Literature DB >> 22764491

Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees.

Neal M Williams1, James Regetz, Claire Kremen.   

Abstract

Variation in the availability of food resources over space and time is a likely driver of how landscape structure and composition affect animal populations. Few studies, however, have directly assessed the spatiotemporal variation in resource availability that arises from landscape pattern, or its effect on populations and population dynamic parameters. We tested the effect of floral resource availability at the landscape scale on the numbers of worker, male, and queen offspring produced by bumble bee, Bombus vosnesenśkii, colonies experimentally placed within complex agricultural-natural landscapes. We quantified flower densities in all land use types at different times of the season and then used these data to calculate spatially explicit estimates of floral resources surrounding each colony. Floral availability strongly correlated with landscape structure, and different regions of the landscape showed distinct seasonal patterns of floral availability. The floral resources available in the landscape surrounding a colony positively affected the number of workers and males it produced. Production was more sensitive to early- than to later-season resources. Floral resources did not significantly affect queen production despite a strong correlation between worker number and queen number among colonies. No landscape produced high floral resources during both the early and late season, and seasonal consistency is likely required for greater queen production. Floral resources are important determinants of colony growth and likely affect the pollination services provided by bumble bees at a landscape scale. Spatiotemporal variation in floral resources across the landscape precludes a simple relationship between resources and reproductive success as measured by queens, but nonetheless likely influences the total abundance of bumble bees in our study region.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22764491     DOI: 10.1890/11-1006.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  33 in total

1.  A comparison of techniques for assessing farmland bumblebee populations.

Authors:  T J Wood; J M Holland; D Goulson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Brain evolution in social insects: advocating for the comparative approach.

Authors:  R Keating Godfrey; Wulfila Gronenberg
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Resource diversity and landscape-level homogeneity drive native bee foraging.

Authors:  Shalene Jha; Claire Kremen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Demographic benefits of early season resources for bumble bee (B. vosnesenskii) colonies.

Authors:  Rosemary L Malfi; Elizabeth Crone; Neal Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States.

Authors:  Insu Koh; Eric V Lonsdorf; Neal M Williams; Claire Brittain; Rufus Isaacs; Jason Gibbs; Taylor H Ricketts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Utility of carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes for inferring wild bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) use of adjacent foraging habitats.

Authors:  Jessie Lanterman Novotny; Karen Goodell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  A model for habitat selection and species distribution derived from central place foraging theory.

Authors:  Ola Olsson; Arvid Bolin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Trait-specific responses of wild bee communities to landscape composition, configuration and local factors.

Authors:  Sebastian Hopfenmüller; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Andrea Holzschuh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An organizing feature of bumble bee life history: worker emergence promotes queen reproduction and survival in young nests.

Authors:  Erica Sarro; Penglin Sun; Kerry Mauck; Damaris Rodriguez-Arellano; Naoki Yamanaka; S Hollis Woodard
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.079

10.  Pollination services provided by bees in pumpkin fields supplemented with either Apis mellifera or Bombus impatiens or not supplemented.

Authors:  Jessica D Petersen; Stephen Reiners; Brian A Nault
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.