Literature DB >> 11090672

Interactions between chromatic adaptation and contrast adaptation in color appearance.

M A Webster1, J A Wilson.   

Abstract

Color appearance depends on adaptation processes that adjust sensitivity both to the average color in the stimulus (through light or chromatic adaptation) and to the variations in color (through contrast adaptation). We explored how these different forms of adaptation interact, by examining how the state of chromatic adaptation depends on the time-varying color contrasts in the stimulus, and conversely, how adaptation to the mean determines the stimulus contrasts underlying contrast adaptation. Light adaptation levels remain very similar whether observers adapt to a static chromaticity or to large temporal modulations in cone excitation that vary at rates of 0.5 Hz or higher. This suggests that up to the sites of light adaptation, the response to moderate contrasts is effectively linear and that the adaptation effectively averages over several seconds of the stimulus. For slower flicker rates color is differentially biased by the last half-cycle of the flicker, and perceived contrast may be altered by response polarization. This polarization selectively saturates responses to moderate (but not low) contrasts along the color direction complementary to the mean color bias, implying that the response changes occur within multiple mechanisms tuned to different chromatic axes. Chromatic adaptation often adjusts only partially to the mean color of the stimulus, and thus leaves a residual bias in the color appearance of the field. Contrast adaptation reduces perceived contrast relative to this residual color, and not relative to the stimulus that appears achromatic. Similarly, contrast discrimination thresholds appear lower around the residual color than around the achromatic point. Thus under biased states of chromatic adaptation alternative measures of 'zero contrast' can be dissociated, suggesting that they do not depend on a common null point within the channels encoding chromatic contrast.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11090672     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00238-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  20 in total

1.  The natural center of chromaticity space is not always achromatic: a new look at color induction.

Authors:  Vebjørn Ekroll; Franz Faul; Reinhard Niederée; Eike Richter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Very-long-term and short-term chromatic adaptation: are their influences cumulative?

Authors:  Suzanne C Belmore; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Slow updating of the achromatic point after a change in illumination.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Kathryn A Dawson; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  Adaptation and visual coding.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Context-dependent judgments of color that might allow color constancy in scenes with multiple regions of illumination.

Authors:  R J Lee; H E Smithson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  The perceptual balance of color.

Authors:  Kyle C McDermott; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Adaptation and visual salience.

Authors:  Kyle C McDermott; Gokhan Malkoc; Jeffrey B Mulligan; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Individual and age-related variation in chromatic contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Sarah L Elliott; John S Werner; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Adaptation and perceptual norms in color vision.

Authors:  Michael A Webster; Deanne Leonard
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 10.  Probing the functions of contextual modulation by adapting images rather than observers.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.