Literature DB >> 24714417

Differential radiosensitivity phenotypes of DNA-PKcs mutations affecting NHEJ and HRR systems following irradiation with gamma-rays or very low fluences of alpha particles.

Yu-Fen Lin1, Hatsumi Nagasawa2, John B Little3, Takamitsu A Kato2, Hung-Ying Shih1, Xian-Jin Xie4, Paul F Wilson5, John R Brogan2, Akihiro Kurimasa6, David J Chen1, Joel S Bedford2, Benjamin P C Chen1.   

Abstract

We have examined cell-cycle dependence of chromosomal aberration induction and cell killing after high or low dose-rate γ irradiation in cells bearing DNA-PKcs mutations in the S2056 cluster, the T2609 cluster, or the kinase domain. We also compared sister chromatid exchanges (SCE) production by very low fluences of α-particles in DNA-PKcs mutant cells, and in homologous recombination repair (HRR) mutant cells including Rad51C, Rad51D, and Fancg/xrcc9. Generally, chromosomal aberrations and cell killing by γ-rays were similarly affected by mutations in DNA-PKcs, and these mutant cells were more sensitive in G1 than in S/G2 phase. In G1-irradiated DNA-PKcs mutant cells, both chromosome- and chromatid-type breaks and exchanges were in excess than wild-type cells. For cells irradiated in late S/G2 phase, mutant cells showed very high yields of chromatid breaks compared to wild-type cells. Few exchanges were seen in DNA-PKcs-null, Ku80-null, or DNA-PKcs kinase dead mutants, but exchanges in excess were detected in the S2506 or T2609 cluster mutants. SCE induction by very low doses of α-particles is resulted from bystander effects in cells not traversed by α-particles. SCE seen in wild-type cells was completely abolished in Rad51C- or Rad51D-deficient cells, but near normal in Fancg/xrcc9 cells. In marked contrast, very high levels of SCEs were observed in DNA-PKcs-null, DNA-PKcs kinase-dead and Ku80-null mutants. SCE induction was also abolished in T2609 cluster mutant cells, but was only slightly reduced in the S2056 cluster mutant cells. Since both non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and HRR systems utilize initial DNA lesions as a substrate, these results suggest the possibility of a competitive interference phenomenon operating between NHEJ and at least the Rad51C/D components of HRR; the level of interaction between damaged DNA and a particular DNA-PK component may determine the level of interaction of such DNA with a relevant HRR component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24714417      PMCID: PMC3979685          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The catalytic subunit of DNA dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) is the key regulator of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), the predominant DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair mechanism in mammals. DNA-PKcs is recruited to DSBs through the DNA-binding heterodimer Ku70/80, and together with these factors form the kinase active DNA-PK holoenzyme [1]. The biological significance of DNA-PKcs first became evident with the finding that mutation within the gene encoding DNA-PKcs led to severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in mice and other animals [2],[3]. The other major phenotypic trait coffered by DNA-PKcs mutations was severe hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR) and radiomimetic chemicals [4]. Kurimasa et al. confirmed the requirement of DNA-PKcs kinase activity for DSB rejoining after irradiation [5]. DNA-PKcs activation upon IR or treatment with radiomimetic chemicals rapidly results in phosphorylation of DNA-PKcs in the S2056 and the T2069 phosphorylation cluster regions [6]–[9]. Studies of DNA-PKcs mutant cell lines indicate that these phosphorylations are required for full DSB repair capacity and normal cellular radiosensitivity. DNA-PKcs and its downstream NHEJ components are active in all cell cycle phases. In contrast, homologous recombination repair (HRR), another major DSB repair mechanism, contributes to DSB repair and cellular survival only during S and G2 phases [10], [11]. To clarify the significance of DNA-PKcs activities in NHEJ-mediated DSB repair and in radiosensitivity, it is important to study synchronous cell populations at different phases throughout the cell cycle. We reported previously that cells expressing DNA-PKcs with mutations in the S2056 cluster, the T2609 cluster, or the PI3K kinase domain have clear differences in radiosensitivities when mutant cells were irradiated in the G1 phase [12]. Expression of DNA-PKcs with mutations in the T2609 cluster (L-3) or in the PI3K kinase domain (L-8, L-9, L-10, and L-11) results in extreme radiosensitivity, similar to that of Ku70/80-deficient xrs-5 and xrs-6 cells; however, mutations in the S2056 cluster (L-12) result in intermediate radiosensitivity [12]. DNA-PKcs mutants, V3 (DNA-PKcs null) and irs-20 (extreme c-terminal motif mutant) cause extreme and moderate radiosensitivity, respectively. These radiosensitive mutant cell strains respond to radiation in a cell-cycle-dependent manner and display enhanced radiation-induced cell cycle delay. In plateau phase G1 cells, a greatly reduced potentially lethal damage repair (PLDR), sub-lethal damage repair (SLDR), and a great reduction or absence of a dose-rate effect are observed [13]–[17]. Chinese Hamster Ku70/80-deficient xrs-5 and xrs-6 cell lines are more radiosensitive than wild-type cells and the radiosensitivity does not depend on cell cycle stage. In addition, these cells show no PLDR and no dose-rate effect. In these respects xrs-5 and xrs-6 are similar to ATM-deficient cell strains [18]–[25]. In connection with the DNA-PKcs phosphorylation-defective mutants described above, we have also reported other results indicating that HRR was required for the induction of SCEs by alpha particles [26], [27]. We have further investigated this in more detail in the present study by comparing SCE induction after very low doses of α-particles in cells that express the mutations in DNA-PKcs described above. The doses were sufficiently low that the observed levels of induced SCE could be attributed to effects produced in unirradiated “bystander” cells. In the present study, we compared radiosensitivity phenotypes among cell lines that express mutant versions of components of NHEJ system (DNA-PKcs, Ku80) or components of HRR system. We also examined the cell cycle dependence of chromosomal aberration induction and cell killing after high and low dose-rate γ irradiation.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and synchrony

For these studies, we employed the wild-type Chinese hamster cell lines CHO [28] and AA8 [29], NHEJ- deficient mutant lines xrs-5 [30] and V3 [31], HRR mutant lines irs-3 [32], CL-V4B [33], 51D1 [34], Fanconi anemia (FA) mutant (KO40) [35], and cell lines derived from DNA-PKcs-null V3 cells complemented with human DNA-PKcs cDNA containing amino acid substitutions at various positions [5]–[7], [12], [36] that are described in Tables 1 and 2. The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 95% air/5% CO2 atmosphere in Eagle's minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (50 mg/ml), and streptomycin (50 µg/ml). When the cultures approached 30% confluence in T-25 tissue culture flasks or Mylar-dishes, the normal growth medium was replaced twice at 24-hour intervals with isoleucine-deficient MEM containing 5% 3× dialyzed FBS to synchronize the cells in the G1 phase [37]. G1 synchronized cells were released in normal growth medium for 12 hours to achieve synchrony in late S/G2 phase of cell cycle. As shown in Table 2, G1 cell populations were relatively pure as judged by quantification of bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) following a 30 minute-pulse labeling; BrdU specifically labels S phase cells. Experiments shown were performed with G1 populations containing 1–12% S phase cells.
Table 1

Amino acid substitutions in the DNA-PKcs constructs.

Cell line/codeDNA-PKcs mutantsS2056 cluster1 T2609 cluster1 PI3KRad-Sens4
S2023S2029S2041S2051S2056T2609S2612T2620S2624T2638T2647Y3715D3921
L-1wild typeN*
L-3V3-6A (T2609 cluster to A)AAAAAASSS*
L-6V3-T2609AAS
L-7V3 (empty vector)SSS*
L-10V3-KC23 (kinase dead)2 DSSS*
L-11V3-KD51 (kinase dead)3 NSSS*
L-12V3-5A (S2056 cluster to A)AAAAAS*
L-14V3-3A (T2609A/T2638A/T2647A)AAASS

. Serine (S) and threonine (T) were replaced with alanine (A) at S2056 and T2609 cluster sites.

. V3-KC23 mutant carries a frame-shift at position of amino acid 3715 that results in truncation of the protein after 10 amino acids and loss of the entire PI3K kinase domain.

. In V3-KD51 mutant aspartic acid (D) at 3921 is replaced with asparagine (N).

. N: Normal; S: Slightly sensitive; SS, Sensitive; SSS: Very sensitive. Levels are from a previous report on survival responses from this laboratory; Sensitivities marked by the * were those confirmed independently in the present study.

Table 2

Induction of SCE with 0.7α-particle irradiation.

Cell lineDefective geneOriginMDT1 (hrs)% in S-phaseSCE per chromosome
0 mGy0.7 mGy
Wild type
CHONoneWild type143.40.336±0.0300.437±0.058
AA8NoneCHO131.40.332±0.0090.440±0.016
NHEJ mutants
xrs-5Ku80−/−CHO1810.50.442±0.0481.281±0.1702
V3DNA-PKcs−/−AA8180.80.387±0.0690.607±0.0733
HR/FA mutants
Irs-3Rad51CV79146.30.161±0.0090.169±0.001
CL-V48Rad51CV79153.40.156±0.0080.148±0.006
51D1Rad51DAA8247.90.326±0.0150.302±0.026
KO40Fancg/xrrc9AA82013.90.332±0.0140.443±0.0173
DNA-PKcs mutants
L-1V3 (wild-type)V3180.80.303±0.0980.430±0.110
L-3V3-6A (T2609 cluster to A)V3147.70.347±0.0130.357±0.028
L-6V3-T2609AV31712.20.305±0.0690.327±0.003
L-10V3-KC23 (kinase dead)V31812.10.421±0.0421.316±0.014
L-11V3-KD51 (kinase dead)V31620.505±0.0560.916±0.002
L-12V3-5A (S2056 cluster to A)V31620.269±0.0120.425±0.053
L-14V3-3A (T2609A/T2638A/T2647A)V3ND6.10.332±0.0140.332±0.014

. MDT: mean doubling time.

. Cells were irradiated with 0.35 mGy.

. Cells were irradiated with 0.18 mGy;

. Serine (S) and threonine (T) were replaced with alanine (A) at S2056 and T2609 cluster sites. . V3-KC23 mutant carries a frame-shift at position of amino acid 3715 that results in truncation of the protein after 10 amino acids and loss of the entire PI3K kinase domain. . In V3-KD51 mutant aspartic acid (D) at 3921 is replaced with asparagine (N). . N: Normal; S: Slightly sensitive; SS, Sensitive; SSS: Very sensitive. Levels are from a previous report on survival responses from this laboratory; Sensitivities marked by the * were those confirmed independently in the present study. . MDT: mean doubling time. . Cells were irradiated with 0.35 mGy. . Cells were irradiated with 0.18 mGy;

Irradiation and colony formation

For acute high dose-rate exposures, cells were irradiated with a J. L. Shepherd and Associates irradiator that emitted 137Cs γ-rays at a dose rate of 2.5 Gy/min. For the low dose rate 137Cs γ-ray irradiations, a J. L. Shepherd and Associates Model 81-14 beam irradiator containing a single relatively low activity (nominal 28 Ci) 137Cs source placed 100 cm above a water-jacketed CO2 incubator that was maintained at 37°C. For the colony formation assay, different dose rates were achieved by placing cultures on shelves in the incubator located at different distances below the source during 8 days of continuous low-dose-rate irradiation [17]. For α-particle irradiation, cells were cultured on the Mylar dishes and were placed over a Mylar window in the exposure well of specially constructed irradiator that provides a uniform source of well-characterized 3.07 MeV α-particles. The source consisted of 296 MBq of 238PuO2 electrodeposited onto one side of a 100-mm diameter stainless steel disk. The cells were irradiated from below in a helium environment, and the α-particles traversed a reciprocating collimator before reaching the Mylar window. The target-to-source distance is 42 mm in helium gas, 6 mm in air, and 3 mm in Mylar. Dose was controlled by a timer and precision photographic shutter, which allowed accurate doses of irradiation [38]. Survival curves were obtained by measuring the colony-forming ability of irradiated cell populations. Cells were plated immediately after irradiation onto 100-mm plastic Petri dishes and incubated for 8–10 days. Colonies were fixed with 100% ethanol and stained with 0.1% crystal violet solution. A colony with more than 50 cells was scored as a survivor.

Chromosome analysis

Synchronized G1-phase cells were subcultured into three T25 plastic flasks and cultured in fresh medium containing 10 µM BrdU for the first and second cycle cells after irradiation. At 4 hour intervals beginning 13 hours after subculture, colcemid was added to one of the three flasks to arrest cells in the first mitosis after subculture; total sampling time thus covered 12 hours. Most cells moved into the first and second rounds of mitosis after 13–18 hours and 25–35 hours post irradiation, respectively. The cells were fixed in methanolacetic acid (3∶1), and chromosomes were spread by air dry method [39]. The differential staining of cells in first and second rounds of mitosis were performed by the fluorescence plus Giemsa technique [40]. Chromosome aberration was analyzed at peak mitotic indices after irradiation. In brief, exponentially growing cells were irradiated with 137Cs γ-rays at a dose rate of 2.5 Gy/min. Colcemid was added to a final concentration of 0.1 µg/ml at 30 min after irradiation, and the cells were harvested 4 hours later; under these conditions the mitotic cells collected would have been in late S/G2 phase of cell cycle at the time of irradiation [41]. For sister chromatid exchange (SCE), irradiated cells were cultured in complete MEM containing 10 µM BrdU for two rounds of cell replication, and colcemid was added prior to the peak of second mitoses [42].

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using Prism GraphPad (version 6.02) software. Statistical significance was diagnosed by t-test and defined as p<0.05, but values of p<0.01, p<0.001 and p<0.0001 are shown as well to indicate level of confidence.

Results

Our previous investigation with G1-synchronized V3 cells and derivative cell lines expressing DNA-PKcs mutants revealed the contributions of the S2056 and T2609 clusters and the PI3K domain to NHEJ-dependent DSB repair and clonogenic survival [12]. In the current study, we examined the impact of DNA-PKcs domains on radiosensitivity for cell killing and chromosomal aberration induction following irradiation during different cell cycle phases. Radiosensitivities for cell killing of wild-type and various NHEJ-deficient mutant cells (Table 1) were investigated in synchronous cell populations in G1 or late S/G2 phases of the cell cycle. The synchronized cell populations were irradiated with γ-rays and reseeded to evaluate clonogenic survival (Fig. 1). In comparison to the wild-type Chinese Hamster cells (CHO and AA8), Ku70/80-deficient xrs-5 cells were extremely radiosensitive, and, as previously reported, survival was not affected by the stage of the cell cycle at the time of irradiation [24]. DNA-PKcs-deficient V3 cells were also highly radiosensitive, but cells irradiated in the late S/G2 phase of cell cycle had enhanced survival compared to those irradiated in G1 (Fig. 1A). Similarly, cells expressing DNA-PKcs mutants defective at the T2609 cluster (L-3, Fig. 1B), the PI3K kinase domain (L-10 and L-11, Fig. 1C), or the S2056 cluster (L-12, Fig. 1D) all exhibited higher cell survival when irradiated in late S/G2 than in G1, although this effect was not as prominent as that observed for the wild-type CHO cells (Table 3).
Figure 1

Effect of radiosensitivities on G1- and late S/G2-phase cells.

G1 (closed symbols) and late S/G2 (LS/G2, open symbols) synchronized cells [CHO and AA8 (WT), xrs-5, (A) V3, L-1, (B) L-3, (C) L-10, L-11, and (D) L-12] were irradiated by γ–rays and were reseeded immediately for analysis of colony formation. A colony with more than 50 cells was scored as a survivor. The results are means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments with each cell line.

Table 3

Effect of cell cycle on radiosensitivity.

Cell lineD10 dose (Gy)1 Ratio of sensitivities of S/G2 to G1 cells2
G1 phaseS/G2 phase
CHO4.16.41.6
AA84.67.71.7
xrs-50.80.81
V30.91.21.3
L-30.91.31.4
L-100.91.31.4
L-110.71.21.7
L-122.23.31.5

. D10, radiation dose required to reduce survival to 10% in G1 or S/G2 synchronized cells.

. Calculated by dividing D10 of S/G2 phase by D10 of G1 phase.

Effect of radiosensitivities on G1- and late S/G2-phase cells.

G1 (closed symbols) and late S/G2 (LS/G2, open symbols) synchronized cells [CHO and AA8 (WT), xrs-5, (A) V3, L-1, (B) L-3, (C) L-10, L-11, and (D) L-12] were irradiated by γ–rays and were reseeded immediately for analysis of colony formation. A colony with more than 50 cells was scored as a survivor. The results are means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments with each cell line. . D10, radiation dose required to reduce survival to 10% in G1 or S/G2 synchronized cells. . Calculated by dividing D10 of S/G2 phase by D10 of G1 phase. Wild-type, xrs-5 and DNA-PKcs mutant cells were examined for chromosome and chromatid-type aberrations induced by various doses of γ-rays (Fig. 2). Generally, DNA-PKcs mutant cells displayed more chromosomal aberrations per unit dose than wild-type CHO cells regardless whether irradiation occurred at G1 or late S/G2 phases. When the cells were irradiated in the G1 phase, relative to wild-type cells significantly elevated frequencies of radiation-induced breaks and exchanges were observed; levels of these aberrations were similar in cells with DNA-PKcs protein defective at the T2609 cluster, the PI3K domain or the S2056 cluster and in Ku-deficient xrs-5 cells (Fig. 2A, 2B). As previously noted, relatively few chromatid-type aberrations were induced by G1 irradiation of wild-type cells but were numerous in NHEJ-deficient mutant cells (Fig. 2A, 2B) [12], [15]. When the cells were irradiated in the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle, frequencies of radiation-induced chromosome breaks or deletions were similar in all DNA-PKcs mutant cells and were significantly different from wild-type cells (Fig. 2C). There were obvious differences between xrs-5 cells and DNA-PKcs mutant cells: After irradiation with 0.5 Gy in late S/G2 phase, approximately 3 to 5 times more chromatid breaks were observed in xrs-5 cells than in DNA-PKcs mutant cells (Fig. 2C). It is notable that after 1 Gy irradiation during the late S/G2 phase of the cell cycle, very few xrs-5 mitotic cells were collected due to a long delay at the G2 checkpoint as previously reported [43]. Results indicated that perhaps DNA-PKcs mutant cells showed lower frequencies of chromatid type exchanges (triradials and quadriradials) when the cells were irradiated in the late S/G2 phase than when cells were irradiated during the G1 phase (Figs. 2B and 2D); L-3 cells were an exception to this, as discussed further below.
Figure 2

Gamma-ray induced chromosomal aberrations in G1 and S/G2 phases.

Wild-type (CHO), NHEJ-deficient mutant lines (xrs-5, V3), and DNA-PKcs mutant strains were irradiated with doses of 0, 0.25, 0.5 or 1.0 Gy γ–rays during the G1 or late S/G2 phases of cell cycle. Chromatid-type (□) and chromosome-type (▪) aberrations were analyzed and scored as breaks (A, C) or exchanges (B, D). The results are means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments. Statistical analyses on the 0.5 Gy or 1 Gy-induced aberrations relative to CHO cells were performed using t-test. *, p<0.05; #, p<0.01; &, p<0.001; the black and gray symbols indicate the significant differences in chromosome-type and chromatid-type aberrations, respectively.

Gamma-ray induced chromosomal aberrations in G1 and S/G2 phases.

Wild-type (CHO), NHEJ-deficient mutant lines (xrs-5, V3), and DNA-PKcs mutant strains were irradiated with doses of 0, 0.25, 0.5 or 1.0 Gy γ–rays during the G1 or late S/G2 phases of cell cycle. Chromatid-type (□) and chromosome-type (▪) aberrations were analyzed and scored as breaks (A, C) or exchanges (B, D). The results are means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments. Statistical analyses on the 0.5 Gy or 1 Gy-induced aberrations relative to CHO cells were performed using t-test. *, p<0.05; #, p<0.01; &, p<0.001; the black and gray symbols indicate the significant differences in chromosome-type and chromatid-type aberrations, respectively. In cells proficient in so-called sub-lethal damage repair, there are marked reductions in effect per unit dose occur when radiation was delivered at low dose rates [44], [45]. For dose rates that are sufficiently low, repair proficient wild-type cells are able to form colonies during continuous irradiation at this or lower dose rates. Mutant cells with even relatively minor defects in critical repair systems are less able to cope with the continuous irradiation, and above a critical dose rate have reduced abilities to form colonies during irradiation [17]. Based on these earlier observations, low dose-rate assay was carried out for the DNA-PKcs mutant cell lines used in the present study. In brief, exponentially growing cells were irradiated for 8 days at dose rates ranging from 1.7 to 5.5 cGy/hour. As illustrated in Figure 3, where the ability to form colonies is plotted against the dose rate experienced during the 8 day incubation period for colony formation, none of the three wild-type cell lines evaluated exhibited any significant reduction in colony forming ability during continuous irradiation at any of the dose-rates tested relative to unirradiated cells. The cells that express the L-3, L-10, and L-11 DNA-PKcs mutants, however, appeared to be even more sensitive than the V3 mutant, while the L-12 mutant appeared as intermediate in sensitivity (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Effect of continuous low-dose-rate irradiation on colony formation.

Asynchronous cells were continuously irradiated at a variety of low-dose rates for 8 days. A colony with more than 50 cells was scored as a survivor. Means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments are shown.

Effect of continuous low-dose-rate irradiation on colony formation.

Asynchronous cells were continuously irradiated at a variety of low-dose rates for 8 days. A colony with more than 50 cells was scored as a survivor. Means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments are shown. The baseline dose-response for SCEs induced by α-particles in wild-type cells is shown from 0 to 1.4 mGy for CHO, and L-1 (V3 corrected) cells in Figure 4. At the extreme low end of the sensitivity for SCE induction HRR-deficient CL-V4B (Rad51C), irs-3 (Rad51C), and 51D1(Rad51D) cells (Fig. 4A) as well as cells expressing DNA-PKcs with mutations in the T2609 cluster region (L-3/L-6 cells) (Fig. 4B) showed little or no SCE induction after α-particle irradiation. At the other extreme, the radiation sensitive xrs-5, V3, and L-10/L-11 (PI3K domain mutant or kinase dead) cells displayed large increases in SCE after 0.35 and 0.7 mGy α-particle irradiation (Figs. 4A and 4B). This contrasts with the very low or absent induction of SCEs observed in DNA-PKcs mutants L-3 and L-6 cells. Although FA-deficient KO40 cells displayed only intermediate radiosensitivity (P. Wilson, unpublished data), a moderate increase in SCE was observed in KO40 cells similar to the dose response for wild-type cells over the dose range tested (Fig. 4A) and this also appeared to be the case for L-12 (multiple S2056 cluster) and L-14 cells (see table 1) (Fig. 4B). Thus, greatly increased induced SCE frequencies were found in extreme radiosensitive xrs-5 and some of the more radiosensitive DNA-PKcs mutant cell strains including V3, L-10, and L-11, but in other instances the induced SCE frequencies were either similar to that for wild-type cells or in some cases no SCEs were induced at all. (see Figure 4 and Table 2 for induced frequencies at 0.7 mGy or, on average, 1 track traversal per 250 cell nuclei).
Figure 4

Induction of sister chromatid exchanges with extremely low dose α-irradiation.

(A) Wild-type (CHO) and cells deficient in NHEJ (xrs-5), HRR (irs-3, CL-V48, 51D1), and FA (KO40) pathways and (B) V3 cells complemented with wild-type DNA-PKcs (L-1) or with mutants defective in T2609 cluster (L-3/6/14), S2056 cluster (L-12), or PI3K domain (L-10/11) were irradiated with extremely low doses of α-particles. SCEs were scored and normalized to the basal level of SCEs. Means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments are given. Statistical analyses on the induced frequencies of SCE relative to CHO cells were performed using t-test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.

Induction of sister chromatid exchanges with extremely low dose α-irradiation.

(A) Wild-type (CHO) and cells deficient in NHEJ (xrs-5), HRR (irs-3, CL-V48, 51D1), and FA (KO40) pathways and (B) V3 cells complemented with wild-type DNA-PKcs (L-1) or with mutants defective in T2609 cluster (L-3/6/14), S2056 cluster (L-12), or PI3K domain (L-10/11) were irradiated with extremely low doses of α-particles. SCEs were scored and normalized to the basal level of SCEs. Means ± SEMs from more than three independent experiments are given. Statistical analyses on the induced frequencies of SCE relative to CHO cells were performed using t-test. **, p<0.01; ***, p<0.001.

Discussion

We previously reported that V3 cells that express DNA-PKcs with substitution mutations in involving various regions of the protein displayed differential radiosensitivities when irradiated during the G1 phase of the cell cycle [12]. V3-derivative cells expressing DNA-PKcs mutants at the T2609 cluster (L-2 and L-3) and the PI3K domain (L-10 and L-11) were extremely radiosensitive for cell killing when irradiated in the G1 phase. In the current study, we observed the general trend that these DNA-PKcs mutant cells show increased radioresistance relative to their G1 responses when irradiated after cells had progressed into late S/G2 phase of cell cycle (Fig. 1A–D). Ku70/80-deficient xrs-5 cell survival, however, was independent of the cell cycle occupied at the time of irradiation. In this, the Ku70/80-deficient cells are similar to ATM-deficient cells, which are extremely sensitive to radiation, display no cell-cycle dependence of radiosensitivity, are deficient in SLD and PLD repair, and have a high frequency of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations relative to wild-type cells [18]–[25], [46]. The lack of a cell-cycle effect in ATM-deficient cells is likely due to the fact that ATM is involved in repair of DSB in both NHEJ and HRR pathways [47], [48]. On the other hand, Ku protein is essential for DSB recognition and DNA-PKcs recruitment through only the NHEJ mechanism [1]. The lack of cell cycle effect on cell survival in xrs-5 cells could be explained by the fact that Ku protects DSB ends from non-specific processing [49], and thereby reduces the frequency of chromosomal exchange aberrations that might otherwise develop. The lack of Ku then might further reduce the proportion of break-pairs that are able to form exchanges, while at the same time resulting in more chromosomal breaks that fail to rejoin altogether resulting in deletion type aberrations. Such a blocking effect on DSB mis-rejoining may occur throughout all cell cycle phases as Ku exhibits similar kinetics for DSB rejoining regardless cell cycle status [50]. As we report here and previously Ku-deficient xrs-5 cells show dramatically increased induction of chromatid breaks but virtually no exchange aberrations when the cells are irradiated in late S/G2 phase of cell cycle [41]. Interestingly, large increases in both chromosome breaks and exchanges were seen per unit dose in irs-5 cells when irradiated in G1 (figure 2A and 2B). Additionally, Ku possesses 5′deoxyribose-5-phosphate (5′-dRP)/AP lyase activity that results in excision of abasic sites near DSBs in vitro [51], although it is not clear whether this activity contributes to cell cycle effects or aberration formation. Low linear energy transfer (LET) irradiation induces base damage, single-strand breaks (SSBs), DSBs, and cross-links immediately after irradiation [41], [45]. SSBs are rejoined in wild-type cells with a half-time of approximately 10 minutes. DSBs are more slowly rejoined with a half time of 1 to 2 hours [15], [52], [53]. Several reports have indicated that a two-component DSB rejoining system operates with a fast component (t1/2 ∼15 minutes) and slow component (t1/2 ∼1 to 2 hours) [15], [52]. Mutations leading to defects in dealing with dsbs strongly argue that prompt (or immediate) production of these dsbs by ionizing irradiation are the most important DNA lesions in cell killing, mutation, and tumor promotion for carcinogenesis by irradiation [15], [45], [54]. A close correlation between cell killing and the induction of chromosomal aberrations has also been reported in a number of investigations [46], [52], [55]–[61]. Our results agree with this conclusion. Cells with mutations in components of the NHEJ system were hypersensitive with respect to cell killing and chromosomal aberration induction by γ radiation. The degree of hypersensitivity varied depending on the nature of the mutation, but increases in numbers of chromosomal aberrations were correlated with increases in cell death in each of the cell lines. In addition to the correlation between cell killing and chromosomal aberration induction, in most, although not all, radiosensitive mutant cells we observed high frequencies of chromosome-type aberrations after G1 irradiation and also a very high frequency of chromatid-types aberrations. In wild-type cells, most aberrations were of chromosome types when cells were irradiated in G1. This general observation has been reported for many radiosensitive DNA-PKcs mutant cells as well as for lymphocyte and fibroblast cells from ataxia-telangiectasia patients who have mutations in ATM [20], [22], [23], [46], [54], [62]–[67]. Because virtually all base damaging agents that do not produce prompt DNA DSBs result in the production of only chromatid-type aberrations after treatment of G1-phase cells, this suggests that ionizing radiation-sensitive mutant cells (e.g. NHEJ and ATM mutations) show both chromatid- and chromosome-type aberrations after G1 irradiation because of a concomitant or partially overlapping deficiency or competitive inhibition between DSB and SSB rejoining systems. Late S/G2-phase Ku80-deficient xrs-5 cells irradiated with doses of 25 and 50 cGy showed extremely high frequencies of total aberrations, and 80–90% were chromatid-type aberrations (Fig. 2). Although xrs-5 cells had an extremely long G2 delay as compared with most other cell lines analyzed upon treatment with relatively low dose irradiation, these cells did progress from the G2 checkpoint into mitosis [43]. Hashimoto and colleagues reported that the Ku 80-deficient cells apparently do not adequately repair DSBs before moving into mitosis [68]. They suggested that incompletely repaired DSBs result in SSBs that may appear as chromatid-type breaks in mitosis. This may be pertinent to the mechanism of G2-chromosomal hypersensitivity originally suggested by Sanford and colleagues [69] and by Scott [70]. Three types of dose response curves for SCE induction were observed when DNA-PKcs mutant cells were irradiated by extremely low-dose α-particle irradiation (Fig. 4). Moderately radiosensitive L-12 (S2056 cluster mutant) cells showed similar (perhaps slightly lower) frequencies of SCEs relative to wild type (CHO and L-1) cells with up to 1.4 mGy α-particle irradiation (Fig. 4B). Only 0.8% of the nuclei were traversed by an α-particle by this dose (i.e., only one cell nucleus in 125 cells was traversed by an α-particle), so most of the surviving cells expressing SCEs occurred in unirradiated bystander cells. There were very few or no SCEs in L-3, L-6, and L-14 cells (T2609 cluster mutant) with up to 1.4 mGy α-particle irradiation (Fig. 4B). This suggests an overlap in the functional operation of the HRR system and the DNA-PKcs T2609 cluster mutant cells of the NHEJ system. The lack of SCE induction with extremely low dose α-particle fluences has been previously reported in CHO cell lines deficient in Rad51 paralogs (Rad51C, xrcc2, xrcc3) as well as another essential HRR protein Brca2 [26], [27], [71]. This was confirmed for other HRR mutant cells (irs-3, CL-V4B, and 51D1), which also lacked the ability to form SCEs in this study (Fig. 4A). We previously reported that mouse DNA-PKcs 3A knock-in mutant cells (identical design to the L-14 cell line used in this study) were defective in both HRR and FA repair pathways [72]. The lack of SCE induction in L-3, L-6, and perhaps L-14 cells suggests that each individual phosphorylatable residue in the T2609 cluster might contribute specifically and distinctively to the functional efficiency of the HRR process. When cells were irradiated during the G1 phase, the extent of cell killing depended on the number of amino acid replacements within the T2609 cluster. We previously reported that L-6 cells with a single residue replaced had near wild-type sensitivity, L-14 with three residues replaced was of intermediate sensitivity, and L-3 cells with six residues replaced was very radiosensitive [12]. The high radiosensitivity of the L-3 mutant was confirmed in the present study. Therefore, each phosphorylation in the T2609 cluster contributes to radiosensitivity after low LET irradiation based on their functionality underlying the NHEJ mechanism, and phosphorylation of these T2609 residues also influences the interaction with the HRR system to allow SCE induction after low dose α-particle irradiation. In contrast to the lack of SCE induction in L-3, L-6, and L-14 cells (T2609 cluster mutants), a significant increase in SCEs relative to wild-type cells were observed in L-10 and L-11 (PI3K mutant) cells. The L-10 and L-11 mutations led to approximately 3 and 10 times higher α-particle induced SCE frequencies, respectively, than observed in wild-type cells after treatment with 0.7 mGy (i.e., 0.4% of nuclei traversed by an α-particle) (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, relative to wild-type cells, Ku70/80-deficient xrs-5 cells showed enormously increased SCE frequencies at 0.13 or 0.17 mGy of α-particle irradiation, where on average less than 1 cell nucleus per 1000 cells was traversed by an α-particle. The reason for difference in sensitivity of one set of NHEJ mutants relative to the other with respect to SCE induction suggests the possibility that the wild-type NHEJ system has a minor modulating effect on the HRR system which is required for SCE formation after α-particle irradiation [26], [27]. Severely reducing or eliminating the NHEJ function resulted in extreme hypersensitivity to cell killing and chromosomal aberration induction by low LET radiation but also removed any interference with the HRR system required for α-particle-induced SCE. The mutation in DNA-PKcs that affected phosphorylation of five residues in the S2056 cluster had only a modest effect on sensitivity of cells to γ-rays and no effect on HRR-dependent induction of SCE by α-particles. In summary, the present study investigated the differential radiosensitivity phenotypes of cells expressing different DNA-PKcs mutants with comparison to cell lines defective in NHEJ or HRR components. Our new analyses are critical as we proceed with further mechanistic studies of DNA-PKcs mutations and their implication in carcinogenesis or other diseases. Significant alteration of DNA-PKcs expression has been correlated with cancer progression and resistance to radio- and/or chemotherapy treatment [73], although less emphasis has been put on mutation spectra analysis of DNA-PKcs probably due to the difficulty of analyzing the enormous DNA-PKcs-encoding PRKDC gene. Nonetheless, several point mutations in DNA-PKcs have been identified from breast tumor biopsies including a missense mutation that results in a Thr to Pro substitution at residue 2609 [74]. It is highly plausible that this substitution in the T2609 cluster is the driver for mutation accumulation, genome instability, and eventually carcinogenesis. With the advancement in deep sequencing techniques, it is foreseeable that DNA-PKcs mutations will be identified from tumor biopsies or other diseases. Our current analyses provide information necessary to delineate the molecular mechanism of phenotypic differences resulting from mutations in DNA-PKcs. Phenotypes and molecular mechanisms underlying them are not always predictable from genotypes.
  71 in total

1.  A possible role of Ku in mediating sequential repair of closely opposed lesions.

Authors:  M Hashimoto; C D Donald; S M Yannone; D J Chen; R Roy; Y W Kow
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Some unsolved problems and unresolved issues in radiation cytogenetics: a review and new data on roles of homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Hatsumi Nagasawa; John R Brogan; Yuanlin Peng; John B Little; Joel S Bedford
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Design of a benchtop alpha particle irradiator.

Authors:  N F Metting; A M Koehler; H Nagasawa; J M Nelson; J B Little
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Relationship between gamma-ray-induced G2/M delay and cellular radiosensitivity.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; P Keng; R Harley; W Dahlberg; J B Little
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.694

6.  Relationship of DNA repair to chromosome aberrations, sister-chromatid exchanges and survival during liquid-holding recovery in X-irradiated mammalian cells.

Authors:  A J Fornace; H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Comparison of kinetics of X-ray-induced cell killing in normal, ataxia telangiectasia and hereditary retinoblastoma fibroblasts.

Authors:  H Nagasawa; J B Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Chromosomal radiosensitivity of ataxia telangiectasia cells at different cell cycle stages.

Authors:  A T Natarajan; M Meyers
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1979-11-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 9.  Contribution of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint arrest to the maintenance of genomic stability.

Authors:  Penny A Jeggo; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-21

10.  Repression of mutagenesis by Rad51D-mediated homologous recombination.

Authors:  John M Hinz; Robert S Tebbs; Paul F Wilson; Peter B Nham; Edmund P Salazar; Hatsumi Nagasawa; Salustra S Urbin; Joel S Bedford; Larry H Thompson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  Coordination of the Ser2056 and Thr2609 Clusters of DNA-PKcs in Regulating Gamma Rays and Extremely Low Fluencies of Alpha-Particle Irradiation to G0/G1 Phase Cells.

Authors:  Hatsumi Nagasawa; Yu-Fen Lin; Takamitsu A Kato; John R Brogan; Hung-Ying Shih; Akihiro Kurimasa; Joel S Bedford; Benjamin P C Chen; John B Little
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Deciphering the role of distinct DNA-PK phosphorylations at collapsed replication forks.

Authors:  Jessica A Neal; Krista Dunger; Kelly Geith; Katheryn Meek
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-07-08

3.  Lysines 3241 and 3260 of DNA-PKcs are important for genomic stability and radioresistance.

Authors:  Eiichiro Mori; Anthony J Davis; Masatoshi Hasegawa; David J Chen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Overexpression of the base excision repair NTHL1 glycosylase causes genomic instability and early cellular hallmarks of cancer.

Authors:  Kristin L Limpose; Kelly S Trego; Zhentian Li; Sara W Leung; Altaf H Sarker; Jason A Shah; Suresh S Ramalingam; Erica M Werner; William S Dynan; Priscilla K Cooper; Anita H Corbett; Paul W Doetsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Induction of Genomic Instability in a Primary Human Fibroblast Cell Line Following Low-Dose Alpha-Particle Exposure and the Potential Role of Exosomes.

Authors:  Eman Mohammed Elbakrawy; Ammar Mayah; Mark A Hill; Munira Kadhim
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-28

6.  A Mechanistic DNA Repair and Survival Model (Medras): Applications to Intrinsic Radiosensitivity, Relative Biological Effectiveness and Dose-Rate.

Authors:  Stephen Joseph McMahon; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 7.  Utilization of cytogenetic biomarkers as a tool for assessment of radiation injury and evaluation of radiomodulatory effects of various medicinal plants - a review.

Authors:  Ravindra M Samarth; Meenakshi Samarth; Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.162

8.  Mechanistic Modelling of DNA Repair and Cellular Survival Following Radiation-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Stephen J McMahon; Jan Schuemann; Harald Paganetti; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Frequency and Spectrum of Mutations Induced by Gamma Rays Revealed by Phenotype Screening and Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Yan Du; Zhuo Feng; Jie Wang; Wenjie Jin; Zhuanzi Wang; Tao Guo; Yuze Chen; Hui Feng; Lixia Yu; Wenjian Li; Libin Zhou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.