Bradd J Haley1, Seon Young Choi2, Christopher J Grim3, Tiffiani J Onifade4, Hediye N Cinar3, Ben D Tall3, Elisa Taviani1, Nur A Hasan5, Abdulshakur H Abdullah2, Laurenda Carter3, Surasri N Sahu3, Mahendra H Kothary3, Arlene Chen1, Ron Baker6, Richard Hutchinson4, Carina Blackmore4, Thomas A Cebula7, Anwar Huq8, Rita R Colwell9. 1. Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America. 2. CosmosID, College Park, Maryland, United States of America. 3. Food and Drug Administration, USFDA/CFSAN/DVA, Laurel, Maryland, United States of America. 4. Florida Department of Health Bureau of Environmental Public Health Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, United States of America. 5. Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; CosmosID, College Park, Maryland, United States of America. 6. Florida Department of Health Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America. 7. CosmosID, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. 8. Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; Maryland Institute for Applied Environmental Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America. 9. Maryland Pathogen Research Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; CosmosID, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; University of Maryland Institute for Advanced Computer Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America; Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Abstract
Between November 2010, and May 2011, eleven cases of cholera, unrelated to a concurrent outbreak on the island of Hispaniola, were recorded, and the causative agent, Vibrio cholerae serogroup O75, was traced to oysters harvested from Apalachicola Bay, Florida. From the 11 diagnosed cases, eight isolates of V. cholerae were isolated and their genomes were sequenced. Genomic analysis demonstrated the presence of a suite of mobile elements previously shown to be involved in the disease process of cholera (ctxAB, VPI-1 and -2, and a VSP-II like variant) and a phylogenomic analysis showed the isolates to be sister taxa to toxigenic V. cholerae V51 serogroup O141, a clinical strain isolated 23 years earlier. Toxigenic V. cholerae O75 has been repeatedly isolated from clinical cases in the southeastern United States and toxigenic V. cholerae O141 isolates have been isolated globally from clinical cases over several decades. Comparative genomics, phenotypic analyses, and a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection for the isolates were conducted. This analysis coupled with isolation data of V. cholerae O75 and O141 suggests these strains may represent an underappreciated clade of cholera-causing strains responsible for significant disease burden globally.
Between November 2010, and May 2011, eleven cases of cholera, unrelated to a concurrent outbreak on the island of Hispaniola, were recorded, and the causative agent, Vibrio cholerae serogroup O75, was traced to oysters harvested from Apalachicola Bay, Florida. From the 11 diagnosed cases, eight isolates of V. cholerae were isolated and their genomes were sequenced. Genomic analysis demonstrated the presence of a suite of mobile elements previously shown to be involved in the disease process of cholera (ctxAB, VPI-1 and -2, and a VSP-II like variant) and a phylogenomic analysis showed the isolates to be sister taxa to toxigenic V. cholerae V51 serogroup O141, a clinical strain isolated 23 years earlier. Toxigenic V. cholerae O75 has been repeatedly isolated from clinical cases in the southeastern United States and toxigenic V. cholerae O141 isolates have been isolated globally from clinical cases over several decades. Comparative genomics, phenotypic analyses, and a Caenorhabditis elegans model of infection for the isolates were conducted. This analysis coupled with isolation data of V. cholerae O75 and O141 suggests these strains may represent an underappreciated clade of cholera-causing strains responsible for significant disease burden globally.
Vibrio cholerae non-O1/non-O139 are the causative agents of sporadic, yet significant, gastrointestinal and extraintestinal infections globally, and it is well established that all strains of this species are capable of causing human infections that represent a significant global health burden [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Infection and subsequent illness caused by these organisms are linked to the presence of virulence factors in the core backbone of V. cholerae (hemolysins, lipases) or mobile pathogenicity islands (VPIs-1 and -2, and CTXΦ) that are frequently found in clinical isolates from cholera patients suffering severe ricewater diarrhea [8], [9], [10]. Epidemic cholera is typically ascribed to V. cholerae serogroup O1 or O139; however, it is now understood that, similar to pathogenic Escherichia coli, a constellation of virulence factors along with host immune and nutritional status, are responsible for the severity and characteristic infections caused by these organisms [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. It is established that those V. cholerae which acquire and express genes carried on mobile elements (O-antigens, VPI-1, VPI-2, CTXΦ, NAG-ST, etc.) are linked to epidemics of cholera. The scenario of mobile genetic element acquisition has been shown to have occurred within the 7th pandemic and PG-1 and -2 clades (12), but occurrence and persistence of such genetic constellations remains underappreciated in V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 (non-PG) lineages. These elements, among many others, can be laterally transferred between strains of the same species or distantly related species in the environment [13], [14], [15] and give rise to virulent strains that potentially can cause epidemics. Further, these elements can be stable in V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 isolates, as in strains of the 7th pandemic clade and persist in these conformations over time, ultimately conserved in the environment.In developed nations, the leading cause of human disease caused by vibrios is consumption of raw or undercooked seafood, namely shellfish. In the United States, seafood-borne vibrioses have been traced to shellfish harvested from coastal (Atlantic and Pacific) regions, as far north as Alaska, but by far the majority of infections occur in the Gulf of Mexico, where the water temperature is warm, a parameter associated with increased Vibrio spp. densities as well as increased risk of vibriosis [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. Recent cases of cholera traced to seafood consumption, and many V. parahaemolyticus infections and deaths caused by V. vulnificus have been reported in this region.V. cholerae O75 serogroup strains have been reported to cause sporadic shellfish-borne cholera cases in the southeastern United States [21], [22]. Outbreaks caused by these strains are not continuous as outbreaks in developing nations because sanitation in the United States is such that untreated human waste is not typically discharged into water used for drinking, recreation, or harvesting of seafood and water used for consumption or for household use is typically treated to remove bacterial pathogens. Further, V. cholerae O75 strains have been isolated from environmental waters in the southeastern United States in the absence of reported cholera cases [21]. Here we present results of analysis of eight clinically recovered V. cholerae O75 isolates from an indigenous US Gulf Coast cholera outbreak that occurred in, 2010, and during March and April, 2011 [22].
Materials and Methods
Clinical V. cholerae isolates that were epidemiologically linked to consumption of oysters harvested from the Apalachicola Bay, FL were obtained from the Florida Department of Health Bureau of Public Health Laboratories in Jacksonville, FL. The genomes described in this study were either obtained from the NCBI Genbank database or, in the case of strains CP1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116 and 1117, were sequenced using the Genome Analyzer IIx system (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer's methods. Raw reads of these genomes were assembled with CLC Genomics Workbench. Genome-to-genome comparisons, identification and characterization of molecular genetic elements (MGEs), as well as core genome phylogenetics were performed by using methods described previously [12]. Genomes of V. cholerae strains CP1110 to CP1117 were annotated using Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology [23]. For in silico genomic island BLASTN and phylogenetic analyses the RAST-annotated ORFs of V. cholerae CP1110 were used as a reference. PCR analyses of virulence factors not resolved by genome sequencing (rstR alleles, nanH, and ctxB biotype) were done using the methods of Choi et al. [24], Vora et al. [25], and Nusrin et al. [26]. Phenotypic assays (proteolysis, hemolysis, biofilm formation, and motility) were conducted following methods standardized for V. cholerae
[27]. Hemolysis, biofilm formation, motility, and proteolysis assays were done in nine replicates. BiOLOG phenotypic microarrays (PM1, PM2A, PM9, and PM10) were conducted in duplicate following the manufacturer's instructions (BiOLOG, Hayward, CA). Substrate metabolism was scored by dividing the area under the curve by the background values. Scores >2 were considered positive for metabolism of that substrate.For the Caenorhabditis elegans model, SS104 glp-4 (bn2) temperature sensitive sterile strain was acquired from the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center (CGC). SS104 worms were maintained at 16°C, and experiments were performed at 25°C. Worms were cultured in C. elegans habitation media (CeHM) in tissue culture flasks on a platform shaker [28]. Adult nematodes were bleached (0.5 M NaOH, 1% Hypochlorite) to collect eggs, which were incubated in M9 media for 24 hours to bring them to synchronized L1 stage, and then transferred to CeHM. L4 stage worms were transferred to assay plates for survival experiments. Pathogen lawns for survival assays along with control bacteria E. coliOP50 were prepared by inoculating Nematode Growth Medium (NGM), in 6-cm Petri dishes, with 50 µl of an overnight V. cholerae culture. Plates were incubated overnight at room temperature before worms were added. Temperature sensitive sterile worms (SS104 glp-4(bn2)) strain, obtained from Caenorhabditis Genetics Center were transferred to NGM plates containing V. cholerae wild type strains E7946, CP1112, CP1114, CP1115 or E. coliOP 50 bacterial lawns and incubated at 25°C with ∼20–30 L4 stage worms added to each plate. Animals were scored every 24 h for survival. Animals were considered dead when they no longer responded to a gentle prod with a platinum wire. C. elegans survival was plotted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and analyzed by log rank test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Survival curves resulting in p values of <0.05 relative to control were considered significantly different [29]. Strains and genomes used in this study are listed in Table 1.
Table 1
Genomes/strains used in this study.
Organism
Strain ID
Serogroup/Serotype
Biotype
Geographical origin
Source of isolation
Year of isolation
Accession nos.
Vibrio cholerae
NCTC 8457
O1
El Tor
Saudi Arabia
Clinical
1910
NZ_AAWD01000000
Vibrio cholerae
M66-2
O1
El Tor
Makassar, Indonesia
Clinical
1937
NC_012578/NC_012580
Vibrio cholerae
MAK757
O1
El Tor
Sulawesi, Indonesia (Celebes Islands)
Clinical
1937
NZ_AAUS00000000
Vibrio cholerae
O395
O1
Classical
India
Clinical
1965
NC_009456/NC_009457
Vibrio cholerae
V52
O37
Sudan
Clinical
1968
NZ_AAKJ02000000
Vibrio cholerae
N16961
O1
El Tor
Bangladesh
Clinical
1975
NC_002505/NC_002506
Vibrio cholerae
E7946
O1
El Tor
Bahrain
Clinical
1978
Not Sequenced
Vibrio cholerae
2740-80
O1
El Tor
Gulf Coast, USA
Water
1980
NZ_AAUT01000000
Vibrio cholerae
TM 11079-80
O1
El Tor
Brazil
Sewage
1980
NZ_ACHW00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CT 5369-93
O1
El Tor
Brazil
Sewage
1980
NZ_ADAL00000000
Vibrio cholerae
TMA21
non-O1/non-O139
Brazil
Water
1982
NZ_ACHY00000000
Vibrio cholerae
12129(1)
O1
El Tor
Australia
Water
1985
NZ_ACFQ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
RC9
O1
El Tor
Kenya
Clinical
1985
NZ_ACHX00000000
Vibrio cholerae
BX 330286
O1
El Tor
Australia
Water
1986
NZ_ACIA00000000
Vibrio cholerae
V51
O141
USA
Clinical
1987
NZ_AAKI02000000
Vibrio cholerae
RC27
O1
Classical
Indonesia
Clinical
1991
NZ_ADAI00000000
Vibrio cholerae
INDRE 91/1
O1
El Tor
Mexico
Clinical
1991
NZ_ADAK00000000
Vibrio cholerae
C6706
O1
El Tor
Peru
Clinical
1991
NZ_AHGQ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1032(5)
O1
El Tor
Mexico
Clinical
1991
NZ_ALDA00000000
Vibrio cholerae
MO10
O139
Madras,India
Clinical
1992
NZ_AAKF00000000
Vibrio cholerae
Amazonia
O1
Amazonia
Amazonas, Brazil
Clinical
1992
NZ_AFSV00000000
Vibrio cholerae
MJ-1236
O1
El Tor
Matlab, Bangladesh
Clinical
1994
NC_012668/NC_012667
Vibrio cholerae
IEC224
O1
El Tor
Belém, Brazil
Clinical
1994
NC_016944/NC_016945
Vibrio cholerae
1587
O12
Lima, Peru
Clinical
1994
NZ_AAUR01000000
Vibrio cholerae
RC385
O135
Chesapeake Bay, USA
Plankton
1998
NZ_AAKH02000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1033(6)
O1
El Tor
Mexico
Clinical
2000
NZ_AJRL00000000
Vibrio cholerae
AM-19226
O39
Bangladesh
Clinical
2001
NZ_AATY01000000
Vibrio cholerae
MZO-3
O37
Bangladesh
Clinical
2001
NZ_AAUU01000000
Vibrio cholerae
MZO-2
O14
Bangladesh
Clinical
2001
NZ_AAWF01000000
Vibrio cholerae
623-39
non-O1/non-O139
Bangladesh
Water
2002
NZ_AAWG00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CIRS101
O1
altered El Tor
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Clinical
2002
NZ_ACVW00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1038
O1
El Tor
Zimbabwe
Clinical
2003
NZ_ALDC00000000
Vibrio cholerae
B33
O1
El Tor
Beira, Mozambique
Clinical
2004
NZ_ACHZ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1040(13)
O1
El Tor
Zambia
Clinical
2004
NZ_ALDD00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1041(14)
O1
El Tor
Zambia
Clinical
2004
NZ_ALDE00000000
Vibrio cholerae
VC35
O1
El Tor
Kedah, Malaysia
Clinical
2004
NZ_AMBR00000000
Vibrio cholerae
3500-05
O1
El Tor
India
Clinical
2005
NZ_AHGL00000000
Vibrio cholerae
3582-05
O1
El Tor
Pakistan
Clinical
2005
NZ_AHGP00000000
Vibrio cholerae
3546-06
O1
El Tor
India
Clinical
2006
NZ_AHGM00000000
Vibrio cholerae
LMA3984-4
O1
El Tor
Belém, Brazil
River Water
2007
CP002555/CP002556
Vibrio cholerae
3554-08
O1
El Tor
Nepal
Clinical
2008
NZ_AHGN00000000
Vibrio cholerae
3569-08
O1
El Tor
Gulf Coast, USA
Environmental
2008
NZ_AHGO00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2009V-1046
O1
El Tor
Pakistan
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHFX01000000
Vibrio cholerae
2009V-1085
O1
El Tor
Sri Lanka/India
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHFY00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2009V-1096
O1
El Tor
India
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHFZ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2009V-1116
O1
El Tor
Pakistan
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHGA00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2009V-1131
O1
El Tor
India
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHGB00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2010V-1014
O1
El Tor
Pakistan
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHGG00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2011EL-1137
O1
El Tor
Zimbabwe
Clinical
2009
NZ_AHGJ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1048(21)
O1
El Tor
Bangladesh
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDJ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1050(23)
O1
El Tor
Bangladesh
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDK00000000
Vibrio cholerae
EL1786
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NC_016445/NC_016446
Vibrio cholerae
EL1798
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AELI00000000
Vibrio cholerae
EL1792
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AELJ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-09
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Environmental
2010
NZ_AFOP00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-39
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Environmental
2010
NZ_AFOQ00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-48
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Environmental
2010
NZ_AFOR00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-02A1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AFOT00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-21A1
O1
El Tor
Saint-Marc, Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AGUK00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-22A1
O1
El Tor
Saint-Marc, Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AGUL00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-32A1
O1
El Tor
Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AGUO00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-72A2
O1
El Tor
Arcahaie, Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AGUY00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-80A1
O1
El Tor
Port-au-Prince, Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AGVB00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2010EL-1961
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AHGD00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2010EL-2010H
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AHGE00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2010EL-2010N
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AHGF00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2011EL-1089
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AHGH00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-41B1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AJRP00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-40
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Hospital Latrine
2010
NZ_AJRX00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-46
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Gray Water
2010
NZ_AJRY00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-44C1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_AJSK00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-39A1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDM00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-41A1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDN00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-42A1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDO00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HC-47A1
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDR00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-16
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Gray Water
2010
NZ_ALEB00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-25
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Gray Water
2010
NZ_ALEC00000000
Vibrio cholerae
HE-45
non-O1/non-O139
Haiti
Gray Water
2010
NZ_ALED00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1042(15)
O1
El Tor
Thailand
Clinical
2010
NZ_ALDF00000000
Vibrio cholerae
BJGO1
non-O1/non-O139
Mississippi Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010
NZ_AFOU00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2010EL-1749
O1
El Tor
western Africa
Clinical
2010
NZ_AHGC00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2011EL-1133
O1
El Tor
Haiti
Clinical
2011
NZ_AHGI00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2011V-1021
O1
El Tor
Dominican Republic
Clinical
2011
NZ_AHGK00000000
Vibrio cholerae
2011EL-301
non-O1/non-O139
Taganrog, Russia
Water
2011
NZ_AJFN00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1110
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWF00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1111
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWS00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1112
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWT00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1113
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWU00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1114
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWV00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1115
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWR00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1116
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_ANNM00000000
Vibrio cholerae
CP1117
O75
Florida Gulf Coast, USA
Clinical
2010–2011
NZ_AMWW00000000
Vibrio cholerae
VL426
non-O1/non-O139
albensis
Maidstone, Kent, UK
Water
NZ_ACHV00000000
Vibrio anguillarum
96F
O1
Chesapeake Bay, USA
Striped bass (Morone saxatilis)
NZ_AEZA00000000
Vibrio anguillarum
RV22
O2β
Atlantic coast of Spain
Turbot (Scophthalmus maximus)
NZ_AEZB00000000
Vibrio anguillarum
775
O1
coast of Washington state, USA
Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch)
NC_015633/NC_015637
Vibrio coralliilyticus
ATCC BAA-450
Zanzibar, Tanzania
Coral
1999
NZ_ACZN00000000
Vibrio mimicus
SX-4
China
Clinical
2009
NZ_ADOO00000000
Vibrio mimicus
VM573
United States
Clinical
1990s
NZ_ACYV00000000
Vibrio mimicus
MB-451
Matlab, Bangladesh
Clinical
NZ_ADAF00000000
Vibrio orientalis
CIP 102891
Yellow sea, China
Water
NZ_ACZV00000000
Vibrio parahaemolyticus
RIMD 2210633
O3:K6
Japan
Clinical
1996
NC_004603/NC_004605
Vibrio splendidus
12B01
Plum Island Estuary, Massachusetts, USA
Water
NZ_AAMR00000000
Vibrio vulnificus
YJ016
biotype 1
Taiwan
Clinical
NC_005139/NC_005140
Vibrio sp. RC341
RC341
O153
Chesapeake Bay, USA
Water
1998
NZ_ACZT00000000
Grimontia hollisae
CIP 101886
Maryland, USA
Clinical
NZ_ADAQ00000000
Results and Discussion
Phylogenomic Analysis of Florida Outbreak Strains
The eight isolates subjected to analysis in this study have been labeled by number (isolates CP1110, 1111, 1112, 1113, 1114, 1115, 1116 and 1117) and are hereafter collectively referred to as the V. cholerae FL Group. The phylogeny of 84 fully and partially sequenced V. cholerae strains, including the eight V. cholerae FL Group genomes, was inferred (Figure 1). Results of the analysis demonstrate that the V. cholerae FL Group are sister taxa with V. cholerae V51, a clinical V. cholerae O141 serogroup strain isolated from a human clinical case in the United States in 1987, suggesting a common ancestor after it had diverged from other V. cholerae lineages. From a public health perspective, the results of the analysis demonstrate the group represents a phyletic lineage of V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains that persist in the United States as a cause of morbidity. Although, not added to this analysis due to the absence of their sequenced genomes, results of this analysis coupled with V. cholerae isolation data from cholera patients worldwide demonstrate that other V. cholerae serogroup O141 and O75 strains result in similar clinical manifestations as the strains in this study, that is symptoms of cholera [30], [31]. As with the isolates sequenced in this analysis, other V. cholerae O141 and O75 infections in the United States were associated with either seafood consumption or presence of the patient in a coastal state, suggesting infections with strains of these serogroups are transmitted to people in a similar manner as those of the O1 serogroup and therefore they have a similar ecology as serogroup O1 strains in the United States [32], [33].
Figure 1
Neighbour-joining tree inferring phylogenetic relationships of 84 V. cholerae genomes based on 995 orthologous protein-coding genes (954,646 bp).
V. cholerae FL Group is labelled in red and V. cholerae V51 is labelled in blue. Haiti non-O1/non-O139 clinical groups-1 and -2 are further defined by Hasan et al. [6]. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values. Nucleotide substitution model is the Kimura-2-parameter. Bar length = 0.002 nucleotide substitutions per site.
Neighbour-joining tree inferring phylogenetic relationships of 84 V. cholerae genomes based on 995 orthologous protein-coding genes (954,646 bp).
V. cholerae FL Group is labelled in red and V. cholerae V51 is labelled in blue. Haitinon-O1/non-O139 clinical groups-1 and -2 are further defined by Hasan et al. [6]. Numbers at nodes represent bootstrap values. Nucleotide substitution model is the Kimura-2-parameter. Bar length = 0.002 nucleotide substitutions per site.We identified 8 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) among the V. cholerae O75 genomes in this study. Six of these occurred in six separate ORFs and two occurred in one ORF annotated as a “putative transcriptional activator ToxR.” It is not clear if these SNPs influence the ecology or virulence potential of these isolates. However, they do demonstrate an appreciable level of genomic diversity between strains of the same outbreak (Table 2). To further estimate the genomic diversity of this lineage, comparisons should be made to other V. cholerae O75 isolates from clinical and environmental isolates.
Table 2
ORFs with polymorphisms within the V. cholerae FL group.
ABC-type polar amino acid transport system ATPase component
GI-26*
G
G
T
G
G
G
G
G
putative transcriptional activator ToxR
A
A
T
A
A
A
A
A
VCA1063
G
G
G
G
T
T
G
G
Ornithine decarboxylase
* = Not found in V. cholerae N16961.
* = Not found in V. cholerae N16961.
Genomic Islands, Pathogenicity Islands, and Virulence Factors
The V. cholerae FL Group isolates were determined to contain the full CTX phage encoding the cholera toxin, but the structure of this region was unresolved due to the limitations of assembly since ORFs were found on multiple contigs. For similar reasons, CTX phage copy number could not be resolved. A BLASTN analysis with V. cholerae N16961 and O395 as reference demonstrated the presence of regions homologous to VC1456 to VC1463 (VC0395_0512 to VC0395_0505 and VC0395_A1060 and VC0395_A1067 of V. cholerae O395) of the CTX phage (ctxB, ctxA, zot, ace, orfU,cep, rstB, rstA, and rstR
Classical). To infer the biotype of the cholera toxin, PCR targeting the ctxB gene was employed and resulted in an amplicon for primers of targeting ctxB
Classical. These PCR results are consistent with profiles of other clinically isolated V. cholerae strains on a global scale that suggest this cholera toxin biotype is the predominant biotype currently causing the majority of disease [34], [35]. Based on the genome sequence data, the CTX phage of the V. cholerae FL Group genomes were lacking the rstR gene of V. cholerae N16961 El Tor (VC1464), but did encode the rstR gene homologous to the one encoded in V. cholerae O395 Classical. To further investigate and confirm these in silico results, PCR targeting the rstR region was done and resulted in amplicons for the Calcutta, Environmental, and Classical biotypes, but not the El Tor biotype, an as-to-date uncommon combination. The rstR amplicons of CP1110 were subjected to Sanger sequencing and the resulting sequences were compared by BLASTN to the NCBI Genbank database for better interpretation of these results and each showed ≥99% nucleotide sequence similarity to Calcutta, Environmental, and Classical sequences (Figure 2). These amplicon sequences were compared with V. cholerae CP1110 reads by BLASTN to re-confirm their presence in the genome sequences. The rstR sequences from the V. cholerae FL Group were confirmed as Calcutta, Environmental, and Classical biotypes (Figure 2). The prototypical V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains encode rstR
El Tor and ctxB
El Tor while Classical strains encode rstR
Classical and ctxB
Classical. Altered V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains which differ from prototypical El Tor strains in their rstR/ctxB types have recently been identified [24]. Data from this study further demonstrates the diversity of the CTX phage outside of the more frequently studied V. cholerae O1 strains and suggests many alleles of this phage can be associated with cholera. Cholera toxin expression was not assayed in this study.
Figure 2
rstR sequences from V. cholerae CP1110.
Sequences are aligned to their most similar homologs extracted from NCBI Genbank database. Nulceotide sequence identity is shown to the right of the last nucleotide aligned for each allele.
rstR sequences from V. cholerae CP1110.
Sequences are aligned to their most similar homologs extracted from NCBI Genbank database. Nulceotide sequence identity is shown to the right of the last nucleotide aligned for each allele.The genomes of the eight V. cholerae FL Group isolates harbored Vibrio pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1) encoding the toxin co-regulated pilus (TCP) shown to be responsible for biofilm formation in the intestine and a receptor for CTXΦ phage [36], [37]. VPI-1 of the V. cholerae FL Group is highly similar in structure to those of other clinical and environmental V. cholerae and V. mimicus (Figure 3). Interestingly, the tcpA gene (often used as a marker of V. cholerae biotype) of this group has the highest similarity with that of V. cholerae O395, a Classical biotype, while showing similarity of 77% with V. cholerae V51. However, a phylogeny of concatenated ORFs of this island demonstrates VPI-1 of the V. cholerae FL Group and V. cholerae V51 are closely related to each other from an evolutionary perspective, and significantly diverged from VPI-1 of other clinical and environmental V. cholerae and V. mimicus strains (Figure 4).
Figure 3
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1).
VPI-1 of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Figure 4
Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1).
Neighbor-joining tree showing evolutionary relationships of VPI-1. The calculation was based on aligned fragments of 25 orthologous genes (VC0819 to VC0845) comprising ca. 26.9 kb. Bar length = 0.005 substitutions per site.
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1).
VPI-1 of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1).
Neighbor-joining tree showing evolutionary relationships of VPI-1. The calculation was based on aligned fragments of 25 orthologous genes (VC0819 to VC0845) comprising ca. 26.9 kb. Bar length = 0.005 substitutions per site.The genomes of all V. cholerae FL Group isolates also encoded VPI-2, with a type III secretion system (T3SS) (Figure 5). Two divergent T3SS variants have been identified in V. cholerae isolates [38]. T3SS in the V. cholerae FL Group genomes are most similar to that of V. cholerae V51 and AM-19226, a non-O1TCP-negative and CTX-negative isolate (Figure 5). The T3SS of V. cholerae AM-19226 has been shown to be essential for colonization of the infantrabbit intestine and associated with severe diarrhea in this model, suggesting it plays a significant role in virulence during human infections [39]. This region has been found in environmental and clinical V. cholerae on a global scale. For instance, V. cholerae HE-25, a gray water isolate from Haiti and V. cholerae VC35, a clinical isolate from Malaysia, both encode T3SS that is structurally and phylogenetically similar to the variant in the V. cholerae FL Group suggesting global distribution of this virulence factor in environmental and clinical isolates (Figure 6). A phylogeny based on conserved ORFs of this variant and of V. parahaemolyticus as an outgroup infers the nearest phylogenetic neighbor to T3SS in the V. cholerae FL Group is V. cholerae VC35 (Figure 7). Although this region has been shown to be part of VPI-2 variants it has been identified as a separate genomic island capable of lateral transfer between V. cholerae strains [12], [40].
Figure 5
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 2 (VPI-2).
VPI-2 of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Figure 6
Phylogenetic analysis of ORFs conserved among all T3SS-positive V. cholerae and closely related species.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 7 orthologous genes (VCHE25_2738, VCHE25_2741, VCHE25_2742, VCHE25_2744, VCHE25_2745, VCHE25_2749, VCHE25_2754) comprising ca. 5.2 kb. Bar length = 0.05 substitutions per site.
Figure 7
Phylogenetic analysis of most closely related T3SS.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 17 orthologous genes (VCHE25_2737 to VCHE25_2742, VCHE25_2745 to VCHE25_2752, and VCHE25_2754) comprising ca. 10.2 kb. Bar length = 0.02 substitutions per site.
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio pathogenicity island 2 (VPI-2).
VPI-2 of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Phylogenetic analysis of ORFs conserved among all T3SS-positive V. cholerae and closely related species.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 7 orthologous genes (VCHE25_2738, VCHE25_2741, VCHE25_2742, VCHE25_2744, VCHE25_2745, VCHE25_2749, VCHE25_2754) comprising ca. 5.2 kb. Bar length = 0.05 substitutions per site.
Phylogenetic analysis of most closely related T3SS.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 17 orthologous genes (VCHE25_2737 to VCHE25_2742, VCHE25_2745 to VCHE25_2752, and VCHE25_2754) comprising ca. 10.2 kb. Bar length = 0.02 substitutions per site.VPI-2 of the V. cholerae FL Group also encodes a complete sialic acid catabolism operon (homologs of VC1773 to VC1784 in the canonical VPI-2 of V. cholerae N16961), including a neuraminidase (sialidase) which has been shown to unmask the GM1 gangliosides of human intestinal epithelial cells, making them available to the cholera toxin [10]. A phylogeny of the sialic acid metabolism region demonstrated this operon in the V. cholerae FL Group is closely related to that of V. cholerae V51, V. cholerae 1587, and V. cholerae 623-39 (Figure 8). The phylogeny of this region is not congruent with that of the T3SS suggesting a more recent ancestral sialic acid metabolism region of the V. cholerae FL Group and V. cholerae V51 than that of the T3SS. Further, when the phylogenies of T3SS and sialic acid metabolism operons of seven V. cholerae strains with homologous ORFs are inferred (V. cholerae strains AM-19226, TMA 21, HE-25, V51, 12129(1), FL Group, and VC35), sister taxa of the V. cholerae FL Group T3SS remains V. cholerae VC35 and sister taxa of the sialic acid metabolism region of the V. cholerae FL Group remains V. cholerae V51 (data not shown). These data suggest the two regions in the V. cholerae FL Group originated from different sources. Morita et al. [40] demonstrated these two regions of VPI-2 could be of separate origin and the insertion locus of V. cholerae T3SS is exclusively in VPI-2. Interestingly, the mu-like phage region, the most variable region of the canonical VPI-2, is absent in these genomes.
Figure 8
Phylogenetic analysis of sialic acid metabolism region of VPI-2.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 7 orthologous genes (VC1781 to VC1774) comprising ca. 5.7 kb. Bar length = 0.05 substitutions per site.
Phylogenetic analysis of sialic acid metabolism region of VPI-2.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment of 7 orthologous genes (VC1781 to VC1774) comprising ca. 5.7 kb. Bar length = 0.05 substitutions per site.A VSP-II-like island was identified in the V. cholerae FL Group isolates with varying levels of similarity and conservation with other homologous sequences in the Vibrionaceae (Figure 9). This island was previously identified as GI-123, but was not well characterized [41]. Interestingly, this island does not encode the canonical integrase of VSP-II but rather one that is similar to an integrase of a not yet described genomic island in V. cholerae CP1033(6), a serogroup O1 strain isolated from a cholera patient in Mexico in 2000. This VSP-II-like island was not inserted at the tRNA-Met (adjacent to VC0517) where the canonical VSP-II is inserted, but rather at the locus homologous to VC0208 and VC0209, where GIs-32, 52, 68, 96, 98, 107 are inserted in other V. cholerae strains [12], [41]. When compared to the prototypical VSP-II island in V. cholerae N16961, the V. cholerae FL Group encodes two regions with high similarity: VC0495 to VC0498 and VC0504 to VC0510. A novel region encoding four ORFs annotated as hypothetical protein, bacteriocin immunity protein, bacteriocin immunity protein, and hypothetical protein were inserted between the two regions that are similar to the prototypical VSP-II (Figures 9 and 10). One of these hypothetical proteins comprises 794 amino acids, with cytoxic and S-type Pyocin domains, known toxins active against bacteria [42]. When compared to the NCBI nucleotide database, highest similarity is with an S-type Pyocin domain-containing protein (YP_004564713.1) of V. anguillarum, a marine fish pathogen. Two adjacent proteins are bacteriocin immunity proteins, with one 83 amino acids and the other 93 amino acids in length. Both have colicin immunity protein/pyocin immunity protein domains and are predicted by pSort to be in the cytoplasm of the V. cholerae
[43]. In other species secreted pyocins are known to cause cell death among closely related strains [42]. The presence of a homologous genetic cluster in the V. cholerae FL Group may allow it to outcompete other V. cholerae strains present in the same local environment which may lead to an increased density of pyocin and pyocin immunity protein-encoding strains in a specific environment such as a single oyster bed. However, further research on pyocins in V. cholerae needs to be conducted to further elucidate their potential role in intra-species competition in the environment.
Figure 9
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio Seventh pandemic island II-like island.
Vibrio Seventh pandemic II-like island of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Figure 10
Structure of the canonical Vibrio Seventh Pandemic island II (VSP-II) and the VSP-II-like element of the V. cholerae FL Group.
Structure of the canonical VSP-II element of V. cholerae N16961 (top), the VSP-II-like element found in the V. cholerae FL Group (middle) based on the annotation in NCBI Genbank, and the homologous locus of insertion of this VSP-II-like element in V. cholerae N16961 (bottom). Sequences homologous to VC0208 and VC0209 in V. cholerae V51 are found on contig NZ_DS179740 at positions 34343 to 34831 and 34897 to 35763. ORFs conserved between the two elements are outlined in red.
Comparative genomic analysis of Vibrio Seventh pandemic island II-like island.
Vibrio Seventh pandemic II-like island of the V. cholerae FL Group is the reference sequence in a BLAST alignment with homologs of other Vibrionaceae genomes. Colored squares show degree of similarity.
Structure of the canonical Vibrio Seventh Pandemic island II (VSP-II) and the VSP-II-like element of the V. cholerae FL Group.
Structure of the canonical VSP-II element of V. cholerae N16961 (top), the VSP-II-like element found in the V. cholerae FL Group (middle) based on the annotation in NCBI Genbank, and the homologous locus of insertion of this VSP-II-like element in V. cholerae N16961 (bottom). Sequences homologous to VC0208 and VC0209 in V. cholerae V51 are found on contig NZ_DS179740 at positions 34343 to 34831 and 34897 to 35763. ORFs conserved between the two elements are outlined in red.The VSP-II-like element in isolates of the V. cholerae FL Group has 12 ORFs with similarity to regions of the V. corallilyticusATCC BAA-450 and V. anguillarum 775 genomes, with percent nucleotide identity between the ORFs ranging from 69 to 99% (Figure 9). These data suggest the suite of VSP-II-like elements is distributed not only among clinical V. cholerae isolates, but also environmental isolates including non-cholera vibrios. Further, the presence of similar ORFs in non-pathogenic vibrios strongly indicates a function in the natural environment.A phylogeny of conserved VSP-II ORFs infers these sequences of the V. cholerae FL Group to be closely related to V. cholerae TMA 21 and significantly divergent from the V. cholerae 7th Pandemic strains (Figure 11). The subclade with which VSP-II of the V. cholerae FL Group clusters comprises environmental V. cholerae strains and Vibrio sp. RC341, a novel Vibrio species closely related to V. cholerae and known to cause sporadic infections in humans [15], [44], [45]. V. cholerae V51 does not encode this element.
Figure 11
Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio Seventh pandemic island II-like island.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment 8 orthologous ORFs (VC0495, VC0496, VC0504 to VC0506, VC0508 to VC0510) comprising ca. 3.7 kb. Bar represents 0.02 substitutions per site.
Phylogenetic analysis of Vibrio Seventh pandemic island II-like island.
Neighbor-joining tree inferred from an alignment 8 orthologous ORFs (VC0495, VC0496, VC0504 to VC0506, VC0508 to VC0510) comprising ca. 3.7 kb. Bar represents 0.02 substitutions per site.The presence of genomic islands comprising the V. cholerae mobilome described by Chun et al. (12) was evaluated using BLASTN and BLASTP. Including VPI-1 and 2 and a VSP-II-like element, the V. cholerae FL Group encoded sequences with high similarity to GIs-1, 2, 3, 4, 26, 37, 57, 58, and two genomic islands not yet described and designated here as FL-GI-1 and FL-GI-2 (Figure 12). All V. cholerae FL Group isolates lacked VSP-I genomic island and the site of insertion does not harbor any other genomic island. Figure 13 depicts a proposed arrangement of genomic island insertion and deletion in the V. cholerae V51/V. cholerae FL Group lineage before and after the two sets of isolates (V. cholerae V51 and V. cholerae FL Group isolates) would have diverged from a common ancestor.
Figure 12
BLAST atlas of V. cholerae FL Group, V. cholerae V51, and V. mimicus MB-451 and V. cholerae N16961 genomes.
V. cholerae N16961 is the reference genome. Genomic islands with the prefix “GI” are described by Chun et al. [12]. SI = superintegron.
Figure 13
Proposed hypothetical insertions of genomic islands in the V. cholerae V51/V. cholerae FL Group clade.
BLAST atlas of V. cholerae FL Group, V. cholerae V51, and V. mimicus MB-451 and V. cholerae N16961 genomes.
V. cholerae N16961 is the reference genome. Genomic islands with the prefix “GI” are described by Chun et al. [12]. SI = superintegron.
Lipopolysaccharide Coding Region
This region of the V. cholerae FL Group is ca. 60.1 kb, with the LPS core region ca. 19.1 kb and wb* region ca. 41 kb. Of all V. cholerae serogroup data represented in NCBI GenBank, the core oligosaccharide (OS) and the O141-antigen-specific coding regions of V. cholerae V51 are most similar to the homologous ORFs of V. cholerae FL Group (Figures 14 and 15). Of 54 identified ORFs in this region of the V. cholerae FL Group, V. cholerae V51 shares 38 with at least 95% nucleotide sequence similarity. When the O-antigen ORFs of V. cholerae V51 and the V. cholerae FL Group are compared the only observed structural differences are seven ORFs absent in the regions homologous to VCV51_0176 to VCV51_0185 in the V. cholerae FL Group and 11 ORFs in V. cholerae V51 absent in the homologous region (found between positions 98044 and 113059 in contig ref|NZ_AMWF01000009.1|). Eight ORFs were identified in the O75-antigen coding region of the V. cholerae FL Group isolates that have not yet been described in the O-antigen coding regions of other V. cholerae genomes, and these ORFs may be specific to the O75 antigen (Figures 14 and 15).
Figure 14
Comparative genomic analysis of LPS coding regions.
Reciprocal BLAST analysis of LPS coding region with V. cholerae V51 as a reference.
Figure 15
Comparative genomic analysis of LPS coding regions.
Reciprocal BLAST analysis of LPS coding region with V. cholerae FL Group as a reference.
Comparative genomic analysis of LPS coding regions.
Reciprocal BLAST analysis of LPS coding region with V. cholerae V51 as a reference.Reciprocal BLAST analysis of LPS coding region with V. cholerae FL Group as a reference.Although it is well known that this region is a hot-spot for gene transfer, it can be assumed that O141 and O75 O-antigen coding regions derived from a recent ancestral sequence based on the high level of conservation between the two, and that the difference between the two clusters arises from a substitution of ORFs specific to the O-antigen region. A similar mechanism has been suggested for the relationship between O139 and O22 serogroups [46], [47]. This substitution may have involved a ca. 18.2 kb region in the genomes of V. cholerae FL Group isolates and a ca. 16.2 kb region in V. cholerae V51 flanked by homologs found at nucleotide positions 97166 to 98047 (glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase) and 116274 to 116825 (lipid carrier:UDP-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase). Alternatively, three substitution events involving shorter sequences may have occurred between the flanking regions, indicated by absent ORFs (red squares in Figure 15) in reciprocal comparison. Interestingly, the serogroup with the next highest level of conservation with serogroups O141 and O75 is the epidemic-associated O139 serogroup isolate V. cholerae MO10.
Phenotypic Analyses
The eight V. cholerae FL Group isolates were evaluated for hemolysis, motility, and proteolysis, following standard methods for testing these methods in V. cholerae
[27]. Although not responsible for the ricewater diarrhea characteristic of cholera, these virulence factors are associated with intestinal and extra-intestinal V. cholerae infections, as well as ecological functions in the aquatic environment [48], [49], [50], [51]. All strains are motile, proteolytic, form biofilms and are hemolytic. However, strain CP1114 demonstrated weak or incomplete hemolysis. This isolate was also weakly proteolytic, compared to the other V. cholerae FL Group isolates, and incomplete hemolysis may be due to incomplete processing of hemolysin by the hemagglutinin/protease [52].The Caenorhabditis elegans model of V. cholerae infection, which yields data on strength of hemolytic activity (hlyA) proved useful [29]. Nematodes were fed three isolates of V. cholerae FL Group (V. cholerae CP1112, 1114, and 1115). CP1115, which showed the largest zone of hemolysis on blood agar, was selected for testing. CP1114 demonstrated incomplete hemolysis and CP1112 showed a moderate zone of clearing when compared to the other isolates of the V. cholerae FL Group. The results demonstrated significantly more rapid lethality in nematodes fed the V. cholerae FL Group isolates than nematodes fed non-pathogenic E. coli as a control, but significantly slower lethality than nematodes fed V. cholerae El Tor strain E7946 (P<0.05) (Figure 16). It is concluded that all three of the V. cholerae FL Group isolates produced in similar C. elegans survival patterns. However, median survival time of worms fed isolates V. cholerae CP1112 and CP1115 was ca. nine days versus ca. eleven days for worms fed V. cholerae CP1114, the isolate with incomplete hemolysis, a consistent result based on previous observations. Interestingly, the three isolates caused a C. elegans die-off similar to V. cholerae O1 biotype Classical than to El Tor [29], not expected since hlyA of the V. cholerae FL Group does not have the same 11 bp deletion linked to the decreased hemolytic activity of V. cholerae O1 Classical but higher nucleotide sequence similarity with V. cholerae O1 El Tor N16961 than Classical O395.
Figure 16
Survival curves of C. elegans challenged with V. cholerae CP1112, CP1114, CP1115, V. cholerae El Tor E7946, Escherichia coli OP50.
Based on BiOLOG phenotypic microarray assay, all strains utilized sialic acid three to six times greater than background demonstrating a functional sialic acid catabolism operon of the VPI-2. Almagro-Moreno and Boyd [10] reported the ability to utilize sialic acid confers a competitive advantage to strains encoding this region during infection of the sialic acid-rich environment of the gut. This is due to the ability of V. cholerae encoding a functional sialic acid metabolism region to utilize sialic acid as a carbon source [10]. All strains also utilized maltose, which was shown by Lång et al. [53] to be related to cholera toxin and toxin co-regulated pilus production and translocation across the V. cholerae outer membrane. Results of the study demonstrated that a functional maltose operon is needed for virulence of V. cholerae
[53].The BiOLOG profiles showed similar metabolic profiles among the V. cholerae FL Group strains (data not shown). However, both replicates of V. cholerae CP1110 utilized caproic acid as carbon source while all other isolates generally did not, except isolate V. cholerae CP1117 which utilized this substrate in one replicate. Isolates CP1112, CP1113, and CP1116 weakly utilized caproic acid in at least one replicate. Isolate V. cholerae CP1115 did not utilize β-methyl-D-glucoside while the other V. cholerae FL Group isolates did.
Conclusions
It is concluded the outbreak was caused by V. cholerae growing to a sufficiently high density in the environment (i.e., not in a single oyster) to cause multiple cases of cholera. Clonality of the isolates, including 67% of all reported cholera cases from this outbreak, demonstrates that there need not be a human vehicle of V. cholerae dispersal into a given geographical region prior to a cholera outbreak, as has been suggested for cholera epidemics. Further, it is concluded that genomic and phenotypic diversity exists among clinical isolates V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 strains of the same outbreak, supporting a recommendation to investigate the genomics of cholera epidemics at the population level. Large-scale genomic and molecular analyses accomplished for the cholera epidemics in Haiti and Bangladesh and the recent epidemics in Nigeria and Kenya have revealed distinct V. cholerae populations causing disease [6], [7], [54], [55].Because the V. cholerae FL Group isolates formed a monophyletic lineage with V. cholerae V51 serogroup O141 (a 1987 clinical isolate), we hypothesize the clade to represent a lineage of cholera-causing isolates, similar to those of the 7th pandemic clade. Although, diverged from recent 7th pandemic strains and older Classical and pre-7th pandemic strains, from an evolutionary perspective, the virulence factors known to be involved in cholera are present in the V. cholerae FL Group and V. cholerae V51. The difference in the constellation of mobile elements and incongruent phylogenies of some elements of V. cholerae V51 and the V. cholerae FL Group suggest that, although these two groups are similar, they have independently acquired various elements from the environment, with some islands globally distributed.Although the majority of the research on V. cholerae focuses on the O1 serogroup because of the major epidemics associated with these strains, V. cholerae non-O1/non-O139 serogroup strains should be further evaluated for contribution to the global disease burden. V. cholerae serogroup O141 isolates have been shown by other investigators to globally cause significant disease and many encode ctxB
Classical
[14], [30], [31], [56] as do the V. cholerae FL Group serogroup O75 isolates. Pathogenic V. cholerae causing cholera outbreaks must be characterized in a phylogenomic context and their genomic island constellations as well. It is no longer sufficient to label these V. cholerae strains as serogroups O1, O139, or non-O1/non-O139, without further appropriate genomic analysis.
Authors: Suraia Nusrin; G Yeahia Khan; N A Bhuiyan; M Ansaruzzaman; M A Hossain; Ashrafus Safa; Rasel Khan; Shah M Faruque; David A Sack; T Hamabata; Yoshifumi Takeda; G Balakrish Nair Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Gary J Vora; Carolyn E Meador; Michele M Bird; Cheryl A Bopp; Joanne D Andreadis; David A Stenger Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-12-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Seon Young Choi; Je Hee Lee; Eun Jin Kim; Hye Ri Lee; Yoon-Seong Jeon; Lorenz von Seidlein; Jaqueline Deen; M Ansaruzzaman; G Marcelino E S Lucas; Avertino Barreto; Francisco F Songane; Catarina Mondlane; G Balakrish Nair; Cecil Czerkinsky; John D Clemens; Jongsik Chun; Dong Wook Kim Journal: J Med Microbiol Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 2.472
Authors: John A Crump; Cheryl A Bopp; Katherine D Greene; Kristy A Kubota; Rebecca L Middendorf; Joy G Wells; Eric D Mintz Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2003-02-18 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: P A Blake; D T Allegra; J D Snyder; T J Barrett; L McFarland; C T Caraway; J C Feeley; J P Craig; J V Lee; N D Puhr; R A Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1980-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F Y Lin; J G Morris; J B Kaper; T Gross; J Michalski; C Morrison; J P Libonati; E Israel Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 1986-03 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Hediye Nese Cinar; Mahendra Kothary; Atin R Datta; Ben D Tall; Robert Sprando; Kivanc Bilecen; Fitnat Yildiz; Barbara McCardell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Megan R Carpenter; Sai S Kalburge; Joseph D Borowski; Molly C Peters; Rita R Colwell; E Fidelma Boyd Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Dalong Hu; Bin Liu; Lu Feng; Peng Ding; Xi Guo; Min Wang; Boyang Cao; Peter R Reeves; Lei Wang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniela Ceccarelli; Arlene Chen; Nur A Hasan; Shah M Rashed; Anwar Huq; Rita R Colwell Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2015-01-02 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Paul C Kirchberger; Fabini D Orata; E Jed Barlow; Kathryn M Kauffman; Rebecca J Case; Martin F Polz; Yan Boucher Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: Leonid M Irenge; Jérôme Ambroise; Prudence N Mitangala; Bertrand Bearzatto; Raphaël K S Kabangwa; Jean-François Durant; Jean-Luc Gala Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-04-20