Literature DB >> 3338884

Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma.

S G Whittaker1, J Budd, R W Cummings.   

Abstract

People with macular scotoma tend to read and visually scan more slowly than others with equivalently reduced visual acuity but intact central fields. We measured fixation eye movements and considered the contribution of fixation variability and centripetal eye drift to poor visual performance. These factors might confound efforts to consistently use an optimum retinal locus outside of the macula. We measured monocular horizontal and vertical eye movements using a search coil eyetracker while subjects with naturally occurring central scotomata or control subjects with simulated scotomata eccentrically fixated a single character that was sized to their visual acuity. Motivated subjects with long-standing stable maculopathies were chosen to estimate attainable performance limits. During attempts to eccentrically fixate, an ubiquitous foveal pursuit or centripetal drift tendency was not found; rather a pattern of drift was idiosyncratic from subject to subject. This finding was confirmed by an analysis of eye drift of 32 eyes with long-standing bilateral macular scotomata. Moreover, the eye drift speeds (15-200 minarc/sec) were too low to be of functional significance. Drift speeds during eccentric fixation with a visible target were not significantly different than those after the target was extinguished; however, drift speeds were greater than during foveal fixation. This suggests that the fovea has a specialized control of slow eye movements. Fixation variability increased with scotoma size for both simulated and real scotomata, with an abrupt rise when scotomata diameters exceeded 20 degrees C. A significant minority of subjects (39%) adopted two or more distinct preferred retinal loci (PRL) during fixation. Multiple PRL were also more likely if scotoma size exceeded 20 degrees C. Reasonably steady fixation is thus attainable when central scotoma sizes are smaller than approximately 20 degrees C.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3338884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  41 in total

1.  Neural correlates of visual search in patients with hereditary retinal dystrophies.

Authors:  Tina Plank; Jozef Frolo; Fatima Farzana; Sabine Brandl-Rühle; Agnes B Renner; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Initiation and stability of pursuit eye movements in simulated retinal prosthesis at different implant locations.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Liancheng Yang; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Reading strategies in Stargardt's disease with foveal sparing.

Authors:  Mira Goldschmidt; Anouk Déruaz; Erika N Lorincz; Andrew R Whatham; Christophe Mermoud; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2010-01-22

6.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in amblyopia: Limitations on fixation stability and acuity?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Girish Kumar; Roger W Li; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Characteristics of fixational eye movements in people with macular disease.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Peripheral vision and hazard detection with average phakic and pseudophakic optical errors.

Authors:  Abinaya Priya Venkataraman; Robert Rosén; Aixa Alarcon Heredia; Patricia Piers; Carmen Canovas Vidal; Linda Lundström
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The Glenn A. Fry Award Lecture 2012: Plasticity of the visual system following central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.