Literature DB >> 19702467

Neural basis of visual distraction.

So-Yeon Kim1, Joseph B Hopfinger.   

Abstract

The ability to maintain focus and avoid distraction by goal-irrelevant stimuli is critical for performing many tasks and may be a key deficit in attention-related problems. Recent studies have demonstrated that irrelevant stimuli that are consciously perceived may be filtered out on a neural level and not cause the distraction triggered by subliminal stimuli. However, in everyday situations, suprathreshold stimuli often do capture attention, but the neural mechanisms by which some stimuli rapidly and automatically trigger distraction remain unknown. Here, we investigated the neural basis of distraction by utilizing a particularly strong form of distractor: the abrupt appearance of a new object. Our results revealed a competitive relation between brain regions coding the locations of the target and the distractor, with distractor processing increasing and target processing decreasing, but only when the distractor was a new object; an equivalent luminance change to an existing object neither generated distraction nor affected target processing. Results also revealed changes in neural activity in intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) that were unique to the new object distractor condition. The strongest relations between behavioral distraction and neural activity were observed in these parietal regions. Furthermore, participants who were less susceptible to distraction showed a more consistent, albeit more moderate, level of activity in IPS and TPJ. The present results thus provide new evidence regarding the neural mechanisms underlying distraction and resistance to it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19702467     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  7 in total

1.  Altered neural activity of magnitude estimation processing in adults with the fragile X premutation.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Ryu-ichiro Hashimoto; Flora Tassone; Tony J Simon; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  The persistence of distraction: a study of attentional biases by fear, faces, and context.

Authors:  Emily L Parks; So-Yeon Kim; Joseph B Hopfinger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12

3.  Accurate expectancies diminish perceptual distraction during visual search.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin; Anna Stegman; Barry Giesbrecht
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Balance in Virtual Reality: Effect of Age and Bilateral Vestibular Loss.

Authors:  Elodie Chiarovano; Wei Wang; Stephen J Rogers; Hamish G MacDougall; Ian S Curthoys; Catherine de Waele
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Neural evidence for persistent attentional bias to threats in patients with social anxiety disorder.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Jung Eun Shin; Yoonji Irene Lee; Haena Kim; Hang Joon Jo; Soo-Hee Choi
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Neural bases of enhanced attentional control: Lessons from action video game players.

Authors:  Julia Föcker; Daniel Cole; Anton L Beer; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Maintaining Balance when Looking at a Virtual Reality Three-Dimensional Display of a Field of Moving Dots or at a Virtual Reality Scene.

Authors:  Elodie Chiarovano; Catherine de Waele; Hamish G MacDougall; Stephen J Rogers; Ann M Burgess; Ian S Curthoys
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.