Partha Sen1, Avinash V Dharmadhikari2, Tadeusz Majewski3, Mahmoud A Mohammad1, Tanya V Kalin4, Joanna Zabielska5, Xiaomeng Ren4, Molly Bray6, Hannah M Brown7, Stephen Welty1, Sundararajah Thevananther8, Claire Langston9, Przemyslaw Szafranski10, Monica J Justice2, Vladimir V Kalinichenko4, Anna Gambin11, John Belmont12, Pawel Stankiewicz2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 2. Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Interdepartmental Program in Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 3. Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 4. Division of Pulmonary Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America. 5. Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. 6. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America. 7. Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Robinson Research Institute, School of Pediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Interdepartmental Program in Translational Biology and Molecular Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 9. Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 10. Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America. 11. Institute of Informatics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. 12. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America; Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Abstract
Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins (ACDMPV) is a developmental disorder of the lungs, primarily affecting their vasculature. FOXF1 haploinsufficiency due to heterozygous genomic deletions and point mutations have been reported in most patients with ACDMPV. The majority of mice with heterozygous loss-of-function of Foxf1 exhibit neonatal lethality with evidence of pulmonary hemorrhage in some of them. By comparing transcriptomes of human ACDMPV lungs with control lungs using expression arrays, we found that several genes and pathways involved in lung development, angiogenesis, and in pulmonary hypertension development, were deregulated. Similar transcriptional changes were found in lungs of the postnatal day 0.5 Foxf1+/- mice when compared to their wildtype littermate controls; 14 genes, COL15A1, COL18A1, COL6A2, ESM1, FSCN1, GRINA, IGFBP3, IL1B, MALL, NOS3, RASL11B, MATN2, PRKCDBP, and SIRPA, were found common to both ACDMPV and Foxf1 heterozygous lungs. Our results advance knowledge toward understanding of the molecular mechanism of ACDMPV, lung development, and its vasculature pathology. These data may also be useful for understanding etiologies of other lung disorders, e.g. pulmonary hypertension, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or cancer.
Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins (ACDMPV) is a developmental disorder of the lungs, primarily affecting their vasculature. FOXF1 haploinsufficiency due to heterozygous genomic deletions and point mutations have been reported in most patients with ACDMPV. The majority of mice with heterozygous loss-of-function of Foxf1 exhibit neonatal lethality with evidence of pulmonary hemorrhage in some of them. By comparing transcriptomes of human ACDMPV lungs with control lungs using expression arrays, we found that several genes and pathways involved in lung development, angiogenesis, and in pulmonary hypertension development, were deregulated. Similar transcriptional changes were found in lungs of the postnatal day 0.5 Foxf1+/- mice when compared to their wildtype littermate controls; 14 genes, COL15A1, COL18A1, COL6A2, ESM1, FSCN1, GRINA, IGFBP3, IL1B, MALL, NOS3, RASL11B, MATN2, PRKCDBP, and SIRPA, were found common to both ACDMPV and Foxf1 heterozygous lungs. Our results advance knowledge toward understanding of the molecular mechanism of ACDMPV, lung development, and its vasculature pathology. These data may also be useful for understanding etiologies of other lung disorders, e.g. pulmonary hypertension, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or cancer.
Alveolar Capillary Dysplasia with Misalignment of Pulmonary Veins (ACDMPV; MIM# 265380) is a rare developmental disorder of the lung [1]. ACDMPV was first described by McMahon [2] and its genetic basis emerged as more patients [3] and familial cases were reported [4]. The primary diagnostic features of ACDMPV include misalignment (malposition) of pulmonary veins, medial thickening of smooth muscles in pulmonary arteries, hyperplasia of alveolar epithelium, and drastically decreased number of capillaries and lobular underdevelopment [5]. Approximately one third of the patients also have lymphangiectasis. The disease usually presents within a few hours after birth although late presentations have been reported [6], [7]. Treatment, including high pressure oxygen, nitric oxide, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) [8]–[11], and more recently Sildenafil [12], only provide temporary relief as the disease is uniformly lethal. Most patients die within the first few weeks of life although some prolonged survivals have been described [13]. The majority of the patients with ACDMPV also have extra-pulmonary anomalies, including gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and genitourinary systems [14].We have shown that ACDMPV results from haploinsufficiency of FOXF1
[15]. To date 42 point mutations and 18 genomic deletions involving FOXF1 or its upstream regulatory region have been identified in patients with ACDMPV [15]–[17]. Interestingly, our recent work has indicated that FOXF1 is incompletely paternally imprinted in human lungs [17], [18]. Foxf1
+/− mice exhibit neonatal mortality similar to humaninfants with ACDMPV and die due to defects in vasculogenesis and alveolarization [19]. They also demonstrate other foregut malformations such as narrowing of the esophagus and trachea, esophageal atresia and trachea-esophageal fistula [20]. Unlike in humans, Foxf1 was not found to be imprinted in mice (data not shown).To better understand the molecular bases of ACDMPV and to identify major genes and pathways involved in lung development, we performed comparative analyses of lung transcriptomes in patients with ACDMPV and in Foxf1
+/− mice using Human Ref-8 v3 and Mouse WG-6 v2 Expression BeadChip Illumina microarrays, respectively.
Materials and Methods
Ethics Statement
Patients with histopathologically-verified ACDMPV were recruited after signing consent for the study, Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol # H-8712 “Molecular genetics of Alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins (ACDMPV)” approved by the IRB for Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) and Affiliated Hospitals. All mouse experiments were carried out under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at BCM. Mice were housed in the TransgenicMouse Facility (barrier level 3) under the care of the Center for Comparative Medicine (CCM), which is accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC).
Patients
The clinical descriptions are shown in Table 1. Patients 3 and 6 were of Hispanic ethnicity and the remainder were Caucasians. Patients 2–8 had sporadic ACDMPV and patient 1 represents a familial case with neither point mutation in FOXF1 nor deletion in the 16q24.1 region identified. Patients 3 & 4 and 2, 5, & 6 were reported by Stankiewicz et al (2009) (pts D4 and M4) and by Sen et al (2013) (pts 15, 1, and 2), respectively. Patients 2 and 5 had missense mutations, patient 4 had a no stop mutation, patient 6 had a nonsense mutation and patient 3 had an approximately 1 Mb deletion involving FOXF1 as well its upstream regulatory region. Patients 2–6 had associated anomalies of the gastrointestinal system. Butterfly vertebrae were identified in the patients 3 and 6. In patient 1, autopsy was limited to heart and lung. No clinical or molecular information about patients 7 and 8 was available.
Table 1
ACDMPV patient sample information.
Patient
Gender
Ethnicity
Inheritance
Life span (days)
FOXF1 molecular defect
Associated anomalies
P1
M
Caucasian
Familial
48
None
Limited autopsy
P2
M
Caucasian
Sporadic
7
Missense mutation (c.286G>A;p.V96M)
Malrotation of the intestine, atrial septal defect, thick distended bladder with muscular hypertrophy, mild bilateral hydroureter and hydronephrosis
P3
F
Hispanic
Sporadic
21
Deletion (chr16: 84,402,571–85,435,712) (hg18)
Imperforate anus, suspected malrotation of the intestine, bicornuate uterus, multiple butterfly vertebrae
P4
M
Caucasian
Sporadic
46
No stop mutation (c.1138T>C;*380Rext*73)
Malrotation of the colon, Meckel's diverticulum
P5
M
Caucasian
Sporadic
28
Missense mutation (c.145C>T;p.P49S)
Incomplete rotation of bowel, right colon unfixed
P6
F
Hispanic
Sporadic
18
Nonsense mutation (c.89C>A;p.S30*
Malrotation of the intestine, imperforate anus, butterfly vertebrae, ventricular septal defect
No clinical or genetic information is available for patients 7 and 8.
No clinical or genetic information is available for patients 7 and 8.
Animals
Foxf1
+/− mice with one Foxf1 allele disrupted by deletion of the forkhead binding domain were generated (Figure S1) and maintained on a mixed 129-C57BL6/J background. The mid-day of vaginal plug identification was considered as embryonic day 0.5 and the mid-day when pups were born was considered as postnatal day (P) 0.5.
RNA isolation
Total RNA was isolated from approximately 10 mg frozen lung samples from patients and normal control humans using TRIzol (Invitrogen). Controls C1-C4 are age-matched lung samples from individuals that had no lung problems and died of other reasons. Control samples C1-C3 are from females and control sample C4 is a male sample. Control sample C5 is a commercially available human total lung RNA (Life Technologies Cat. No# AM7968). The tissue was homogenized in microfuge tubes with a hand held homogenizer in the presence of 200 μl of TRIzol. The aqueous phase was collected after spinning at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. This step was repeated and the pooled aqueous phase was loaded onto an RNeasy column (Qiagen). RNA was eluted from the columns following the manufacturer's instruction. The RNA was quantified using Nanodrop and its quality was assessed on a BioRad Bioanalyzer. In spite of the differences in their process of collection and preservation, the RNA isolated from the lung tissues of patients with ACDMPV were of good quality.Mouse RNA was extracted from frozen whole lungs of P0.5 Foxf1
+/− mice and their wildtype littermate controls. Whole lungs were homogenized using TissueLyser LT (Qiagen) in QIAzol lysis reagent (Qiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA was isolated from lung homogenates using the miRNeasy mini kit (Qiagen). RNAs were tested for quality on the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and quantified on the Nanodrop Spectrophotometer by the Genomic and RNA Profiling Core (GARP) facility at BCM.
Microarray analysis
500 ng of total human RNA was converted into cDNA and then cRNA following the manufacturer's instructions. The cRNA was biotinylated and hybridized to the Human Ref8.V3 microarray (Illumina) contains probes representing ∼22,000 curated genes and ESTs conjugated with streptavidin-Cy3. Quality standards for hybridization, labeling, staining, background signal, and basal level of housekeeping gene expression for each chip were verified. The scanned images of the chip were analyzed using GenomeStudio software (Illumina). Gene expression analyses of RNA from patients' lungs (n = 8) was compared to those from the control lungs (n = 5).Transcriptomes of six Foxf1
+/− and six wildtype littermate samples were assessed in two separate microarray experiments using MouseWG-6 v2.0 Expression BeadChip kit (Illumina) containing probes for over 45,200 transcripts. 500 ng of total RNA was labeled using Illumina TotalPrep RNA Amplification Kit (Ambion) and hybridized as per manufacturer's instructions. The array data were analyzed using the lumi bioconductor package [21], normalized by robust spline normalization (RST), and transformed using variance stabilization transformation (VST) [22]. ComBAT batch correction [23] was applied to correct for differences in expression values between the two separate microarray experiments. Two-sample t-test was applied to determine differentially expressed genes between Foxf1
+/− and wild type lung groups. Differential expression p-values were adjusted for false discovery rates (FDR). Fold changes were calculated using reverse VST.Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID), Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA), and Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) softwares were used for gene ontology, pathway, and network analyses.The ACDMPV and Foxf1
+/− lung microarray data sets can be accessed through the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/geo/) under accession numbers GSE54780 and GSE54128, respectively.
qRT-PCR
Confirmation of the differential gene expression was done by qRT-PCR using an ABI 7900HT Fast real time PCR System. Universal probe library and Fast start probe master mix from Roche Applied Science was used following manufacturer's instructions.For the mouse microarray analysis validation, RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies) and amplified using the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Life Technologies). Primers used for qRT-PCR validation of the mouse microarray are listed in table S5.
Immunohistochemistry
Antibody against COL1A1 was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. The respective dilutions of antibodies and other experimental conditions used were following manufacturer's instructions.
Results
ACDMPV lung gene expression analysis
Statistical analysis revealed 337 genes deregulated in ACDMPV lungs compared to control lungs (adjusted p-value <0.05, fold-change approximately >/ = 2 or = −2), of which 205 (60.83%) were down-regulated and 132 (39.17%) were up-regulated (Figure 1A, Table S1). DAVID analysis revealed gene ontologies (GO) related to inflammation and immune responses, vasculature development, cell adhesion and chemotaxis associated with the deregulated genes (Figure 1B). The microarray data were validated using qRT-PCR for eight differentially expressed genes: IL8, SPP1, IGFBP3, COL1A1, SOD2, GLI2, ANGPTL4, and HES4 (data not shown). Further, differences in protein quantity were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies against a significantly differentially expressed (COL1A1) product (Figure 1C). The amount of COL1A1 was significantly higher in the patient samples as compared to the control lung.
Figure 1
ACDMPV lung microarray analysis: heat map, clustering, DAVID analysis, and IHC validation.
(A) Heat map for genes differentially expressed (adjusted p-value <0.05, fold change approximately >/ = 2 or = − 2) between ACDMPV lungs (n = 8) and control lungs (n = 5); Decreased gene expression is shown in green and increased gene expression is shown in red. (B) Top significant gene ontology (biological processes) terms associated with deregulated genes identified by DAVID analysis. (C) IHC validation for COL1A1; Representative slides from two patients' and one control sample at 20× magnification. A commercial control lung sample C5 clustered with the age-matched control lung samples C1-4. A lung sample from a patient who died from a different congenital diffuse lung developmental disorder was also included in the analysis. The deregulated genes in this sample clustered differently than those in ACDMPV lung samples (data not shown), confirming the validity of our approach.
ACDMPV lung microarray analysis: heat map, clustering, DAVID analysis, and IHC validation.
(A) Heat map for genes differentially expressed (adjusted p-value <0.05, fold change approximately >/ = 2 or = − 2) between ACDMPV lungs (n = 8) and control lungs (n = 5); Decreased gene expression is shown in green and increased gene expression is shown in red. (B) Top significant gene ontology (biological processes) terms associated with deregulated genes identified by DAVID analysis. (C) IHC validation for COL1A1; Representative slides from two patients' and one control sample at 20× magnification. A commercial control lung sample C5 clustered with the age-matched control lung samples C1-4. A lung sample from a patient who died from a different congenital diffuse lung developmental disorder was also included in the analysis. The deregulated genes in this sample clustered differently than those in ACDMPV lung samples (data not shown), confirming the validity of our approach.GSEA and DAVID analyses showed enrichment of pathways related to signaling in the immune system, hemostasis, cell surface interactions at the vascular wall, and the lysosome (Table S2). Further analyses by GSEA allowed determining gene sets associated with chemical and genetic perturbations enriched in the 337 genes deregulated in the ACDMPV lungs (Table S3). Genes up-regulated in vascular smooth muscle cells by MAPK8, and genes up-regulated in the Kras2LA lung cancermouse model, are enriched in the list of down-regulated genes. Genes up-regulated by E-cadherin, and genes down-regulated in the Kras2LA lung cancermouse model are enriched in the list of up-regulated genes. IPA pathway analysis was used to build networks and demonstrate interactions among the deregulated genes (Figure 2). Top networks involve cellular movement, cellular proliferation, inflammatory response, cardiovascular disease, hematological system development, and carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.
Figure 2
Networks involving deregulated genes in ACDMPV lungs identified using IPA; down-regulated genes are shown in green and up-regulated genes are shown in red.
Deregulated genes involved in (A) Cellular movement, immune cell trafficking, inflammatory response; (B) Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, tumor morphology; (C) Cellular development, hematological system development and function, immune cell trafficking; (D) Cardiovascular disease, inflammatory response and cellular movement; (E) Carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism and molecular transport.
Networks involving deregulated genes in ACDMPV lungs identified using IPA; down-regulated genes are shown in green and up-regulated genes are shown in red.
Deregulated genes involved in (A) Cellular movement, immune cell trafficking, inflammatory response; (B) Cellular development, cellular growth and proliferation, tumor morphology; (C) Cellular development, hematological system development and function, immune cell trafficking; (D) Cardiovascular disease, inflammatory response and cellular movement; (E) Carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism and molecular transport.
Foxf1
+/− mouse lung gene expression analysis
Statistical analysis showed 789 deregulated genes in Foxf1
+/− lungs compared to control lungs (FDR< 0.05, fold-change >/ = 1.5 and = −1.5) (Figure 3A). 394 genes of them (49.93%) were down-regulated and 395 (50.06%) were up-regulated (Table S4). GSEA and DAVID analyses revealed GO terms related to response to cytokine stimulus, cell division, blood circulation, regulation of cell proliferation and cell adhesion associated with deregulated genes (Figure 3B).
Figure 3
Foxf1
+/− mouse lung microarray analysis: heat map, clustering, DAVID analysis, and qRT-PCR validation.
(A) Heat map for genes differentially expressed (fdr <0.05, fold change >/ = 2 or = − 2) between Foxf1
+/− lungs (n = 6) and littermate control lungs (n = 6); Decreased gene expression is shown in green and increased gene expression is shown in red; Foxf1
+/− lung samples and wildtype lung samples cluster as two separate groups. (B) Top significant gene ontology (biological processes) terms associated with deregulated genes from DAVID analysis. (C) qRT-PCR validation for down-regulated genes (Sema3C, Dll4, and Hgf) and up-regulated genes (Cma1 and Ren1); n = 6 for each group; * = p value <0.05; ** = p value <0.001.
Foxf1
+/− mouse lung microarray analysis: heat map, clustering, DAVID analysis, and qRT-PCR validation.
(A) Heat map for genes differentially expressed (fdr <0.05, fold change >/ = 2 or = − 2) between Foxf1
+/− lungs (n = 6) and littermate control lungs (n = 6); Decreased gene expression is shown in green and increased gene expression is shown in red; Foxf1
+/− lung samples and wildtype lung samples cluster as two separate groups. (B) Top significant gene ontology (biological processes) terms associated with deregulated genes from DAVID analysis. (C) qRT-PCR validation for down-regulated genes (Sema3C, Dll4, and Hgf) and up-regulated genes (Cma1 and Ren1); n = 6 for each group; * = p value <0.05; ** = p value <0.001.The microarray data were confirmed using qRT-PCR for five differentially expressed genes: Dll4, Hgf, Sema3C, Cma1, and Ren1 (Figure 3C). Canonical pathways affected include genes involved in focal adhesion, homeostasis, p53 signaling, as well as in Vegf, Endothelin, and Notch signaling (Table S6). Additional GSEA analysis identified genes down-regulated by E-cadherin and genes up-regulated in vascular smooth muscle cells by MAPK8 to be enriched in the list of down-regulated genes. Genes regulated by hypoxia were found to be enriched in the list of up-regulated genes (Table S7). Network analysis by IPA identified interactions amongst genes involved in cellular movement, inflammatory response, and hematological and cardiovascular system development (Figure 4).
Figure 4
Networks involving deregulated genes in Foxf1 lungs identified using IPA.
Deregulated genes involved in (A) Inflammatory response, cellular movement, cardiovascular disease; (B) Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cellular movement, hematological system development and function; (C) Embryonic development, organ development; (D) Cardiovascular system development and function, organ development, cellular movement; down-regulated genes are shown in green and up-regulated gens are shown in red.
Networks involving deregulated genes in Foxf1 lungs identified using IPA.
Deregulated genes involved in (A) Inflammatory response, cellular movement, cardiovascular disease; (B) Cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, cellular movement, hematological system development and function; (C) Embryonic development, organ development; (D) Cardiovascular system development and function, organ development, cellular movement; down-regulated genes are shown in green and up-regulated gens are shown in red.
Gene expression alterations common to both ACDMPV and Foxf1
+/− lung transcriptomes
To identify genes regulated by both FOXF1 and Foxf1 in human and mouse lungs, respectively, we compared genes with similarly altered expression in both ACDMPV patients and P0.5 Foxf1
+/− pups and identified fourteen intersecting genes (Figure 5; Table S8). Ten genes: COL15A1, COL18A1, COL6A2, FSCN1, IGFBP3, MALL, MATN2, NOS3, PRKCDBP, and RASL11B upregulated in ACDMPV patients were also upregulated in Foxf1
+/− pups. Four genes: ESM1, GRINA, IL1B, and SIRPA were downregulated in ACDMPV patients and also Foxf1
+/− pups. However, five genes ORM1, FGG, KLF4, IGFBP5, and GAMT were found to be differentially altered in the human vs mouse microarray datasets.
Figure 5
Deregulated genes common to both ACDMPV lungs and P0.5 Foxf1 lungs.
(A) Heat map comparing expression of 14 overlapping genes in ACDMPV lung samples and control lung samples; (B) Heat map comparing expression of 14 overlapping genes in Foxf1
+/− lung samples and control lung samples.
Deregulated genes common to both ACDMPV lungs and P0.5 Foxf1 lungs.
(A) Heat map comparing expression of 14 overlapping genes in ACDMPV lung samples and control lung samples; (B) Heat map comparing expression of 14 overlapping genes in Foxf1
+/− lung samples and control lung samples.
Discussion
To date, we have recruited greater than 100 families with children affected with ACDMPV. This is the largest collection of ACDMPV samples worldwide. To identify transcriptional changes in the neonate ACDMPV lungs, we compared the whole genome expression in the lungs of eight patients with ACDMPV with transcriptional changes in P0.5 Foxf1mouse lungs, and appropriate control lungs. This approach enabled us to identify gene ontologies and pathways associated with ACDMPV and gain a better understanding of the disease.The Foxf1mouse lungs showed down-regulation of Notch signaling genes Dll4 and Notch1 and slightly lower but significant (fold change: −1.46) down-regulation of the Notch target gene Hey1 (data not shown). Notch signaling has been reported to be affected in Foxf1 lungs [24]. Genes involved in pulmonary vasculature development, Sema3c and lung branching morphogenesis, Hgf and Lama1, were also down-regulated. Sema3c, a semaphorin gene expressed in the lung endothelium, interacts with neuropillin-1 during vasculature development; loss of semaphorin-neuropilin-1 signaling showed lung pathology reminiscent of ACDMPV [25]. Sema3c was down-regulated in our study and Foxf1 was down-regulated in lungs of Nrp1 mice, suggesting a possible interaction between Foxf1 and Sema3C in murine lung pathology. These transcriptional changes potentially lead to underdeveloped lungs causing respiratory distress at birth.Transcriptional changes found in Foxf1
+/− lungs, potentially resulting from the respiratory distress, include deregulation of pathways associated with hypoxia-induced vascular remodeling. There is increased expression of α-smooth muscle actin Acta2, indicating greater muscularization of pulmonary vessels and possible pulmonary hypertension. Greater expression of Acta2 could also be due to endothelium-to-mesenchyme transition that is found to accompany vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension [26]. Additionally, members of the Endothelin-1 signaling pathway were deregulated. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a potent vasoconstrictor regulating vascular tone and is implicated in pulmonary hypertension. Edn1 over-expression in mice leads to development of systemic hypertension with altered vascular reactivity [27].Fibronectin and several members of the collagen gene family are also found to be up-regulated, likely leading to increased production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Accumulation of ECM proteins such as collagen, elastin, and fibronectin leads to thickening of pulmonary blood vessels, likely contributing to pulmonary hypertension. Interestingly, endothelin induced collagen remodeling has been reported in a mouse model of pulmonary hypertension [28], indicating that the increased endothelin-1 signaling in Foxf1
+/− lungs may be causing an increase in collagen production. Integrins involved in cell surface interactions at the vascular wall were also found to be down-regulated. Similar transcriptional changes have been observed to be associated with matrix and vasculature remodeling in TGF-α induced pulmonary fibrosis [29]. Foxf1 was shown to play an essential role in mesenchymal migration by transcriptionally regulating integrin-β3 (Itgβ3) [30]. Integrin-ECM interactions also contribute to vascular remodeling. Altered integrin-ECM interactions have been documented in chronic hypoxia and monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension [31].Mast cell chymase and tryptase genes (Mcpt4, Mcpt6, Cma1, and Cpa3) are highly up-regulated i n Foxf1 lungs, showing evidence of pulmonary mastocytosis. Pulmonary mastocytosis and enhanced lung inflammation in Foxf1mice after chemically induced or allergen-mediated lung injury was reported [32]. These inflammatory molecules could contribute to the vascular remodeling through their effects on vascular cell wall permeability, matrix protein production, and by inducing recruitment of mesenchymal precursor cells [33]. Similar accumulation of mast cell mediators was found in lungs of Fgfr3/4 mutant mice that exhibit Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) like pathology and in lungs of children with BPD [34], suggesting that pulmonary mastocytosis could be a common feature found in diffuse lung developmental conditions. Ren1 which along with Cma1 and Cpa3 is a component of the blood pressure regulating renin angiotensin system is also up-regulated.Other transcriptional changes include up-regulation of Mki67, Ccnd1, and Foxm1, showing an increase in proliferation in the lung. Foxf1 has been reported to be down-regulated in mice with endothelial cell-specific deletion of Foxm1
[35], indicating a reciprocal feedback loop between Foxf1 and Foxm1. Finally, up-regulation of Hif3α and Nos3 is also observed, suggesting a compensatory mechanism to counteract the effects of hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension.Microarray analysis of ACDMPV human lung transcriptomes primarily identified deregulation of genes involved in inflammation and cell surface interactions at the vascular wall. Members of the collagen gene family are highly up-regulated similar to the up-regulation seen in Foxf1
+/− lungs, potentially leading to increased ECM collagen production, causing thickening of pulmonary blood vessels, and resulting in pulmonary hypertension, a typical feature found in neonates with ACDMPV.IHC for COL1A1 confirmed the increased protein levels of COL1A1 in ACDMPV patient lungs (Figure 1C). Structural changes in ACDMPV lungs that could be attributed to hypoxia-induced vascular remodeling include medial thickening of smooth muscles in pulmonary arteries. Transcriptional changes which could be described as compensatory mechanisms to counteract the pulmonary hypertension include down-regulation of genes involved in TREM1 signaling (TREM1, TLR4, IL1B, and ITGAX) and up-regulation of NOS3. Pulmonary inflammatory responses play an important role in hypoxia-induced vascular remodeling [33] and down-regulation of TREM1 signaling could be a compensatory response to attenuate pulmonary inflammatory responses. Tlr-4 deficient mice were shown to be resistant to chronic hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension by attenuating the pulmonary vascular inflammatory response to hypoxia [36]. Up-regulation of NOS3 also could be a compensatory response to counteract the hypertension.Other affected pathways include signaling related to the lysosome function, carbohydrate metabolism, cell cycle, and axon guidance which are also deregulated in Foxf1
+/− lungs. Interestingly, we found targets of E-cadherin enriched in the deregulated genes. Recently, E-cadherin has been shown to be a target of FOXF1, which in turn has been shown to be a target of p53, regulating cancer cell migration and invasiveness [37]. Additionally, FOXF1 expression has been shown to be changed in numerous humanmalignancies [38]–[45].Comparison of the deregulated genes in both experiments enabled identification of 14 genes, COL15A1, COL18A1, COL6A2, ESM1, FSCN1, GRINA, IGFBP3, IL1B, MALL, NOS3, RASL11B, MATN2, PRKCDBP, and SIRPA, similarly altered in both ACDMPV and Foxf1 heterozygous lung transcriptomes. ESM1 is mainly expressed in endothelial cells and its expression is upregulated by cytokines like TNFα and IL-1β suggesting that it plays a role in endothelium-dependent pathological disorders [46]. ESM1 as well as IL1B are downregulated in both the microarray datasets. ESM1 has also been computationally predicted to have a FOX: ETS binding motif in its vicinity suggesting that it could be a direct target of FOXF1 in endothelial cells [47]. Another common downregulated gene in both datasets, SIRPA has been shown to interact with surfactant proteins A & D in the absence of inflammation to suppress alveolar macrophage phagocytosis [48]. Whereas there is greater variation for Sirpa in the mouse data, the average fold change difference for this gene correlates with the human data.In aggregate, we present the results of genome-wide analyses of transcriptional changes in lungs from patients with ACDMPV due to point mutations or genomic deletions in FOXF1 and in mice heterozygous for Foxf1 loss. The transcriptional changes should help better define the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of ACDMPV and may also be a valuable source for future research on lung vasculature development and pulmonary disease conditions such as pulmonary hypertension, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and lung cancer.Generation of the
Single allele deletion of the Foxf1 gene was achieved by breeding of Foxf1-floxed heterozygous females with EIIa-Cre male mice. Foxf1-floxed allele possesses two LoxP sites (white arrowhead) and one Frt site that surround exon 1, encoding the Forkhead DNA-binding domain of the Foxf1 protein. Cre-mediated recombination occurs in a wide range of tissues, including the germ cells that transmit Foxf1-null allele to offspring. Exon 1 and part of the promoter of Foxf1 are deleted. The GRCm38/mm10 coordinates of the deleted region are chr8∶121,083,499-121,085,436 (1938 bp). Fendrr is a long non coding RNA gene located upstream to Foxf1, and negatively regulates it. Primer sequences used to genotype mice with heterozygous loss of Foxf1 are: F: 5′-TTCAGATCTGAGAGTGGCAGCTTC-3′; R1∶5′-GCTTTGTCTCCAAGCGCTGC-3′; and R2∶5′GAAGGAACCCAGATGTTCCCTG-3′.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.ACDMPV lung microarray analysis: List of deregulated genes (adjusted p value <0.05, fold change> / = 2 or = - 2).(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Pathways enriched in ACDMPV lung transcriptomes: GSEA and DAVID analyses (p-value <0.05).(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Chemical and genetic perturbation gene sets enriched in ACDMPV lungs: GSEA analysis (fdr <0.05).(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.List of primer sequences used for qRT-PCR validation using SYBR.(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Pathways enriched in
lung transcriptomes: GSEA and DAVID analyses (p-value <0.05).(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.Chemical and genetic perturbation gene sets enriched in
lungs: GSEA analysis (fdr <0.05).(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.GO terms associated with genes similarly altered in both ACDMPV lungs and(XLSX)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: P Lassalle; S Molet; A Janin; J V Heyden; J Tavernier; W Fiers; R Devos; A B Tonnel Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1996-08-23 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: A M Mansoor; M Honda; K Saida; Y Ishinaga; T Kuramochi; A Maeda; T Takabatake; Y Mitsui Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1995-10-24 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Kate V Everett; Paris Ataliotis; Barry A Chioza; Charles Shaw-Smith; Eddie M K Chung Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Vladimir Ustiyan; Craig Bolte; Yufang Zhang; Lu Han; Yan Xu; Katherine E Yutzey; Aaron M Zorn; Tanya V Kalin; John M Shannon; Vladimir V Kalinichenko Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2018-08-25 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Przemyslaw Szafranski; Tomasz Gambin; Avinash V Dharmadhikari; Kadir Caner Akdemir; Shalini N Jhangiani; Jennifer Schuette; Nihal Godiwala; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Jessica Sebastian; Suneeta Madan-Khetarpal; Urvashi Surti; Rosanna G Abellar; David A Bateman; Ashley L Wilson; Melinda H Markham; Jill Slamon; Fernando Santos-Simarro; María Palomares; Julián Nevado; Pablo Lapunzina; Brian Hon-Yin Chung; Wai-Lap Wong; Yoyo Wing Yiu Chu; Gary Tsz Kin Mok; Eitan Kerem; Joel Reiter; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Scott A Anderson; David R Kelly; Joseph Shieh; Taryn C Rosenthal; Kristin Scheible; Laurie Steiner; M Anwar Iqbal; Margaret L McKinnon; Sara Jane Hamilton; Kamilla Schlade-Bartusiak; Dawn English; Glenda Hendson; Elizabeth R Roeder; Thomas S DeNapoli; Rebecca Okashah Littlejohn; Daynna J Wolff; Carol L Wagner; Alison Yeung; David Francis; Elizabeth K Fiorino; Morris Edelman; Joyce Fox; Denise A Hayes; Sandra Janssens; Elfride De Baere; Björn Menten; Anne Loccufier; Lieve Vanwalleghem; Philippe Moerman; Yves Sznajer; Amy S Lay; Jennifer L Kussmann; Jasneek Chawla; Diane J Payton; Gael E Phillips; Erwin Brosens; Dick Tibboel; Annelies de Klein; Isabelle Maystadt; Richard Fisher; Neil Sebire; Alison Male; Maya Chopra; Jason Pinner; Girvan Malcolm; Gregory Peters; Susan Arbuckle; Melissa Lees; Zoe Mead; Oliver Quarrell; Richard Sayers; Martina Owens; Charles Shaw-Smith; Janet Lioy; Eileen McKay; Nicole de Leeuw; Ilse Feenstra; Liesbeth Spruijt; Frances Elmslie; Timothy Thiruchelvam; Carlos A Bacino; Claire Langston; James R Lupski; Partha Sen; Edwina Popek; Paweł Stankiewicz Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Xiaomeng Ren; Vladimir Ustiyan; Minzhe Guo; Guolun Wang; Craig Bolte; Yufang Zhang; Yan Xu; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Tanya V Kalin; Vladimir V Kalinichenko Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Guolun Wang; Bingqiang Wen; Xiaomeng Ren; Enhong Li; Yufang Zhang; Minzhe Guo; Yan Xu; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Tanya V Kalin; Vladimir V Kalinichenko Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Avinash V Dharmadhikari; Jenny J Sun; Krzysztof Gogolewski; Brandi L Carofino; Vladimir Ustiyan; Misty Hill; Tadeusz Majewski; Przemyslaw Szafranski; Monica J Justice; Russell S Ray; Mary E Dickinson; Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Anna Gambin; Paweł Stankiewicz Journal: Biol Open Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 2.422
Authors: Olena A Kolesnichenko; Jeffrey A Whitsett; Tanya V Kalin; Vladimir V Kalinichenko Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2021-11 Impact factor: 6.914