Literature DB >> 24696390

The persistence of distraction: a study of attentional biases by fear, faces, and context.

Emily L Parks1, So-Yeon Kim, Joseph B Hopfinger.   

Abstract

Efficient processing of the visual world requires that distracting items be avoided, or at least rapidly disengaged from. The mechanisms by which highly salient, yet irrelevant, stimuli lead to distraction, however, are not well understood. Here, we utilized a particularly strong type of distractor--images of human faces--to investigate the mechanisms of distraction and the involuntarily biasing of attention. Across three experiments using a novel discrimination task, we provided new evidence that the robust distraction triggered by faces may not reflect enhanced attraction but, instead, may reflect an extended holding of attention. Specifically, the onset of a task-irrelevant distractor initially impaired target performance regardless of the identity of that distractor (fearful faces, neutral faces, or places). In contrast, an extended period of distraction was observed only when the distractor was a face. Our results thus demonstrate two distinct mechanisms contributing to distraction: an initial involuntary capture to any sudden event and a subsequent holding of attention to a potentially meaningful, yet task-irrelevant stimulus-in this case, a human face. Critically, the latter holding of attention by faces was not unique to fearful faces but also occurred for neutral faces. The present results dissociate attentional capture from hold in another way as well, since the capture occurred regardless of the nature of the distractors, but the extended holding of attention was dependent upon the ongoing distractor context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24696390     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-014-0615-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  19 in total

1.  Emotional facial expressions capture attention.

Authors:  P Vuilleumier; S Schwartz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load.

Authors:  Do-Joon Yi; Geoffrey F Woodman; David Widders; René Marois; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

Authors:  E Fox; R Russo; R Bowles; K Dutton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

5.  Neural basis of visual distraction.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment.

Authors:  R Epstein; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-04-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli.

Authors:  A Ohman; D Lundqvist; F Esteves
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-03

8.  The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-06

9.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect.

Authors:  C H Hansen; R D Hansen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

10.  Entirely irrelevant distractors can capture and captivate attention.

Authors:  Sophie Forster; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Finding faces among faces: human faces are located more quickly and accurately than other primate and mammal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Zachary Buchin; Katie Werner; Rey Worrell; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Neural evidence for persistent attentional bias to threats in patients with social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Jung Eun Shin; Yoonji Irene Lee; Haena Kim; Hang Joon Jo; Soo-Hee Choi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.