BACKGROUND: Perceived age is important to women and is a primary driver for topical product use and facial cosmetic surgery. Changes in facial features and biophysical skin parameters with chronological age and their associations with perceived age have not been described in Asian populations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biophysical properties of the skin, visual features of skin ageing and perceived facial age in Chinese women. METHODS: Facial photographs were collected of 250 Chinese women, aged 25-70 years in Shanghai, China. The perceived facial age was determined and related to the chronological age for each participant and to a range of visual assessments of skin appearance and objective biophysical measurements of the skin. The profile of changes in these parameters with age was investigated together with the differences in those parameters for women judged to look younger than their chronological age and those judged to look older than their chronological age. RESULTS: Large discrepancies in perceived age (up to 29 years) were found in women of the same chronological age. Each objective skin measure and visual assessment parameter had a stronger correlation with perceived age than with chronological age. The strongest relationships to perceived age were for wrinkles and hyperpigmentation. Skin colour, hydration and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) had weaker associations with perceived age. Women judged to look older than their chronological age had significantly higher scores than those judged to look younger for coarse wrinkles and hyperpigmentation across all age groups. The appearance differences between these groups were evident in composite facial images of the same average chronological age. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified the skin attributes which differ with perceived age in Chinese women. Perceived age is a better measure of the biological age of facial skin than is chronological age in this population.
BACKGROUND: Perceived age is important to women and is a primary driver for topical product use and facial cosmetic surgery. Changes in facial features and biophysical skin parameters with chronological age and their associations with perceived age have not been described in Asian populations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between biophysical properties of the skin, visual features of skin ageing and perceived facial age in Chinese women. METHODS: Facial photographs were collected of 250 Chinese women, aged 25-70 years in Shanghai, China. The perceived facial age was determined and related to the chronological age for each participant and to a range of visual assessments of skin appearance and objective biophysical measurements of the skin. The profile of changes in these parameters with age was investigated together with the differences in those parameters for women judged to look younger than their chronological age and those judged to look older than their chronological age. RESULTS: Large discrepancies in perceived age (up to 29 years) were found in women of the same chronological age. Each objective skin measure and visual assessment parameter had a stronger correlation with perceived age than with chronological age. The strongest relationships to perceived age were for wrinkles and hyperpigmentation. Skin colour, hydration and trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) had weaker associations with perceived age. Women judged to look older than their chronological age had significantly higher scores than those judged to look younger for coarse wrinkles and hyperpigmentation across all age groups. The appearance differences between these groups were evident in composite facial images of the same average chronological age. CONCLUSIONS: We have identified the skin attributes which differ with perceived age in Chinese women. Perceived age is a better measure of the biological age of facial skin than is chronological age in this population.
Authors: Andrew E Mayes; Peter G Murray; David A Gunn; Cyrena C Tomlin; Sharon D Catt; Yi B Wen; Li P Zhou; Hong Q Wang; Michael Catt; Stewart P Granger Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Carina Trojahn; Gabor Dobos; Andrea Lichterfeld; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Sebastian Majewski; Anna Pietrzak; Damian Tworek; Karolina Szewczyk; Anna Kumor-Kisielewska; Zofia Kurmanowska; Paweł Górski; Anna Zalewska-Janowska; Wojciech Jerzy Piotrowski Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2017-08-11