| Literature DB >> 26379750 |
Fatiqa Zafar1, Nazish Jahan1, Ahrar Khan2, Waseem Akram3.
Abstract
The present study was designed to develop safer, effective, and viable cardioprotective herbal combination to control oxidative stress related cardiac ailments as new alternatives to synthetic drugs. The synergetic cardioprotective potential of herbal combination of four plants T. arjuna (T.A.), P. nigrum (P.N), C. grandiflorus (C), and C. oxyacantha (Cr) was assessed through curative and preventive mode of treatment. In preventive mode of treatment, the cardiac injury was induced with synthetic catecholamine (salbutamol) to pretreated rabbits with the proposed herbal combination for three weeks. In curative mode of treatment, cardiotoxicity/oxidative stress was induced in rabbits with salbutamol prior to treating them with plant mixture. Cardiac marker enzymes, lipids profile, and antioxidant enzymes as biomarker of cardiotoxicity were determined in experimental animals. Rabbits administrated with mere salbutamol showed a significant increase in cardiac marker enzymes and lipid profile and decrease in antioxidant enzymes as compared to normal control indicating cardiotoxicity and myocardial cell necrosis. However, pre- and postadministration of plant mixture appreciably restored the levels of all biomarkers. Histopathological examination confirmed that the said combination was safer cardioprotective product.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26379750 PMCID: PMC4563096 DOI: 10.1155/2015/734903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Conditions used for HPLC analysis.
| Column | Shim-Pack CLC-ODS (C-18), 25 cm × 4.6 mm, 5 |
|
| |
| Mobile phase | Gradient: A (H2O : AA—94 : 6, pH = 2.27), B (CAN 100%), 0–15 min = 15% B, 15–30 = 45% B, 30–45 = 100% B |
|
| |
| Flow rate | 1 mL/min |
|
| |
| Detector | UV-visible detector. 280 nm |
|
| |
| Temperature | RT |
|
| |
| Range | Bipolar, 1250 mV, 10 samples per sec. |
|
| |
| Detection | Gradient |
Figure 1HPLC analysis of polyphenolic contents of four medicinal plants.
Preventive cardioprotective effect of herbal combination on cardiac enzymes in different experimental groups.
| Groups | CK-MB (IU/L) | LDH (IU/L) | AST (IU/L) | ALT (IU/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control | 35.5 ± 0.32 | 545.8 ± 2.24 | 37.26 ± 0.37 | 45.6 ± 0.41 |
| Salbutamol control group | 80.4 ± 0.47 | 859.5 ± 3.57 | 113.5 ± 0.83 | 140.7 ± 0.63 |
| Base line group | 22.8 ± 0.27# | 539.7 ± 4.01# | 36.8 ± 0.54# | 49.5 ± 0.84# |
| Herbal mixture + (salbutamol) | 38.2 ± 0.48# | 551.5 ± 2.07# | 39.7 ± 0.55# | 62.4 ± 1.05# |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Preventive cardioprotective effect of herbal combination on lipid profile in different experimental groups.
| Groups | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | Triglyceride (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal control group | 42 ± 0.45 | 118.5 ± 1.43 | 26 ± 0.34 | 45.6 ± 0.47 |
| Salbutamol control group | 86.2 ± 0.39 | 342.4 ± 1.64 | 57.6 ± 0.63 | 32.4 ± 0.36 |
| Base line group | 49.5 ± 0.63# | 164 ± 1.83# | 19 ± 0.14# | 55 ± 0.48# |
| Herbal mixture + salbutamol | 55.5 ± 0.83# | 203.8 ± 0.54# | 29.5 ± 0.47# | 43.7 ± 0.31# |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Curative cardioprotective effect of herbal combination on cardiac marker (enzymes) in different experimental groups.
| Enzyme | Day | Normal control | Salbutamol control | Salbutamol + herbal mixture | Standard drug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK-MB (IU/L) | 1 | 35.3 ± 0.50 | 80.3 ± 1.32 | 59.3 ± 0.49# | 67.8 ± 1.06 |
| 2 | 34.5 ± 0.35 | 81.5 ± 1.42 | 57.67 ± 0.54# | 61.2 ± 1.67 | |
| 3 | 36.1 ± 0.54 | 83.7 ± 2.12 | 48.3 ± 0.76# | 57.3 ± 2.32# | |
| 4 | 32.7 ± 0.62 | 85.2 ± 1.37 | 39.25 ± 0.53# | 49.8 ± 2.10# | |
| 5 | 33.8 ± 0.47 | 82.8 ± 1.02 | 37.6 ± 0.67# | 42.7 ± 1.84# | |
|
| |||||
| AST (IU/L) | 1 | 37 ± 0.43 | 113.6 ± 0.86 | 95.3 ± 0.96 | 101.7 ± 2.5 |
| 2 | 35.67 ± 0.70 | 114.1 ± 0.74 | 51.33 ± 1.76# | 97.25 ± 2.47 | |
| 3 | 36.8 ± 0.23 | 113.7 ± 0.97 | 45.0 ± 1.65# | 66.34 ± 3.10# | |
| 4 | 35.1 ± 0.87 | 113.5 ± 0.75 | 41.67 ± 1.45# | 61.9 ± 2.95# | |
| 5 | 37.2 ± 0.56 | 114.3 ± 1.02 | 39.4 ± 2.01# | 54.3 ± 1.95# | |
|
| |||||
| ALT (IU/L) | 1 | 45 ± 1.43 | 142.4 ± 1.23 | 139 ± 1.87 | 147.3 ± 3.10 |
| 2 | 43.3 ± 1.62 | 142.9 ± 1.54 | 136 ± 2.43 | 135.6 ± 2.73 | |
| 3 | 42.7 ± 1.45 | 143.7 ± 3.02 | 93.3 ± 2.56# | 133.8 ± 2.74 | |
| 4 | 45.5 ± 1.56 | 141.8 ± 2.31 | 83.67 ± 2.12# | 113 ± 2.43 | |
| 5 | 47.3 ± 1.76 | 144.2 ± 2.13 | 60.33 ± 1.98# | 69.8 ± 3.45# | |
|
| |||||
| LDH (IU/L) | 1 | 545.2 ± 2.43 | 859.2 ± 4.35 | 747.6 ± 4.71 | 810.5 ± 7.23 |
| 2 | 549.5 ± 2.87 | 859.6 ± 3.84 | 609.7 ± 2.54# | 771.5 ± 6.34 | |
| 3 | 542.8 ± 2.61 | 857.3 ± 4.71 | 588 ± 3.78# | 634 ± 9.33 | |
| 4 | 547.2 ± 3.54 | 855.1 ± 3.42 | 567 ± 9.32# | 588.5 ± 7.83# | |
| 5 | 541.3 ± 2.69 | 860.3 ± 5.67 | 549.6 ± 5.43# | 552.7 ± 5.99# | |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Curative cardioprotective effect of herbal combination on lipids in different experimental groups.
| Enzyme | Day | Normal control | Salbutamol control | Salbutamol + herbal mixture | Standard drug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 1 | 42.3 ± 0.73 | 102.0 ± 3.45 | 98.7 ± 1.33 | 104 ± 0.64 |
| 2 | 42.7 ± 0.43 | 102.8 ± 3.87 | 86.3 ± 1.06# | 101 ± 0.71 | |
| 3 | 45.3 ± 0.56 | 101.3 ± 2.56 | 80.0 ± 1.43# | 76.5 ± 0.48# | |
| 4 | 43.5 ± 0.37 | 100.8 ± 2.76 | 67.8 ± 1.01# | 69.7 ± 0.82# | |
| 5 | 44.25 ± 0.92 | 103.1 ± 1.99 | 53.4 ± 0.43# | 56.4 ± 0.58# | |
|
| |||||
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 1 | 118.7 ± 1.56 | 342.6 ± 3.07 | 326.7 ± 1.47 | 340.7 ± 1.19 |
| 2 | 117.9 ± 2.62 | 341.8 ± 2.25 | 305.2 ± 1.94 | 338.8 ± 1.35 | |
| 3 | 118.1 ± 3.27 | 343.6 ± 2.52 | 273.8 ± 1.54# | 321.4 ± 1.39 | |
| 4 | 119.1 ± 2.97 | 342.1 ± 2.87 | 236.5 ± 1.43# | 212.3 ± 1.09# | |
| 5 | 116.6 ± 3.11 | 340.2 ± 3.67 | 147.7 ± 1.65# | 192.7 ± 1.62# | |
|
| |||||
| LDL (mg/dL) | 1 | 26.1 ± 1.96 | 57.0 ± 0.38 | 51.67 ± 0.23 | 55.4 ± 1.26 |
| 2 | 26.8 ± 1.62 | 56.8 ± 0.87 | 48.3 ± 0.27 | 49.4 ± 1.33 | |
| 3 | 23.6 ± 1.68 | 57.7 ± 0.59 | 47.7 ± 0.34 | 43.8 ± 1.93 | |
| 4 | 22.9 ± 0.99 | 55.9 ± 0.48 | 36.67 ± 0.41# | 36.6 ± 1.35# | |
| 5 | 24.1 ± 0.57 | 55.4 ± 0.79 | 25.33 ± 0.22# | 35.8 ± 1.29# | |
|
| |||||
| HDL (mg/dL) | 1 | 45.7 ± 1.66 | 31.5 ± 1.32 | 31.33 ± 0.43 | 33.3 ± 1.37 |
| 2 | 43.9 ± 1.59 | 33.2 ± 1.61 | 33.5 ± 0.97 | 35.6 ± 1.40 | |
| 3 | 44.3 ± 1.39 | 32.4 ± 0.99 | 38.3 ± 0.68 | 38.33 ± 0.9 | |
| 4 | 42.8 ± 2.56 | 31.8 ± 2.01 | 42.1 ± 1.3 | 40.2 ± 0.86 | |
| 5 | 43.1 ± 1.84 | 32.4 ± 1.03 | 43.3 ± 1.04 | 41.5 ± 0.37 | |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Level of antioxidant enzymes (Units/g of wt.) in different experimental groups of rabbit.
| Antioxidant enzyme | Control | Salbutamol control | Herbal mixture + salbutamol | Salbutamol + herbal mixture | Standard drug |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superoxide dismutase (SOD) | 95.42 ± 0.54 | 49.73 ± 0.64 | 66.45 ± 0.69# | 99.68 ± 0.86# | 44 .54 ± 0.47 |
| Catalase | 403.07 ± 0.87 | 61.00 ± 0.58 | 62.00 ± 0.47 | 400.00 ± 1.74# | 937.43 ± 1.46# |
| Peroxidase | 810.3 ± 1.32 | 730 ± 1.04 | 1800 ± 1.76# | 600 ± 1.26# | 1205.7 ± 1.73# |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Weight of different body organs of different experimental groups.
| Groups | Heart | Liver | Lungs | Kidney | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | ||||
| Normal control | 2.5 | 20.6 | 4.7 | 5 | 5.1 |
| Salbutamol control | 5.1 | 34.2 | 11 | 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Preventive group | 2.5# | 20.2# | 5.1# | 4.8# | 4.9# |
| Curative group | 3.3 | 33.8 | 7.5 | 5.2 | 4.4# |
| Standard drug | 2.8# | 41.1 | 9.1 | 5# | 5.3 |
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (SEM) for n = 3.
Significantly different from normal control.
#Significantly different from salbutamol control.
Gross pathology of different groups of experimental rabbits.
| Groups | Heart | Liver | Lungs | Kidney | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | ||||
| Normal control | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Salbutamol control | Enlarged, hard, and necrosis | Normal | Congested | Slight necrosis congested | Hemorrhage and congested |
| Preventive | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Curative | Slightly congested | Normal | Normal | Normal | Normal |
| Standard drug | Normal | Normal | Congested | Normal | Slight necrosis |
Figure 2Histopathological architecture of heart of different experimental groups.