Ire1 is activated in response to accumulation of misfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum as part of the unfolded protein response (UPR). It is a unique enzyme, possessing both kinase and RNase activity that is required for specific splicing of Xbp1 mRNA leading to UPR activation. How phosphorylation impacts on the Ire1 splicing activity is unclear. In this study, we isolate distinct phosphorylated species of Ire1 and assess their effects on RNase splicing both in vitro and in vivo. We find that phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop significantly increases RNase splicing in vitro. Correspondingly, mutants of Ire1 that cannot be phosphorylated on the activation loop show decreased specific Xbp1 and promiscuous RNase splicing activity relative to wild-type Ire1 in cells. These data couple the kinase phosphorylation reaction to the activation state of the RNase, suggesting that phosphorylation of the activation loop is an important step in Ire1-mediated UPR activation.
Ire1 is activated in response to accumulation of misfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum as part of the unfolded protein response (UPR). It is a unique enzyme, possessing both kinase and RNase activity that is required for specific splicing of Xbp1 mRNA leading to UPR activation. How phosphorylation impacts on the Ire1 splicing activity is unclear. In this study, we isolate distinct phosphorylated species of Ire1 and assess their effects on RNase splicing both in vitro and in vivo. We find that phosphorylation within the kinase activation loop significantly increases RNase splicing in vitro. Correspondingly, mutants of Ire1 that cannot be phosphorylated on the activation loop show decreased specific Xbp1 and promiscuous RNase splicing activity relative to wild-type Ire1 in cells. These data couple the kinase phosphorylation reaction to the activation state of the RNase, suggesting that phosphorylation of the activation loop is an important step in Ire1-mediated UPR activation.
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the site of synthesis, modification and folding for
membrane proteins and secretory proteins destined for other cellular compartments and
the extracellular space. Upon ER stress, the influx of nascent polypeptides overwhelms
the capacity of the ER to correctly fold and maintain protein tertiary structure, and,
as a result, a complex cell signalling system termed the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR)
is activated to maintain homeostasis. The UPR elicits a varied response, which includes
transcriptional upregulation of chaperones, general cell translation attenuation,
activation of ER-associated degradation (ERAD) and an increase in ER size. If the
imbalance is not rectified, then the UPR switches from being prosurvival to instigating
an apoptotic response12.Ire1 is one of three sensor proteins
that initiates and ultimately dictates the outcome of the response in humans.
Ire1 consists of a luminal domain,
a single pass transmembrane segment and a cytoplasmic domain that is further subdivided
into an autophosphorylating kinase domain and an endoribonuclease (RNase) domain.Upon activation, the luminal domains of Ire1 dimerize/oligomerize; this positions the cytoplasmic kinase
domains in close proximity to each other in a face-to-face orientation, which allows
autophosphorylation to occur3. On the basis of yeast structures,
Ire1 reorientates to form a
back-to-back rearrangement, which may form higher oligomeric structures, and is thought
to be important to achieve the RNase splicing competent state45.In budding yeast, RNase domain splices a 252-nucleotide segment specific to HAC1 mRNA in a spliceosome-independent manner.
The 3′ untranslated region of HAC1 contains a targeting sequence, which may be required for mRNA
recruitment to the oligomerized Ire1
active state. By contrast, in the human system, unspliced Xbp1 contains a C-terminal signal sequence that
recruits the ribosome-nascent mRNA chain to the ER membrane to undergo splicing by
Ire1 (refs 1, 6). Ire1 splices a shorter 26-nucleotide sequence from Xbp1 mRNA. This causes a translational
frameshift, which results in the expression of a potent transcriptional activator that
upregulates expression of UPR target genes278.UPR has been implicated in many diseased states, notably cancer. Interestingly,
Ire1 has recently emerged as a new
target for therapeutic intervention in multiple myeloma (MM), a cancer resulting from
malignant transformation of plasma cells. Xbp1, besides its role in UPR, acts as a checkpoint control in
plasma cell differentiation, and misregulation can cause uncontrollable proliferation
leading to MM91011. We have previously demonstrated that
inhibiting the human Ire1 kinase
reaction with a specific kinase inhibitor sunitinib resulted in loss of Xbp1 splicing in MM cell lines3.Mechanistic understanding of how phosphorylation and ligand binding affect the RNase
activity of Ire1 is of crucial
importance for therapeutic interventions. Recently, phosphomimetic mutants of yeast
Ire1 were seen to undergo
sustained splicing, indicating that dephosphorylation of Ire1 is an important step in RNase
deactivation12. However, a separate study suggested that the
phosphoryl transfer reaction is important for deactivation rather than activation of
RNase13, which supports a previous work suggesting that the
kinase inhibitor 1NM-PP1 activated
RNase splicing thereby circumventing the requirement for phosphorylation114. This contrasts with early experimental work showing mutation
of catalytic residues in the kinase domain disrupting RNase function15 and more recently inhibition of kinase activity leading to loss of splicing
in vivo
31516. Furthermore, sunitinib has also been shown to be a potent inhibitor of closely
related RNase L and PKR; these proteins are involved in antiviral
innate immune responses and share significant sequence homology with Ire1 kinase17.In an attempt to clarify the role of phosphorylation and ligand binding upon the RNase
splicing activity of Ire1, we identify
and map, using mass spectrometry analysis, specific phosphorylation sites by purifying
distinct phosphorylated Ire1
populations from proteins expressed in the eukaryotic insect cell system. The isolation
of differentially phosphorylated species allows us to assay the effects of specific
phosphorylations upon the RNase splicing activity. We show that phosphorylations upon
the activation loop increase the enzymatic rate of splicing manyfold above that of the
dephosphorylated protein in vitro, whereas linker region and RNase domain
phosphorylations have little/no impact upon splicing. Trans-autophosphorylation of
dephosphorylated Ire1
in vitro leads to phosphorylation of two specific residues in the kinase
activation loop. C-terminal Ire1
expressed in insect cells exhibits further phosphorylations that occur on the Linker and
RNase domain. Furthermore, we show that mutations of activation loop phosphorylation
sites result in loss of splicing and a reduction in RIDD activity relative to wild-type
Ire1 in cells. This work indicates
the importance of the kinase auto-transphosphorylation reaction in activating the RNase
domain to achieve the splicing active state, thereby coupling the two reactions
together. Phosphorylation of kinase activation loop is an important and necessary step
for achieving the activated Ire1 RNase
splicing state in which splicing of Xbp1 is enhanced, leading to subsequent activation of UPR signal.
This study will help to clarify our understanding of Ire1-phosphoregulated RNase splicing and provide valuable insights
for cancer therapeutic targeting of Ire1.
Results
Identification of phosphorylation sites
A cytoplasmic portion of human Ire1 (547–977) encompassing the kinase and
endoribonuclease domains was expressed in insect cells. We have previously
detailed our purification protocol for obtaining homogenous samples of
dephosphorylated protein3. In the present protein
purification, we omitted the incubation with lambda phosphatase and performed
the monoQ anion exchange step with a very shallow gradient (Fig.
1a,b). From this purification step we were able to isolate several
different peaks, which we sent for mass spectrometry analysis, where proteins
were treated with trypsin digestion. The resultant peptide fragments were
subjected to tandem mass spectrometry using MALDI-TOF/TOF and then ESI QTOF
instruments (Supplementary Figs
1A–D
and 2A,B and Supplementary Table 1). Several peptides
exhibited modifications consistent with being phosphorylated. Using the ESI QTOF
setup, we were able to map the sites of certain phosphorylations. To further
reinforce our data, we analysed the molecular mass of the different
phosphorylated protein samples using the MALDI-TOF/TOF setup (Supplementary Fig. 3). Using both
trypsin-digested analysis and molecular mass spectrometry of protein peak
samples, coupled with the fact that this is an established technique for
purifying phosphorylated proteins, particularly kinases1819, we were fully confident of the phosphorylated protein assignments. The
order of peaks that eluted off from the monoQ column roughly correlated with
increasing number of phosphorylations upon Ire1. The first peak (Fig. 1a,b),
which was also the largest peak, relates to purified Ire1 protein being in a dephoshorylated
state, interestingly, suggesting that Ire1 protein is being kept in a ‘ground
dephosphorylated state’ by various phosphatases consistent with other
kinase regulatory mechanisms. The next peak (PK2) (Fig.
1a,b) indicated purified protein being phosphorylated at two sites
ser551 and ser562 in the linker region; we refer to this as L-phos. Peak 3 (PK3)
contained five phosphorylations at ser724, ser726, and L-phos, with a weak/low
signal for thr973 phosphorylation. PK4 indicates Ire1 protein phosphorylated at ser724,
ser726, ser729 and L-phos, and, again as with PK3, weak/low levels of thr973
phosphorylation were detected. The sites of phosphorylations fall into three
particular areas, phosphorylation in the linker region (L-phos), kinase
activation loop phosphorylations and thr973 phosphorylation positioned within
the C-terminal RNase domain (Fig. 1c). The isolation of
differentially phosphorylated Ire1 subspecies allows us to assay the effects of specific
phosphorylations upon Ire1 RNA
splicing activity; however, initially it is also necessary to understand the
effects of ligand binding upon the splicing reaction.
Figure 1
Identification of phosphorylation sites.
Chromatogram showing the elution profile of human Ire1 protein (547–977)
expressed in insect cells and passed through a monoQ anion exchange column.
The four peaks indicated distinct phosphorylated species of Ire1, and their sites of
phosphorylation were identified by mass spectrometry (see Supplementary Figs 1,2, Supplementary Table 1). (b)
Ire1 protein
(547–977) samples from the four distinct peaks isolated by anion
exchange were visualized by SDS-PAGE (top panel) and by western blot using a
generic human Ire1
antibody (bottom panel). (c) The position of phospho sites relative
to each other and mapped onto the X-ray structure of human Ire1 autophosphorylation complex
(3P23).
Ligand binding has minimal effect on RNase activity in
vitro
To assay the effects of phosphorylations and ligand binding upon RNase splicing
activity, we made use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer
(FRET)—quenched mini Xbp1 RNA substrate probe (Fig. 2a),
which when cleaved by Ire1
emits fluorescence at 590 nm (cy3) wavelength20.
Initially, just taking the dephosphorylated protein, we incubated varying
concentrations of substrate probe and measured the fluorescence emitted over a
period of time (Fig. 2b). The resultant reaction data were
of very high quality and the reactions fitted excellently with
Michaelis–Menton enzyme kinetics. By using the initial rates of each
reaction at varying concentrations of the probe, we were able to successfully
measure the substrate turnover (Kcat) and the catalytic enzyme
efficiency (Kcat/Km) (Table
1). We performed the same analysis for both dephosphorylated
proteins in the presence of a non-hydrolysable ATP mimic AMP-PNP and ADP (Fig. 2c). We
found that the Kcat values for both the dephosphorylated and
the AMP-PNP bound cofactors
were almost identical at 0.118 and
0.144 s−1; this was also reflected in
the kcat/Km, which gives a measure of the
efficiency of the enzyme, at 3.21 × 104 and 2.63
×
104 M−1 s−1,
respectively. For dephoshorylated protein in the presence of ADP, the Kcat and
Kcat/Km were only slightly higher at
0.295 s−1 and 4.61 ×
104
M−1s−1, suggesting that
the bound ADP may assist in a
conformation conducive for the RNase cleavage reaction. Previously reported data
in the field suggested that the presence of nucleotide can induce RNase
activity; if this were the case, then AMP-PNP would also have an inducing effect, which in our
data it does not and is instead clearly identical to the basal level splicing of
dephosphorylated protein without any ligand, suggesting that just the mere
presence of nucleotide is not enough to induce significant splicing. However, on
comparison of the dephosphorylated Ire1 rates of reaction with those of the phosphorylated
Ire1 protein (see below
PK3 and PK4), the values between dephosphorylated, ADP and AMP-PNP bound protein showed
insignificant differences.
Figure 2
Ligand binding to dephosphorylated Ire1 has little impact on RNase splicing.
(a) Fret-quenched RNA Xbp1 substrate probe was tagged with Cy3 label at the
5′ end and with BHQ2 quencher at 3′ end. The substrate
probe was cleaved by Ire1
allowing measurement of fluorescence emission at 590 nm.
(b) Fluorescence emission time course experiment measuring RNase
splicing of FRET probe by Ire1
in vitro. Dephosphorylated Ire1 protein was incubated with substrate probe, and
cleavage reaction was followed by fluorescence emission over a period of
time. The time course was repeated with varying concentrations of the
substrate probe. All experiments were performed in triplicate. (c)
The initial rates of reactions calculated from each profile obtained from
fluorescence time course splicing experiment in b were plotted
against various concentrations of substrate probe to give initial rate
curves that obeyed Michelis–Menton kinetics. The initial rate
curves for both dephosphorylated Ire1 (blue) and dephosphorylated Ire1 bound to AMP-PNP (red) gave similar
profiles, whereas dephosphorylated Ire1 bound to ADP (black) gave a slightly elevated profile (see Table 1).
Table 1
Enzymatic rates of RNase splicing; the kinetic parameters of various
dephosphorylated and phosphorylated states of Ire1.
The purification and isolation of the differentially phosphorylated Ire1 enabled us to measure the effects
of specific phosphorylations upon the RNase activity (Fig.
3a–e). PK2 contains doubly phosphorylated protein in the
linker region at ser551 and ser562. Analysis of the initial rate curve for
PK2-phosphorylated Ire1 (Fig. 3a,e and Table 1) gave a
Kcat/Km value of 5.11 ×
104 M−1 s−1.
This value is only slightly higher than that of dephosphorylated Ire1 protein with ADP binding, suggesting that
phosphorylations within the linker region do not have much of an effect on the
catalytic efficiency of Ire1
splicing reactions, which is not that surprising as it is quite a distance away
from the RNase and indeed kinase active sites.
(a–d) Fluorescence time course experiments measuring
splicing of FRET probe by differently phosphorylated species of
Ire1 protein at
increasing concentrations of substrate probe. (a) Profile of PK 2
Ire1 protein.
(b) Profile of in vitro
ATP re-phosphorylated
Ire1 that was
initially dephosphorylated. (c) Profile of PK 3 Ire1 protein. (d) Profile of
PK 4 Ire1 protein.
(e) A plot of the initial rates derived from each fluorescence
time course splicing profile in a–d at varying
substrate concentrations to give an overall initial rate curve for that
particular protein peak sample from which we obtain the kinetic parameters
listed in Table 1. PK 4 Ire1 sample (red) displays the
steepest initial rate curve profile, and this is reflected in its kinetic
rates Km and Kcat (see Table 1). PK 3 human Ire1 protein sample (black) purified from insect cells
with distinct phosphorylations on ser724 and ser726 within the activation
loop and with extra L-phos and pT973 gives a very similar initial rate
profile to dephosphoshorylated protein that has been re-phosphorylated by
incubating with ATP
in vitro and exhibiting phosphorylations on Ser724 and Ser726 on
activation loop only. PK 2 Ire1 protein sample (grey) containing only L-phos
modification shows a very slow initial rate curve profile.
PK3 contains Ire1 protein,
which is phosphorylated on L-phos, and three further sites, ser724 and ser726 on
the activation loop of the kinase domain and low levels of pthr973 in the RNase
domain. Using the FRET assay, we obtained a Kcat value of
7.37 s−1 and
Kcat/Km of 3.02 ×
105 M−1 s−1
(Fig. 3b,e and Table 1). These
values represent a huge increase over the dephosphorylated protein or indeed any
of the previous samples tested. The substrate turnover (Kcat)
was over 60-fold higher than that for the dephosphorylated protein and at least
24-fold higher than that for dephosphorylated Ire1 with ADP bound. These increases were also mirrored in the
Kcat/Km values with PK3 Ire1 being an order of magnitude higher
than that of dephosphorylated protein. The difference between PK2 and PK3 is
essentially of the two phosphorylations, ser724, ser726 (with low level thr973
detected), on the activation loop. These two phosphorylations are responsible
for the greatest increase in enzyme RNase activity, even more so than that of
PK3 to PK4 (see below PK4). The phosphorylations no doubt have an effect on the
conformation of the activation loop and possibly lock it into a position
different from that of the dephosphorylated protein. These movements would
transmit down to the RNase domain thus allowing it to adopt a conformation,
which is more conducive for splicing to occur.PK4 Ire1 differs from PK3
protein by having one additional phosphorylation positioned on the activation
loop at ser729. Using the FRET assay, we obtained the Kcat
value of 12.7 s−1 and
Kcat/Km value of 1.26 ×
106 M−1 s−1
(Fig. 3c,e and Table 1). This
represents an increase of more than 105-fold in substrate turnover compared with
dephoshorylated protein and almost double that of PK3 Ire1. Again, this is reflected in the
catalytic efficiency of Kcat/Km, which is
almost 40-fold higher than that of dephosphorylated protein and over 4-fold
higher than that of PK3 Ire1.
Although the enzymatic rate values for PK4 are the highest for all samples
tested, the greatest increase between samples is that of PK2 to PK3 and is
attributable to pS274 and pS726.It is clear from the enzymatic rate analysis that the phosphorylations on the
activation loop enhance the RNase splicing activity of Ire1 manyfold above that of the
dephosphorylated protein; in the case where all three of the activation loop
residues, ser724, ser726 and ser729, are phosphorylated, the substrate turnover
is over 100-fold higher than that of the dephosphorylated protein. This
unambiguously links the phosphorylations upon the activation loop to enhanced
RNase splicing of Ire1. The
phosphorylations upon the linker region and the RNase domain do not seem to
effect the splicing reaction. Similarly, the addition of nucleotide
ADP and AMP-PNP to dephosphorylated protein
seems to have a minimal effect upon the splicing reaction when compared with
activation loop phosphorylations. It would be interesting to see how the binding
of ligands to the distinct phosphorylated species effects the RNase activity. To
test this point, we incubated both ADP and AMP-PNP to the different Ire1 peaks and observed the enzymatic activity (Supplementary Fig. 4A–C).
We see that, in the presence of ADP and AMP-PMP, the enzymatic reaction is largely reduced
when compared with that of phosphorylated protein without ligand. This indicates
that ADP and AMP-PMP, rather
than having an activating effect upon splicing, reduce the rate of reaction
significantly. Ligand binding possibly causes the glycine-rich loop to close over the
ligand-bound active site, locking the kinase domain in a
‘closed’ conformation, with a subsequent conformational
change transmitted to RNase domain and negatively effecting the splicing
activity.
In vitro
Ire1 is re-phosphorylated on
ser724 and ser726
The distinct phosphorylated populations of Ire1 purified from insect cells, which contain phosphatases,
indicate that they are biologically relevant. It would be interesting to
investigate which of these phosphorylations occur solely due to Ire1 kinase auto-transphosphorylation
reaction. To test this point, we incubated dephosphorylated protein in the
presence of ATP and then
subjected the protein to trypsin digestion and subsequent mass spectrometry
analysis. The mass spectrometry analysis indicated the presence of two
phosphorylations at ser724 and ser726 on the activation loop of the kinase
domain. We then tested the substrate turnover and catalytic efficiency by using
the FRET probe assay (Fig. 3d,e and Table
1). The Kcat and
Kcat/Km values for the in vitro
re-phosphorylated Ire1 wwere
6.79 s−1 and 4.2 ×
105 M−1 s−1,
respectively. These values match very closely with those of PK3 Ire1, which was also phosphorylated on
ser724 and ser726 of the activation loop with further phosphorylations on L-phos
and Thr973, but as L-phos and pThr973 do not contribute significantly to the
splicing reaction, we would expect that PK3 and re-phosphorylated protein to
have similar values for their enzymatic rates, which is indeed the case. This
further supports the notion that L-phos and pThr973 do not contribute greatly to
splicing reaction kinetics, and the major factor in the increase in RNase
activity is due to phosphorylation of activation loop residues ser724, ser726
and ser729 with the greatest contribution from ser724 and ser726.
Activation loop mutant reduces RNase splicing in cells
It is clear that activation loop phosphorylations have a significant effect upon
the RNase activity in vitro. We wanted to investigate the effects of
mutating specific phosphorylations on RNase splicing in vivo. To address
this point, we co-transfected HT1080 cells with plasmids expressing
Ire1 phosphorylation
mutations (Fig. 4a–c, Supplementary Fig. 5), identified from our
mass spectrometry data, and measured splicing by RT–PCR analysis.
Initially, we mutated each phosphorylation site to assay the effect of that
specific phosphorylation upon splicing and then used the double and triple
mutations to mimic sets of phosphorylations such as L-phos (S551A, S562A), in
vitro re-phosphorylated activation loop (S724A, S726A) and full
activation loop phosphorylations (S724A, S726A, S729A) to establish their
effects. Using 50 μM tunicamycin to induce ER stress, we
measured the total level of splicing for each mutant and compared it with both
wild-type Ire1 and empty
vector control. After 2 h, the most drastic effect by a
single-amino-acid mutation on splicing was observed with activation loop
mutants, S724A, S726A, S729A and, in particular, S726A (Fig.
4a–c), which displayed a 50% reduction in splicing when
compared to wild type. This is in agreement with the in vitro splicing
activity where the biggest effect was seen with PK3, which contains both S724
and S726. The linker region mutations S551A and S562A seem to have very little
effect upon splicing; this is further confirmed by the double linker region
mutation S551A/S562A, which also did not exhibit significant loss of splicing
compared with activation loop mutations. The T973A mutation displayed a slight
inhibition of splicing of around 85% of wild type, which was more than L-phos
double mutant, but again when compared with the activation loop mutants it
becomes less significant. The phosphorylation on residues pS724 and pS726, which
is present in PK3 and in in vitro re-phosphorylated Ire1, was seen from our FRET assay to
have the largest increase in activity (Table 1)
corresponding to a fivefold jump from PK2 to PK3, whereas PK3 to PK4 represented
a twofold increase in terms of Kcat values. It is therefore
straightforward to predict that the double-mutant S724A/S726A would have a
drastic effect and indeed this was the case with splicing in vivo reduced
to 38%, recapitulating the results obtained in vitro. Interestingly, the
triple activation loop mutant S724A, S726A, S729A seems to be inhibiting to a
similar level as that of the double-mutant S724A, S726A. This indicates that
there maybe a basal level of splicing, which is not directly influenced by
phosphorylation, and that mutation of S724A and S726A is sufficient to reach
this basal level in vivo.
Figure 4
Mutation of phosphorylation sites inhibits splicing in cells.
(a) Xbp1 splicing
in HT 1080 human cell line. Individual phosphorylation mutants were
co-transfected into HT1080 cells and subjected to tunicamycin for
2 h to induce ER stress. RT–PCR of sXbp1 and uXbp1 was run on 3% agarose gel and
visualized by gel red DNA stain. Empty vector was used as control, and all
experiments were repeated in triplicate. (b) Xbp1 splicing using sets of
mutations mimicking groups of phosphorylations within Ire1. S551A/S562A represents L-phos
mutations, S724A/S726A replicates in vitro re-phosphorylation of
dephos Ire1 with
ATP,
S724A/S726A/S729A triple mutant represents all activation loop
phosphorylations. (c) Quantification of inhibition of Xbp1 splicing in vivo of
each individual phosphorylation mutant and sets of mutants in HT1080 cells,
with empty vector (EV) as control. Splicing is clearly reduced in all
activation loop mutants and especially in the double and triple mutants
recapitulating the in vitro findings. Linker region or L-phos single
and double mutants seem not to have an impact on splicing, whereas T973A
seems to have a small impact. Error bars represent mean±s.e.m.,
n=3.
Therefore, these data clearly indicate that mutation of activation loop
phosphorylation sites upon Ire1 in HT1080 cells significantly reduces RNase splicing,
consistent with the in vitro FRET splicing data.
Activation loop mutant reduces splicing in Ire1−/−
cells
To further emphasize the importance of the activation loop phosphorylations, we
conducted a splicing time course experiment using Ire1−/− MEF cells
in mild ER stress conditions of 0.5μM tunicamycin with triple
activation loop mutant S724A, S726A, S729A and wild-type Ire1 and observed the fold change in
splicing compared with empty vector by qRT–PCR analysis (Fig. 5a). We see at each time point a reduced level of
splicing for the triple activation loop mutant as compared with wild type. At
2 h, the mutant level of splicing is comparable to empty vector
splicing but increases twofold above empty vector before dropping back after
18 h. The wild type displays significantly more splicing at each time
point with an almost 3.5-fold increase at 6 h before dropping back at
18 h. Moreover, the splicing for wild type fluctuates more than the
mutant. This result clearly shows that mutation of active site phosphorylations
reduces splicing in mild ER stress conditions in Ire1−/− cells and
is consistent with both the HT1080 cell line and in vitro splicing data.
Furthermore, fluctuations in wild-type splicing suggest that wild-type
Ire1 may be able to adapt
its splicing requirements better than mutant protein, again suggesting that
active site phophorylations have a role in regulating splicing output. To
investigate the effects of activation loop phosphorylation mutant upon expressed
protein levels, we performed a western blot analysis for spliced Xbp1 from Ire1−/− cells at
varying time points. (Fig. 5b, and Supplementary Fig. 6). We clearly see a
difference between wild-type and mutant samples for spliced Xbp1 protein expression levels at all
time points tested using mild ER stress, with the largest difference in protein
levels occurring at a 4-h time point. The difference in spliced Xbp1 expression levels between triple
mutant and wild type becomes much less pronounced during the course of the
experiment, suggesting that the rate of activation is compromised more severely
in the mutant protein during early stages of ER stress.
Figure 5
Activation loop phosphorylation mutants retard splicing and RIDD activity in
Ire1−/−cells.
(a) Ire1−/− cells were co-transfected with
plasmids containing Ire1
wild-type (WT), triple activation mutant (TM) or empty vector with plasmid
containing GFP. Cells were treated with mild ER stress (0.5μM
tunicamycin), and splicing levels (sXbp1) were measured at 2, 4, 6 and 18 h time
points by qRT–PCR analysis (mean±s.e.m., n=3).
The fold change in splicing levels of wild-type and triple mutant
Ire1 were compared
with empty vector splicing. (b) Western blot using an
anti-sXbp1 antibody
showing spliced Xbp1
protein expression levels under mild ER stress at 2, 4, 6, 18 h
time points. Triple mutant shows reduced spliced Xbp1 protein expression levels as
compared with wild type in Ire1−/− cells, which become less
pronounced over time. (c) Ire1−/− cells were treated with
0.5μM tunicamycin for 6 h, after which mRNA levels of
RIDD target genes were measured by qRT–PCR and
normalized to GAPDH (mean±s.e.m., n=3). mRNA levels of
RIDD target genes were lower in cells transfected with WT
Ire1 relative to
activation loop mutant Ire1.
Taken together, the experiments conducted both in HT1080 and Ire1−/− cells
reinforce the notion that activation loop phosphorylations are coupled to RNase
activity as evidenced by both reduced mRNA splicing and reduced sXbp1 protein expression levels.
To understand whether active site phosphorylations have an impact upon RIDD, we
measured the relative mRNA levels of RIDD target genes21 in Ire1−/− cells that have been transfected
either with wild-type Ire1 or
with triple activation loop mutants using qRT–PCR. After
6 h of treatment with tunicamycin, we observed that five out of the
six RIDD genes had lower mRNA levels in wild-type Ire1 samples as compared with mutant
samples with Scara3,
Pdgfrb and
Hgsnat
displaying almost 20% reduction in wild type compared with mutant (Fig. 5c). This suggests that RIDD activity is higher in
wild-type than in mutant samples consistent with the notion that Ire1 active site phosphorylation
mutants reduce RNase activity. Thus, mutation of Ire1 activation loop phosphorylations
reduces Ire1’s
RIDD activity and suggests that phosphorylation may have a regulatory role in
RIDD activity.
Discussion
In this study, we identify specific phosphorylations upon Ire1 that fall into three regions; linker,
activation loop and RNase domain. We show that activation loop phosphorylations are
important for achieving high levels of splicing in vitro and that mutation of
activation loop phosphorylations retards splicing both in HT1080 and in
Ire1−/−
cells. Moreover, we show that these activation loop phosphorylations have an effect
on Ire1’s RIDD
activity. Thus, the data clearly link the phosphorylation events on ser724, ser726
and ser729 within the activation loop to enhanced RNase splicing and imply that
kinase activation loop phosphorylations are an important and necessary step to
achieve the activated Ire1 RNase
state leading to enhanced Xbp1
splicing and subsequent UPR activation.The precise mechanism of how phosphorylations activate the RNA splicing inferred from
this study, and in analogy to other kinases22, is most likely
based on conformational changes that take place within the protein. In general
kinase biology22, the phosphorylation event causes movements
within the active site that are transmitted to the rest of the protein, manifesting
in gross movements of C-lobe relative to N-lobe. In a similar manner, it is most
likely that Ire1 activation loop
phosphorylation leads to subtle movements within the kinase active site that are
transmitted to the RNase active site by conformational movements via the C-lobe of
the kinase domain. These conformational changes would induce the binding of RNA
substrate in a more efficient manner leading to increased splicing.Interestingly, we see effects on splicing activity that are consistent between both
in vitro and in vivo systems; however, the scale varies. This is
most likely due to different rate limiting steps. The rate limiting step in
vitro may be the conformational changes relating to association and
dissociation of the RNA substrate, whereas in vivo the RNase domain may
require other protein or cellular factors to regulate such events. This may cause
differences between observations in vitro and in vivo, and such
effects cannot be ruled out in this study.To obtain the differently phosphorylated Ire1 protein for our in vitro analysis, we have made use
of eukaryotic insect expression system that can authentically process
post-translational modifications, in part, due to the presence of phosphatases, and
that allows us to isolate distinct phosphorylated species. The ability to purify
these distinct populations suggests that they are in a biologically relevant state.
Interestingly, we see no further phosphorylation species above those seen in PK4 and
no evidence of hyperphosphorylation similar to that seen in yeast Ire1 expressed in E.coli. A likely
explanation for this is that yeast Ire1 has an extra loop insertion rich in ser and thr residues compared with the human sequence, which could be
the site for extra hyperphosphorylations; alternatively, a recent report suggests a
non-physiological role for hyperphosphorylation for proteins expressed in
E.coli23.Although the role of activation loop phosphorylations ser724, ser726 and ser729 is
clearly linked to enhanced splicing, the remaining phosphorylations, notably the
linker region (L-phos) and RNase domain thr973, have minimal impact on splicing. In
the case of L-phos, it is too far way from the kinase or RNase active site to cause
an effect. It has be suggested that maybe L-phos has a role in increasing the
oligomeric state of Ire1;
however, we see no biophysical evidence that any phosphorylated species exists
higher than that of a dimer (Prischi et al. in preparation), and even if it
did increase the oligomeric state we see no increase in enzymatic rates. Similarly,
L-phos could cause the break-up of a dimer, but again this is unlikely as we see no
corresponding loss in enzymatic rate when compared with dephosphorylated protein.
Interestingly, when we allow the auto-transphosphorylation reaction to occur with
dephosphorylated protein in vitro, we only measure ser724 and ser726
phosphorylation. The mechanism of activation loop phosphorylation whether in
vitro or in cells can easily be rationalized by the human Ire1 crystal structure, which captures the
autophosphorylation event and shows the ordered region of the activation loop
protruding outward towards the kinase active site of the opposite monomer. However,
there must be some cellular factor causing the phosphorylation of ser729, linker
region and thr973, possibly another phosphorylating kinase. For ser729, the
phosphorylation of which causes an increase in splicing, this could act as another
level of regulatory control whereby initial cleavage of Xbp1 causes a tempered response to unfolded
protein, but then Ire1 has
another ‘gear’ so as to amplify the response. Very low levels
of thr973 phosphorylation were detected and only when the Ire1 protein had already achieved high
degree of phosphorylation (PK3, PK4). thr973 does not have an impact directly on the
splicing activity in vitro, but has a small noticeable effect in vivo.
Its position within the RNase binding domain suggests that it may be able to
influence the reaction in other ways. It is tempting to speculate that this
phosphorylation and the phophorylations on the linker region could act as
recruitment factors for Traf2
binding and initiate apoptosis (Fig. 6a,b). Interestingly,
there is now accumulating evidence to suggest that there are a number of factors
that can influence the duration and amplitude of Ire1 signalling via a protein-signalling platform termed
UPRosome2425. One such example is the regulation by the
BAX-BAK protein complex, which influences
Ire1 signalling by helping to
alleviate stress in the first instance, but if the stress signal is not relived then
this complex switches to outputting an apoptotic response24. It
may be that phosphorylations are a key component of initiating interactions with
cofactors that constitute the UPRosome, and hence the importance of the present
study is in trying to shed light on this interesting type of regulation.
Figure 6
Model of phosphoregulated Ire1 activation.
(a) In vitro dephosphorylated Ire1, re-phoshorylated with
ATP. Depicts the
situation when purified dephosphorylated human Ire1 protein (PK1) is auto
re-phosphorylated in vitro with incubation of ATP only. Initially, the
dephosphorylated protein exists in a ground state and forms a face-to-face
dimer. Upon addition of ATP, trans-phosphorylation occurs on positions ser724
and ser726 of the activation loop, which causes conformation changes within
the kinase domain that translate to the RNase domain resulting in activation
of RNase such that splicing turnover is enhanced over 60-fold higher than
that of the ‘ground state’. Ire1 then probably reorientates to
form a back-to-back arrangement. (b) Recombinant human Ire1 expressed in insect cell
model. Initially, Ire1 is
dephosphorylated and in the ‘ground state’ where it
forms the trans-autophosphorylation face-to-face dimer. Upon addition of
ATP,
autophosphorylation occurs on the activation loop resulting in pSer724,
pSer726. Another factor may cause phosphorylation at other sites within the
linker region and RNase domain. Phosphatases within eukaryotic cells keep
phosphorylated Ire1 in a
biologically relevant state. The order of phosphorylation is not known, but
the final phosphorylation on the activation loop pSer729 results in
activated RNase splicing such that the turnover is enhanced at least
100-fold above ground state. Phosphorylations within the RNase domain and
linker region have no/little direct impact on splicing but may be recruiting
factors for other process such as RIDD or Traf2; this part of the model is
highlighted with dashed lines to indicate that it is speculative. At this
stage, Ire1 probably
reorientates to form a back-to-back arrangement.
It is clear that phosphorylation has an important role in regulating Ire1 activity and what is understood from
this study is the impact that specific phosphorylations have on RNase splicing and
RIDD activity and the requirement of kinase loop phosphorylations to achieve the
activated Ire1 RNase splicing
state for UPR signal activation.
Methods
Expression and purification of phosphorylated Ire1 species
The C-terminal domain of human Ire1α (residues 547–977) was expressed
in sf9 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac method after a 3-day-growth at
27 °C (ref. 3). The cell pellet
was lysed by sonication in 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, supplemented with protease
inhibitors and centrifuged to remove cell debris and insoluble material at
16,000 g for 60 min. The supernatant was then
passed through a batch/gravity column containing 15 ml of talon resin
(Clontech), and protein was eluted off with 300 mM imidazole in a total volume of
50 ml3. Sample was treated with Rhinovirus 3C
protease (PreScission protease, Amersham Biosciences, 300 ml at
2 mg ml−1) to remove
his-tag. To obtain distinct Ire1 phosphorylated species, the lambda phosphatase
incubation step was omitted3 and sample was passed through
Mono-Q column with a shallower gradient (80–300 mM
NaCl over 30 column
volumes). The eluted phosphorylated peaks were separated and further purified by
size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex200
column (GE Healthcare) in a
25 mM Hepes pH 7.5
buffer, containing 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT and 5% glycerol.
In vitro autophosphorylation
Ire1 autophosphorylation was
achieved by incubation for at least 2 h of 50 μM
PK1/dephosphorylated Ire1
with 2 mM ATP
(Sigma), 5 mM MgCl2, at room temperature in a 25 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, containing
150 mM NaCl,
5 mM DTT and 5%
glycerol. The presence of
autophosphorylation was confirmed by mass spectrometry and western blot using a
pSer724 phospho-specific antibody.
In vitro RNase splicing assay
Ire1α RNase activity
was measured by incubation of 0.2 μM purified protein with
increasing concentrations (0–50 μM) of quenched
single-strand RNA probe (5′- Cy3-GACGUCCACAUCCUGGUCC-BHQ2
-3′ IDT DNA Technologies, Leuven, Belgium) at
30 °C in a 384-well low-volume non-binding plate (Greiner
Bio-One Ltd, Gloucestershire, UK) with a final reaction volume of 20
μl. Ire1α
reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM DTT, 5% glycerol) was used for all RNase
activity measurements. Whether in presence of ATP or ADP or AMP-PNP (Sigma) the same protocol of
the autophosphorylation was used (incubation of 50 μM protein for at
least 2 h with 2 mM nucleotide and 5 mM
MgCl2).
Time-dependent fluorescence was measured on a POLARstar Omega plate reader (BMG
LABTECH GmbH, Germany) using an excitation filter of 550 nm and
emission filter of 590 nm. Initial rates were measured using MARS Data Analysis Software V2.41 (BMG LABTECH GmbH, Germany). Initial rates were plotted
with a Michaelis and Menten model using PRISM 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla
California USA, www.graphpad.com).
Cell culture and in vivo
Xbp1 mRNA splicing
assays
Human Fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified
Eagle Medium supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, 2 mM
L-Glutamine, 50U
Penicillin per
50 μg Streptomycin per ml. A day before transfection, 300,000
cells per well (2 ml) were plated on a six-well plate. Wells were
transfected with 2 μg of DNA mixed with Fugene 6 reagent
(Promega) in a 1:3ratio.2 μg of total DNA per well were
prepared by mixing equimolar ratio (1:1) of Wild-Type/Mutants IRE1α (Adgene pcDNA3 plasmid)
and Adgene’s pEGFP-C3 (transfection efficiency indicator). After
24 h, IRE1α- expressing cells in each well were induced
by 0.5 μM Tunicamycin dissolved in DMSO (0.5% v/v) and harvested after 2,
4 and 6 h. The total RNA was extracted from the cells by using RNeasy
Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen), and were DNAse I treated (1U/10 μl
RNA) and reverse transcribed to cDNA by SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis
SuperMix (by random hexamers). The spliced (228 bp) and unspliced
(254 bp) Xbp1 cDNA
fragments were amplified by PCR (Phusion Flash High Fidelity PCR Master
Mix-Thermo Scientific) using 68 °C as an annealing
temperature and following set of primers: foward primer:
5′-CCTGGTTGCTGAAGAGGAGG-3′ and reverse primer:
5′-CCATGGGGAGATGTTCTGGAG-3′. PCR products were run on 3%
agarose gel stained with Gel Red dye (Biotium) in 1 × TBE buffer. All
samples were made in triplicate and subjected to densitometry measurements by
Phoretix gel analysis software (TotalLab). Splicing percentage values are shown
as an average value of three measurements±s.d. The same experiments
were performed in Ire1−/− cells. Ire1−/− MEFs
(kindly provided by Professor David Ron) were grown in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagle Medium (high glucose) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum,
2 mM L-glutamine, 1 × non-essential amino-acid
solution, 50 μM 2-Mercaptoethanol and 50U Penicillin per
50 μg Streptomycin per ml. A total of 500,000 cells were plated
24 h before transfection, then transfected with
2 μg DNA (equimolar mixture of plasmids+pEGFP-C3) in ratio
1:6 with Fugene 6 reagent (Promega). After 48 h (peak of
IRE1a expression), cells
were induced with 5 μM tunicamycin and harvested,
respectively, after 2, 4 and 6 h. Further stages of experiment were
performed as described previously.
Quantitative RT–PCR
MEF Ire1−/− retrotranscribed cDNA was used in
triplicate for quantitative real-time PCR analysis using the SYBR Green reagent
system (Applied Biosystems) and an ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems). Relative
quantities of amplified cDNAs were then determined using SDS v 1.4 software and
normalized to GAPDH.
Western blot analysis
Induced MEFs in each well of asix-well plate containing IRE1a−/− cell
monolayer were lysed in RIPA buffer, scraped and agitated for 15 min
at 4 °C. After that cell extracts were incubated on ice for
30 min and centrifuged for 10 min at
10,000 g. Collected supernatants were mixed with Leammli
buffer and run on 4–12% precast Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen). Gels were
transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen’s iBlot) and
blocked in PBS+0.05% Tween-20 and 5% Marvel Dried Milk. Primary antibody was
added to blocking buffer (PBS, Tween-20, 2.5% milk powder) in concentration of
1:200 for antispliced human Xbp1s (Biolegend) and 1:2,000 for antihuman GAPDH FL-335
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology)(Full image western blot of sXbp1 over time in Ire1−/− cells is
presented in Supplementary Fig. 7).
After a 1 h incubation at room temperature, membranes were washed
three times in PBS+0.05% Tween-20 and incubated with secondary antibody (anti
rabbit, GE Healthcare) diluted (1:2,000) in 2.5% milk blocking buffer
(1 h, room temperature). Followed by another three washes, blots were
visualized by Millipore Luminata Crescendo Western HRP substrate and developed
on Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare).
Statistical methods
All experiments were performed in triplicate unless otherwise stated.
Mass spectrometry
MS MALDI TOF. Mass spectrometry. In preparation for mass
spectrometry, the desired protein band was excised, lyophilized and digested
with trypsin (E.C.3.4.21.4, Promega) overnight. Peptides were extracted from gel
pieces, and nanoLC was performed on an Ultimate 3000 using a PepMap 100
75 mm × 15-cm-fused silica C18 analytical column (LC
Packings, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA), coupled to a Probot for fraction collection
and matrix addition with α-Cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid acid as the matrix.
A gradient of 2–60% ACN in 0.1% TFA was delivered over 36 min at a flow rate of
0.300 nl min−1. MALDI
TOF/TOF-MS was performed using an Applied Biosystems 4800 mass spectrometer
(Foster City, CA.) in the positive reflectron mode with delayed extraction. MS
precursor acquisition was followed by interpretation and data-dependent MS/MS
acquisition with the CID on. Data interpretation was configured to select a
maximum of 10 precursor ions per fraction with a minimum signal-to-noise ratio
of 50. The data were processed using GPS Explorer (Applied Biosystems, CA)
against the Swiss-Prot database. Search parameters were enzyme=trypsin; fixed
modifications=carboxymethyl (C); variable modifications=oxidation (M); mass
tolerance±100 p.p.m.; fragment mass tolerance=0.3 Da; maximum missed
cleavages=1; mass values=monoisotopic. Phosphorlyated peptides were assigned
manually on inspection of the data.
Mass analysis of intact protein
Samples were desalted by adsorption to Millipore C4 Ziptip, washed with 5%(v/v)
acetic acid and eluted to
the sample slide with 2 μl of CHCA matrix
(10 mg ml−1
alphacyano-4-hydroxycinnamic
acid in 50% acetonitrile/water conatining 0.1%trifluroacetic acid). After drying at
room temperature, samples were analysed in a Waters MaldiMicro MX mass
spectrometer operating in linear mode with a 10 Hz UV laser, power
130, pulse voltage 850 V, ion extraction delay time
2,000 ns with external calibration using multiple charge states of
bovine trypsinogen and its dimer. Spectra were displayed as the average of
~1,000 laser shots each. Data processing was performed by using
Waters MassLynx software.ESI QTOF. Sample processing. For intact molecular mass
determination, samples were button dialysed (Hapton Research, Aliso Viejo, CA,
USA) overnight into 50 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.9. For phosphorylation site analysis,
samples were separated by 1D SDS-PAGE. The phosphoprotein band was excised for
proteolytic digestion with trypsin followed by phosphopeptide enrichment by
TiO2 chromatography. In brief, 2.5 μg of
each protein was mixed 1:1:1 (v/v/v) with 3 × Tris sample buffer and
150 mM DTT and
heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Samples were cooled,
centrifuged and loaded onto 15% Tris-glycine gels. A constant voltage of
200 V was applied for 1.5 h (running buffer 1 ×
SDS
tris/glycine). The gels were rinsed with
distilled water (5 min) and then stained with InstantBlue Coomassie
stain (Expedeon Hartson, UK) overnight. Phopshoprotein gel bands were excised
and chopped into small pieces (~1 mm3 ) and
destained in 30% ethanol at
70 °C for 30 min with shaking. This was repeated
with fresh ethanol solution
until all coomassie stain was removed. The gel was then covered with
25 mM ammonium
bicarbonate/50% acetonitrile and vortexed for 10 min. The gel
slices were then covered with 100% acetonitrile and left for 5 min with vortexing
before the supernatant was discarded and replaced with a fresh aliquot of
acetonitrile.
Acetonitrile was removed,
and the gel pieces were completely dried under vacuum centrifugation for
30 min. Once dry, the gel slices were cooled on ice and then covered
with ice cold trypsin solution
(20 ng μl−1 in
25 mM ammonium
bicarbonate) and left on ice for 30 min to
rehydrate. Excess trypsin solution was removed, and the gel slices were covered
with a minimal amount of 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate. After briefly vortexing and
centrifuging, the gel slices were incubated at 37 °C with
shaking for 18 h. The resulting digest was vortexed, centrifuged and
50 μl water was added. Following vortexing for
10 min, the supernatant was recovered and added to an eppendorf
containing 5 μl acetonitrile/water/formic acid (60/35/5; v/v). Fifty microlitres of
acetonitrile/water/formic acid (60/35/5; v/v) was added to the gel slices and
vortexed for an additional 10 min. The supernatant was pooled with
the previous wash, and one additional wash of the gel slices was performed. The
pooled washes containing the peptides were dried by vacuum centrifugation. For
phosphopeptide enrichment by TiO2 affinity chromatography, the
tryptic digests were reconstituted in 25 μl loading buffer
(1 M glycolic acid
(Sigma Aldrich, UK) in 80% acetonitrile/5% TFA). A TiO2 micro-column was prepared by
plugging the constricted end of a 200 μl GELoader pipette
tip with a C8 disc. TiO2 beads (GL Sciences, Japan) were suspended in
100% acetonitrile and packed
to column length of 3 mm by the application of gentle air pressure.
The column was flushed with 50 μl of 50% acetonitrile and equilibrated with
20 μl of loading buffer. The peptide solution was then
passed through the column and the flow-through collected. The column was washed
with 5 μl of loading buffer followed by
30 μl of washing buffer (80% acetonitrile/1% TFA) ,and the eluates were pooled with
the flow-through. Bound peptides were eluted from the column with
50 μl elution buffer (0.5% ammonia solution) followed by
1 μl of 30% acetonitrile. All fractions were lyophilized to complete
dryness and stored at −20 °C until ready for MS
analysis.Enriched samples were reconstituted in 10 μl water and
desalted using ZipTip C18 tips (Millipore UK Ltd, Watford, UK) into 50%
acetonitrile and analysed
by Z-spray nanoelectrospray ionization MS using a quadrupole-IMS-orthogonal
time-of-flight MS (Synapt HDMS, Waters UK Ltd., Manchester, UK) using
gold/palladium-coated nanospray tips. The MS was operated in positive TOF mode
using a capillary voltage of 1.5 kV, cone voltage of 20 V,
nanoelectrospray nitrogen gas pressure of 0.1 bar, backing pressure of
2.47 mbar and collision energy of 15–25 V in
the trap. The source and desolvation temperatures were set at 80 and
150 °C, respectively. During TOF-MS acquisition, Argon was
used as the buffer gas, at a pressure of 4.0 ×
10−3 mbar in the trap and transfer.
Mass calibration was performed by a separate injection of sodium iodide at a concentration of
2 μg μl−1.
Data processing was performed using the MassLynx v4.1 suite of software supplied
with the mass spectrometer.
Author contributions
F.P. isolated and purified different phosphorylation species, designed, performed and
analysed FRET data, performed and analyzed qRT-PCR data, analysed Mass spec and
cloned some in vivo mutants. P.R.N. expressed constructs in sf9 cells, cloned
Ire1 mutants, performed and
analysed Ire1
in vivo RT–PCR splicing experiment and maintained all cell
cultures. M.C. helped with cloning and purification of in vivo mutants. M.M.
U.A. conceived, designed and supervised experiments and wrote the manuscript.
Additional information
How to cite this article: Prischi, F. et al. Phosphoregulation of
Ire1 RNase splicing activity.
Nat. Commun. 5:3554 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4554 (2014).
Authors: Shoshana Klein; Tamar Geiger; Inbal Linchevski; Mario Lebendiker; Anna Itkin; Karin Assayag; Alexander Levitzki Journal: Protein Expr Purif Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Faith E Davies; Ann M Dring; Cheng Li; Andrew C Rawstron; Masood A Shammas; Sheila M O'Connor; James A L Fenton; Teru Hideshima; Dharminder Chauhan; Isabella T Tai; Elizabeth Robinson; Daniel Auclair; Karen Rees; David Gonzalez; A John Ashcroft; Ranjit Dasgupta; Constantine Mitsiades; Nicholas Mitsiades; Lan B Chen; Wing H Wong; Nikhil C Munshi; Gareth J Morgan; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2003-08-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Amit Shrestha; Garth Hamilton; Eric O'Neill; Stefan Knapp; Jonathan M Elkins Journal: Protein Expr Purif Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 1.650
Authors: Claudia Rubio; David Pincus; Alexei Korennykh; Sebastian Schuck; Hana El-Samad; Peter Walter Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Maruf M U Ali; Tina Bagratuni; Emma L Davenport; Piotr R Nowak; M Cris Silva-Santisteban; Anthea Hardcastle; Craig McAndrews; Martin G Rowlands; Gareth J Morgan; Wynne Aherne; Ian Collins; Faith E Davies; Laurence H Pearl Journal: EMBO J Date: 2011-02-11 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Daniel R Carrasco; Kumar Sukhdeo; Marina Protopopova; Raktim Sinha; Miriam Enos; Daniel E Carrasco; Mei Zheng; Mala Mani; Joel Henderson; Geraldine S Pinkus; Nikhil Munshi; James Horner; Elena V Ivanova; Alexei Protopopov; Kenneth C Anderson; Giovanni Tonon; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Gang Chen; Carla M P Ribeiro; Ling Sun; Kenichi Okuda; Takafumi Kato; Rodney C Gilmore; Mary B Martino; Hong Dang; Aiman Abzhanova; Jennifer M Lin; Emily A Hull-Ryde; Allison S Volmer; Scott H Randell; Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico; Yingfeng Deng; Philipp E Scherer; Barry R Stripp; Wanda K O'Neal; Richard C Boucher Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nicholas Blazanin; Jeongin Son; Alayna B Craig-Lucas; Christian L John; Kyle J Breech; Michael A Podolsky; Adam B Glick Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ole Niewoehner; Carmela Garcia-Doval; Jakob T Rostøl; Christian Berk; Frank Schwede; Laurent Bigler; Jonathan Hall; Luciano A Marraffini; Martin Jinek Journal: Nature Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Xiaoying Liu; Grace L Guo; Bo Kong; David B Hilburn; Susan C Hubchak; Seong Park; Brian LeCuyer; Antony Hsieh; Li Wang; Deyu Fang; Richard M Green Journal: Hepatology Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Ling Yang; Ediz S Calay; Jason Fan; Alessandro Arduini; Ryan C Kunz; Steven P Gygi; Abdullah Yalcin; Suneng Fu; Gökhan S Hotamisligil Journal: Science Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 47.728