Literature DB >> 24695430

Visual effects in great bowerbird sexual displays and their implications for signal design.

John A Endler1, Julie Gaburro, Laura A Kelley.   

Abstract

It is often assumed that the primary purpose of a male's sexual display is to provide information about quality, or to strongly stimulate prospective mates, but other functions of courtship displays have been relatively neglected. Male great bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus nuchalis) construct bowers that exploit the female's predictable field of view (FOV) during courtship displays by creating forced perspective illusions, and the quality of illusion is a good predictor of mating success. Here, we present and discuss two additional components of male courtship displays that use the female's predetermined viewpoint: (i) the rapid and diverse flashing of coloured objects within her FOV and (ii) chromatic adaptation of the female's eyes that alters her perception of the colour of the displayed objects. Neither is directly related to mating success, but both are likely to increase signal efficacy, and may also be associated with attracting and holding the female's attention. Signal efficacy is constrained by trade-offs between the signal components; there are both positive and negative interactions within multicomponent signals. Important signal components may have a threshold effect on fitness rather than the often assumed linear relationship.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bowerbird; constraints; holding attention; illusions; sexual display; visual effects

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695430      PMCID: PMC3996615          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Time course of chromatic adaptation for color appearance and discrimination.

Authors:  O Rinner; K R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Interactions between chromatic adaptation and contrast adaptation in color appearance.

Authors:  M A Webster; J A Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection.

Authors:  J A Endler; A L Basolo
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Male great bowerbirds create forced perspective illusions with consistently different individual quality.

Authors:  Laura A Kelley; John A Endler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The multiple signals assessed by female satin bowerbirds: could they be used to narrow down females' choices of mates?

Authors:  Timothy E Robson; Anne W Goldizen; David J Green
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems.

Authors:  J A Endler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1993-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Male displays adjusted to female's response.

Authors:  Gail L Patricelli; J Albert C Uy; Gregory Walsh; Gerald Borgia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Complex mate searching in the satin bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus.

Authors:  J A Uy; G L Patricelli; G Borgia
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Female preferences drive the evolution of mimetic accuracy in male sexual displays.

Authors:  Seth William Coleman; Gail Lisa Patricelli; Brian Coyle; Jennifer Siani; Gerald Borgia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The current and future state of animal coloration research.

Authors:  John A Endler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  A systems approach to animal communication.

Authors:  Eileen A Hebets; Andrew B Barron; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Mark E Hauber; Paul H Mason; Kim L Hoke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolving from static to dynamic signals: evolutionary compensation between two communicative signals.

Authors:  Emília P Martins; Alison G Ossip-Klein; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega; Cuauhcihuatl Vital García; Stephanie M Campos; Diana K Hews
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Colour polymorphic lures exploit innate preferences for spectral versus luminance cues in dipteran prey.

Authors:  Thomas E White; Darrell J Kemp
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Rebecca J Fox; Iain Barber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  How do great bowerbirds construct perspective illusions?

Authors:  Laura A Kelley; John A Endler
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Multi-modal sexual displays in Australian humpback dolphins.

Authors:  S J Allen; S L King; M Krützen; A M Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.