PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of sleep quality in patients using a mandibular advancement device (MAD) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) based upon cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC). METHODS: A total of 52 patients (mean age 53.7±9.6 years, range 33-74 years) were included in this study. Of them, there were 47 males (90.4%). All subjects were diagnosed with OSA after in-laboratory full-night polysomnography and reevaluated after 3-month use of a MAD. At baseline, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 33.6±17.0, Epworth sleepiness scale was 10.5±4.8, and Pittsburgh sleep quality index was 5.8±2.8. The CPC parameters were extracted from single-lead electrocardiography of polysomnography. We compared CPC parameters at baseline with those after 3-month use of a MAD. RESULTS: All respiratory indices improved with the use of MAD. However, there were no differences in the sleep architectures except N3 sleep (3.7±4.3 to 6.9±6.4%, p<0.001). The CPC parameters showed a significant improvement with the use of MAD. Low-frequency coupling (59.5±16.1 to 47.7±14.8%, p<0.001) and elevated low-frequency coupling (44.6±18.4 to 32.6±15.7%, p<0.001) significantly decreased. High-frequency coupling (28.6±16.0 to 36.5±15.7%, p=0.004) and very low frequency coupling (11.7±7.2 to 15.3±6.6%, p=0.028) significantly increased. The change of AHI significantly correlated with changes of the CPC parameters: negatively correlated with high-frequency coupling change (r=-0.572, p<0.001) and positively correlated with low-frequency and elevated low-frequency coupling changes (r=0.604 and 0.497, respectively; p<0.001 in both). However, the changes of Epworth sleepiness scale and Pittsburgh sleep quality index after MAD therapy showed no significant correlation with the changes in the CPC parameters. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the quality of sleep in patients using a MAD for their OSA based upon CPC analysis. Low-frequency coupling decreased as AHI improved, while high-frequency coupling increased as AHI improved. The CPC parameters showed that the sleep quality was improved by MAD therapy.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of sleep quality in patients using a mandibular advancement device (MAD) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) based upon cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC). METHODS: A total of 52 patients (mean age 53.7±9.6 years, range 33-74 years) were included in this study. Of them, there were 47 males (90.4%). All subjects were diagnosed with OSA after in-laboratory full-night polysomnography and reevaluated after 3-month use of a MAD. At baseline, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 33.6±17.0, Epworth sleepiness scale was 10.5±4.8, and Pittsburgh sleep quality index was 5.8±2.8. The CPC parameters were extracted from single-lead electrocardiography of polysomnography. We compared CPC parameters at baseline with those after 3-month use of a MAD. RESULTS: All respiratory indices improved with the use of MAD. However, there were no differences in the sleep architectures except N3 sleep (3.7±4.3 to 6.9±6.4%, p<0.001). The CPC parameters showed a significant improvement with the use of MAD. Low-frequency coupling (59.5±16.1 to 47.7±14.8%, p<0.001) and elevated low-frequency coupling (44.6±18.4 to 32.6±15.7%, p<0.001) significantly decreased. High-frequency coupling (28.6±16.0 to 36.5±15.7%, p=0.004) and very low frequency coupling (11.7±7.2 to 15.3±6.6%, p=0.028) significantly increased. The change of AHI significantly correlated with changes of the CPC parameters: negatively correlated with high-frequency coupling change (r=-0.572, p<0.001) and positively correlated with low-frequency and elevated low-frequency coupling changes (r=0.604 and 0.497, respectively; p<0.001 in both). However, the changes of Epworth sleepiness scale and Pittsburgh sleep quality index after MAD therapy showed no significant correlation with the changes in the CPC parameters. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the quality of sleep in patients using a MAD for their OSA based upon CPC analysis. Low-frequency coupling decreased as AHI improved, while high-frequency coupling increased as AHI improved. The CPC parameters showed that the sleep quality was improved by MAD therapy.
Authors: Seung Hoon Lee; Ji Ho Choi; Il Ho Park; Sang Hag Lee; Tae Hoon Kim; Heung Man Lee; Hee-Kwon Park; Robert J Thomas; Chol Shin; Chang-Ho Yun Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: F Roche; V Pichot; E Sforza; I Court-Fortune; D Duverney; F Costes; M Garet; J C Barthélémy Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Thomas Penzel; Jan W Kantelhardt; Ludger Grote; Jörg-Hermann Peter; Armin Bunde Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Michael R Littner; Cathy A Alessi; Dennis Bailey; Jack Coleman; Leah Friedman; Max Hirshkowitz; Sheldon Kapen; Milton Kramer; Teofilo Lee-Chiong; Judith Owens; Jeffrey P Pancer Journal: Sleep Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Robert Joseph Thomas; Joseph E Mietus; Chung-Kang Peng; Geoffrey Gilmartin; Robert W Daly; Ary L Goldberger; Daniel J Gottlieb Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Diane C Lim; Diego R Mazzotti; Kate Sutherland; Jesse W Mindel; Jinyoung Kim; Peter A Cistulli; Ulysses J Magalang; Allan I Pack; Philip de Chazal; Thomas Penzel Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Atul Malhotra; Indu Ayappa; Najib Ayas; Nancy Collop; Douglas Kirsch; Nigel Mcardle; Reena Mehra; Allan I Pack; Naresh Punjabi; David P White; Daniel J Gottlieb Journal: Sleep Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 6.313