Literature DB >> 24720381

Preclinical imaging in bone tissue engineering.

Manuela Ventura1, Otto C Boerman, Chris de Korte, Mark Rijpkema, Arend Heerschap, Egbert Oosterwijk, John A Jansen, X Frank Walboomers.   

Abstract

Since X-rays were discovered, in 1895, and since the first radiological image of a hand, bone tissue has been the subject of detailed medical imaging. However, advances in bone engineering, including the increased complexity of implant scaffolds, currently also underline the limits of X-ray imaging. Therefore, advanced follow-up imaging methods are pivotal to develop. The field of noninvasive, high-sensitivity, and high-resolution anatomical and functional imaging techniques (optical, ultrasound, positron emission tomography, single-photon emission computed tomography, magnetic resonance, etc.) offers a wide variety of tools that potentially could be considered as alternatives, or at least supportive, to the most commonly used X-ray computed tomography. Moreover, dedicated preclinical scanners have become available, with sensitivity and resolution even higher than clinical scanners, thus favoring a quick translation from preclinical to clinical applications. Furthermore, the armamentarium of bone-specific probes and contrast agents for each of this imaging modalities is constantly growing. This review focuses on such preclinical imaging tools, each with its respective strengths and weaknesses, used alone or in combination. Especially, multimodal imaging will dramatically contribute to improve the knowledge on bone healing regenerative processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24720381     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  5 in total

1.  Pre-Assembly of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Multivalent Molecular Probes for Biological Imaging.

Authors:  Evan M Peck; Paul M Battles; Douglas R Rice; Felicia M Roland; Kathryn A Norquest; Bradley D Smith
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.774

2.  Evaluation of scaffold microstructure and comparison of cell seeding methods using micro-computed tomography-based tools.

Authors:  Aleksi Palmroth; Sanna Pitkänen; Markus Hannula; Kaarlo Paakinaho; Jari Hyttinen; Susanna Miettinen; Minna Kellomäki
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Longitudinal in vivo evaluation of bone regeneration by combined measurement of multi-pinhole SPECT and micro-CT for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Philipp S Lienemann; Stéphanie Metzger; Anna-Sofia Kiveliö; Alain Blanc; Panagiota Papageorgiou; Alberto Astolfo; Bernd R Pinzer; Paolo Cinelli; Franz E Weber; Roger Schibli; Martin Béhé; Martin Ehrbar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Perfluorocarbon/Gold Loading for Noninvasive in Vivo Assessment of Bone Fillers Using 19F Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Simone Mastrogiacomo; Weiqiang Dou; Olga Koshkina; Otto C Boerman; John A Jansen; Arend Heerschap; Mangala Srinivas; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 9.229

5.  Frequent, quantitative bone planar scintigraphy for determination of bone anabolism in growing mice.

Authors:  Ariane Zaloszyc; Claus Peter Schmitt; Amira Sayeh; Laetitia Higel; Catherine-Isabelle Gros; Fabien Bornert; Gaëlle Aubertin-Kirch; Jean-Philippe Dillenseger; Christian Goetz; André Constantinesco; Michel Fischbach; Seiamak Bahram; Philippe Choquet
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.