Literature DB >> 29487988

Biofilms Developed on Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies.

Lorenzo Bevilacqua1, Annalisa Milan2, Veronica Del Lupo1, Michele Maglione1, Lucilla Dolzani3.   

Abstract

Microbial biofilms developed on dental implants play a major role in perimplantitis' pathogenesis. Many studies have indicated that surface roughness is the main feature favoring biofilm development in vitro, but its actual influence in vivo has still to be confirmed. In this study, the amount of biofilm formed on differently treated titanium surfaces, showing distinct roughness, has been examined both in vivo and in vitro by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. In vitro studies availed of biofilm developed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa or by salivary bacteria from volunteer donors. In vivo biofilm production was obtained by exposing titanium discs to the oral cavity of healthy volunteers. In vitro experiments showed that P. aeruginosa and, to a lesser extent, salivary bacteria produce more biomass and develop thicker biofilms on laser-treated and sandblasted titanium surfaces with respect to machined ones. In vivo experiments confirmed that bacterial colonization starts on sites of surface unevenness, but failed to disclose biomass differences among biofilms formed on surfaces with different roughness. Our study revealed that biofilm developed in vitro is more easily influenced by surface features than biofilm formed by complex communities in the mouth, where the cooperation of a variety of bacterial species and the presence of a wide range of nutrients and conditions allow bacteria to optimize substrate colonization. Therefore, quantitative differences observed in vitro among surfaces with different characteristics may not be predictive of different colonization rates in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29487988     DOI: 10.1007/s00284-018-1446-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Microbiol        ISSN: 0343-8651            Impact factor:   2.188


  27 in total

Review 1.  Dental plaque formation.

Authors:  B Rosan; R J Lamont
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.700

Review 2.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infections: Community Structure, Antimicrobial Tolerance and Immune Response.

Authors:  Morten Rybtke; Louise Dahl Hultqvist; Michael Givskov; Tim Tolker-Nielsen
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Salivary pellicle composition and multispecies biofilm developed on titanium nitrided by cold plasma.

Authors:  I M G Cavalcanti; A P Ricomini Filho; S C Lucena-Ferreira; W J da Silva; A F Paes Leme; P M Senna; A A Del Bel Cury
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2014-04-12       Impact factor: 2.633

4.  Antibiofilm activity of sandblasted and laser-modified titanium against microorganisms isolated from peri-implantitis lesions.

Authors:  Lorenzo Drago; Monica Bortolin; Elena De Vecchi; Serse Agrappi; Roberto L Weinstein; Roberto Mattina; Luca Francetti
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 1.714

5.  An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces.

Authors:  M C Sánchez; A Llama-Palacios; E Fernández; E Figuero; M J Marín; R León; V Blanc; D Herrera; M Sanz
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Bacterial colonization of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study.

Authors:  M Quirynen; D van Steenberghe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.977

7.  Plaque formation on surface modified dental implants. An in vitro study.

Authors:  B Grössner-Schreiber; M Griepentrog; I Haustein; W D Müller; K P Lange; H Briedigkeit; U B Göbel
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants. Part I: Surface optimization for rapid osseointegration.

Authors:  Yo Shibata; Yasuhiro Tanimoto
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.642

9.  Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs.

Authors:  J van Dijk; F Herkströter; H Busscher; A Weerkamp; H Jansen; J Arends
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Modified implant surface with slower and less initial biofilm formation.

Authors:  Gordon John; Jürgen Becker; Frank Schwarz
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.932

View more
  9 in total

1.  Hydroxyapatite Pellets as Versatile Model Surfaces for Systematic Adhesion Studies on Enamel: A Force Spectroscopy Case Study.

Authors:  Johannes Mischo; Thomas Faidt; Ryan B McMillan; Johanna Dudek; Gubesh Gunaratnam; Pardis Bayenat; Anne Holtsch; Christian Spengler; Frank Müller; Hendrik Hähl; Markus Bischoff; Matthias Hannig; Karin Jacobs
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2022-03-09

2.  Radiographic bone level around particular laser-treated dental implants: 1 to 6 years multicenter retrospective study.

Authors:  C Mongardini; B Zeza; P Pelagalli; R Blasone; M Scilla; M Berardini
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-07-28

Review 3.  Influence of Dental Prosthesis and Restorative Materials Interface on Oral Biofilms.

Authors:  Yu Hao; Xiaoyu Huang; Xuedong Zhou; Mingyun Li; Biao Ren; Xian Peng; Lei Cheng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Effect of core materials for core fabrication for dental implants on in-vitro cytocompatibility of MC3T3-E1 cells.

Authors:  Jung-Hyun Park; Hyun Lee; Seen-Young Kang; Junesun Kim; Ji-Hwan Kim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  The effect of standoff distance and surface roughness on biofilm disruption using cavitation.

Authors:  N Vyas; R L Sammons; S A Kuehne; C Johansson; V Stenport; Q X Wang; A D Walmsley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  In situ substrate-formed biofilms using IDODS mimic supragingival tooth-formed biofilms.

Authors:  Inmaculada Tomás; Isabel Prada-López; Victor Quintas; Maria José Carreira; Áurea Simón-Soro; Alejandro Mira; Carlos Balsa-Castro
Journal:  J Oral Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.474

7.  Candida albicans biofilms on different materials for manufacturing implant abutments and prostheses.

Authors:  A Eguia; A Arakistain; I De-la-Pinta; J López-Vicente; E Sevillano; G Quindós; E Eraso
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2020-01-01

Review 8.  Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications.

Authors:  Torsten Sterzenbach; Ralf Helbig; Christian Hannig; Matthias Hannig
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Ultrastructural changes of smooth and rough titanium implant surfaces induced by metal and plastic periodontal probes.

Authors:  Matthias Folwaczny; Torsten Rudolf; Iris Frasheri; Madlena Betthäuser
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.