Literature DB >> 24691118

Development and application of a suite of 4-D virtual breast phantoms for optimization and evaluation of breast imaging systems.

Nooshin Kiarashi, Joseph Y Lo, Yuan Lin, Lynda C Ikejimba, Sujata V Ghate, Loren W Nolte, James T Dobbins, William P Segars, Ehsan Samei.   

Abstract

Mammography is currently the most widely utilized tool for detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. However, in women with dense breast tissue, tissue overlap may obscure lesions. Digital breast tomosynthesis can reduce tissue overlap. Furthermore, imaging with contrast enhancement can provide additional functional information about lesions, such as morphology and kinetics, which in turn may improve lesion identification and characterization. The performance of these imaging techniques is strongly dependent on the structural composition of the breast, which varies significantly among patients. Therefore, imaging system and imaging technique optimization should take patient variability into consideration. Furthermore, optimization of imaging techniques that employ contrast agents should include the temporally varying breast composition with respect to the contrast agent uptake kinetics. To these ends, we have developed a suite of 4-D virtual breast phantoms, which are incorporated with the kinetics of contrast agent propagation in different tissues and can realistically model normal breast parenchyma as well as benign and malignant lesions. This development presents a new approach in performing simulation studies using truly anthropomorphic models. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed 4-D phantoms, we present a simplified example study to compare the performance of 14 imaging paradigms qualitatively and quantitatively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24691118      PMCID: PMC4226410          DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2312733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging        ISSN: 0278-0062            Impact factor:   10.048


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Initial clinical experience with contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara C Chen; Ann-Katherine Carton; Michael Albert; Emily F Conant; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.

Authors:  Christina M Li; W Paul Segars; Georgia D Tourassi; John M Boone; James T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Breast cancer: regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging--initial results.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Delille; Priscilla J Slanetz; Eren D Yeh; Daniel B Kopans; Leoncio Garrido
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Robert S Saunders
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  An anthropomorphic breast model for breast imaging simulation and optimization.

Authors:  Baiyu Chen; Jamie Shorey; Robert S Saunders; Samuel Richard; John Thompson; Loren W Nolte; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Guideline implementation for breast healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries: overview of the Breast Health Global Initiative Global Summit 2007.

Authors:  Benjamin O Anderson; Cheng-Har Yip; Robert A Smith; Roman Shyyan; Stephen F Sener; Alexandru Eniu; Robert W Carlson; Edward Azavedo; Joe Harford
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Roberta A Jong; Martin J Yaffe; Mia Skarpathiotakis; Rene S Shumak; Nathalie M Danjoux; Anoma Gunesekara; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Correlation of contrast agent kinetics between iodinated contrast-enhanced spectral tomosynthesis and gadolinium-enhanced MRI of breast lesions.

Authors:  Vera Froeling; Felix Diekmann; Diane M Renz; Eva M Fallenberg; Ingo G Steffen; Susanne Diekmann; Rüdiger Lawaczeck; Florian F Schmitzberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Quantitative analysis of dynamic Gd-DTPA enhancement in breast tumors using a permeability model.

Authors:  P S Tofts; B Berkowitz; M D Schnall
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  8 in total

1.  Investigation of x-ray spectra for iodinated contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Stephen J Glick; Andrey Makeev
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-01-26

2.  Task-based strategy for optimized contrast enhanced breast imaging: analysis of six imaging techniques for mammography and tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Lynda C Ikejimba; Nooshin Kiarashi; Sujata V Ghate; Ehsan Samei; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Impact of breast structure on lesion detection in breast tomosynthesis, a simulation study.

Authors:  Nooshin Kiarashi; Loren W Nolte; Joseph Y Lo; W Paul Segars; Sujata V Ghate; Justin B Solomon; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-09-13

4.  An Anthropomorphic Digital Reference Object (DRO) for Simulation and Analysis of Breast DCE MRI Techniques.

Authors:  Leah Henze Bancroft; James Holmes; Ryan Bosca-Harasim; Jacob Johnson; Pingni Wang; Frank Korosec; Walter Block; Roberta Strigel
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-04-02

5.  Method for simulating dose reduction in digital mammography using the Anscombe transformation.

Authors:  Lucas R Borges; Helder C R de Oliveira; Polyana F Nunes; Predrag R Bakic; Andrew D A Maidment; Marcelo A C Vieira
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A Selective Ensemble Classification Method Combining Mammography Images with Ultrasound Images for Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Jinyu Cong; Benzheng Wei; Yunlong He; Yilong Yin; Yuanjie Zheng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Patient-based 4D digital breast phantom for perfusion contrast-enhanced breast CT imaging.

Authors:  Marco Caballo; Ritse Mann; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Iodine quantification in limited angle tomography.

Authors:  Koen Michielsen; Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Ingrid Reiser; James G Nagy; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 4.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.