitation increases the fluorescence
intensities with reasonably low secondary laser intensities (1–100
kW/cm2) by decreasing the steady-state dark-state residence
to enable more fluorophores to absorb and fluoresce under primary
excitation. The relative enhancement factor is defined asin which Iprimary and Idual are the
fluorescence intensities
with primary-only and dual laser excitation, respectively, and τoff is the photophysical off time with dual laser excitation.[14] Thus, to achieve high enhancement, the fluorophores
should exhibit relative on and off times subject to (1) τon < τoff0 and (2) τoff ≪ τoff0. These conditions
generally hold for dyes exhibiting the following properties:[14]When the above conditions are met, the maximum
relative enhancement
factor is determined by τoff0 /τon, corresponding to complete
removal of the dark-state residence through secondary laser coillumination
(i.e., τoff goes to zero).
Figure 1
(A) Typical fluorescence
blinking from a single silver nanodot
(900 nm emitter). (B) Jablonski diagram illustrating the reverse intersystem
crossing between bright and dark states of silver–DNA nanodots.
(Reproduced with permission from ref (20). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.)
A naturally decaying dark state exhibiting
some characteristic decay time.Dark-state absorption at lower energy
than that of the collected fluorescence.High forward action cross sections
(extinction coefficient times dark-state quantum yield), enabling
low primary illumination intensities.High reverse action cross sections
for dark-state depopulation, enabling low secondary illumination intensities.(A) Typical fluorescence
blinking from a single silver nanodot
(900 nm emitter). (B) Jablonski diagram illustrating the reverse intersystem
crossing between bright and dark states of silver–DNA nanodots.
(Reproduced with permission from ref (20). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.)
Optically Enhanceable Fluorophores
The crucial requirement for optically enhanced fluorescence is
to have a relatively long lived but long-wavelength optically reversible
dark state. Thus, microsecond to millisecond transient absorption
spectroscopy and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) studies
are exceedingly helpful in identifying candidate fluorophores and
guiding secondary laser selection.[6,1,14] In principle, any transient photoinduced dark state
can suffice (e.g., triplet, photoisomer, charge separation, etc.)
as long as it decays on its own and its natural lifetime is comparable
to or longer than the inverse excitation rate. Below we discuss the
most promising enhanceable fluorophores that we have identified to
date.
Silver Nanodots
Few-atom silver nanodots
(less than ∼12 Ag atoms) become stable in solution only with
the help of protective scaffolds.[20,21] However, the
choice of scaffold not only determines which nanodot species is formed
but also is crucial for optical enhancement of its fluorescence. Through
the use of these different scaffolds, many single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-protected
silver nanodots have been successfully synthesized and photophysically
characterized, yielding strong emitters extending from the visible
to the near-IR.[22,23] Table 1 lists a small subset of our emitters and their basic photophysical
parameters.
Table 1
Photophysical Parameters of Ag Nanoclusters[23]
species
ssDNA sequence
emission wavelength (nm)
lifetime (ns)
Φ (%)
ε (105 M–1 cm–1)
blue
5′-CCCTTTAACCCC-3′
485
2.98 ± 0.01
NA
NA
green
5′-CCCTCTTAACCC-3′
520
0.22 ± 0.01
16 ± 3
NA
yellow
5′-CCCTTAATCCCC-3′
572
4.35 ± 0.01
38 ± 2
2.0 ± 0.4
red
5′-CCTCCTTCCTCC-3′
620
2.23 ± 0.01
32 ± 4
1.2 ± 0.3
near-IR
5′-CCCTAACTCCCC-3′
705
3.46 ±.01
34 ± 5
3.5 ± 0.7
The strong
nucleobase–Ag interaction and suggestive transient
absorption/FCS studies[6,24] coupled with the known propensity
of Ag nanoclusters to photoeject electrons[25] led us to the conclusion that a ∼10 μs-lived charge-separated
dark state is the likely modulatable level. Common among all of the
DNA-encapsulated Ag nanodots studied, the transient absorption spectra
suggested that the common red absorption band (650–850 nm)
arises from anionic cytosine absorption that decays via reverse charge
transfer. Nicely matching the fluorescence enhancement action spectrum,
this provides a framework for rationalizing how the dark-state lifetime
decreases and the total (higher-energy) fluorescence intensity increases
upon coillumination at 800 nm.[1]
Organic Fluorophores
Myriad fluorescent
organic compounds have been employed in fluorescence spectroscopy
and microscopy because of their synthetic tunability, bright emission,
and wide availability. The excited-state photophysics of many common
fluorophores have been mapped out through transient absorption and
FCS studies, and some have even been demonstrated to undergo reverse
ISC under very high intensity (>1 MW/cm2) dual laser
excitation.[19,26] Some weak emitters, however,
build up large dark-state populations
with strong transient absorptions that are significantly red-shifted
from their fluorescent transitions. Cy5, for example, exhibits forward
and reverse ISC from short-lived triplet levels and rapidly photoisomerizes
between the trans ground state and the relatively long lived, red-shifted
cis dark state.[27,28] In agreement with the transient
absorption studies,[27] a near-IR secondary
laser efficiently optically reverses the photoisomerization, thereby
modulating the trans-Cy5 emission. Many fluorophores,
including various cyanines and multiple fluorescein and rhodamine
derivatives, exhibit fluorescence that can be optically enhanced for
signal improvement through long-wavelength coillumination.[19,29] The nature of these transient but photoreversible dark states varies
from triplets to photoisomers, but all are useful because of their
ability to dynamically increase the fluorescence through optical depletion
of the long-lived dark states.[11,28]
Fluorescence
Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Pairs
Multiple FRET techniques have been proposed to circumvent
the drawbacks of many natural fluorescent organic compounds.[30] Frustrated FRET,[31,32] in which a
red secondary laser is used to saturate the acceptor in order to manipulate
the higher-energy donor fluorescence, is ideal for conferring modulatability
only on bound complexes. Similar to the use of stimulated emission
depletion (STED) to frustrate fluorescence,[12] coupling unmodulatable molecules together and optically frustrating
their FRET creates modulatable composite dyes. Specifically, we attached
fluorescein and tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) to opposite ends of hairpin
DNA (Figure 2). Because of energy transfer,
TMR quenched the fluorescein emission. We demonstrated that we could
dynamically increase the donor emission by optically frustrating FRET
through direct acceptor saturation, even though neither dye is individually
enhanceable on its own.[15] By utilizing
acceptors with longer dark-state lifetimes, we further improved the
donor fluorescence enhancement at lower excitation intensities. In
principle, this can be done to create optically enhanceable donors
only when species are bound, thereby potentially enabling the measurement
of binding constants in high-background environments.
Figure 2
Schematic of SAFIRe using
FRET pairs on hairpin-forming ssDNA.
(A) Typical energy transfer from donor to acceptor with donor excitation
only. (B) Saturation of the acceptor excitation can block (or modulate)
energy transfer, thereby increasing donor emission through frustrated
FRET. (Reproduced with permission from ref (15). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Schematic of SAFIRe using
FRET pairs on hairpin-forming ssDNA.
(A) Typical energy transfer from donor to acceptor with donor excitation
only. (B) Saturation of the acceptor excitation can block (or modulate)
energy transfer, thereby increasing donor emission through frustrated
FRET. (Reproduced with permission from ref (15). Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.)
Fluorescent
Proteins
The discovery
of fluorescent proteins has revolutionized cell biology, as both in
vivo and in vitro dynamics and statics can be readily studied with
one-to-one labeling, genetic encodability, and excellent biocompatibility.[8] While much effort has gone into creating fluorescent
protein derivatives with improved brightness, photostability, and
spectral coverage, many recent efforts have focused on their photoswitching
properties.[33] Since the first discoveries
of the photoswitching properties of green fluorescent protein derivatives
(GFPs),[34,35] studies of multiple derivatives[36,37] have demonstrated that different wavelengths of light can induce
forward and reverse photoisomerization. The fluorophore’s propensity
to undergo excited-state proton transfer offers the unique ability
to tune the chromophore environment, further changing the isomerization
barriers and protonation-state thermodynamics.[38] Because of these photoreversible states, we postulated
that the photoisomers should also have long-wavelength absorptions
that could optically regenerate the emissive state. To date, we have
identified blue fluorescent proteins (BFPs) and GFPs capable of optically
enhanced fluorescence.[9,13] Furthermore, by altering the
amino acids surrounding the fluorophore, we have demonstrated that
we can both shift the dark-state absorption to longer wavelengths
and improve the magnitude of the fluorescence enhancement upon secondary
illumination (Table 2).[9,13]
Upon primary excitation, all modulatable
dyes exhibit an initial
burst of bulk fluorescence with a decrease to the steady-state intensity
as the dark-state population builds. Secondary coillumination at wavelengths
longer than those of the collected fluorescence restores the higher
ground-state population, increasing the steady-state fluorescence
with both lasers illuminating the sample while generating no additional
background. Turning the secondary laser on and off switches between
brighter and dimmer steady-state fluorescence intensities. If the
secondary laser intensity is modulated at a specific frequency, the
fluorescence intensity will also be modulated at the exact same frequency.[1] Thus, through dynamic control of the ground-state
population with very long wavelength secondary coexcitation, the fluorescence
of interest is shifted away from all of the background to a unique
detection frequency without either generating any additional background
that can obscure detection or increasing the photobleaching quantum
yields.[9] As demonstrated below, this directly
enables the extraction of molecular signatures within complex environments
and avoids signals from competing fluorophores—some by increasing
the signal but mostly by decreasing the background within the detection
window. Such an optical fluorescence modulation and demodulation process
is what we have termed synchronously amplified fluorescence image
recovery (SAFIRe) microscopy.
Sensitivity Improvement:
SAFIRe
Amplitude modulation techniques have been widely used
in high-fidelity
signal transmission and recovery, as desired or encoded signals are
shifted to specific frequencies exhibiting greatly reduced background.
If fluorophore signals can be selectively modulated, their signals
will shift away from the unmodulated background, drastically improving
their visibility and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In photon counting
experiments, the unmodulated fluorescence intensity, i1(t), isin which nS(t) is the number of signal photons at steady state
and nB(t) is the number
of uniform
background counts. Steady-state dark-state populations can be altered
through secondary coillumination, and amplitude modulation of this
secondary laser yields a fluorescence intensity i2(t) given byin which m is the relative
fluorescence enhancement factor and f is the sinusoidal
modulation frequency. In shot-noise-limited photon counting measurements,
the SNRs without and with modulation, respectively, areandin which N is the number
of bins in the measurement. Equations 1 and 2 demonstrate that when there exists uniform, high
exogenous fluorescence contamination or when the fluorescence intensity
is relatively low compared with the background, there is little SNR
advantage unless the relative enhancement factor is much larger than
1.The true practical challenge is one of signal visibility.
When
a weak signal is buried within a high or spatially heterogeneous background,
one is often unable to separate signal photons from background photons,
rendering weak signals invisible. In bioimaging applications, the
commonly observed heterogeneous background around regions of interest
precludes discerning between the desired signal and unwanted background
a priori. Thus, the more important metric is signal visibility, or
the signal-to-background ratio (SBR), to quantify the imaging quality/contrast
of the fluorophore of interest. Different from eqs 1 and 2, the SBRs without and with modulation/demodulation,
respectively, areFrom eqs 3 and 4, one sees that SAFIRe efficiently
increases the
SBR and thus the image contrast, even with high heterogeneous background
levels. This major advantage makes visible features that are otherwise
obscured, enabling their quantification by recovery of shot-noise-limited
detection sensitivities through shifting the signal to specific narrow-band
detection (modulation) frequencies that are free from background interference
(Figure 3).
Figure 3
(A) Fluorescence response of an optically
modulatable blue fluorescent
protein (modBFP/H148K) with constant primary excitation and modulated
secondary excitation. The insets show Jablonski diagrams representing
dark/bright populations. (B) Time trace of aqueous modBFP/H148K with
372 nm primary excitation and 514 nm secondary excitation modulated
at 13 Hz. The inset shows the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the
bulk intensity trajectory, recovering the modulation frequency encoded
in the fluorescence signal. (C) Analysis of optically modulated image
stacks acquired with SAFIRe by taking the Fourier transform of each
pixel’s intensity trajectory. The demodulated image is formed
from the FFT amplitude at each pixel.
(A) Fluorescence response of an optically
modulatable blue fluorescent
protein (modBFP/H148K) with constant primary excitation and modulated
secondary excitation. The insets show Jablonski diagrams representing
dark/bright populations. (B) Time trace of aqueous modBFP/H148K with
372 nm primary excitation and 514 nm secondary excitation modulated
at 13 Hz. The inset shows the fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the
bulk intensity trajectory, recovering the modulation frequency encoded
in the fluorescence signal. (C) Analysis of optically modulated image
stacks acquired with SAFIRe by taking the Fourier transform of each
pixel’s intensity trajectory. The demodulated image is formed
from the FFT amplitude at each pixel.
Switching Speed
In SAFIRe, the enhancement
results from repumping molecules from
the dark state to the emissive manifold faster than through natural
dark-state decay. Thus, the rates into and out of the dark state define
the characteristic frequency (or inverse characteristic time) for
establishing these steady-state populations. Consequently, compounds
should exhibit characteristic cutoff frequencies in their modulation
frequency response curves.At low excitation intensities, a singlet–singlet transition
with a natural excited-state lifetime τ0 yields a
normalized frequency response R(f) given by[39]Similarly, fluorescent
molecules with one
photophysical on time τon and one off time τoff have an intrinsic optical response time τc given byin which Iex is
the excitation intensity, σ is the absorption cross section,
ϕISC is the ISC quantum yield, and τdark is the intrinsic dark-state relaxation time. Whenever the external
driving frequency is much higher than the inverse characteristic response
time τc–1, the molecules cannot
fully respond, decreasing the fluorescence enhancement or modulation
depth at these high frequencies. Hence, analogous to a frequency-domain
lifetime measurement, scanning the scaled modulation frequency generates
a modulation depth versus frequency response curve for a bulk sample
that is given byFitting response
curves to this model yields
the intrinsic response time τc, which represents
the time necessary to establish steady-state ground- and dark-state
populations, or the frequency at which the modulation depth decreases
by 50%. An example of this, Figure 4 shows
characteristic frequency response curves of AcGFP and the corresponding
fitted curves.[9] This opens the potential
for discriminating otherwise identical fluorophores on the basis of
their dark-state or characteristic lifetimes (Figure 5A). Furthermore, eqs 5 and 6 suggest that one can also manipulate the characteristic cutoff
frequency simply by changing the excitation intensity, as demonstrated
in Figure 5B. Consequently, one has the option
of tuning the characteristic frequency to match the dynamics under
study. Any change in the characteristic frequency could then be interpreted
as a change in molecular dynamics (e.g., diffusion, binding, etc.)
that effectively depopulates the dark level, replacing it with a fluorophore
in its emissive manifold.
Figure 4
Modulation frequency dependence of AcGFP enhancement
at 561 nm
for immobilized (red) and diffusing (black) molecules. The modulation
depth at each frequency was computed by normalizing the doubled Fourier
transform of each time trace by the number of data points and by its
DC component. The inset shows the Fourier transform of the square-wave-modulated
fluorescence of AcGFP at 1 Hz. (Reproduced with permission from ref (9). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society.)
Figure 5
(A) Frequency response
curves from Cy5, AcGFP, and modBFP/H148k
in solution showing the span of the cutoff frequencies due to different
photophysical on/off times. (B) Power-dependent cutoff frequency of
Cy5 molecules in aqueous solution with constant 710 nm secondary excitation
intensity (12 kW/cm2) and varied 594 nm primary excitation
intensity.
Modulation frequency dependence of AcGFP enhancement
at 561 nm
for immobilized (red) and diffusing (black) molecules. The modulation
depth at each frequency was computed by normalizing the doubled Fourier
transform of each time trace by the number of data points and by its
DC component. The inset shows the Fourier transform of the square-wave-modulated
fluorescence of AcGFP at 1 Hz. (Reproduced with permission from ref (9). Copyright 2012 American
Chemical Society.)(A) Frequency response
curves from Cy5, AcGFP, and modBFP/H148k
in solution showing the span of the cutoff frequencies due to different
photophysical on/off times. (B) Power-dependent cutoff frequency of
Cy5 molecules in aqueous solution with constant 710 nm secondary excitation
intensity (12 kW/cm2) and varied 594 nm primary excitation
intensity.
Applications
Three
crucial aspects of SAFIRe distinguish it from photoswitch-based
methods: (1) Because modulated low-energy (lower than that of collected
fluorescence) secondary illumination is used, SAFIRe modulates only
the desired signal—it does not modulate the background. (2)
The externally defined secondary laser modulation frequency is directly
encoded in the collected fluorescence, and therefore, SAFIRe does
not need an exogenous reference signal for cross-correlation, but
instead a lock-in amplifier or digital signal processing can be directly
utilized without sacrificing signal (Figure 6). (3) SAFIRe is dynamic but has a characteristic frequency. This
frequency results from the rates in and out of the dark state, enabling
resolution of differently modulatable fluorophores based on dark-state
lifetimes and the potential to directly probe the dynamics of complex
systems. As only the fluorescence of interest is modulated, the waveform
used to modulate the amplitude of the secondary laser serves as the
reference for demodulation in either wide-field or confocal geometry
(Figure 3C). The signal visibility gains coupled
with the characteristic frequency response enable applications that
both probe dynamics and visualize weak signals obscured by high, heterogeneous
background (Figure 7).
Figure 6
Selective fluorescence
recovery of mitochondria-targeted AcGFP
in the presence of high nuclear-targeted EGFP fluorescence for (A)
fixed and (B) live NIH 3T3 cells: (leftmost images in (A) and (B))
raw fluorescence of AcGFP-labeled mitochondria and EGFP; (rightmost
images in (A) and (B)) demodulated AcGFP fluorescence. SAFIRe efficiently
eliminates the heterogeneous, unmodulatable EGFP signal and reveals
a >10-fold improved contrast in the demodulated fluorescence images.
For all of the images, the primary laser intensity was held at 5.9
kW/cm2 and the secondary intensity (64 kW/cm2) was modulated at 300 Hz. All scale bars are 10 μm. (Reproduced
with permission from ref (9). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.)
Figure 7
(A) Highly nonlinear titration of the numbers
of Cy5 molecules
with and without constant Texas Red background when FCS was used to
determine the numbers of fluorophores. (B) Plots of FFT amplitude
vs the number of Cy5 molecules, showing that the modulation amplitude
is independent of the presence of the unmodulatable Texas Red background.
Selective fluorescence
recovery of mitochondria-targeted AcGFP
in the presence of high nuclear-targeted EGFP fluorescence for (A)
fixed and (B) live NIH 3T3 cells: (leftmost images in (A) and (B))
raw fluorescence of AcGFP-labeled mitochondria and EGFP; (rightmost
images in (A) and (B)) demodulated AcGFP fluorescence. SAFIRe efficiently
eliminates the heterogeneous, unmodulatable EGFP signal and reveals
a >10-fold improved contrast in the demodulated fluorescence images.
For all of the images, the primary laser intensity was held at 5.9
kW/cm2 and the secondary intensity (64 kW/cm2) was modulated at 300 Hz. All scale bars are 10 μm. (Reproduced
with permission from ref (9). Copyright 2012 American Chemical Society.)
Quantifying Fluorophore Concentrations in
High-Background Solutions
To demonstrate the dynamic range
of modulation for concentration determination, we diluted Cy5 at varying
concentrations in (A) high Texas Red background and (B) pure, fluorescence-free
water. Identical dilutions from the Cy5 stock solutions were used
in the samples (A) and controls (B). Data were collected with dual
laser excitation, exciting and collecting the emission from both Cy5
and Texas Red. The secondary laser (710 nm) was amplitude-modulated
at 1 kHz. Figure 7A shows the comparison between the apparent numbers of molecules
with and without Texas Red background obtained by FCS. The curve is
not linear because the high Texas Red background overwhelms the FCS
analysis at low Cy5 copy numbers. In contrast, plotting the modulated
signal amplitude (the amplitude at the modulation frequency in the
Fourier domain) versus the number of Cy5 molecules as determined by
FCS from the control yielded essentially identical linear curves for
samples with and without Texas Red (Figure 7B). Thus, modulation recovered the true number of Cy5 molecules with
linear scaling down to the single-molecule level independent of the
fluorescent background.(A) Highly nonlinear titration of the numbers
of Cy5 molecules
with and without constant Texas Red background when FCS was used to
determine the numbers of fluorophores. (B) Plots of FFT amplitude
vs the number of Cy5 molecules, showing that the modulation amplitude
is independent of the presence of the unmodulatable Texas Red background.
Cellular
Imaging and Fluorescent Protein Discrimination
Utilizing
Ag nanodots,[1] organic dyes,[12] and fluorescent proteins,[9,13] we
have employed SAFIRe to improve the contrast in fixed- and live-cell
imaging. Figure 6 demonstrates that modulatable
AcGFP-labeled features can be selectively recovered from both autofluorescence
and spectrally indistinguishable but unmodulatble EGFP background
in a modulated confocal geometry. The signal visibility was improved
by >10-fold through SAFIRe-based demodulation with a lock-in amplifier.
Analogously, although BFPs are typically rarely used because of problems
with high autofluorescence background, we identified modulatable variants
that enable wide-field SAFIRe imaging to essentially remove all of
the autofluorescence background. We demonstrated signal gains of our
SAFIRe scheme on mitochondria-targeted modBFP/H148K in live NIH 3T3
cells (Figure 8). The contrast for features
of interest was again enhanced more than 5-fold after removal of the
intrinsic inhomogeneous autofluorescence.
Figure 8
Live-cell demodulation
of mitochondria-targeted modBFP/H148K. Upon
405 nm illumination, blue fluorescence was collected from modBFP/H148K-mito
mixed with high background emission. Coillumination at 514.5 nm modulated
at 2 Hz (secondary illumination only within the white circle) recovered
only the modBFP/H148K-mito signal on a greatly reduced background
(lower circle). The scale bar is 20 μm. (Reproduced with permission
from ref (13). Copyright
2013 American Chemical Society.)
Live-cell demodulation
of mitochondria-targeted modBFP/H148K. Upon
405 nm illumination, blue fluorescence was collected from modBFP/H148K-mito
mixed with high background emission. Coillumination at 514.5 nm modulated
at 2 Hz (secondary illumination only within the white circle) recovered
only the modBFP/H148K-mito signal on a greatly reduced background
(lower circle). The scale bar is 20 μm. (Reproduced with permission
from ref (13). Copyright
2013 American Chemical Society.)
Selective Fluorescent Detection within Tissue
Mimics
Medical imaging using fluorescence faces many substantial
challenges. Penetration depths are typically sub-millimeter, even
for near-IR wavelengths, and tissue autofluorescence poses detection
challenges for low-concentration dyes buried at depths beyond 1 mm.
To gauge the potential of SAFIRe-based detection for in vivo fluorescence
studies, we embedded tissue-mimicking phantoms containing 100 nM (modulatable)
Cy5 and 235 nM (unmodulatable) Texas Red within much larger non-Cy5-containing
skin tissue mimics that were otherwise identical. All of the phantoms
were composed of talc-France perfume powder (40 mg/mL), polystyrene
beads (3 μm diameter, 1 mg/mL), and Texas Red (235 nM) in sodium
alginate aqueous gels that were cross-linked in 80 mM calcium chloride
aqueous solution for 40 min. Texas Red was used to mimic intrinsic
autofluorescence in real tissue.[10] As shown
in Figure 9A, acceptable SNRs were obtained
when the doped phantom was buried as deep as 6 mm within the highly
scattering and brightly fluorescent skin tissue mimics. Furthermore,
Figure 9B,C shows that we can correctly determine
the depth of the Cy5-doped phantom. Because we modulate ground-state
populations, many absorption-based contrast mechanisms become possible
with analogous methods, all with laser intensities that should not
exceed the maximum permissible skin exposure.
Figure 9
(A) Comparison of experimental
and computed emission signals of
Cy5 buried within high-background skin-tissue-mimicking phantoms.
(B) Schematic of an emitter 4 mm deep within the tissue phantom. (C)
Experimentally determined and finite element-calculated FFT signals
at the 100 Hz modulation frequency when the 0.5 mm thick Cy5-loaded
phantom was fixed at a depth of 4 mm. (Reproduced with permission
from ref (10). Copyright
2013 American Chemical Society.)
(A) Comparison of experimental
and computed emission signals of
Cy5 buried within high-background skin-tissue-mimicking phantoms.
(B) Schematic of an emitter 4 mm deep within the tissue phantom. (C)
Experimentally determined and finite element-calculated FFT signals
at the 100 Hz modulation frequency when the 0.5 mm thick Cy5-loaded
phantom was fixed at a depth of 4 mm. (Reproduced with permission
from ref (10). Copyright
2013 American Chemical Society.)
Conclusion
We have applied the principles
of molecular modulation to fluorescence
detection and live-cell imaging. By designing and characterizing new
fluorophores for biological imaging, we have expanded the dimensionality
of fluorescence imaging by using dark-state lifetime as an additional
discriminating feature. Furthermore, the dark-state dynamics can now
be studied in bulk, as characteristic lifetimes become observable
without having to resort to single-molecule or fluctuation-based experiments.
Because the dynamics change as a result of new time scales being present,
a wide array of new experiments become possible to probe diffusion,
binding, and photophysical dynamics in bulk studies that were previously
unobservable. The long-wavelength modulation increases the fluorescence
without generating any additional background in the higher-energy
fluorescence detection channel. The fluorescence signal of interest
is shifted away from all of the background to unique detection frequencies
that have orders of magnitude lower noise, thereby enhancing both
the signal visibility and sensitivity in complex, high-background
systems. Signal visibilities in biological systems have been enhanced
by up to 2 orders of magnitude, but further gains are possible as
nearly shot-noise-limited detection is recovered. Through continued
fluorophore development and utilization, we expect to make further
sensitivity gains that enable ever finer features and dynamics to
be probed in living systems.
Authors: Gerard Marriott; Shu Mao; Tomoyo Sakata; Jing Ran; David K Jackson; Chutima Petchprayoon; Timothy J Gomez; Erica Warp; Orapim Tulyathan; Holly L Aaron; Ehud Y Isacoff; Yuling Yan Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-11-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ute Resch-Genger; Markus Grabolle; Sara Cavaliere-Jaricot; Roland Nitschke; Thomas Nann Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Amy E Jablonski; Jung-Cheng Hsiang; Pritha Bagchi; Nathan Hull; Chris I Richards; Christoph J Fahrni; Robert M Dickson Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Pavel Leiderman; Liat Genosar; Dan Huppert; Xiaokun Shu; S James Remington; Kyril M Solntsev; Laren M Tolbert Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2007-10-06 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Daniel P Mahoney; Eric A Owens; Chaoyang Fan; Jung-Cheng Hsiang; Maged M Henary; Robert M Dickson Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Baijie Peng; Ryan Dikdan; Shannon E Hill; Athéna C Patterson-Orazem; Raquel L Lieberman; Christoph J Fahrni; Robert M Dickson Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.466