| Literature DB >> 24712710 |
A Porcheron1, J Latreille, R Jdid, E Tschachler, F Morizot.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Ageing leads to characteristic changes in the appearance of facial skin. Among these changes, we can distinguish the skin topographic cues (skin sagging and wrinkles), the dark spots and the dark circles around the eyes. Although skin changes are similar in Caucasian and Chinese faces, the age of occurrence and the severity of age-related features differ between the two populations. Little is known about how the ageing of skin influences the perception of female faces in Chinese women. The aim of this study is to evaluate the contribution of the different age-related skin features to the perception of age and attractiveness in Chinese women.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese women; age perception; facial attractiveness; skin features
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24712710 PMCID: PMC4283052 DOI: 10.1111/ics.12128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cosmet Sci ISSN: 0142-5463 Impact factor: 2.970
Figure 1(a) Example of an original Chinese face and the four types of manipulation (sagging/wrinkles, dark spots, dark circles and all signs). (b) Example of an original Caucasian face and the four types of manipulation (sagging/wrinkles, dark spots, dark circles and all signs). Subjects' eyes are masked in printed pictures to assure their anonymity, but were not masked during the evaluations. The boxes also mask manipulations in the region around the eye.
Figure 2Effect of each manipulation on perceived age difference (LSMean + SE in years) of Chinese faces and Caucasian faces.
Figure 3Distribution of increase in attractiveness after manipulation (‘strong increase’ vs. ‘slight-to-moderate increase’) according to racial group and type of manipulation.
The effects of the type of manipulation on facial attractiveness differed according to the origin of face (‘origin of face’ as a fixed effect). For example, Caucasian faces after manipulation of sagging/wrinkles had 2.82 more chance of obtaining a ‘strong increase’ in attractiveness than Chinese faces with similar manipulation (P < 0.0001), whereas Chinese faces after manipulation of dark spots had 1.5 more chance of obtaining a ‘strong increase’ in attractiveness than Caucasian faces with similar manipulation (P = 0.0063)
| ‘Origin of face’ effect | Odds ratio (OR) | Standard error | CI of 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caucasian vs. Chinese/sagging and wrinkles | 2.82 | 0.51 | [1.97; 4.02] | |
| Chinese vs. Caucasian/dark spots | 1.50 | 0.22 | [1.12; 2.00] | |
| Caucasian vs. Chinese/dark circles | 1.63 | 0.34 | [1.08; 2.45] | |
| Caucasian vs. Chinese/all signs | 1.78 | 0.29 | [1.30; 2.44] |
A large confidence interval (CI) indicates low OR precision. If the CI of the OR does not overlap value 1, a difference is statistically significant. P is Wald test probability.
The effects of the type of manipulation on facial attractiveness differed according to the origin of face (‘type of manipulation’ as a fixed effect). For example, Caucasian faces after manipulation of sagging/wrinkles had 2.2 more chance of obtaining a ‘strong increase’ in attractiveness than after manipulation of dark circles (P < 0.0001). Chinese faces after manipulation of dark spots had 6.07 more chance of obtaining a ‘strong increase’ in attractiveness than after manipulation of sagging/wrinkles (P < 0.0001)
| ‘Type of manipulation’ effect | Odds ratio (OR) | Standard error | CI of 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sagging and wrinkles vs. dark circles/ Caucasian | 2.20 | 0.32 | [1.66; 2.92] | |
| Sagging and wrinkles vs. dark circles/ Chinese | 1.27 | 0.20 | [0.94; 1.73] | 0.1233 |
| All signs vs. sagging and wrinkles/ Caucasian | 7.02 | 0.92 | [5.42; 9.08] | |
| All signs vs. sagging and wrinkles/ Chinese | 11.10 | 1.68 | [8.25; 14.92] | |
| Dark spots vs. sagging and wrinkles/ Caucasian | 1.44 | 0.17 | [1.13; 1.83] | |
| Dark spots vs. sagging and wrinkles/ Chinese | 6.07 | 0.92 | [4.51; 8.18] | |
| All signs vs. dark circles/ Caucasian | 15.47 | 2.43 | [11.37; 21.06] | |
| All signs vs. dark circles/ Chinese | 14.12 | 2.31 | [10.25; 19.46] | |
| Dark spots vs. dark circles/ Caucasian | 3.17 | 0.42 | [2.44; 4.12] | |
| Dark spots vs. dark circles/ Chinese | 7.73 | 1.21 | [5.68; 10.51] | |
| All signs vs. dark spots/ Caucasian | 4.88 | 0.62 | [3.80; 6.25] | |
| All signs vs. dark spots/ Chinese | 1.83 | 0.19 | [1.49; 2.24] |
A large confidence interval (CI) indicates low OR precision. If the CI of the OR does not overlap value 1, a difference is statistically significant. P is Wald test probability.
Figure 4Correlation between the real age and the mean perceived age from all the participants. Spearman's R = 0.72 (P = 0.02) for Chinese faces; Spearman's R = 0.13 (P = 0.72) for Caucasian faces.