Literature DB >> 24721341

New toolkit to measure quality of person-centered care: development and pilot evaluation with nursing home communities.

Kimberly Van Haitsma1, Scott Crespy2, Sarah Humes2, Amy Elliot3, Adrienne Mihelic4, Carol Scott5, Kim Curyto6, Abby Spector7, Karen Eshraghi8, Christina Duntzee8, Allison Reamy Heid8, Katherine Abbott8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, nursing home (NH) providers are adopting a person-centered care (PCC) philosophy; yet, they currently lack methods to measure their progress toward this goal. Few PCC tools meet criteria for ease of use and feasibility in NHs. The purpose of this article is to report on the development of the concept and measurement of preference congruence among NH residents (phase 1), its refinement into a set of quality indicators by Advancing Excellence in America's Nursing Homes (phase 2), and its pilot evaluation in a sample of 12 early adopting NHs prior to national rollout (phase 3). The recommended toolkit for providers to use to measure PCC consists of (1) interview materials for 16 personal care and activity preferences from Minimum Data Set 3.0, plus follow-up questions that ask residents how satisfied they are with fulfillment of important preferences; and (2) an easy to use Excel spreadsheet that calculates graphic displays of quality measures of preference congruence and care conference attendance for an individual, household or NH. Twelve NHs interviewed residents (N = 146) using the toolkit; 10 also completed a follow-up survey and 9 took part in an interview evaluating their experience.
RESULTS: NH staff gave strong positive ratings to the toolkit. All would recommend it to other NHs. Staff reported that the toolkit helped them identify opportunities to improve PCC (100%), and found that the Excel tool was comprehensive (100%), easy to use (90%), and provided high quality information (100%). Providers anticipated using the toolkit to strengthen staff training as well as to enhance care planning, programming and quality improvement.
CONCLUSIONS: The no-cost PCC toolkit provides a new means to measure the quality of PCC delivery. As of February 2014, over 700 nursing homes have selected the Advancing Excellence in America's Nursing Homes PCC goal as a focus for quality improvement. The toolkit enables providers to incorporate quality improvement by moving beyond anecdote, and advancing more systematically toward honoring resident preferences.
Copyright © 2014 AMDA – The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Person-centered care; measures; nursing home; preference congruence; preferences

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24721341     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc        ISSN: 1525-8610            Impact factor:   4.669


  20 in total

1.  Honoring the Everyday Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Perceived Choice and Satisfaction With Care.

Authors:  Lauren R Bangerter; Allison R Heid; Katherine Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2017-06-01

2.  "A Bone of Contention…": Perceived Barriers and Situational Dependencies to Food Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Chelsea N Goldstein; Katherine M Abbott; Lauren R Bangerter; Amy Kotterman; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Nutr Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2019-05-27

3.  Preferences for home- and community-based long-term care services in Germany: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  T Lehnert; O H Günther; A Hajek; S G Riedel-Heller; H H König
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-06

4.  "Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents.

Authors:  Lauren R Bangerter; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Allison R Heid; Katherine Abbott
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  "It Depends": Reasons Why Nursing Home Residents Change Their Minds About Care Preferences.

Authors:  Allison R Heid; Karen Eshraghi; Christina I Duntzee; Katherine Abbott; Kimberly Curyto; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2014-05-09

6.  Do Family Proxies Get It Right? Concordance in Reports of Nursing Home Residents' Everyday Preferences.

Authors:  Allison R Heid; Lauren R Bangerter; Katherine M Abbott; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2015-04-28

7.  Cognitive Interviewing: Revising the Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory for Use In the Nursing Home.

Authors:  Kim Curyto; Kimberly S Van Haitsma; Gail L Towsley
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 1.571

8.  "We can't provide season tickets to the opera": Staff perceptions of providing preference based person centered care.

Authors:  Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Kimberly Van Haitsma
Journal:  Clin Gerontol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  Maturation of the MOUTh Intervention: From Reducing Threat to Relationship-Centered Care.

Authors:  Rita A Jablonski-Jaudon; Ann M Kolanowski; Vicki Winstead; Corteza Jones-Townsend; Andres Azuero
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.254

10.  The consistency of self-reported preferences for everyday living: implications for person-centered care delivery.

Authors:  Kimberly Van Haitsma; Katherine M Abbott; Allison R Heid; Brian Carpenter; Kimberly Curyto; Morton Kleban; Karen Eshraghi; Christina I Duntzee; Abby Spector
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.