Literature DB >> 24700218

Systemic wound care: a meta-review of cochrane systematic reviews.

Dirk T Ubbink1, Trientje B Santema1, Robert M Stoekenbroek1.   

Abstract

Wound care is a classic example of a surgical realm with a great variation in care. The diversity in wounds and wound treatments, the limited amount of convincing evidence, and the diverging opinions among doctors and nurses involved in wound care contribute to this undesirable variation in care. For chronic wounds, such as arterial or venous ulcers, pressure sores, and diabetic foot ulcers, but also for acute wounds after surgery or trauma, international and national guidelines provide recommendations on diagnostic procedures and treatment options, but rely mostly on expert opinion. We present the available evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews for the systemic treatment (i.e., not prevention) of patients with wounds, as opposed to topical wound treatments. This evidence shows: - Venous ulcers: High-compression therapy is the classic and evidence-based treatment for treating venous ulcers. Oral pentoxifylline promotes ulcer healing with and without compression therapy. Oral zinc is not effective to heal venous ulcers. - Acute wounds: Recombinant human growth hormone accelerates healing of large burn wounds and donor sites, while high-carbohydrate feeding might reduce the risk of pneumonia. Linezolid is more effective than vancomycin for treating skin and soft tissue infections. Hyperbaric oxygen may help heal crush wounds and skin grafts. Therapeutic touch does not heal acute wounds. - Pressure sores: Air-fluidized and some low-tech devices appear effective for treating existing pressure ulcers. Oral zinc, protein, or vitamin C supplements seem ineffective. Also, evidence is lacking on the effectiveness of repositioning regimes as a treatment option. - Diabetic ulcers: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and pressure-relieving devices may improve healing rates. - Arterial ulcers: Prostanoids and spinal cord stimulation may be effective in healing ischemic ulcers. Thus, fortunately, some high-level evidence exists for various local and systemic interventions in wound care. Caregivers should be aware of, and apply, the strongest evidence available. Only when all stakeholders (patients, physicians, wound care nurses, but also manufacturers and buyers) implement this available evidence will optimum quality of care for patients with wounds be ensured.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24700218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Technol Int        ISSN: 1090-3941


  8 in total

Review 1.  Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Chronic Wounds: The Spectrum from Basic to Advanced Therapy.

Authors:  Marta Otero-Viñas; Vincent Falanga
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Pathogen distribution and drug resistance in a burn ward: a three-year retrospective analysis of a single center in China.

Authors:  Hanghui Cen; Zhenbo Wu; Fan Wang; Chunmao Han
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

Review 3.  Seeking effective interventions to treat complex wounds: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Jesmin Antony; Afshin Vafaei; Paul A Khan; Alana Harrington; Elise Cogo; Charlotte Wilson; Laure Perrier; Wing Hui; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Opportunities for better value wound care: a multiservice, cross-sectional survey of complex wounds and their care in a UK community population.

Authors:  Trish A Gray; Sarah Rhodes; Ross A Atkinson; Katy Rothwell; Paul Wilson; Jo C Dumville; Nicky A Cullum
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  The Roles of Vitamin C in Skin Health.

Authors:  Juliet M Pullar; Anitra C Carr; Margreet C M Vissers
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Assessing the uncertainty of treatment outcomes in a previous systematic review of venous leg ulcer randomized controlled trials: Additional secondary analysis.

Authors:  Kristen A Eckert; Marissa J Carter
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 7.  Vitamin C in the critically ill - indications and controversies.

Authors:  Christoph S Nabzdyk; Edward A Bittner
Journal:  World J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-10-16

8.  Urine Culture in Hospitalized Patients during 2014-2018: An Analysis on Pathogen Distribution and Drug Sensitivity.

Authors:  Dongkai Sun; Peishan Cong; Fengju Guan; Shuai Liu; Lijiang Sun; Guiming Zhang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 3.434

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.