Literature DB >> 24692500

Exploring the recent trend in esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence and mortality using comparative simulation modeling.

Chung Yin Kong1, Sonja Kroep2, Kit Curtius2, William D Hazelton2, Jihyoun Jeon2, Rafael Meza2, Curtis R Heberle3, Melecia C Miller3, Sung Eun Choi3, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar2, Marjolein van Ballegooijen2, Eric J Feuer2, John M Inadomi2, Chin Hur4, E Georg Luebeck2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has increased five-fold in the United States since 1975. The aim of our study was to estimate future U.S. EAC incidence and mortality and to shed light on the potential drivers in the disease process that are conduits for the dramatic increase in EAC incidence.
METHODS: A consortium of three research groups calibrated independent mathematical models to clinical and epidemiologic data including EAC incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER 9) registry from 1975 to 2010. We then used a comparative modeling approach to project EAC incidence and mortality to year 2030.
RESULTS: Importantly, all three models identified birth cohort trends affecting cancer progression as a major driver of the observed increases in EAC incidence and mortality. All models predict that incidence and mortality rates will continue to increase until 2030 but with a plateauing trend for recent male cohorts. The predicted ranges of incidence and mortality rates (cases per 100,000 person years) in 2030 are 8.4 to 10.1 and 5.4 to 7.4, respectively, for males, and 1.3 to 1.8 and 0.9 to 1.2 for females. Estimates of cumulative cause-specific EAC deaths between both sexes for years 2011 to 2030 range between 142,300 and 186,298, almost double the number of deaths in the past 20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Through comparative modeling, the projected increases in EAC cases and deaths represent a critical public health concern that warrants attention from cancer control planners to prepare potential interventions. IMPACT: Quantifying this burden of disease will aid health policy makers to plan appropriate cancer control measures. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(6); 997-1006. ©2014 AACR. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24692500      PMCID: PMC4048738          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  35 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Michael Pignone; Somnath Saha; Tom Hoerger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II: Age-period-cohort models.

Authors:  D Clayton; E Schifflers
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The estimation of age, period and cohort effects for vital rates.

Authors:  T R Holford
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Statistical age-period-cohort analysis: a review and critique.

Authors:  L L Kupper; J M Janis; A Karmous; B G Greenberg
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1985

6.  Impact of endoscopic surveillance on mortality from Barrett's esophagus-associated esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Kunal Mehtani; Charles Quesenberry; Wei Zhao; Jolanda de Boer; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Screening and surveillance for Barrett esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Richard Sampliner; Jesper Lagergren; David Lieberman; A Mark Fendrick; Nimish Vakil
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Natural history of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease diagnosed in general practice.

Authors:  A Ruigómez; L A García Rodríguez; M-A Wallander; S Johansson; H Graffner; J Dent
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric atrophy: risk of adenocarcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia.

Authors:  Weimin Ye; Maria Held; Jesper Lagergren; Lars Engstrand; William J Blot; Joseph K McLaughlin; Olof Nyrén
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Natural history of early esophageal squamous carcinoma and early adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the People's Republic of China.

Authors:  Y Guanrei; Q Songliang; H He; F Guizen
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  35 in total

1.  Optimal healthcare decision making under multiple mathematical models: application in prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Dimitris Bertsimas; John Silberholz; Thomas Trikalinos
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2016-09-17

2.  An Accurate Cancer Incidence in Barrett's Esophagus: A Best Estimate Using Published Data and Modeling.

Authors:  Sonja Kroep; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Joel H Rubenstein; Harry J de Koning; Reinier Meester; John M Inadomi; Marjolein van Ballegooijen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The Role of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Other Factors during Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Kit Curtius; John M Inadomi; Thomas L Vaughan; Rafael Meza; Joel H Rubenstein; Chin Hur; E Georg Luebeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Disease Progression in Barrett's Low-Grade Dysplasia With Radiofrequency Ablation Compared With Surveillance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Sachin Wani; Sherif Gendy; Ben Harnke; Jacques J Bergman; Herbert Wolfsen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Is Mass Screening for Barrett's Esophagus a Myth or Reality?

Authors:  Prashanthi N Thota; Amitabh Chak
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Genetic variants of FOXP1 and FOXF1 are associated with the susceptibility of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in Chinese population.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Jiebin Chen; Tianheng Ma; Huimin Guo; Bin Yang
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 7.  Epidemiology of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas M Runge; Julian A Abrams; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.806

8.  Predicting the Future Burden of Esophageal Cancer by Histological Subtype: International Trends in Incidence up to 2030.

Authors:  Melina Arnold; Mathieu Laversanne; Linda Morris Brown; Susan S Devesa; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  The Impact of a Prior Diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus on Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Survival.

Authors:  Angela C Tramontano; Deirdre F Sheehan; Jennifer M Yeh; Chung Yin Kong; Emily C Dowling; Joel H Rubenstein; Julian A Abrams; John M Inadomi; Deborah Schrag; Chin Hur
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.