Leyla Sadighpour1, Farideh Geramipanah2, Mehran Falahchai3, Hasan Tadbiri3. 1. DDS, MSc, Associate Professor, Dental Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Department of prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Prosthodontic CCP Clinic, Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 2. DDS, MSc, Professor, Dental Implant Research Center, Department of prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. DDS, MSc, Assistant Professor, Dental Sciences Research Center, Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the marginal adaptation of three-unit interim restorations fabricated by different techniques from different materials. Also, the efficacy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems for their fabrication is still questionable. This study aimed to assess the marginal adaptation of three-unit interim restorations fabricated by the CAD-CAM systems and the direct method from different materials before and after thermocycling. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sound mandibular second premolar and a second molar were prepared for a three-unit all-ceramic restoration. Metal dies were fabricated to simulate a case of mandibular first molar missing, and were mounted in an acrylic block. Seventy-two three-unit interim restorations were fabricated by different techniques from different materials in six groups (n=12). In the first four groups, restorations were fabricated from Tempron, Visalys Temp, Unifast III, and Acropars by the direct technique, while the Amann Girrbach and Arum CAD-CAM systems and Ceramill Temp blocks were used in the last two groups. Marginal gap in each group was measured under a stereomicroscope at ×100 magnification. The specimens then underwent 5000 thermal cycles (5-55°C), and the marginal gap was measured again afterwards. ANCOVA and Bonferroni test (for pairwise comparisons) were applied for statistical analyses (α=0.05). RESULTS: Amann Girrbach and Arum CAD-CAM systems were not significantly different regarding the marginal gap of restorations (P=0.999). Among the traditional interim materials, Acropars showed significantly higher marginal gap than others (P<0.001). No significant difference was noted between other traditional materials. CAD-CAM interim materials showed significantly smaller marginal gap than traditional materials (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CAD-CAM interim materials yielded superior marginal adaptation in three-unit interim restorations compared with traditional interim materials. The type of CAD-CAM system had no significant effect on the final marginal adaptation of restorations. Key words:Dental marginal adaptation, interim dental prosthesis, CAD-CAM. Copyright:
BACKGROUND: Limited information is available regarding the marginal adaptation of three-unit interim restorations fabricated by different techniques from different materials. Also, the efficacy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) systems for their fabrication is still questionable. This study aimed to assess the marginal adaptation of three-unit interim restorations fabricated by the CAD-CAM systems and the direct method from different materials before and after thermocycling. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sound mandibular second premolar and a second molar were prepared for a three-unit all-ceramic restoration. Metal dies were fabricated to simulate a case of mandibular first molar missing, and were mounted in an acrylic block. Seventy-two three-unit interim restorations were fabricated by different techniques from different materials in six groups (n=12). In the first four groups, restorations were fabricated from Tempron, Visalys Temp, Unifast III, and Acropars by the direct technique, while the Amann Girrbach and Arum CAD-CAM systems and Ceramill Temp blocks were used in the last two groups. Marginal gap in each group was measured under a stereomicroscope at ×100 magnification. The specimens then underwent 5000 thermal cycles (5-55°C), and the marginal gap was measured again afterwards. ANCOVA and Bonferroni test (for pairwise comparisons) were applied for statistical analyses (α=0.05). RESULTS: Amann Girrbach and Arum CAD-CAM systems were not significantly different regarding the marginal gap of restorations (P=0.999). Among the traditional interim materials, Acropars showed significantly higher marginal gap than others (P<0.001). No significant difference was noted between other traditional materials. CAD-CAM interim materials showed significantly smaller marginal gap than traditional materials (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CAD-CAM interim materials yielded superior marginal adaptation in three-unit interim restorations compared with traditional interim materials. The type of CAD-CAM system had no significant effect on the final marginal adaptation of restorations. Key words:Dental marginal adaptation, interim dental prosthesis, CAD-CAM. Copyright:
Authors: Mohammad M Rayyan; Moustafa Aboushelib; Nagwa M Sayed; Ahmed Ibrahim; Ryo Jimbo Journal: J Prosthet Dent Date: 2015-05-20 Impact factor: 3.426