Literature DB >> 17538170

Economic analysis of NCIC CTG JBR.10: a randomized trial of adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin compared with observation in early stage non-small-cell lung cancer--a report of the Working Group on Economic Analysis, and the Lung Disease Site Group, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Raymond Ng1, Baktiar Hasan, Nicole Mittmann, Marie Florescu, Frances A Shepherd, Keyue Ding, Charles Andrew Butts, Yvon Cormier, Gail Darling, Glenwood D Goss, Richard Inculet, Lesley Seymour, Timothy L Winton, William K Evans, Natasha B Leighl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 study is among the landmark trials that have established third generation platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy as the standard of care after resection of stages IB-II NSCLC, improving absolute 5-year survival by 15% and median survival by 21 months. This cost-effectiveness analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy from the perspective of Canada's public health care system was undertaken based on the JBR.10 study population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The primary outcome of the study was the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed in dollars per life-year gained (LYG). Direct medical resource utilization data were collected retrospectively from trial data and medical records of patients enrolled in the JBR.10 study at the five largest accruing Canadian centers, from the time of random assignment until death or study closure (April 2004). Survival and available costs (2005 Canadian dollars [$CAD]) are presented both with and without discounting at 5% per year.
RESULTS: Utilization data were collected from 172 Canadian patients (36% of the trial population), 85 randomly assigned to observation and 87 randomly assigned to chemotherapy. The mean costs of treatment per patient in the observation and adjuvant chemotherapy arms were $23,878 and $31,319, respectively, with an ICER of CAD$7,175/LYG discounted (95% CI, -$3,463 to $41,565), and $10,096/LYG undiscounted (95% CI, -$819 to $55,651).
CONCLUSION: Adjuvant vinorelbine plus cisplatin is a highly cost effective treatment that compares very favorably with other standard health care interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17538170     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.4342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  16 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in Canada.

Authors:  T E Delea; J Amdahl; H R Nakhaipour; S C Manson; A Wang; N Fedor; A Chit
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  The economic impact of the transition from branded to generic oncology drugs.

Authors:  W Y Cheung; E A Kornelsen; N Mittmann; N B Leighl; M Cheung; K K Chan; P A Bradbury; R C H Ng; B E Chen; K Ding; J L Pater; D Tu; A E Hay
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Cost-effectiveness of a 14-gene risk score assay to target adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joshua A Roth; Paul Billings; Scott D Ramsey; Robert Dumanois; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-04-07

4.  Capecitabine or infusional 5-fluorouracil for gastroesophageal cancer: a cost-consequence analysis.

Authors:  A M Horgan; J J Knox; G Liu; C Sahi; P A Bradbury; N B Leighl
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert Pirker
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10

6.  Optimizing the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with comorbidities.

Authors:  Stacyann Bailey; Qian Wang; Chung Yin Kong; Kimberly Stone; Rajwanth Veluswamy; Susan E Bates; Cardinale B Smith; Juan P Wisnivesky; Keith Sigel
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 7.  Cisplatin versus carboplatin in NSCLC: is there one "best" answer?

Authors:  Rachel E Sanborn
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-19

Review 8.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluations in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Josh J Carlson; David L Veenstra; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Economics of treatments for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Christos Chouaid; Kukovi Atsou; Gilles Hejblum; Alain Vergnenegre
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Minimization of resource utilization data collected within cost-effectiveness analyses conducted alongside Canadian Cancer Trials Group phase III trials.

Authors:  Matthew C Cheung; Kelvin Kw Chan; Shane Golden; Annette Hay; Joseph Pater; Anca Prica; Bingshu E Chen; Natasha Leighl; Nicole Mittmann
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.