| Literature DB >> 24711789 |
Willem M Otte1, Kajo van der Marel2, Kees P Braun3, Rick M Dijkhuizen4.
Abstract
Permanent focal brain damage can have critical effects on the function of nearby as well as remote brain regions. However, the effects of transient disturbances on global brain function are largely unknown. Our goal was to develop an experimental in vivo model to map the impact of transient functional brain impairment on large-scale neural networks in the absence of structural damage. We describe a new rat model of transient functional hemispheric disruption using unilateral focal anesthesia by intracarotid pentobarbital injection. The brain's functional status was assessed with resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). We performed network analysis to identify and quantify highly connected network hubs, i.e., "rich-club organization," in pre- and postbarbital functional networks. Perfusion MRI data demonstrated that the catheterized carotid artery predominantly supplied the ipsilateral hemisphere, allowing for selective hemispheric brain silencing. The prebarbital baseline network displayed strong functional connectivity (FC) within and between hemispheres. Following pentobarbital injection, the disrupted hemisphere revealed increased intrahemispheric FC with concomitant decrease of interhemispheric connectivity. The bilateral functional network was characterized by a strong positive rich-club effect, which was not affected by ipsilateral disruption. Nevertheless, the rich-club value was significantly decreased in the ipsilateral hemisphere and to a lesser extent contralaterally. Loss of interhemispheric EEG synchronization supported the rs-fMRI findings. Our data support the concept that densely connected rich-club regions play a central role in global brain communication, and show that network hub configurations can be significantly affected by focal temporary functional hemispheric disruption without structural neuronal damage. Further studies with this rat model will provide essential additional insights into network reorganization patterns in response to transient functional brain disruption.Entities:
Keywords: neural network; rat brain; resting-state fMRI; rich-club effect; transient brain impairment
Year: 2014 PMID: 24711789 PMCID: PMC3968768 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Syst Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5137
Figure 2Pre- and postbarbital individual network node strengths plotted as bar graphs. The 64 bilateral nodes are sorted from high to low strength. The 10 network nodes with the highest strength prior to pentobarbital injection are given in blue. The node with the highest strength in the postbarbital functional network, the contralateral primary motor cortex, is given in orange. The following abbreviations are used, contra, left hemisphere, contralateral to cannulation, ipsi, right hemisphere, ipsilateral to cannulation; AID, agranular insular cortex dorsal part; AIP, agranular insular cortex posterior part; Au1, primary auditory cortex; AuD, secondary auditory cortex dorsal area; AuV, secondary auditory cortex ventral area; AIV, agranular insular cortex ventral part; Cg1, cingulate cortex area 1; Cg2, cingulate cortex area 2; CPu, caudate-putamen complex; DI, facial nucleus; Fr3, frontal cortex area 3; GI, granular insular cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; M2, secondary motor cortex; PrL, prelimbic cortex; PtPD, parietal cortex posterior area dorsal part; PtPR, parietal cortex posterior area rostral part; Rt, intermediate reticular nucleus; S1BF, primary somatosensory cortex barrel field; S1DZ, primary somatosensory cortex dysgranular zone; S1FL, primary somatosensory cortex forelimb region; S1HL, primary somatosensory cortex hindlimb region; S1J, primary somatosensory cortex jaw region; S1ULp, primary somatosensory cortex upper lip region; S2, secondary somatosensory cortex; TeA, temporal association cortex.
Figure 1Perfusion MRI frames, demonstrating clear unilateral delivery of the contrast agent in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the side of cannulation. The frames were acquired at 100 ms intervals from the start of bolus administration until 1.5 s later (the temporal frame sequence runs from top left to bottom right). The frames are in coronal plane at 1 mm from bregma. Presence of contrast agent is displayed using a color scale: dark for low contrast concentrations and bright for high contrast concentration (in arbitrary units). The green rectangles mark the ipsi- and contralateral hemispheres.
Figure 3Pre- and postbarbital (A) whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) networks, displayed as matrices. Each row and column stands for a region-of-interest in the hemisphere ipsi- or contralateral to the side of cannulation. Matrix elements are colored according to FCs values, measured as the correlation coefficient r between regions-of-interest. Red indicates no FC; yellow indicates high FC. Interhemispheric FCs are delineated with blue squares; intrahemispheric FCs with green squares. Weighted rich-club effects (y-axis) are plotted against increasing levels of strength (x-axis) for the entire brain network (B), and the contra- and ipsilateral (C) hemispheric networks. The maximum strength threshold depends on the size of the network. The strength thresholds were increased until networks started to disintegrate. This explains the different scaling of the x-axis in the hemispheric networks as compared to the entire brain network. Significant differences in weighted rich-club effects between prebarbital (blue line) and postbarbital (red line) networks are indicated as * [permutation analysis; p < 0.01 considered significant].
Figure 4Pre- and postbarbital (A) variation within the whole-brain functional connectivity matrices as shown in Figure 3. Each row and column represent a region-of-interest in the hemisphere ipsi- or contralateral to the side of cannulation. Matrix elements are colored according to the standard deviation (SD) of the individual functional connectivity values, measured as the correlation coefficient r between regions-of-interest. Red indicates SD values close to 0; yellow indicates SD values close to 0.4. As shown in the density distribution of all SD values (B), the variation between individual networks is slightly smaller for the prebarbital data (most SD's between 0 and 0.3) as compared to the variation in the postbarbital data (with most SD's between 0 and 0.4).
Figure 5The interhemispheric somatosensory functional EEG connectivities (measured as correlation coefficients ( The corresponding moment of pentobarbital injection and periods of resting-state fMRI used to construct functional networks are shown below (B). Note that functional imaging was acquired prior to EEG, but was identical in approach and timing of pentobarbital injection.