| Literature DB >> 24723959 |
Jiangang Liu1, Karoline Peter2, Dazhuo Shi1, Lei Zhang1, Guoju Dong1, Dawu Zhang1, Heimo Breiteneder2, Rudolf Bauer3, Johannes Jakowitsch4, Yan Ma2.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-inflammatory profiling of the Chinese herbal formula Sini Tang (SNT) in myocardial infarction (MI) rats. SNT, a decoction consisting of four herbs: Aconitum carmichaelii, Cinnamomum cassia, Zingiber officinale, and Glycyrrhiza uralensis, was characterized as a remedy to treat syndromes corresponding to heart failure and MI in China. Potential biomarkers, which reflect the extent of myocardial necrosis and correlate with cardiac outcomes following MI, such as atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor- α , interleukin-6, and interleukin-1 β (TNF- α , IL-6, and IL-1 β ) were determined in plasma, serum, and in myocardial tissue of MI rats after treatment with SNT. Our data indicate that SNT decreased significantly the levels of hs-CRP, TNF- α , IL-6, and IL-1 β in MI rats. SNT decreased the expression of ANP levels in plasma and increased the vascular active marker nitric oxide, which limits vascular inflammation. In addition, SNT could decrease the expression of endothelin-1 levels in rat plasma post-MI. Our data suggest that the Chinese herbal formula SNT has the potential to improve cardiac function after MI. SNT may be a candidate for treating MI and its associated inflammatory responses.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24723959 PMCID: PMC3958768 DOI: 10.1155/2014/309378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Composition of the Chinese herbal formula SNT.
| Pin Yin | Chinese | Common | Latin | Amount/weight ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhi Fu Zi |
| Aconite |
| 6 |
| Rou Gui |
| Cinnamon |
| 1 |
| Gan Jiang |
| Ginger |
| 3 |
| Jiu Gan Cao |
| Licorice |
| 8 |
The experimental rats groups. Drugs and decocts diluted with distilled drinking water were administered orally once a day for 30 days starting two days after induction of AMI.
| Group | Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD |
|
| 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Operation | Sham | AMI | AMI | AMI | AMI |
| Oral administration | DW | DW | 0.9 mg/kg | 4.5 g/kg | 13.5 g/kg |
Sham: sham operated.
AMI: induced acute myocardial infarction.
DW: drinking water.
FS: fosinopril sodium (0.9 mg/kg).
SNT-LD: low dose of SNT (4.5 g/kg).
SNT-HD: high dose of SNT (13.5 g/kg).
Figure 1Quality control and toxicity evaluation of SNT by HPLC. (a) HPLC measurement of SNT. (b) The standard solution of diester-diterpenoid alkaloids: (1) mesaconitine, (2) hypaconitine, and (3) aconitine. mAU: milli absorption units.
Echocardiographic parameters overview of ventricular remodeling effects.
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Remodeling effects (versus model) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVDs (mm) | 0.91 ± 0.20 | 6.44 ± 1.59** | 3.81 ± 1.21∗∗▲▲ | 4.95 ± 1.95** | 3.74 ± 1.47∗∗▲▲ | ↓ |
| LVDd (mm) | 3.29 ± 0.81 | 6.24 ± 0.72** | 4.45 ± 1.28 | 5.37 ± 1.78 | 4.87 ± 1.47 | ↓ |
| EF (%) | 93.32 ± 2.94 | 55.48 ± 12.89** | 78.03 ± 10.70∗▲▲ | 69.69 ± 13.91∗∗▲ | 77.83 ± 12.32∗▲▲ | ↑ |
| IS (mm2) | 38.04 ± 8.35 | 23.91 ± 7.99▲▲ | 31.25 ± 10.68 | 27.81 ± 4.91▲ | ↓ |
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 versus sham group; ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 2Echocardiographic parameters. (a) Echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular dimension at end systole (LVDs), (b) left ventricular dimension at end diastole (LVDd), (c) left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and (d) infarct size results.
Overview of vascular functional index marker expression levels in serum or in plasma ().
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Expression levels (versus model) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET (ng/L) | 161.40 ± 13.95 | 171.09 ± 13.17 | 166.15 ± 9.01 | 166.74 ± 7.70 | 158.49 ± 9.97 | ↓ |
| NO (µmol/L) | 54.04 ± 11.88 | 48.18 ± 10.14 | 53.78 ± 6.24 | 53.06 ± 11.54 | 64.85 ± 8.74▲ | ↑ |
| NO/ET | 3.35 | 2.83 | 3.24 | 3.18 | 4.09∗∗▲▲ | ↑ |
| ANP (ng/L) | 250.00 ± 21.32 | 367.34 ± 43.20 | 222.26 ± 80.25 | 224.82 ± 80.19 | 189.05 ± 49.96▲ | ↓ |
ET and ANP were measured in plasma. NO was measured in serum.
**P < 0.01 versus sham group, ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 3Effects of SNT on ANP, ET-1 levels in plasma, and NO levels in serum. ANP (atrial natriuretic peptide) levels (a) and ET-1 (endothelin-1) levels (b) in plasma. NO (nitric oxide) levels in serum (c). ANP and NO levels of the SNT-HD group were significantly more different than those of the model group (P < 0.05).
Overview of inflammatory factors and cytokines levels in serum and in myocardial tissue.
| Sham | Model | FS | SNT-LD | SNT-HD | Expression levels (versus model) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In serum | ||||||
| hs-CRP (mg/L) | 4.53 ± 0.66 | 6.71 ± 0.70** | 5.02 ± 0.71▲▲ | 3.94 ± 0.61▲▲ | 3.97 ± 0.77▲▲ | ↓ |
| IL-6 (ng/L) | 204.17 ± 39.83 | 240.65 ± 27.80 | 210.60 ± 38.83 | 196.81 ± 22.68 | 202.55 ± 37.37 | ↓ |
| TNF- | 23.38 ± 7.10 | 33.23 ± 5.78** | 22.17 ± 8.66▲ | 25.61 ± 7.57 | 23.94 ± 4.27▲ | ↓ |
| IL-1 | 157.15 ± 17.34 | 199.86 ± 25.44** | 151.17 ± 16.62▲▲ | 170.91 ± 15.09▲ | 170.8 ± 23.30▲ | ↓ |
| In myocardial tissue | ||||||
| IL-1 | 29.73 ± 1.53 | 41.56 ± 6.08** | 32.85 ± 3.64▲ | 37.32 ± 4.89 | 30.37 ± 1.91▲▲ | ↓ |
**P < 0.01 versus sham group; ▲ P < 0.05, ▲▲ P < 0.01 versus model group.
Figure 4Effects of SNT on the levels of inflammatory factors in serum and myocardial tissue. The hs-CRP levels (a) of the FS and the SNT treatment groups showed significant decreases in comparison to the model group (P < 0.01). The IL-6 levels in serum (b) were reduced in the FS and SNT treatment groups. The TNF-α levels (c) of the treatment groups were reduced. FS and the SNT-HD groups showed significant decreases in comparison to the model group (P < 0.05). The IL-1β levels in serum (d) were reduced in the FS and SNT groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05 versus model group, resp.). The IL-1β levels in myocardial tissue (e) were reduced in the FS and SNT groups and significantly in the FS and SNT-HD groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, resp.) compared to model group.