Literature DB >> 33493399

The Perception of Regional Dialects and Foreign Accents by Cochlear Implant Users.

Terrin N Tamati1,2, David B Pisoni3, Aaron C Moberly1.   

Abstract

Purpose This preliminary research examined (a) the perception of two common sources of indexical variability in speech-regional dialects and foreign accents, and (b) the relation between indexical processing and sentence recognition among prelingually deaf, long-term cochlear implant (CI) users and normal-hearing (NH) peers. Method Forty-three prelingually deaf adolescent and adult CI users and 44 NH peers completed a regional dialect categorization task, which consisted of identifying the region of origin of an unfamiliar talker from six dialect regions of the United States. They also completed an intelligibility rating task, which consisted of rating the intelligibility of short sentences produced by native and nonnative (foreign-accented) speakers of American English on a scale from 1 (not intelligible at all) to 7 (very intelligible). Individual performance was compared to demographic factors and sentence recognition scores. Results Both CI and NH groups demonstrated difficulty with regional dialect categorization, but NH listeners significantly outperformed the CI users. In the intelligibility rating task, both CI and NH listeners rated foreign-accented sentences as less intelligible than native sentences; however, CI users perceived smaller differences in intelligibility between native and foreign-accented sentences. Sensitivity to accent differences was related to sentence recognition accuracy in CI users. Conclusions Prelingually deaf, long-term CI users are sensitive to accent variability in speech, but less so than NH peers. Additionally, individual differences in CI users' sensitivity to indexical variability was related to sentence recognition abilities, suggesting a common source of difficulty in the perception and encoding of fine acoustic-phonetic details in speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33493399      PMCID: PMC8632473          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  30 in total

1.  Speaker sex identification from voiced, whispered, and filtered isolated vowels.

Authors:  N J Lass; K R Hughes; M D Bowyer; L T Waters; V T Bourne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory free classification: methods and analysis.

Authors:  Cynthia G Clopper
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-05

3.  SPEECH PERCEPTION AS A TALKER-CONTINGENT PROCESS.

Authors:  Lynne C Nygaard; Mitchell S Sommers; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  1994-01-01

4.  Long-term memory in speech perception: Some new findings on talker variability, speaking rate and perceptual learning.

Authors:  David B Pisoni
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.017

5.  Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.

Authors:  Terrin N Tamati; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Profiles of verbal working memory growth predict speech and language development in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  William G Kronenberger; David B Pisoni; Michael S Harris; Helena M Hoen; Huiping Xu; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Influence of voice similarity on talker discrimination in children with normal hearing and children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Miranda Cleary; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Performance variability on perceptual discrimination tasks in profoundly deaf adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Marcia J Hay-McCutcheon; Nathaniel R Peterson; David B Pisoni; Karen Iler Kirk; Xin Yang; Jason Parton
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  Language structures used by kindergartners with cochlear implants: relationship to phonological awareness, lexical knowledge and hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Emily Sansom; Keri Low; Caitlin Rice; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Long-term speech and language outcomes in prelingually deaf children, adolescents and young adults who received cochlear implants in childhood.

Authors:  Chad V Ruffin; William G Kronenberger; Bethany G Colson; Shirley C Henning; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 1.854

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.