John I Nurnberger1, Daniel L Koller2, Jeesun Jung3, Howard J Edenberg4, Tatiana Foroud1, Ilaria Guella5, Marquis P Vawter5, John R Kelsoe6. 1. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis2Institute of Psychiatric Research, Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. 2. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. 3. Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis. 5. Functional Genomics Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine. 6. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla7Department of Psychiatry, Special Treatment and Evaluation Program, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Genome-wide investigations provide systematic information regarding the neurobiology of psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: To identify biological pathways that contribute to risk for bipolar disorder (BP) using genes with consistent evidence for association in multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS). DATA SOURCES: Four independent data sets with individual genome-wide data available in July 2011 along with all data sets contributed to the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Bipolar Group by May 2012. A prior meta-analysis was used as a source for brain gene expression data. STUDY SELECTION: The 4 published GWAS were included in the initial sample. All independent BP data sets providing genome-wide data in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were included as a replication sample. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We identified 966 genes that contained 2 or more variants associated with BP at P < .05 in 3 of 4 GWAS data sets (n = 12,127 [5253 cases, 6874 controls]). Simulations using 10,000 replicates of these data sets corrected for gene size and allowed the calculation of an empirical P value for each gene; empirically significant genes were entered into a pathway analysis. Each of these pathways was then tested in the replication sample (n = 8396 [3507 cases, 4889 controls]) using gene set enrichment analysis for single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The 226 genes were also compared with results from a meta-analysis of gene expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Empirically significant genes and biological pathways. RESULTS Among 966 genes, 226 were empirically significant (P < .05). Seventeen pathways were overrepresented in analyses of the initial data set. Six of the 17 pathways were associated with BP in both the initial and replication samples: corticotropin-releasing hormone signaling, cardiac β-adrenergic signaling, phospholipase C signaling, glutamate receptor signaling, endothelin 1 signaling, and cardiac hypertrophy signaling. Among the 226 genes, 9 differed in expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with BP: CACNA1C, DTNA, FOXP1, GNG2, ITPR2, LSAMP, NPAS3, NCOA2, and NTRK3. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pathways involved in the genetic predisposition to BP include hormonal regulation, calcium channels, second messenger systems, and glutamate signaling. Gene expression studies implicate neuronal development pathways as well. These results tend to reinforce specific hypotheses regarding BP neurobiology and may provide clues for new approaches to treatment and prevention.
IMPORTANCE: Genome-wide investigations provide systematic information regarding the neurobiology of psychiatric disorders. OBJECTIVE: To identify biological pathways that contribute to risk for bipolar disorder (BP) using genes with consistent evidence for association in multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS). DATA SOURCES: Four independent data sets with individual genome-wide data available in July 2011 along with all data sets contributed to the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium Bipolar Group by May 2012. A prior meta-analysis was used as a source for brain gene expression data. STUDY SELECTION: The 4 published GWAS were included in the initial sample. All independent BP data sets providing genome-wide data in the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were included as a replication sample. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: We identified 966 genes that contained 2 or more variants associated with BP at P < .05 in 3 of 4 GWAS data sets (n = 12,127 [5253 cases, 6874 controls]). Simulations using 10,000 replicates of these data sets corrected for gene size and allowed the calculation of an empirical P value for each gene; empirically significant genes were entered into a pathway analysis. Each of these pathways was then tested in the replication sample (n = 8396 [3507 cases, 4889 controls]) using gene set enrichment analysis for single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The 226 genes were also compared with results from a meta-analysis of gene expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Empirically significant genes and biological pathways. RESULTS Among 966 genes, 226 were empirically significant (P < .05). Seventeen pathways were overrepresented in analyses of the initial data set. Six of the 17 pathways were associated with BP in both the initial and replication samples: corticotropin-releasing hormone signaling, cardiac β-adrenergic signaling, phospholipase C signaling, glutamate receptor signaling, endothelin 1 signaling, and cardiac hypertrophy signaling. Among the 226 genes, 9 differed in expression in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with BP: CACNA1C, DTNA, FOXP1, GNG2, ITPR2, LSAMP, NPAS3, NCOA2, and NTRK3. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pathways involved in the genetic predisposition to BP include hormonal regulation, calcium channels, second messenger systems, and glutamate signaling. Gene expression studies implicate neuronal development pathways as well. These results tend to reinforce specific hypotheses regarding BP neurobiology and may provide clues for new approaches to treatment and prevention.
Authors: Michael Elashoff; Brandon W Higgs; Robert H Yolken; Michael B Knable; Serge Weis; Maree J Webster; Beata M Barci; E Fuller Torrey Journal: J Mol Neurosci Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.444
Authors: Fred A Wright; Hanwen Huang; Xiaojun Guan; Kevin Gamiel; Clark Jeffries; William T Barry; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Patrick F Sullivan; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; Fei Zou Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Dheeraj Malhotra; Shane McCarthy; Jacob J Michaelson; Vladimir Vacic; Katherine E Burdick; Seungtai Yoon; Sven Cichon; Aiden Corvin; Sydney Gary; Elliot S Gershon; Michael Gill; Maria Karayiorgou; John R Kelsoe; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Ellen Leibenluft; Deborah L Levy; Vladimir Makarov; Abhishek Bhandari; Anil K Malhotra; Francis J McMahon; Markus M Nöthen; James B Potash; Marcella Rietschel; Thomas G Schulze; Jonathan Sebat Journal: Neuron Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: P Sklar; J W Smoller; J Fan; M A R Ferreira; R H Perlis; K Chambert; V L Nimgaonkar; M B McQueen; S V Faraone; A Kirby; P I W de Bakker; M N Ogdie; M E Thase; G S Sachs; K Todd-Brown; S B Gabriel; C Sougnez; C Gates; B Blumenstiel; M Defelice; K G Ardlie; J Franklin; W J Muir; K A McGhee; D J MacIntyre; A McLean; M VanBeck; A McQuillin; N J Bass; M Robinson; J Lawrence; A Anjorin; D Curtis; E M Scolnick; M J Daly; D H Blackwood; H M Gurling; S M Purcell Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2008-03-04 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Lena Backlund; Catharina Lavebratt; Louise Frisén; Pernilla Nikamo; Dzana Hukic Sudic; Lil Träskman-Bendz; Mikael Landén; Gunnar Edman; Marquis P Vawter; Urban Ösby; Martin Schalling Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mark W Logue; Ananda B Amstadter; Dewleen G Baker; Laramie Duncan; Karestan C Koenen; Israel Liberzon; Mark W Miller; Rajendra A Morey; Caroline M Nievergelt; Kerry J Ressler; Alicia K Smith; Jordan W Smoller; Murray B Stein; Jennifer A Sumner; Monica Uddin Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Peter S Jensen; Mark A Frye; Joanna M Biernacka; Paul E Croarkin; Joan L Luby; Kelly Cercy; Jennifer R Geske; Marin Veldic; Matthew Simonson; Paramjit T Joshi; Karen Dineen Wagner; John T Walkup; Malik M Nassan; Alfredo B Cuellar-Barboza; Leah Casuto; Susan L McElroy Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: R Jansen; B W J H Penninx; V Madar; K Xia; Y Milaneschi; J J Hottenga; A R Hammerschlag; A Beekman; N van der Wee; J H Smit; A I Brooks; J Tischfield; D Posthuma; R Schoevers; G van Grootheest; G Willemsen; E J de Geus; D I Boomsma; F A Wright; F Zou; W Sun; P F Sullivan Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Seth A Ament; Szabolcs Szelinger; Gustavo Glusman; Justin Ashworth; Liping Hou; Nirmala Akula; Tatyana Shekhtman; Judith A Badner; Mary E Brunkow; Denise E Mauldin; Anna-Barbara Stittrich; Katherine Rouleau; Sevilla D Detera-Wadleigh; John I Nurnberger; Howard J Edenberg; Elliot S Gershon; Nicholas Schork; Nathan D Price; Richard Gelinas; Leroy Hood; David Craig; Francis J McMahon; John R Kelsoe; Jared C Roach Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael J McCarthy; Melissa J Le Roux; Heather Wei; Stephen Beesley; John R Kelsoe; David K Welsh Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Olga Varea; Maria Dolores Martin-de-Saavedra; Katherine J Kopeikina; Britta Schürmann; Hunter J Fleming; Jessica M Fawcett-Patel; Anthony Bach; Seil Jang; Elior Peles; Eunjoon Kim; Peter Penzes Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Debomoy K Lahiri; Bryan Maloney; Baindu L Bayon; Nipun Chopra; Fletcher A White; Nigel H Greig; John I Nurnberger Journal: Epigenomics Date: 2016-03-07 Impact factor: 4.778