Literature DB >> 20154705

A PP4 phosphatase complex dephosphorylates RPA2 to facilitate DNA repair via homologous recombination.

Dong-Hyun Lee1, Yunfeng Pan, Shlomo Kanner, Patrick Sung, James A Borowiec, Dipanjan Chowdhury.   

Abstract

Double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) induce a phosphorylation-mediated signaling cascade, but the role of phosphatases in this pathway remains unclear. Here we show that human protein phosphatase 4 (PP4) dephosphorylates replication protein A (RPA) subunit RPA2, regulating its role in the DSB response. PP4R2, a regulatory subunit of PP4, mediates the DNA damage-dependent association between RPA2 and the PP4C catalytic subunit. PP4 efficiently dephosphorylates phospho-RPA2 in vitro, and silencing PP4R2 in cells alters the kinetics and pattern of RPA2 phosphorylation. Depletion of PP4R2 impedes homologous recombination (HR) via inefficient loading of the essential HR factor RAD51, causing an extended G2-M checkpoint and hypersensitivity to DNA damage. Cells expressing phosphomimetic RPA2 mutants have a comparable phenotype, suggesting that PP4-mediated dephosphorylation of RPA2 is necessary for an efficient DNA-damage response. These observations provide new insight into the role and regulation of RPA phosphorylation in HR-mediated repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20154705      PMCID: PMC3057140          DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  46 in total

1.  A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Michael-Christopher Keogh; Jung-Ae Kim; Michael Downey; Jeffrey Fillingham; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Jacob C Harrison; Megumi Onishi; Nira Datta; Sarah Galicia; Andrew Emili; Judy Lieberman; Xuetong Shen; Stephen Buratowski; James E Haber; Daniel Durocher; Jack F Greenblatt; Nevan J Krogan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  RPA2 is a direct downstream target for ATR to regulate the S-phase checkpoint.

Authors:  Erin Olson; Christian J Nievera; Vitaly Klimovich; Ellen Fanning; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Assaying double-strand break repair pathway choice in mammalian cells using a targeted endonuclease or the RAG recombinase.

Authors:  David M Weinstock; Koji Nakanishi; Hildur R Helgadottir; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  Sequential and synergistic modification of human RPA stimulates chromosomal DNA repair.

Authors:  Rachel W Anantha; Vitaly M Vassin; James A Borowiec
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Protein phosphatase 2A antagonizes ATM and ATR in a Cdk2- and Cdc7-independent DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Paris Petersen; Danny M Chou; Zhongsheng You; Tony Hunter; Johannes C Walter; Gernot Walter
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Functions of human replication protein A (RPA): from DNA replication to DNA damage and stress responses.

Authors:  Yue Zou; Yiyong Liu; Xiaoming Wu; Steven M Shell
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Agata Smogorzewska; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Corey E Bakalarski; Zhenming Zhao; Nicole Solimini; Yaniv Lerenthal; Yosef Shiloh; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways.

Authors:  Ellen Fanning; Vitaly Klimovich; Andrew R Nager
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  RPA mediates recombination repair during replication stress and is displaced from DNA by checkpoint signalling in human cells.

Authors:  Kate M Sleeth; Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Natalia Issaeva; Jaroslaw Dziegielewski; Jiri Bartek; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  SMK-1/PPH-4.1-mediated silencing of the CHK-1 response to DNA damage in early C. elegans embryos.

Authors:  Seung-Hwan Kim; Antonia H Holway; Suzanne Wolff; Andrew Dillin; W Matthew Michael
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  64 in total

1.  Overexpression of protein phosphatase 4 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with stage II pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shaofan Weng; Hua Wang; Weihong Chen; Matthew H Katz; Deyali Chatterjee; Jeffrey E Lee; Peter W Pisters; Henry F Gomez; James L Abbruzzese; Jason B Fleming; Huamin Wang
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  What goes on must come off: phosphatases gate-crash the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Lee; Dipanjan Chowdhury
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 13.807

3.  Protein phosphatase 4 catalytic subunit is overexpressed in glioma and promotes glioma cell proliferation and invasion.

Authors:  Mengyou Li; Xin Li; Shiming Xu; Pengfei Xue; QingZhe Li; Qingyang Lu; Qingbin Jia; Lianqun Zhang; Xueyuan Li; Xingang Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-04-09

Review 4.  RPA-coated single-stranded DNA as a platform for post-translational modifications in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Alexandre Maréchal; Lee Zou
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 25.617

5.  RPA Phosphorylation Inhibits DNA Resection.

Authors:  Michael M Soniat; Logan R Myler; Hung-Che Kuo; Tanya T Paull; Ilya J Finkelstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Distinct phosphatases antagonize the p53 response in different phases of the cell cycle.

Authors:  Indra A Shaltiel; Melinda Aprelia; Adrian T Saurin; Dipanjan Chowdhury; Geert J P L Kops; Emile E Voest; René H Medema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The DNA damage checkpoint and the spindle position checkpoint: guardians of meiotic commitment.

Authors:  Olivia Ballew; Soni Lacefield
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  ATR kinase regulates its attenuation via PPM1D phosphatase recruitment to chromatin during recovery from DNA replication stress signalling.

Authors:  Debadrita Bhattacharya; Disha Hiregange; Basuthkar J Rao
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Interplay of DNA damage and cell cycle signaling at the level of human replication protein A.

Authors:  Gloria E O Borgstahl; Kerry Brader; Adam Mosel; Shengqin Liu; Elisabeth Kremmer; Kaitlin A Goettsch; Carol Kolar; Heinz-Peter Nasheuer; Greg G Oakley
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-06-13

10.  ATM modulates the loading of recombination proteins onto a chromosomal translocation breakpoint hotspot.

Authors:  Jiying Sun; Yukako Oma; Masahiko Harata; Kazuteru Kono; Hiroki Shima; Aiko Kinomura; Tsuyoshi Ikura; Hidekazu Suzuki; Shuki Mizutani; Roland Kanaar; Satoshi Tashiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.