| Literature DB >> 16299475 |
Nathan C Shaner1, Paul A Steinbach, Roger Y Tsien.
Abstract
The recent explosion in the diversity of available fluorescent proteins (FPs) promises a wide variety of new tools for biological imaging. With no unified standard for assessing these tools, however, a researcher is faced with difficult questions. Which FPs are best for general use? Which are the brightest? What additional factors determine which are best for a given experiment? Although in many cases, a trial-and-error approach may still be necessary in determining the answers to these questions, a unified characterization of the best available FPs provides a useful guide in narrowing down the options.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16299475 DOI: 10.1038/nmeth819
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Methods ISSN: 1548-7091 Impact factor: 28.547