Literature DB >> 24721504

Comparison of the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of traditional and CAD/CAM interim materials before and after thermal cycling.

Jiajing Yao1, Jing Li2, Yuhua Wang2, Hui Huang3.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Limited information is available concerning the properties of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) interim materials.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the flexural strength and marginal accuracy of 2 traditional bis-acryl composite resin interim materials (Protemp 4 and Structur 2 SC/QM) and 2 CAD/CAM interim materials (Teilo CAD and VITA CAD-Temp).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard specimens (25 × 2 × 2 mm) of the 4 materials were made (n=20). Each group contained 10 specimens fractured under 3-point loading in a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The other 10 specimens were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles (5°C and 55°C) before testing. Four groups of interim crowns were fabricated from the 4 materials on models of a prepared left maxillary first molar (n=10). Twenty-four hours after cementing the crowns, margin discrepancies were measured under a stereomicroscope. The crowns then were subjected to 5000 thermal cycles (5°C and 55°C), and the margin discrepancies were measured again.
RESULTS: Teilo CAD showed the highest mean flexural strength of the 4 interim materials before and after thermal cycling, and VITA CAD-Temp showed the lowest (P<.05). After thermal cycling, the flexural strength decreased significantly (P<.05). The margin discrepancies were larger for the bis-acryl interim crowns than for the CAD/CAM crowns before and after thermal cycling (P<.05). After thermal cycling, the margin discrepancies in the bis-acryl interim crowns were larger (P<.05); however, no significant differences were found for the margin discrepancies in the CAD/CAM interim crowns (P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CAD/CAM interim materials were stronger and had better marginal accuracy properties than bis-acryl materials, especially after thermal cycling.
Copyright © 2014 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24721504     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  17 in total

1.  Assessing abrasion of orthodontic surface sealants using a modified ophthalmic optical coherence tomography device.

Authors:  Sinan Şen; Ralf Erber; Kevin Kunzmann; Stefanie Kirschner; Vanessa Weyer; Lothar Schilling; Marc A Brockmann; Stefan Rues; Gül Orhan; Christopher J Lux; Sebastian Zingler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of Flexural Strength of Thermocycled Interim Resin Materials Used in Prosthetic Rehabilitation- An In-vitro Study.

Authors:  Krishna Kishore Kadiyala; Mohan Krishna Badisa; Gopinadh Anne; Sampath Chowdary Anche; Sandeep Chiramana; Suresh Babu Muvva; Srujana Zakkula; Ravi Rakesh Dev Jyothula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-09-01

3.  Interleukin-1β activity in gingival crevicular fluid of abutment teeth with temporary fixed restorations versus final fixed restorations: Prospective observational study.

Authors:  Amal Abdallah A Abo-Elmagd; Dina Sabry; Ebtehal Mohammed
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2021-06-06

Review 4.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Saurabh Jain; Mohammed E Sayed; Mallika Shetty; Saeed M Alqahtani; Mohammed Hussain Dafer Al Wadei; Shilpi Gilra Gupta; Ahlam Abdulsalam Ahmed Othman; Abdulkarim Hussain Alshehri; Hatem Alqarni; Abdulaziz Hussain Mobarki; Khalid Motlaq; Haifa F Bakmani; Asma A Zain; Abdullah J Hakami; Moayad F Sheayria
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Are different generations of CAD/CAM milling machines capable to produce restorations with similar quality?

Authors:  Renato Roperto; Hussein Assaf; Thiago Soares-Porto; Lisa Lang; Sorin Teich
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2016-10-01

6.  Comparative in vitro evaluation of CAD/CAM vs conventional provisional crowns.

Authors:  Adil Othman Abdullah; Effrosyni A Tsitrou; Sarah Pollington
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  A Comparison of the Color Stability of Conventional and CAD/CAM Polymethyl Methacrylate Denture Base Materials.

Authors:  Cagatay Dayan; Melahat Celik Guven; Burc Gencel; Canan Bural
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2019-06

8.  Marginal adaptation of three-unit interim restorations fabricated by the CAD-CA systems and the direct method before and after thermocycling.

Authors:  Leyla Sadighpour; Farideh Geramipanah; Mehran Falahchai; Hasan Tadbiri
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-06-01

9.  An in vitro comparative study to evaluate the retention of different attachment systems used in implant-retained overdentures.

Authors:  Tejomaya Shastry; N M Anupama; Shilpa Shetty; M Nalinakshamma
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

10.  A comparative evaluation of vertical marginal fit of provisional crowns fabricated by computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing technique and direct (intraoral technique) and flexural strength of the materials: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ishita Dureja; Bhupender Yadav; Puja Malhotra; Nupur Dabas; Akshay Bhargava; Ripul Pahwa
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.