Literature DB >> 24720498

Assessment of periodontal and opportunistic flora in patients with peri-implantitis.

Matteo Albertini1, Lorena López-Cerero2, Manuel G O'Sullivan1, Carlos F Chereguini1, Sofia Ballesta3, Vicente Ríos1, Mariano Herrero-Climent1, Pedro Bullón1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess the presence of periodontal and opportunistic organisms in patients with peri-implantitis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-three partially edentulous subjects (22 women, 11 men), aged 32-90 years, who had one or more implants with peri-implantitis were included. Peri-implantitis was defined as: (i) the presence of bleeding on probing and/or suppuration and (ii) radiographic images showed marginal bone loss >1.8 mm after 1 year in function. Criteria for inclusion were: (i) partially edentulous patients having at least one implant diagnosed with peri-implantitis; (ii) no antibiotic therapy for 6 months prior to clinical examination. Following this definition, a total of 48 implants were diagnosed with peri-implantitis. Subgingival bacterial samples were obtained with sterile paper points from infected implants and selected teeth of each individual. Periodontopathogens (Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia and Treponema denticola) were detected by multiplex PCR targeting 16S rDNA. Samples were placed in reduced transport medium and cultured for opportunistic pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, enteric bacteria, Pseudomonas and yeasts).
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients yielded positive results for P. gingivalis, 25 for T. forsythia, eight for P. intermedia and 13 for T. denticola. None of the patients yielded a positive result for A. actinomycetemcomitans. Non-periodontal species were found in five patients (15% of total). P. aeruginosa was found in four (12%) patients, and C. albicans (3%) and S. aureus in one patient (3%) each. In two cases of peri-implantitis, none of the periodontal or opportunistic microorganisms studied were detected in either implant or tooth samples. When results of the periodontopathic bacteria from the implant and tooth samples of the same patient were compared, 18 patients (54%) showed the same results for both samples and 15 (45%) patients different results.
CONCLUSIONS: The implant surface may be colonized with pathogens different from periodontal bacteria. Opportunistic pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and C. albicans may be associated with implant failure.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  culture; multiplex PCR; peri-implant flora; peri-implantitis; periodontally-compromised patients; periodontitis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720498     DOI: 10.1111/clr.12387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  23 in total

1.  Novel bioactive tetracycline-containing electrospun polymer fibers as a potential antibacterial dental implant coating.

Authors:  R G Shahi; M T P Albuquerque; E A Münchow; S B Blanchard; R L Gregory; M C Bottino
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Biofilms Developed on Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Bevilacqua; Annalisa Milan; Veronica Del Lupo; Michele Maglione; Lucilla Dolzani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.188

3.  Current Concepts on the Pathogenesis of Peri-implantitis: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ioannis Fragkioudakis; Georgia Tseleki; Aikaterini-Elisavet Doufexi; Dimitra Sakellari
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2021-03-19

4.  Real-time PCR analysis of fungal organisms and bacterial species at peri-implantitis sites.

Authors:  Frank Schwarz; Kathrin Becker; Sebastian Rahn; Andrea Hegewald; Klaus Pfeffer; Birgit Henrich
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 5.  Microbial Profiles and Detection Techniques in Peri-Implant Diseases: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Miguel Padial-Molina; Jesús López-Martínez; Francisco O'Valle; Pablo Galindo-Moreno
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2016-09-09

Review 6.  A systematic review on the implication of Candida in peri-implantitis.

Authors:  Irene Lafuente-Ibáñez de Mendoza; Amaia Cayero-Garay; Guillermo Quindós-Andrés; José Manuel Aguirre-Urizar
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-06-17

7.  Hierarchical micro/nanostructured titanium with balanced actions to bacterial and mammalian cells for dental implants.

Authors:  Yu Zhu; Huiliang Cao; Shichong Qiao; Manle Wang; Yingxin Gu; Huiwen Luo; Fanhao Meng; Xuanyong Liu; Hongchang Lai
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-10-27

Review 8.  Peri-implant disease: what we know and what we need to know.

Authors:  Nicola Alberto Valente; Sebastiano Andreana
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Microbial profiles at baseline and not the use of antibiotics determine the clinical outcome of the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Authors:  S Bizzarro; M L Laine; M J Buijs; B W Brandt; W Crielaard; B G Loos; E Zaura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine and Air Polishing System in the Treatment of Candida albicans Infected Dental Implants: An Experimental In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Pier Carmine Passarelli; Marta De Leonardis; Giovan Battista Piccirillo; Viviana Desantis; Raffaele Papa; Edoardo Rella; Giuseppe Niccolò Mastandrea Bonaviri; Piero Papi; Giorgio Pompa; Guido Pasquantonio; Paolo Francesco Manicone; Antonio D'Addona
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.