| Literature DB >> 24721774 |
Abdulfatah A G Abushagur1, Norhana Arsad2, Mamun Ibne Reaz3, A Ashrif A Bakar4.
Abstract
The large interest in utilising fibre Bragg grating (FBG) strain sensors for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) applications to replace conventional electrical tactile sensors has grown in the past few years. FBG strain sensors offer the advantages of optical fibre sensors, such as high sensitivity, immunity to electromagnetic noise, electrical passivity and chemical inertness, but are not limited by phase discontinuity or intensity fluctuations. FBG sensors feature a wavelength-encoding sensing signal that enables distributed sensing that utilises fewer connections. In addition, their flexibility and lightness allow easy insertion into needles and catheters, thus enabling localised measurements inside tissues and blood. Two types of FBG tactile sensors have been emphasised in the literature: single-point and array FBG tactile sensors. This paper describes the current design, development and research of the optical fibre tactile techniques that are based on FBGs to enhance the performance of MIS procedures in general. Providing MIS or microsurgery surgeons with accurate and precise measurements and control of the contact forces during tissues manipulation will benefit both surgeons and patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24721774 PMCID: PMC4029712 DOI: 10.3390/s140406633
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Various FBG tactile sensors developed in MIS applications.
| Endoscope with tactile sensitivity | Array of 4 FBGs attached to steel strip | Aston University, Birmingham UK | 2006 |
| Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) | 3 Optical fibers with FBG each integrated into a catheter tip | University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center & Endosense SA, Geneva, Switzerland | 2008 |
| Vitreoretinal microsurgery | 1 FBG integrated into 1-DOF | Johns Hopkins University | Early 2009 |
| Vitreoretinal microsurgery | 3 FBGs into 2-DOF | Johns Hopkins University | Late 2009 |
| Vitreoretinal microsurgery minimally invasive robotic surgery (MIRS) | Platform with cooperative control system for manipulating 2-DOF FBG sensor | Johns Hopkins University | 2010 |
| Vitreoretinal microsurgery & MIRS | Testing previous platform control with added auditory system | Johns Hopkins University | 2010 |
| Otorhinolaryngology (ORL) | 2 FBGs integrated in top and bottom Microforceps' arms | ARTORG Center | 2010 |
| Needle Biopsy and treatment | 3 optical fibers with 2 FBGs each to monitor real-time 3-D needle deflection | Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University | 2010 |
| Vitreoretinal microsurgery | FBG integrated into disposable Microforceps 2-DOF | Technische Universität München & Johns Hopkins University | 2012 |
| RF ablation and predicting perforation | 1 FBG in designed catheter (2 catheters with two different adhesive bonding FBG inside the hollow. | University of Houston, Houston, TX 77004, USA | 2012 |
| Needle Biopsy Shaping sensing | 3 optical fibers with 2 FBGs each integrated with needle biopsy | Delft University of Technology, Netherland | 2012 |
| Needle Biopsy Shaping sensing | Array of 12 FBGs integrated into Nitional needle biopsy for reconstruction the 3-D shape. | Delft University of Technology, Netherland | 2013 |
Figure 1.Schematic diagram of a single-point FBG tactile device with 2 DOFs.
Wavelength/Force ratio vs. position along the tool.
| 1 | 13 |
| 5 | 9 |
| 10 | 4.2 |
| 12.5 | 3 |
| 14 | 1 |
| 15 | 0 |
Figure 2.Schematic of the artificial stapes prosthesis which is usually clamped to the incus in the middle ear during surgery.
Correlation between catheter tip CF calculated from FBG sensors as a function of measured force by certified balance.
| Perpendicular (90 degrees) | 0.7 | 1.0 | −0.6 | ||
| Parallel (0 degree) | 1.0 | 0.7 | −1.1 | ||
| (45 degrees) | 0.8 | 1.4 | 2.8 |
Figure 3.Schematic of the sensor head of the catheter.
Figure 4.Layout of 4 FBG array sensors on a 1-D tactile sensing strip [79].
Figure 5.Layout of 2-D 9 FBG sensor array in a 3 × 3 grid for distributed tactile sensing on a surface.
Figure 6.Taxel prototype of the designed diaphragm-type transducer.
Figure 7.Taxel prototype of a bridge-type transducer.
Figure 8.The fabricated two-dimensional sensor array that can detect distributed forces and distributed temperatures.
Figure 9.A schematic diagram of the signal detection using three optical splitters for a parallel detection scheme that simultaneously measured the distributed temperatures and forces.
Figure 10.Schematic diagram illustrating the modified needle prototype with the 3 incorporated optical fibers each associated with two FBGs.
Summary for FBGs tactile force sensor in MIS.
| Cowie | endoscope with tactile sensitivity | Array of 4 FBGs and 9 FBGs in 1-D and 2-D resp. to detect load position, shape of contacted surface | Error ≈ 11mm (2.7% of full scale) | No. Big size cannot fit in MIS | Shorter FBGs and more sensors would improve |
| Yokoyama | RF ablation AF(Cardiac) | 3 FBG into a catheter tip. (TactiCath Endosense SA)) | Res. = 0.01N; W.R = 0–0.5 N | Yes | - |
| Sun | Vitreoretinal microsurgery | 1 FBG integrated into 1-DOF (device) | Res = 14 pm/mN, sensitivity = 0.25 mN | Yes, but not applicable due to 1-axis forces only | Only if 3-axis and temp. compensated |
| Iordachita | Vitreoretinal microsurgery | 3 FBGs into 2-DOF (device) | Sensitivity = 0.25 mN | Yes, but it lacks of axial forces and temp. compensation | Fourth FBG in the middle to decouple the axial and lateral forces |
| Bell | ORL | 2 FBGs integrated in top and bottom Microforceps' arms | Peak measured = 2.4 N−5.2 N & sensitivity = 0.12 nm/N and 0.14 nm/N | Yes | - |
| Park | Needle Biopsy and treatment | 3 optical fibers with 2 FBGs each to monitor real-time 3-D needle deflection | Max tip deflection error 0.38 mm in +15 mm actual range | Yes | Proper sensor locations with more FBG sensors could improve the accuracy |
| Kuru | Vitreoretinal microsurgery | FBG integrated into disposable Microforceps 2-DOF | Accuracy = 0.3 mN & sensitivity = 0.25 mN | Yes, but it couldn't measure axial forces | 3-DOF required/by attaching FBG behind grasper stick to some slides attached with proper spring to induce compression/tensile onto FBG |
| Biosense Webster Inc. [ | Catheter for RF ablation AF | THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH | NA | Yes | - |
| Ho | RF ablation andpredicting perforation | 1 FBG in designed catheter (2 catheters with two different adhesive bonding FBG inside the hollow. | Threshold res. = 0.01 nm and 0.05 nm for epoxy and urethane adhesive resp. | No calibration was discussed to verify parameters such as force sensitivity | - |
| Henken | Needle Biopsy Shaping sensing | 3 optical fibers with 2 FBGs each integrated with needle biopsy | Tip position was estimated with accuracy of 0.98 mm within range of ±12.5 mm | Yes | More FBG members will enhance accuracy |
| Roesthuis | Needle Biopsy Shaping sensing | Array of 12 FBGs integrated into Nitional needle biopsy for reconstruction the 3-D shape. | The maximum accuracy error of tip position with camera image was 0.74 mm | Yes/ | - |