Literature DB >> 24710309

Cost-effectiveness of a 14-gene risk score assay to target adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Joshua A Roth1, Paul Billings, Scott D Ramsey, Robert Dumanois, Josh J Carlson.   

Abstract

Life Technologies has developed a 14-gene molecular assay that provides information about the risk of death in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients after surgery. The assay can be used to identify patients at highest risk of mortality, informing subsequent treatments. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this novel assay. Patients and Methods. We developed a Markov model to estimate life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs for testing versus standard care. Risk-group classification was based on assay-validation studies, and chemotherapy uptake was based on pre- and post-testing recommendations from a study of 58 physicians. We evaluated three chemotherapy-benefit scenarios: moderately predictive (base case), nonpredictive (i.e., the same benefit for each risk group), and strongly predictive. We calculated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and performed one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Results. In the base case, testing and standard-care strategies resulted in 6.81 and 6.66 life years, 3.76 and 3.68 QALYs, and $122,400 and $118,800 in costs, respectively. The ICER was $23,200 per QALY (stage I: $29,200 per QALY; stage II: $12,200 per QALY). The ICER ranged from "dominant" to $92,100 per QALY in the strongly predictive and nonpredictive scenarios. The model was most sensitive to the proportion of high-risk patients receiving chemotherapy and the high-risk hazard ratio. The 14-gene risk score assay strategy was cost-effective in 68% of simulations. Conclusion. Our results suggest that the 14-gene risk score assay may be a cost-effective alternative to standard guideline-based adjuvant chemotherapy decision making in early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost effectiveness; Gene-expression profiling; Non-small cell lung cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24710309      PMCID: PMC4012962          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  39 in total

1.  Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36.

Authors:  M B Nichol; N Sengupta; D R Globe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis for decision trees with multiple branches: use of the Dirichlet distribution in a Bayesian framework.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; A E Ades; Martin J Price
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Utilities and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  G W Torrance; D Feeny
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Incorporation of uncertainty in health economic modelling studies.

Authors:  Anthony O'Hagan; Christopher McCabe; Ron Akehurst; Alan Brennan; Andrew Briggs; Karl Claxton; Elisabeth Fenwick; Dennis Fryback; Mark Sculpher; David Spiegelhalter; Andrew Willan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Quality-adjusted life-years. Ethical implications for physicians and policymakers.

Authors:  J La Puma; E F Lawlor
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cancer Care Ontario and American Society of Clinical Oncology adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I-IIIA resectable non small-cell lung cancer guideline.

Authors:  Katherine M W Pisters; William K Evans; Christopher G Azzoli; Mark G Kris; Christopher A Smith; Christopher E Desch; Mark R Somerfield; Melissa C Brouwers; Gail Darling; Peter M Ellis; Laurie E Gaspar; Harvey I Pass; David R Spigel; John R Strawn; Yee C Ung; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rodrigo Arriagada; Bengt Bergman; Ariane Dunant; Thierry Le Chevalier; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Johan Vansteenkiste
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Economic analysis of NCIC CTG JBR.10: a randomized trial of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer--a report of the Working Group on Economic Analysis, and the Lung Disease Site Group, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  Raymond Ng; Baktiar Hasan; Nicole Mittmann; Marie Florescu; Frances A Shepherd; Keyue Ding; Charles Andrew Butts; Yvon Cormier; Gail Darling; Glenwood D Goss; Richard Inculet; Lesley Seymour; Timothy L Winton; William K Evans; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin in elderly patients: National Cancer Institute of Canada and Intergroup Study JBR.10.

Authors:  Carmela Pepe; Baktiar Hasan; Timothy L Winton; Lesley Seymour; Barbara Graham; Robert B Livingston; David H Johnson; James R Rigas; Keyue Ding; Frances A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Biopsy-Based 8-Protein Prostate Cancer Prognostic Assay to Optimize Treatment Decision Making in Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4 Early Stage Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Joshua A Roth; Scott D Ramsey; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Cost-Utility of a Prognostic Test Guiding Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decisions in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  David D Stenehjem; Brandon K Bellows; Kraig M Yager; Joshua Jones; Rajesh Kaldate; Uwe Siebert; Diana I Brixner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-11-27

Review 3.  Towards decision-making using individualized risk estimates for personalized medicine: A systematic review of genomic classifiers of solid tumors.

Authors:  Daniel M Trifiletti; Vanessa N Sturz; Timothy N Showalter; Jennifer M Lobo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Model-based effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of risk-based selection strategies for adjuvant chemotherapy in Dutch stage II colon cancer patients.

Authors:  Gabrielle Jongeneel; Marjolein J E Greuter; Felice N van Erning; Miriam Koopman; Geraldine R Vink; Cornelis J A Punt; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Comprehensive Comparison Between Adjuvant Targeted Therapy and Chemotherapy for EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Wenqian Li; Hanfei Guo; Lingyu Li; Jiuwei Cui
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  The Case for Adolescent HIV Vaccination in South Africa: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Nishila Moodley; Glenda Gray; Melanie Bertram
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of precision diagnostic testing for precision medicine approaches against non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Raymond Henderson; Peter Keeling; Declan French; Dave Smart; Richard Sullivan; Mark Lawler
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 6.603

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.