Literature DB >> 24723270

Evaluation of fixation stability using different targets with the MP1 microperimeter.

M Cesareo1, D Manca2, E Ciuffoletti2, V De Giovanni2, F Ricci2, C Nucci2, L Cerulli2.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate fixation stability using two different fixation targets with the Nidek MP1 microperimeter. Twenty-nine healthy subjects with a mean age of 26.53 ± 7.35 years and visual acuity ≥0.0 logMAR were enrolled in this study. Fifty-eight eyes of 29 patients without ophthalmic and/or systemic disease underwent a fixation test with the MP1 microperimeter. Fixation stability related to a red cross (central) and/or a red circle (pericentral) target was quantified using either Fujii classification or by calculating the bivariate contour ellipse area (BCEA). For statistical analysis, BCEA values were converted into their logarithms (logBCEA) and all data obtained were analyzed using paired Student's t test. The inclination values of the axis of BCEA were analyzed with Chi squared test. The mean values of logBCEA and the mean values of the major and minor axis of the ellipses related to the cross and the circle fixation target were significantly different (68.2 %, p = 0.00; 95.4 %, p = 0.00; 99.6 %, p = 0.00, respectively) for each BCEA standard deviation. Fixation was significantly less stable for the pericentral fixation target in normal subjects, indicating an advantage for central fixation targets. These results are of particular interest when evaluation of changes in fixation is needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bivariate contour ellipse area; Fixation stability; Fixation targets; Microperimeter

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723270     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-014-9924-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.031


  16 in total

1.  Fixation stability: a comparison between the Nidek MP-1 and the Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope in persons with and without diabetic maculopathy.

Authors:  Hannah M P Dunbar; Michael D Crossland; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Fixation pattern in healthy subjects during microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Fredrik P Källmark; Jan Ygge
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2008-06

3.  Intrasession repeatability of fixation stability assessment with the Nidek MP-1.

Authors:  Fred K Chen; Praveen J Patel; Wen Xing; Michael D Crossland; Catey Bunce; Gary S Rubin; Lyndon Da Cruz
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma.

Authors:  S G Whittaker; J Budd; R W Cummings
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Preferred retinal locus development in patients with macular disease.

Authors:  Michael D Crossland; Louise E Culham; Stamatina A Kabanarou; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Fixation stability using central and pericentral fixation targets in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Caren Bellmann; Mary Feely; Michael D Crossland; Stamatina A Kabanarou; Gary S Rubin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The oculomotor reference in humans with bilateral macular disease.

Authors:  J M White; H E Bedell
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Patient selection for macular translocation surgery using the scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Gildo Y Fujii; Eugene de Juan; Janet Sunness; Mark S Humayun; Dante J Pieramici; Tom S Chang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Fixation characteristics of patients with macular degeneration recorded with the mp-1 microperimeter.

Authors:  Luminita Tarita-Nistor; Esther G González; Samuel N Markowitz; Martin J Steinbach
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  A microperimeter that provides fixation pattern and retinal sensitivity measurement.

Authors:  Miki Sawa; Fumi Gomi; Ayako Toyoda; Yasushi Ikuno; Takashi Fujikado; Yasuo Tano
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.211

View more
  6 in total

1.  Smaller Fixation Target Size Is Associated with More Stable Fixation and Less Variance in Threshold Sensitivity.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Kana Okano; Risako Koshiji; Wakana Funaki; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessment of the retinal posterior pole in dominant optic atrophy by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry.

Authors:  Massimo Cesareo; Elena Ciuffoletti; Alessio Martucci; Jacopo Sebastiani; Roberto Pietro Sorge; Eleonora Lamantea; Barbara Garavaglia; Federico Ricci; Andrea Cusumano; Carlo Nucci; Francesco Brancati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Variability in monocular and binocular fixation during standard automated perimetry.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Kaoru Kobayashi; Asuka Shibamoto; Houmi Tobari; Yuki Fukuda; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Quantitative Evaluation of the Association Between Fixation Stability and Phoria During Short-Term Binocular Viewing.

Authors:  Sang-Yeob Kim; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Hyun Gug Cho; Dong-Sik Yu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Measurement of Fixational Eye Movements With the Head-Mounted Perimeter Imo.

Authors:  Takuya Ishibashi; Chota Matsumoto; Hiroki Nomoto; Fumi Tanabe; Ikumi Narita; Marika Ishibashi; Sachiko Okuyama; Tomoyasu Kayazawa; Shinji Kimura; Kenzo Yamanaka; Shunji Kusaka
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.048

6.  Comparison of size modulation and conventional standard automated perimetry with the 24-2 test protocol in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Nobuyuki Shoji; Masayuki Kasahara; Kazuhiro Matsumura; Kimiya Shimizu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.