Literature DB >> 24711418

Distinct phosphatases antagonize the p53 response in different phases of the cell cycle.

Indra A Shaltiel1, Melinda Aprelia1, Adrian T Saurin2, Dipanjan Chowdhury3, Geert J P L Kops4, Emile E Voest5, René H Medema6.   

Abstract

The basic machinery that detects DNA damage is the same throughout the cell cycle. Here, we show, in contrast, that reversal of DNA damage responses (DDRs) and recovery are fundamentally different in G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle. We find that distinct phosphatases are required to counteract the checkpoint response in G1 vs. G2. Whereas WT p53-induced phosphatase 1 (Wip1) promotes recovery in G2-arrested cells by antagonizing p53, it is dispensable for recovery from a G1 arrest. Instead, we identify phosphoprotein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit (PP4) to be specifically required for cell cycle restart after DNA damage in G1. PP4 dephosphorylates Krüppel-associated box domain-associated protein 1-S473 to repress p53-dependent transcriptional activation of p21 when the DDR is silenced. Taken together, our results show that PP4 and Wip1 are differentially required to counteract the p53-dependent cell cycle arrest in G1 and G2, by antagonizing early or late p53-mediated responses, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24711418      PMCID: PMC4034242          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322021111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  43 in total

1.  Overexpression of protein phosphatase 4 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shaofan Weng; Hua Wang; Weihong Chen; Matthew H Katz; Deyali Chatterjee; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W Pisters; Henry F Gomez; James L Abbruzzese; Jason B Fleming; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Smek promotes histone deacetylation to suppress transcription of Wnt target gene brachyury in pluripotent embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Jungmook Lyu; Eek-Hoon Jho; Wange Lu
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 25.617

3.  A PP4 phosphatase complex dephosphorylates RPA2 to facilitate DNA repair via homologous recombination.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Yunfeng Pan; Shlomo Kanner; Patrick Sung; James A Borowiec; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Roles of Kruppel-associated Box (KRAB)-associated Co-repressor KAP1 Ser-473 Phosphorylation in DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Chen Hu; Shengping Zhang; Xuan Gao; Xiaojing Gao; Xiaohong Xu; Ya Lv; Yan Zhang; Zhenhong Zhu; Changqing Zhang; Qiao Li; Jiemin Wong; Yongping Cui; Wen Zhang; Lin Ma; Chuangui Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Wip1 phosphatase is associated with chromatin and dephosphorylates gammaH2AX to promote checkpoint inhibition.

Authors:  L Macůrek; A Lindqvist; O Voets; J Kool; H R Vos; R H Medema
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that PP4 dephosphorylates KAP-1 impacting the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Aaron A Goodarzi; Guillaume O Adelmant; Yunfeng Pan; Penelope A Jeggo; Jarrod A Marto; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 7.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  A Mec1- and PP4-dependent checkpoint couples centromere pairing to meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Jill E Falk; Andrew Chi-ho Chan; Eva Hoffmann; Andreas Hochwagen
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  The ATM substrate KAP1 controls DNA repair in heterochromatin: regulation by HP1 proteins and serine 473/824 phosphorylation.

Authors:  David White; Ilona U Rafalska-Metcalf; Alexey V Ivanov; Andrea Corsinotti; Hongzhuang Peng; Sheng-Chung Lee; Didier Trono; Susan M Janicki; Frank J Rauscher
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 5.852

10.  PP4 dephosphorylates Maf1 to couple multiple stress conditions to RNA polymerase III repression.

Authors:  Andrew J Oler; Bradley R Cairns
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  40 in total

1.  Protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit is overexpressed in glioma and promotes glioma cell proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Mengyou Li; Xin Li; Shiming Xu; Pengfei Xue; QingZhe Li; Qingyang Lu; Qingbin Jia; Lianqun Zhang; Xueyuan Li; Xingang Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-09

2.  Phosphatases reverse p53-mediated cell cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  Lawrence A Donehower
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  p53 regulation upon genotoxic stress: intricacies and complexities.

Authors:  Rajni Kumari; Saishruti Kohli; Sanjeev Das
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2014-12-23

4.  Dynamics of CDKN1A in Single Cells Defined by an Endogenous Fluorescent Tagging Toolkit.

Authors:  Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Galit Lahav
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 5.  Wip1 phosphatase in breast cancer.

Authors:  A Emelyanov; D V Bulavin
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  T cell proliferation and adaptive immune responses are critically regulated by protein phosphatase 4.

Authors:  Fang-Hsuean Liao; Wan-Yi Hsiao; Yu-Chun Lin; Yi-Chiao Chan; Ching-Yu Huang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Protein phosphatase 6 is a key factor regulating spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Wen-Long Lei; Feng Han; Meng-Wen Hu; Qiu-Xia Liang; Tie-Gang Meng; Qian Zhou; Ying-Chun Ouyang; Yi Hou; Heide Schatten; Zhen-Bo Wang; Qing-Yuan Sun
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 15.828

8.  SCF(FBXW7)-mediated degradation of p53 promotes cell recovery after UV-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  María Galindo-Moreno; Servando Giráldez; M Cristina Limón-Mortés; Alejandro Belmonte-Fernández; Steven I Reed; Carmen Sáez; Miguel Á Japón; Maria Tortolero; Francisco Romero
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.834

9.  Altered Transcriptional Control Networks with Trans-Differentiation of Isogenic Mutant-KRas NSCLC Models.

Authors:  John A Haley; Elizabeth Haughney; Erica Ullman; James Bean; John D Haley; Marc Y Fink
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Fanconi anemia cells with unrepaired DNA damage activate components of the checkpoint recovery process.

Authors:  Alfredo Rodríguez; Leda Torres; Ulises Juárez; David Sosa; Eugenio Azpeitia; Benilde García-de Teresa; Edith Cortés; Rocío Ortíz; Ana M Salazar; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Luis Mendoza; Sara Frías
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.