Literature DB >> 24701404

Prognostic categorization of intensive care septic patients.

Mohamed Ezzat Moemen1.   

Abstract

Sepsis is one of the leading worldwide causes of morbidity and mortality in critically-ill patients. Prediction of outcome in patients with sepsis requires repeated clinical interpretation of the patients' conditions, clinical assessment of tissue hypoxia and the use of severity scoring systems, because the prognostic categorization accuracy of severity scoring indices alone, is relatively poor. Generally, such categorization depends on the severity of the septic state, ranging from systemic inflammatory response to septic shock. Now, there is no gold standard for the clinical assessment of tissue hypoxia which can be achieved by both global and regional oxygen extractabilities, added to prognostic pro-inflammatory mediators. Because the technology used to identify the genetic make-up of the human being is rapidly advancing, the structure of 30 000 genes which make-up the human DNA bank is now known. This would allow easy prognostic categorization of critically-ill patients including those suffering from sepsis. The present review spots lights on the main severity scoring systems used for outcome prediction in septic patients. For morbidity prediction, it discusses the Multiple Organ Dysfunction score, the sequential organ failure assessment score, and the logistic organ dysfunction score. For mortality/survival prediction, it discusses the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores, the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System, the Simplified acute physiology score and the Mortality Probability Models. An ideal severity scoring system for prognostic categorization of patients with systemic sepsis is far from being reached. Scoring systems should be used with repeated clinical interpretation of the patients' conditions, and the assessment of tissue hypoxia in order to attain satisfactory discriminative performance and calibration power.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genome; Prognostic markers; Sepsis; Severity scoring systems; Systemic inflammatory Response syndrome

Year:  2012        PMID: 24701404      PMCID: PMC3953866          DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v1.i3.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 2220-3141


  49 in total

1.  A simple method for frequent monitoring of gastric carbon dioxide.

Authors:  C F Corke; G Prisco; P Gizycki; A Selvakumaran
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.669

2.  Therapeutic intervention scoring system: a method for quantitative comparison of patient care.

Authors:  D J Cullen; J M Civetta; B A Briggs; L C Ferrara
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE III prognostic system.

Authors:  J V Pappachan; B Millar; E D Bennett; G B Smith
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Community-wide assessment of intensive care outcomes using a physiologically based prognostic measure: implications for critical care delivery from Cleveland Health Quality Choice.

Authors:  C A Sirio; L B Shepardson; A J Rotondi; G S Cooper; D C Angus; D L Harper; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Application of SOFA score to trauma patients. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Authors:  M Antonelli; R Moreno; J L Vincent; C L Sprung; A Mendoça; M Passariello; L Riccioni; J Osborn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Prediction of outcome from intensive care: a prospective cohort study comparing Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and III prognostic systems in a United Kingdom intensive care unit.

Authors:  D H Beck; B L Taylor; B Millar; G B Smith
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Scoring systems for assessing organ dysfunction and survival.

Authors:  J L Vincent; F Ferreira; R Moreno
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  The oxygen delivery/consumption controversy. Approaches to management of the critically ill.

Authors:  J A Russell; P T Phang
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 21.405

9.  Gastric intramucosal pH as a therapeutic index of tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients.

Authors:  G Gutierrez; F Palizas; G Doglio; N Wainsztein; A Gallesio; J Pacin; A Dubin; E Schiavi; M Jorge; J Pusajo
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Mortality is increased by procalcitonin and decreased by an antiserum reactive to procalcitonin in experimental sepsis.

Authors:  E S Nylen; K T Whang; R H Snider; P M Steinwald; J C White; K L Becker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  James R Jauchem
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 2.  Pancreatic injury in patients with septic shock: A literature review.

Authors:  Anis Chaari; Karim Abdel Hakim; Kamel Bousselmi; Mahmoud Etman; Mohamed El Bahr; Ahmed El Saka; Eman Hamza; Mohamed Ismail; Elsayed Mahmoud Khalil; Vipin Kauts; William Francis Casey
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-07-15

3.  The Effect of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on the Mortality of Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Promising Therapy.

Authors:  Emine Alp; Zeynep Burcin Gonen; Kursat Gundogan; Aliye Esmaoglu; Leylagul Kaynar; Aysun Cetin; Musa Karakukcu; Mustafa Cetin; Gamze Kalin; Mehmet Doganay
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Increased plasma vaspin concentration in patients with sepsis: an exploratory examination.

Authors:  Michael C Motal; Daniel A Klaus; Diana Lebherz-Eichinger; Bianca Tudor; Thomas Hamp; Marion Wiegele; Rudolf Seemann; Claus G Krenn; Georg A Roth
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.313

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.