Literature DB >> 10084495

Comparison of outcome from intensive care admission after adjustment for case mix by the APACHE III prognostic system.

J V Pappachan1, B Millar, E D Bennett, G B Smith.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III (APACHE III) scoring system in the context of general adult ICUs in the United Kingdom.
DESIGN: Prospective, noninterventional, cohort study.
SETTING: Seventeen general adult ICUs in a discrete area of southwest England. PATIENTS: 12,793 patients admitted between April 1, 1993 and December 31, 1995. MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic and severity-of-illness data were collected for all patients admitted to the study units. Formal goodness-of-fit tests were applied and observed mortality was compared with that predicted by using the APACHE III system.
RESULTS: For the group of ICUs as a whole, the risk-adjusted standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was 1.23 (95% confidence intervals, 1.12-1.25). For 11 out of 17 ICUs, the SMR was significantly greater than unity (p < 0.05). Calibration, as tested by Hosmer-Lemeshow statistics, was poor (H2 = 312.54; C2 = 332.85; df = 8; p < 0.01); however, model discrimination was good with a total correct classification rate of 82.9% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89.
CONCLUSIONS: The excess mortality observed after case-mix adjustment using the APACHE III system in this study may be the result of either poor intensive care performance as compared with the United States or a failure of the APACHE III equation to fit the UK data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10084495     DOI: 10.1378/chest.115.3.802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  18 in total

Review 1.  Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes.

Authors:  Dale M Needham; David W Dowdy; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Margaret S Herridge; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  [Medical emergency teams: current situation and perspectives of preventive in-hospital intensive care medicine].

Authors:  S G Russo; C Eich; M Roessler; B M Graf; M Quintel; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  RGS4, a GTPase activator, improves renal function in ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Andrew M Siedlecki; Xiaohua Jin; Winston Thomas; Keith A Hruska; Anthony J Muslin
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Statin therapy prior to ICU admission: protection against infection or a severity marker?

Authors:  Rafael Fernandez; Victor Jose De Pedro; Antonio Artigas
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Using the E-PASS scoring system to estimate the risk of emergency abdominal surgery in patients with acute gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  Kenichi Koushi; Daisuke Korenaga; Hirofumi Kawanaka; Toshirou Okuyama; Yasuharu Ikeda; Kenji Takenaka
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  SAPS II revisited.

Authors:  Philippe Aegerter; Ariane Boumendil; Aurélia Retbi; Etienne Minvielle; Benoit Dervaux; Bertrand Guidet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Dieter H Beck; Gary B Smith; John V Pappachan; Brian Millar
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Prognostic categorization of intensive care septic patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Ezzat Moemen
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-06-04

9.  Profit and loss analysis for an intensive care unit (ICU) in Japan: a tool for strategic management.

Authors:  Pengyu Cao; Shin-ichi Toyabe; Toshikazu Abe; Kouhei Akazawa
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  ICU resource allocation: life in the fast lane.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.