Literature DB >> 24695203

Do S cones contribute to color-motion feature binding?

Wei Wang, Steven K Shevell.   

Abstract

Wu et al. [Nature 429, 262 (2004)] describe a visual illusion in which color and motion are incorrectly bound: green dots moving downward and red dots moving upward are seen as green dots going up and red dots going down. The present study determined whether S cones contribute to color-motion feature-binding errors, in order to assess the neural representation of color at the level of binding. The specific experimental question is whether binding errors depend on S-cone responses from the objects perceived to have an illusory direction of motion. Alternatively, only L and M cones may determine the neural representation of color that regulates color-motion feature binding. In two experiments, the chromatic difference was manipulated between central objects, which induce color-motion binding errors, and peripheral objects, where color-motion binding errors occur. The chromaticity difference was varied along only the L/M-cone axis or only the S-cone axis. As in Wu et al. [Nature 429, 262 (2004)], color-motion binding was frequently observed in the periphery when there were no central versus peripheral chromatic differences. Further, the results showed that the frequency of color-motion binding errors in the periphery depended on the difference in S-cone excitation between center and periphery, thereby demonstrating that the neural representation of color at the level of feature binding depends on signals from not only L and M cones but also S cones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24695203     DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.31.000A60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  7 in total

1.  The role of color in motion feature-binding errors.

Authors:  Natalie N Stepien; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Perceptual resolution of color for multiple chromatically ambiguous objects.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Ambiguity is a linking feature for interocular grouping.

Authors:  Sunny M Lee; Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 2.004

4.  Color-motion feature-binding errors are mediated by a higher-order chromatic representation.

Authors:  Steven K Shevell; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Grouping ambiguous neural representations: neither identical chromaticity (the stimulus) nor color (the percept) is necessary.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 2.129

6.  Perceptual resolution of ambiguous neural representations for form and chromaticity.

Authors:  Emily Slezak; Andrew J Coia; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 7.  A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Matteo Valsecchi; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.