Literature DB >> 24696358

A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory.

Ola Olsson1, Arvid Bolin.   

Abstract

We have developed a habitat selection model based on central place foraging theory. An individual's decision to include a patch in its habitat depends on the marginal fitness contribution of that patch, which is characterized by its quality and distance to the central place. The essence of the model we have developed is a fitness isocline which is a function of patch quality and travel time to the patch. It has two parameters: the maximum travel distance to a patch of infinite quality and a coefficient that appropriately scales quality by travel time. Patches falling below the isocline will have positive marginal fitness values and should be included in the habitat. The maximum travel distance depends on the availability and quality of patches, as well as on the forager's life history, whereas the scaling parameter mostly depends on life history properties. Using the model, we derived a landscape quality metric (which can be thought of as a connectivity measure) that sums the values of available habitat in the landscape around a central place. We then fitted the two parameters to foraging data on breeding white storks (Ciconia ciconia) and estimated landscape quality, which correlated strongly with reproductive success. Landscape quality was then calculated for a larger region where re-introduction of the species is currently going on in order to demonstrate how this model can also be regarded as a species distribution model. In conclusion, we have built a general habitat selection model for central place foragers and a novel way of estimating landscape quality based on a behaviorally scaled connectivity metric.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24696358     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-2931-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  16 in total

1.  Spatially structured metapopulation models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity.

Authors:  O Ovaskainen; I Hanski
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees.

Authors:  Neal M Williams; James Regetz; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Long foraging distances impose high costs on offspring production in solitary bees.

Authors:  Antonia Zurbuchen; Stephanie Cheesman; Jeannine Klaiber; Andreas Müller; Silke Hein; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  Mechanisms of functional connectivity: the case of free-ranging bison in a forest landscape.

Authors:  Karine Dancose; Daniel Fortin; Xulin Guo
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Testing simple indices of habitat proximity.

Authors:  Rachael Winfree; Jonathan Dushoff; Elizabeth E Crone; Cheryl B Schultz; Robert V Budny; Neal M Williams; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Bumblebees experience landscapes at different spatial scales: possible implications for coexistence.

Authors:  Catrin Westphal; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Teja Tscharntke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Behavioural biology: an effective and relevant conservation tool.

Authors:  Richard Buchholz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps.

Authors:  Paul Beier; Wayne Spencer; Robert F Baldwin; Brad H McRae
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 6.560

9.  Assessing habitat quality of farm-dwelling house sparrows in different agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Maria von Post; Pernilla Borgström; Henrik G Smith; Ola Olsson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  An interspecific comparison of foraging range and nest density of four bumblebee (Bombus) species.

Authors:  M E Knight; A P Martin; S Bishop; J L Osborne; R J Hale; R A Sanderson; D Goulson
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.185

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of landscape composition and configuration on pollination in a native herb: a field experiment.

Authors:  Johan Ekroos; Anna Jakobsson; Joel Wideen; Lina Herbertsson; Maj Rundlöf; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Central-place foraging poses variable constraints year-round in a neotropical migrant.

Authors:  Kristen M Lalla; Kevin C Fraser; Barbara Frei; Jason D Fischer; Joe Siegrist; James D Ray; Mario Cohn-Haft; Kyle H Elliott
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.253

3.  When beggars are choosers-How nesting of a solitary bee is affected by temporal dynamics of pollen plants in the landscape.

Authors:  Anna S Persson; Florence Mazier; Henrik G Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Activity seascapes highlight central place foraging strategies in marine predators that never stop swimming.

Authors:  Yannis P Papastamatiou; Yuuki Y Watanabe; Urška Demšar; Vianey Leos-Barajas; Darcy Bradley; Roland Langrock; Kevin Weng; Christopher G Lowe; Alan M Friedlander; Jennifer E Caselle
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.