| Literature DB >> 34966570 |
Ariane Zaloszyc1,2,3,4, Claus Peter Schmitt5, Amira Sayeh4,6, Laetitia Higel1, Catherine-Isabelle Gros6,7,8, Fabien Bornert6,7,8, Gaëlle Aubertin-Kirch4,9, Jean-Philippe Dillenseger4,10, Christian Goetz11, André Constantinesco4, Michel Fischbach1, Seiamak Bahram2,3,12,13,14, Philippe Choquet4,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To provide insight into bone turnover, quantitative measurements of bone remodeling are required. Radionuclide studies are widely used in clinical care, but have been rarely used in the exploration of the bone in preclinical studies. We describe a bone planar scintigraphy method for frequent assessment of bone activity in mice across the growing period. Since repeated venous radiotracer injections are hardly feasible in mice, we investigated the subcutaneous route.Entities:
Keywords: Growth; Mice; Radionuclide imaging; Subcutaneous application
Year: 2021 PMID: 34966570 PMCID: PMC8667748 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Experimental scheme.
Figure 2Experimental setup.
(A) Side view, showing (1) the head of the gamma-camera, (2) the collimator and (3) the animal inside the bed. (B) Close view of the bed showing the laces used to move away the hind legs, and especially the knees, from the body.
Figure 3Sequential view of data processing.
(A) Typical dorsal view, saturated pixels, allowing visualization from top to bottom the injection site, the bladder and the knees. (B) Automatically applied threshold using maximum entropy method: the injection site (top) and the bladder (bottom) were detected, and masks are used to define corresponding ROI. They are used to get the number of counts inside the injection site and to withdraw the bladder for the next step. (C) Automatically applied threshold using Huang’s fuzzy thresholding method to create the whole body ROI (surrounded by a green line). (D) Freehand ROI drawn on the left knee (surrounded by a green line). (E) Isosurface representation of the femur (selected from a typical whole body µCT acquisition): femoral length was measured between the higher point of greater trochanter (green arrow) and the maximal concavity of lateral epicondyle (blue arrow).
Morphometric measurements (weight and femur length measured by µCT) and scintigraphic index by gender and acquisition.
|
|
|
| Mean Scintigraphic index ± SD (counts s−1 pixel−1 MBq −1 g−1× 10 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 43 (6.1) | 13.3 ± 0.6 | 14.6 ± 2.9 |
| 11.82 ± 0.47(3) | 12.41 ± 0.87(5) |
| 86.4 ± 8.1(3) | 91.8 ± 13.7(5) |
|
|
| 52 (7.4) | 16.7 ± 1.5 | 18.5 ± 2.1 |
| 13.15 ± 0.35(3) | 13.44 ± 1.06(2) |
| 67.7 ± 14.3(3) | 63.7 ± 10.0(2) |
|
|
| 58 (8.3) | 22.0 ± 1.0 |
| 13.95 ± 0.57(2) |
| 34.0 ± 3.7(3) |
| |||
|
| 67 (9.6) | 19.0 ± 0 | 22.0 ± 0.7 |
| 14.08 ± 0.16(3) | 14.58 ± 0.37(5) |
| 49.3 ± 2.4(3) | 27.3 ± 1.3(2) |
|
|
| 73 (10.4) | 18.3 ± 0.6 | 22.2 ± 1.8 |
| 14.32 ± 0.14(3) | 14.77 ± 0.35(5) |
| 35.8 ± 3.8(3) | 26.1 ± 7.5(5) |
|
|
| 80 (11.4) | 19.0 ± 0 | 23.4 ± 1.1 |
| 14.52 ± 0.13(3) | 14.96 ± 0.37(5) |
| 43.6 ± 1.5(3) | 27.6 ± 4.5(5) |
|
|
| 87 (12.4) | 18.7 ± 0.6 | 23.8 ± 1.8 |
| 14.70 ± 0.10(3) | 15.16 ± 0.37(5) |
| 34.0 ± 1.7(3) | 21.9 ± 4.1(5) |
|
|
| 94 (13.4) | 19.5 ± 0.7 | 23.8 ± 2.2 |
| 14.83 ± 0.13(2) | 15.20 ± 0.33(4) |
| 24.9 ± 0.6(2) | 19.1 ± 6.2(4) |
|
|
| 101 (14.4) | 20.0 ± 0 | 24.8 ± 1.5 |
| 14.90 ± 0.04(2) | 15.40 ± 0.39(4) |
| 33.4 ± 0.7(2) | 16.8 ± 2.6(4) |
|
|
| 115 (16.4) | 21.0 | 24.8 ± 3.3 |
| 15.39(1) | 15.50 ± 0.36(4) |
| 20.5(2) | 16.7 ± 3.0(4) |
|
|
| 123 (17.6) | 21.0 | 25.8 ± 1.3 |
| 15.46(1) | 15.64 ± 0.35(4) |
| 11.4(1) | 8.5 ± 0.9(4) |
|
|
| 130 (18.6) | 21.0 | 26.5 ± 0.6 |
| 15.50(1) | 15.57 ± 0.29(4) |
| 9.4(1) | 7.4 ± 1.3(4) |
|
|
| 136 (19.4) | 21.0 | 26.8 ± 2.2 |
| 15.61(1) | 15.58 ± 0.28(4) |
| 17.9(1) | 16.0 ± 3.8(4) |
|
|
| 157 (22.4) | 22.0 | 28.0 ± 1.8 |
| 15.69(1) | 15.83 ± 0.24(4) |
| 12.9(1) | 9.8 ± 7.8(4) |
|
|
| 171 (24.4) | 22.0 | 27.2 ± 1.5 |
| 15.85(1) |
| 23.5(1) | 13.8 ± 2.3(4) |
| |
|
| 192 (27.4) | 23.0 | 27.2 ± 1.0 |
|
| 17.6(1) | 11.2 ± 0.8(4) |
| ||
Notes.
Acquisition
Table associated with Fig. 4.
| Results in mean ± standard deviation | Investigator 1 | Investigator 2 | Investigator 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A in counts s−1 pixel−1 MBq−1 g−1 × 106 | 468.4 ± 99.2 | 462.1 ± 82.6 | 451.2 ± 84.7 |
| TA in days | 23.2 ± 2.6 | 23.0 ± 2.1 | 24.2 ± 2.5 |
| C in counts s−1 pixel−1 MBq−1 g−1 × 106 | 14.4 ± 2.1 | 12.3 ± 1.6 | 11.9 ± 2.1 |
Figure 4Index reflecting bone planar scintigraphic activity as a function of the age of the animals.
A color dot (one color per investigator) represents one processed acquisition. The three lines represent the exponential formula (1) used to fit scintigraphic data. A table (Table 2) is given with the formula for each investigator.
Figure 5Mean values of femur length measured by µCT and mean values of whole-body mass as a function of the age of the animals, along with standard deviations.
The blue dotted line represents the Gompertz formula (2) used to fit femur length.
Figure 6Negative correlation between the index reflecting bone planar scintigraphic and the mean femur length measured by µCT.
Pearson correlation coefficient, r, is given is the upper part of the scatter plot.